Inđić i Velaskez

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to call into question the logic of interpretation of the texts of Ortega y Gasset about Velázquez made by Trivo Inđić. The sociologist from Belgrade in his text „Ortega i Velaskes“ [„Ortega and Velázquez“] overlooked an important question which the philosopher from Madrid proposed with regard to his interpretation of Velázquez - what is actually the condition of possibility to comprehend the work of (this) painter? Painting is a mute form of expression. Ortega y Gasset asks - how to speak about the persons who do not speak? Because Trivo Inđić did not stress the importance of this question and did not discover this transcendental motif, his text will be problematized in that direction.

Svr ha ra da je do vo đe nje u pi ta nje lo gi ke či ta nja tek sto va Or te ge i Ga se ta o Ve la ske zu ko je je spro veo Tri vo In đić. Be o grad ski so ci o log je u tek stu „Or te ga i Ve la skes“ pre vi deo bit no pi ta nje ko je po sta vlja ma drid ski fi lo zof u okviru nje go ve in ter pre ta ci je Ve la ske za, a to je – ko ji je za pra vo uslov mo guć no sti po i ma nja de la (ovog) sli ka ra? Sli kar stvo je ne ma for ma iz ra za. Or te ga i Ga set se pi ta – ka ko go vo ri ti o lju di ma ko ji ne go vo re? Po što Tri vo In đić ni je is ta kao bit nost ovog pi ta nja i ot krio taj tran scen den tal ni mo tiv, sam nje gov nje gov tekst o Vela ske zu bi će pro ble ma ti zo van u tom prav cu.