Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Inđić i Velaskez

Inđić and Velázquez

Thumbnail
2016
bitstream_4196.pdf (232.3Kb)
Authors
Ćipranić, Miloš
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to call into question the logic of interpretation of the texts of Ortega y Gasset about Velázquez made by Trivo Inđić. The sociologist from Belgrade in his text „Ortega i Velaskes“ [„Ortega and Velázquez“] overlooked an important question which the philosopher from Madrid proposed with regard to his interpretation of Velázquez - what is actually the condition of possibility to comprehend the work of (this) painter? Painting is a mute form of expression. Ortega y Gasset asks - how to speak about the persons who do not speak? Because Trivo Inđić did not stress the importance of this question and did not discover this transcendental motif, his text will be problematized in that direction.
Svr ha ra da je do vo đe nje u pi ta nje lo gi ke či ta nja tek sto va Or te ge i Ga se ta o Ve la ske zu ko je je spro veo Tri vo In đić. Be o grad ski so ci o log je u tek stu „Or te ga i Ve la skes“ pre vi deo bit no pi ta nje ko je po sta vlja ma drid ski fi lo zof u okviru nje go ve in ter pre ta ci je Ve la ske za, a to je – ko ji je za pra vo uslov mo guć no sti po i ma nja de la (ovog) sli ka ra? Sli kar stvo je ne ma for ma iz ra za. Or te ga i Ga set se pi ta – ka ko go vo ri ti o lju di ma ko ji ne go vo re? Po što Tri vo In đić ni je is ta kao bit nost ovog pi ta nja i ot krio taj tran scen den tal ni mo tiv, sam nje gov nje gov tekst o Vela ske zu bi će pro ble ma ti zo van u tom prav cu.
Keywords:
mutism / painting / José Ortega y Gasset / Trivo Inđić / Diego Velázquez
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2016, 27, 3, 664-678
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Funding / projects:
  • Studying climate change and its influence on environment: impacts, adaptation and mitigation (RS-43007)

DOI: 10.2298/FID1603670C

ISSN: 0353-5738

WoS: 000408372100021

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=392
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1871
Collections
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=392
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1871
AB  - The aim of this paper is to call into question the logic of interpretation of the texts of Ortega y Gasset about Velázquez made by Trivo Inđić. The sociologist from Belgrade in his text „Ortega i Velaskes“ [„Ortega and Velázquez“] overlooked an important question which the philosopher from Madrid proposed with regard to his interpretation of Velázquez - what is actually the condition of possibility to comprehend the work of (this) painter? Painting is a mute form of expression. Ortega y Gasset asks - how to speak about the persons who do not speak? Because Trivo Inđić did not stress the importance of this question and did not discover this transcendental motif, his text will be problematized in that direction.
AB  - Svr ha ra da je do vo đe nje u pi ta nje lo gi ke či ta nja tek sto va Or te ge i
Ga se ta o Ve la ske zu ko je je spro veo Tri vo In đić. Be o grad ski so ci o log je u tek stu
„Or te ga i Ve la skes“ pre vi deo bit no pi ta nje ko je po sta vlja ma drid ski fi lo zof u okviru
nje go ve in ter pre ta ci je Ve la ske za, a to je – ko ji je za pra vo uslov mo guć no sti
po i ma nja de la (ovog) sli ka ra? Sli kar stvo je ne ma for ma iz ra za. Or te ga i Ga set se
pi ta – ka ko go vo ri ti o lju di ma ko ji ne go vo re? Po što Tri vo In đić ni je is ta kao bit nost
ovog pi ta nja i ot krio taj tran scen den tal ni mo tiv, sam nje gov nje gov tekst o Vela
ske zu bi će pro ble ma ti zo van u tom prav cu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Inđić i Velaskez
T1  - Inđić and Velázquez
IS  - 3
VL  - 27
SP  - 664
EP  - 678
DO  - 10.2298/FID1603670C
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to call into question the logic of interpretation of the texts of Ortega y Gasset about Velázquez made by Trivo Inđić. The sociologist from Belgrade in his text „Ortega i Velaskes“ [„Ortega and Velázquez“] overlooked an important question which the philosopher from Madrid proposed with regard to his interpretation of Velázquez - what is actually the condition of possibility to comprehend the work of (this) painter? Painting is a mute form of expression. Ortega y Gasset asks - how to speak about the persons who do not speak? Because Trivo Inđić did not stress the importance of this question and did not discover this transcendental motif, his text will be problematized in that direction., Svr ha ra da je do vo đe nje u pi ta nje lo gi ke či ta nja tek sto va Or te ge i
Ga se ta o Ve la ske zu ko je je spro veo Tri vo In đić. Be o grad ski so ci o log je u tek stu
„Or te ga i Ve la skes“ pre vi deo bit no pi ta nje ko je po sta vlja ma drid ski fi lo zof u okviru
nje go ve in ter pre ta ci je Ve la ske za, a to je – ko ji je za pra vo uslov mo guć no sti
po i ma nja de la (ovog) sli ka ra? Sli kar stvo je ne ma for ma iz ra za. Or te ga i Ga set se
pi ta – ka ko go vo ri ti o lju di ma ko ji ne go vo re? Po što Tri vo In đić ni je is ta kao bit nost
ovog pi ta nja i ot krio taj tran scen den tal ni mo tiv, sam nje gov nje gov tekst o Vela
ske zu bi će pro ble ma ti zo van u tom prav cu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Inđić i Velaskez, Inđić and Velázquez",
number = "3",
volume = "27",
pages = "664-678",
doi = "10.2298/FID1603670C"
}
Ćipranić, M.. (2016). Inđić i Velaskez. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(3), 664-678.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1603670C
Ćipranić M. Inđić i Velaskez. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(3):664-678.
doi:10.2298/FID1603670C .
Ćipranić, Miloš, "Inđić i Velaskez" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 27, no. 3 (2016):664-678,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1603670C . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB