Negacija i asimetrija: šta preostaje od negativnog utilitarizma
Negation and Asymmetry: What is Left of Negative Utilitarism
Abstract
Početak rada posvećen je opštem Poperovom razumevanju naučnog metoda, u kojem se posebno izdvaja momenat opovrgavanja. Drugi deo rada izlaže primenu na polje etike i „javne politike“ tog modela, u formi onoga što će se posle Popera nazvati „negativni utilitarizam“. Potom se pažnja usmerava na prigovore koji su upućeni negativnom utilitarizmu, pre svega kada je reč o onom „odvratnom zaključku“ koji ga približava promortalizmu i antinatalizmu. U završnom delu nastoji se, jednim svođenjem na princip a ne na kompletnu teoriju ili zaokruženu koncepciju, odbraniti ono što preostaje od intuicije koja motiviše negativni utilitarizam.
The beginning of the paper is dedicated to Popper’s general understanding of the
scientific method, in which the moment of refutation stands out. The second part of
the paper presents the application of that model to the field of ethics and ’public policy,’
in the form of a suggestion to be called later ’negative utilitarianism.’. Then, attention is focused on the objections addressed to negative utilitarianism, primarily when it comes to the ’ repugnant conclusion’ that brings it closer to promortalism and anti-natalism. In the final part, the author strives to defend what remains of the intuition that motivates negative utilitarianism by its reduction to a principle, and not to a complete theory or a comprehensive conception.
Keywords:
negativizam / negativni utilitarizam / asimetrija patnje i sreće / Karl Poper / moralna intuicija / negativism / negative utilitarianism / asymmetry of suffering and happiness / Karl Popper / moral intuitionSource:
Theoria, 2020, 63, 3Publisher:
- Beograd : Filozofsko društvo Srbije
Collections
Institution/Community
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Krstić, Predrag PY - 2020 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3065 AB - Početak rada posvećen je opštem Poperovom razumevanju naučnog metoda, u kojem se posebno izdvaja momenat opovrgavanja. Drugi deo rada izlaže primenu na polje etike i „javne politike“ tog modela, u formi onoga što će se posle Popera nazvati „negativni utilitarizam“. Potom se pažnja usmerava na prigovore koji su upućeni negativnom utilitarizmu, pre svega kada je reč o onom „odvratnom zaključku“ koji ga približava promortalizmu i antinatalizmu. U završnom delu nastoji se, jednim svođenjem na princip a ne na kompletnu teoriju ili zaokruženu koncepciju, odbraniti ono što preostaje od intuicije koja motiviše negativni utilitarizam. AB - The beginning of the paper is dedicated to Popper’s general understanding of the scientific method, in which the moment of refutation stands out. The second part of the paper presents the application of that model to the field of ethics and ’public policy,’ in the form of a suggestion to be called later ’negative utilitarianism.’. Then, attention is focused on the objections addressed to negative utilitarianism, primarily when it comes to the ’ repugnant conclusion’ that brings it closer to promortalism and anti-natalism. In the final part, the author strives to defend what remains of the intuition that motivates negative utilitarianism by its reduction to a principle, and not to a complete theory or a comprehensive conception. PB - Beograd : Filozofsko društvo Srbije T2 - Theoria T1 - Negacija i asimetrija: šta preostaje od negativnog utilitarizma T1 - Negation and Asymmetry: What is Left of Negative Utilitarism IS - 3 VL - 63 DO - 10.2298/THEO2003043K ER -
@article{ author = "Krstić, Predrag", year = "2020", abstract = "Početak rada posvećen je opštem Poperovom razumevanju naučnog metoda, u kojem se posebno izdvaja momenat opovrgavanja. Drugi deo rada izlaže primenu na polje etike i „javne politike“ tog modela, u formi onoga što će se posle Popera nazvati „negativni utilitarizam“. Potom se pažnja usmerava na prigovore koji su upućeni negativnom utilitarizmu, pre svega kada je reč o onom „odvratnom zaključku“ koji ga približava promortalizmu i antinatalizmu. U završnom delu nastoji se, jednim svođenjem na princip a ne na kompletnu teoriju ili zaokruženu koncepciju, odbraniti ono što preostaje od intuicije koja motiviše negativni utilitarizam., The beginning of the paper is dedicated to Popper’s general understanding of the scientific method, in which the moment of refutation stands out. The second part of the paper presents the application of that model to the field of ethics and ’public policy,’ in the form of a suggestion to be called later ’negative utilitarianism.’. Then, attention is focused on the objections addressed to negative utilitarianism, primarily when it comes to the ’ repugnant conclusion’ that brings it closer to promortalism and anti-natalism. In the final part, the author strives to defend what remains of the intuition that motivates negative utilitarianism by its reduction to a principle, and not to a complete theory or a comprehensive conception.", publisher = "Beograd : Filozofsko društvo Srbije", journal = "Theoria", title = "Negacija i asimetrija: šta preostaje od negativnog utilitarizma, Negation and Asymmetry: What is Left of Negative Utilitarism", number = "3", volume = "63", doi = "10.2298/THEO2003043K" }
Krstić, P.. (2020). Negacija i asimetrija: šta preostaje od negativnog utilitarizma. in Theoria Beograd : Filozofsko društvo Srbije., 63(3). https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2003043K
Krstić P. Negacija i asimetrija: šta preostaje od negativnog utilitarizma. in Theoria. 2020;63(3). doi:10.2298/THEO2003043K .
Krstić, Predrag, "Negacija i asimetrija: šta preostaje od negativnog utilitarizma" in Theoria, 63, no. 3 (2020), https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2003043K . .