Proportionality and responsibility
Proporcionalnost i odgovornost
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in
just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and
one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither
one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented
and modified by an ethic of responsibility.
Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu
minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja
zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo
dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti.
Кључне речи:
proportionality / responsibility / asymmetric warfare / just war theoryИзвор:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2020, 31, 3, 363-381Издавач:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
URI
https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/issue/view/53http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2186
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Walzer, Michael PY - 2020 UR - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/issue/view/53 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2186 AB - This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented and modified by an ethic of responsibility. AB - Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti. PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - Proportionality and responsibility T1 - Proporcionalnost i odgovornost IS - 3 VL - 31 SP - 363 EP - 381 DO - 10.2298/FID2003385W ER -
@article{ author = "Walzer, Michael", year = "2020", abstract = "This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented and modified by an ethic of responsibility., Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "Proportionality and responsibility, Proporcionalnost i odgovornost", number = "3", volume = "31", pages = "363-381", doi = "10.2298/FID2003385W" }
Walzer, M.. (2020). Proportionality and responsibility. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(3), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003385W
Walzer M. Proportionality and responsibility. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(3):363-381. doi:10.2298/FID2003385W .
Walzer, Michael, "Proportionality and responsibility" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 3 (2020):363-381, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003385W . .