Proportionality and responsibility
Proporcionalnost i odgovornost
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in
just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and
one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither
one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented
and modified by an ethic of responsibility.
Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu
minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja
zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo
dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti.
Keywords:
proportionality / responsibility / asymmetric warfare / just war theorySource:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2020, 31, 3, 363-381Publisher:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
URI
https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/issue/view/53http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2186
Collections
Institution/Community
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Walzer, Michael PY - 2020 UR - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/issue/view/53 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2186 AB - This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented and modified by an ethic of responsibility. AB - Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti. PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - Proportionality and responsibility T1 - Proporcionalnost i odgovornost IS - 3 VL - 31 SP - 363 EP - 381 DO - 10.2298/FID2003385W ER -
@article{ author = "Walzer, Michael", year = "2020", abstract = "This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented and modified by an ethic of responsibility., Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "Proportionality and responsibility, Proporcionalnost i odgovornost", number = "3", volume = "31", pages = "363-381", doi = "10.2298/FID2003385W" }
Walzer, M.. (2020). Proportionality and responsibility. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(3), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003385W
Walzer M. Proportionality and responsibility. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(3):363-381. doi:10.2298/FID2003385W .
Walzer, Michael, "Proportionality and responsibility" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 3 (2020):363-381, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003385W . .