Show simple item record

History versus Historicism: The Case of the Enlightenment

dc.creatorKrstić, Predrag
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-22T19:49:30Z
dc.date.available2018-06-22T19:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1848-2309 (Online)
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1583
dc.description.abstractČlanak nastoji relativizirati poslovičnu primjedbu historizma prosvjetiteljstvu za njegovu nepovijesnost. U prvome se dijelu unutar same škole filozofske historijske hermeneutike pronalazi napor za rehabilitiranjem prosvjetiteljske filozofije povijesti pred napadima romantizma i pravedno procijene njeni dometi, da bi se potom čitavom historizmu suprotstavila protufilozofska tradicija znanosti povijesti. Na primjeru razumijevanja povijesti čovječanstva Kanta i Herdera, u drugom dijelu rada izlažu se njihove rivalske koncepcije s namjerom testiranja opravdanosti zamjerke za manjak historijske svijesti prosvjetiteljstva i ukaže na korektiv koji »univerzalnoj povijesti« upućuje »kulturna povijest«. Zaključuje se da je uvriježeni refren o nepovijesnosti prosvjetiteljstva prije zgodna akademska poštapalica za svrstavanje u uredne rubrike povijesnofilozofskih usmjerenja nego što se može tekstualno dokumentirati i razložno braniti.sr
dc.description.abstractThis paper seeks to relativize the proverbial remark that historicism addressed to the Enlightenment for its unhistoricity. The first part finds the effort to rehabilitate the Enlightenment philosophy of history before the attacks of Romanticism and fair assessment of its achievements within the very school of philosophical historical hermeneutics, to be followed by opposing the entire Historicism a counter-philosophical tradition of the science of history. In the examples of Kant’s and Herder’s understanding of the history of mankind, the second part of the paper exhibits their rival concepts, in order to test the validity of criticism for the lack of historical consciousness of the Enlightenment and indicate the corrective that “cultural history” suggests to “universal history”. It is concluded that ingrained refrain about ahistorical Enlightenment is rather convenient academic buzzword for its inclusion in neat columns of historico-philosophical orientations than it can be textually documented and reasonably defendeden
dc.language.isosrsr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/43007/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceFilozofska istraživanjasr
dc.subjectprosvetiteljstvosr
dc.subjecthumanitätsr
dc.subjectenlightenmentsr
dc.subjectromanticismsr
dc.subjecthistoricismsr
dc.subjecthistorical sciencesr
dc.subjectprogresssr
dc.subjectuniversal historysr
dc.subjectcultural historysr
dc.subjectromantizamsr
dc.subjecthistorizamsr
dc.subjectistorijska naukasr
dc.subjectnapredaksr
dc.subjectuniverzalna istorijasr
dc.subjectkulturna istorijasr
dc.titlePovijest versus historizam: slučaj prosvjetiteljstvasr
dc.titleHistory versus Historicism: The Case of the Enlightenmenten
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NCsr
dcterms.abstractКрстић, Предраг; Повијест версус хисторизам: случај просвјетитељства; Повијест версус хисторизам: случај просвјетитељства;
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.volume34
dc.citation.spage619
dc.citation.epage632
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/3267/12_Krstic.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record