Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject
Against the Individual. Deindividualized Political Subject
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Autorica u tekstu polazi od premise da je politički subjekt neoliberalizma, vladajuće političke
racionalnosti, individua koja se može okarakterizirati kao isključivi i nepodijeljeni posjednik samog sebe. Preispitivanjem tropa ne/ovisnosti razlažu se pretpostavke koje su uključene u pojam individue, a potom se, analizom konteksta njegove upotrebe u 19. stoljeću, pokazuje da je on bremenit genealogijama koje ograničavaju njegovu političku upotrebljivost u 21. stoljeću. Misliti protiv neoliberalizma zahtijeva napuštanje ideje individue kao suverenog vlasnika koji vlada sobom. Promišljanje alternativnog političkog horizonta, traganje za homo politicus-om koji se uistinu razlikuje od homo oeconomicus-a, iziskuje napuštanje političkog mišljenja koje polazi od pojedinca.
The text is based on two premises. The first is that we live in the times of neoliberalism, and
the second is that the political subject of neoliberalism is the individual, the “one” qualified as
indivisible, independent, sole owner of one’s self. To define what an individual is, I will revisit
several 19th-century claims which at the same time posit individual as an empty universal – anyone qualifies for entitlement of an individual – and reveal it as profoundly exclusionary – as
the holder of entitlements. I will claim that the indivisibility of an individual is also the basis for
its understanding as sovereign and self-actualized. Liberal politicization of a sovereign possessor of interests introduces not only homo oeconomicus, but it also integrates economic mode of
governmentality into the sphere of the political, it becoming a space of incessant play of exclusions and inclusions. If another kind of political imaginary is to be developed, I argue we need
to distance ourselv...es from the figure of the individual, bearing in mind that homo oeconomicus
triumphs today as the exhaustive figure of the human, amidst the patently unequal distribution
not only of precarity but also of vulnerability. Critical engagement with neoliberalism assumes
engaging with the political centrality of a figure of an agentic individual
Кључне речи:
individua / homo oeconomicus / homo politicus / ovisnost / suverenost / vlasnik / Foucault / John Locke / Judith Butler / Wendy BrownИзвор:
Filozofska istraživanja, 2018, 151, 3, 651-666Издавач:
- Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Политике друштвеног памћења и националног идентитета: регионални и европски контекст (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-179049)
Колекције
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Zaharijević, Adriana PY - 2018 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2169 AB - Autorica u tekstu polazi od premise da je politički subjekt neoliberalizma, vladajuće političke racionalnosti, individua koja se može okarakterizirati kao isključivi i nepodijeljeni posjednik samog sebe. Preispitivanjem tropa ne/ovisnosti razlažu se pretpostavke koje su uključene u pojam individue, a potom se, analizom konteksta njegove upotrebe u 19. stoljeću, pokazuje da je on bremenit genealogijama koje ograničavaju njegovu političku upotrebljivost u 21. stoljeću. Misliti protiv neoliberalizma zahtijeva napuštanje ideje individue kao suverenog vlasnika koji vlada sobom. Promišljanje alternativnog političkog horizonta, traganje za homo politicus-om koji se uistinu razlikuje od homo oeconomicus-a, iziskuje napuštanje političkog mišljenja koje polazi od pojedinca. AB - The text is based on two premises. The first is that we live in the times of neoliberalism, and the second is that the political subject of neoliberalism is the individual, the “one” qualified as indivisible, independent, sole owner of one’s self. To define what an individual is, I will revisit several 19th-century claims which at the same time posit individual as an empty universal – anyone qualifies for entitlement of an individual – and reveal it as profoundly exclusionary – as the holder of entitlements. I will claim that the indivisibility of an individual is also the basis for its understanding as sovereign and self-actualized. Liberal politicization of a sovereign possessor of interests introduces not only homo oeconomicus, but it also integrates economic mode of governmentality into the sphere of the political, it becoming a space of incessant play of exclusions and inclusions. If another kind of political imaginary is to be developed, I argue we need to distance ourselves from the figure of the individual, bearing in mind that homo oeconomicus triumphs today as the exhaustive figure of the human, amidst the patently unequal distribution not only of precarity but also of vulnerability. Critical engagement with neoliberalism assumes engaging with the political centrality of a figure of an agentic individual PB - Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo T2 - Filozofska istraživanja T1 - Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject T1 - Against the Individual. Deindividualized Political Subject IS - 3 VL - 151 SP - 651 EP - 666 DO - 10.21464/fi38314 ER -
@article{ author = "Zaharijević, Adriana", year = "2018", abstract = "Autorica u tekstu polazi od premise da je politički subjekt neoliberalizma, vladajuće političke racionalnosti, individua koja se može okarakterizirati kao isključivi i nepodijeljeni posjednik samog sebe. Preispitivanjem tropa ne/ovisnosti razlažu se pretpostavke koje su uključene u pojam individue, a potom se, analizom konteksta njegove upotrebe u 19. stoljeću, pokazuje da je on bremenit genealogijama koje ograničavaju njegovu političku upotrebljivost u 21. stoljeću. Misliti protiv neoliberalizma zahtijeva napuštanje ideje individue kao suverenog vlasnika koji vlada sobom. Promišljanje alternativnog političkog horizonta, traganje za homo politicus-om koji se uistinu razlikuje od homo oeconomicus-a, iziskuje napuštanje političkog mišljenja koje polazi od pojedinca., The text is based on two premises. The first is that we live in the times of neoliberalism, and the second is that the political subject of neoliberalism is the individual, the “one” qualified as indivisible, independent, sole owner of one’s self. To define what an individual is, I will revisit several 19th-century claims which at the same time posit individual as an empty universal – anyone qualifies for entitlement of an individual – and reveal it as profoundly exclusionary – as the holder of entitlements. I will claim that the indivisibility of an individual is also the basis for its understanding as sovereign and self-actualized. Liberal politicization of a sovereign possessor of interests introduces not only homo oeconomicus, but it also integrates economic mode of governmentality into the sphere of the political, it becoming a space of incessant play of exclusions and inclusions. If another kind of political imaginary is to be developed, I argue we need to distance ourselves from the figure of the individual, bearing in mind that homo oeconomicus triumphs today as the exhaustive figure of the human, amidst the patently unequal distribution not only of precarity but also of vulnerability. Critical engagement with neoliberalism assumes engaging with the political centrality of a figure of an agentic individual", publisher = "Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo", journal = "Filozofska istraživanja", title = "Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject, Against the Individual. Deindividualized Political Subject", number = "3", volume = "151", pages = "651-666", doi = "10.21464/fi38314" }
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject. in Filozofska istraživanja Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo., 151(3), 651-666. https://doi.org/10.21464/fi38314
Zaharijević A. Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject. in Filozofska istraživanja. 2018;151(3):651-666. doi:10.21464/fi38314 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject" in Filozofska istraživanja, 151, no. 3 (2018):651-666, https://doi.org/10.21464/fi38314 . .