This article intends to critically envisage limits and values of philosophy of art of Arthur Danto and to point out the main problems of the theory of supstitutional
representation, when placed within wider theoretical frame of traditional aesthetics, such as the notion of meaning in the philosophy of art of Arthur Danto. The article focuses on the notions of exteral and interal representation and denotation of non-existent and existent entities, substituted by representation. This article intends to question the validity of Danto’s position.
Keywords:
meaning / denotation / supstitucija / eksteralna reprezentacija / interalna reprezentacija
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2006, 163-178
Publisher:
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
TY - JOUR
AU - Ristić, Stefan
PY - 2006
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/740
AB - This article intends to critically envisage limits and values of philosophy of art of Arthur Danto and to point out the main problems of the theory of supstitutional
representation, when placed within wider theoretical frame of traditional aesthetics, such as the notion of meaning in the philosophy of art of Arthur Danto. The article focuses on the notions of exteral and interal representation and denotation of non-existent and existent entities, substituted by representation. This article intends to question the validity of Danto’s position.
PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Zašto je supstituciona teorija reprezentacije nespojiva sa tradicionalnim određenjem estetike? Kritika filozofije umetnosti A.C. Dantoa
T1 - Why is Supstitutional Theory of Representation inconsistent when combined with Traditional Aesthetics? Review of A. C. Danto’s philosophy of art
SP - 163
EP - 178
DO - 10.2298/FID0629163R
ER -
@article{
author = "Ristić, Stefan",
year = "2006",
abstract = "This article intends to critically envisage limits and values of philosophy of art of Arthur Danto and to point out the main problems of the theory of supstitutional
representation, when placed within wider theoretical frame of traditional aesthetics, such as the notion of meaning in the philosophy of art of Arthur Danto. The article focuses on the notions of exteral and interal representation and denotation of non-existent and existent entities, substituted by representation. This article intends to question the validity of Danto’s position.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Zašto je supstituciona teorija reprezentacije nespojiva sa tradicionalnim određenjem estetike? Kritika filozofije umetnosti A.C. Dantoa, Why is Supstitutional Theory of Representation inconsistent when combined with Traditional Aesthetics? Review of A. C. Danto’s philosophy of art",
pages = "163-178",
doi = "10.2298/FID0629163R"
}
Ristić, S.. (2006). Zašto je supstituciona teorija reprezentacije nespojiva sa tradicionalnim određenjem estetike? Kritika filozofije umetnosti A.C. Dantoa. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 163-178.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629163R
Ristić S. Zašto je supstituciona teorija reprezentacije nespojiva sa tradicionalnim određenjem estetike? Kritika filozofije umetnosti A.C. Dantoa. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2006;:163-178.
doi:10.2298/FID0629163R .
Ristić, Stefan, "Zašto je supstituciona teorija reprezentacije nespojiva sa tradicionalnim određenjem estetike? Kritika filozofije umetnosti A.C. Dantoa" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2006):163-178,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629163R . .
