Приказ основних података о документу

Savremeno značenje Vitgenštajnove kasne filozofije

dc.contributor.editorSládeček, Michal
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:16:26Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/652
dc.description.abstractEditor’s Preface Reč priređivača The 125th anniversary of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s birth provides the occasion for the texts presented here. These articles, by mainly younger researchers, are a modest contribution to this anniversary. Despite the distance in time, if we judge according to Wittgenstein’s impact on contemporary philosophical production (his works span numerous subjects including questions of the limits of philosophy, the foundations of language and meaning, the problems of necessity, the existence of the external world and the nature of the mind and the self, as well as questions of religion, ethics and the significance of human existence), he is our contemporary and interlocutor maybe more than any other philosopher from the past. Wittgenstein’s thought is a subject of discussion not only in philosophical circles, but in those of the theory of literature, cognitive science, psychology, linguistics, anthropology, sociology and cultural studies as well. Wittgenstein’s’ influence on 20th century philosophy is immeasurable and it continues unceasingly into the 21st century. The articles presented here underwrite a continued interest in his philosophy manifested not only in the exegesis and interpretation of his work, but, above all, in scrutinizing the interconnections of Wittgenstein’s thought with relevant endeavours in current philosophy. Ken Shigeta elaborates Kripke’s skeptical argument in rule-following considerations as well as the possibility of its revision, which would make the argument compatible with Wittgenstein’s understanding of the paradox of interpretation. Tamara Dobler surveys the place of Wittgenstein’s understanding of the autonomy of grammar in the dispute between externalism and internalism. Finally, Michael O’Sullivan in his article analyses affiliations and differences between Wittgenstein’s and Quine’s understanding of the relation of language and meaning to the stimulus and the speaker’s environment.eng
dc.format25 1 (2014) 125-179
dc.languagesr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Societysrp
dc.subjectWitgenštajn, Ludvig
dc.titleThe contemporary significance of Wittgenstein's later philosophyeng
dc.titleSavremeno značenje Vitgenštajnove kasne filozofijesr
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractСавремено значење Витгенштајнове касне филозофије;
dc.citation.spage125
dc.citation.epage179
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/8058/0353-57381401144D.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_652


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу