The article discusses the reasons for the construction, in the 1960s, of a memorial to the victims of the former camp Jasenovac in Yugoslavia, although no such memorial was built at the Sajmište site. How should we explain and understand this difference and what do these two sites stand for in Yugoslav discourses about the past? I will argue that the memorial project for Jasenovac was, due to certain developments, seen as a substitute for similar plans at nearly all the former camp locations in Yugoslavia. Because of this substitution, after the mid 1960s none of the other concetration camp sites in the country benefited from federal financing and thus all of them were excluded from having a real chance at being made into a proper memorial site.
Ključne reči:
World War Two / concetration camps / memory / Yugoslavia / Subnor
Izvor:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2012, 106-118
TY - JOUR
AU - Karge, Heike
PY - 2012
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/562
AB - The article discusses the reasons for the construction, in the 1960s, of a memorial to the victims of the former camp Jasenovac in Yugoslavia, although no such memorial was built at the Sajmište site. How should we explain and understand this difference and what do these two sites stand for in Yugoslav discourses about the past? I will argue that the memorial project for Jasenovac was, due to certain developments, seen as a substitute for similar plans at nearly all the former camp locations in Yugoslavia. Because of this substitution, after the mid 1960s none of the other concetration camp sites in the country benefited from federal financing and thus all of them were excluded from having a real chance at being made into a proper memorial site.
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Sajmište, Jasenovac, and the Social Frames of Remembering and Forgetting
T1 - Sajmište, Jasenovac i društveni okviri sećanja i zaborava
SP - 106
EP - 118
DO - 10.2298/FID1204106K
ER -
@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Karge, Heike",
year = "2012",
abstract = "The article discusses the reasons for the construction, in the 1960s, of a memorial to the victims of the former camp Jasenovac in Yugoslavia, although no such memorial was built at the Sajmište site. How should we explain and understand this difference and what do these two sites stand for in Yugoslav discourses about the past? I will argue that the memorial project for Jasenovac was, due to certain developments, seen as a substitute for similar plans at nearly all the former camp locations in Yugoslavia. Because of this substitution, after the mid 1960s none of the other concetration camp sites in the country benefited from federal financing and thus all of them were excluded from having a real chance at being made into a proper memorial site.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Sajmište, Jasenovac, and the Social Frames of Remembering and Forgetting, Sajmište, Jasenovac i društveni okviri sećanja i zaborava",
pages = "106-118",
doi = "10.2298/FID1204106K"
}
Milidrag, P.,& Karge, H.. (2012). Sajmište, Jasenovac, and the Social Frames of Remembering and Forgetting. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 106-118.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204106K
Milidrag P, Karge H. Sajmište, Jasenovac, and the Social Frames of Remembering and Forgetting. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:106-118.
doi:10.2298/FID1204106K .
Milidrag, Predrag, Karge, Heike, "Sajmište, Jasenovac, and the Social Frames of Remembering and Forgetting" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2012):106-118,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204106K . .
