Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Glavna kolekcija
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Glavna kolekcija
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation

Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji

Thumbnail
2012
526.pdf (172.8Kb)
Authors
Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
Contributors
Milidrag, Predrag
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Permissibility of contraception as a method of birth control is closely connected with issues of moral justification of reproductive autonomy, namely the question whether or not individuals should be allowed to autonomously and freely decide if they are going to have children, when and how many. The development of medical and scientific technologies led to the usage of artificial methods of contraception that can prevent conception with the goal of postponing and planning the birth of a child. In the first part I analyse the bioethical arguments that appear in debates about reproductive autonomy and which can be mobilized against the permissibility of contraception. In the second part I have compared the bioethical arguments to those used against the artificial contraception in the literature about the philosophy of sexuality. In the third and final part, I have argued against the stance of G.E.M. Anscombe and J. Finnis that there is morally relevant distinction between artificial and ...natural methods of birth control.

Keywords:
intention / reproductive autonomy / philosophy of sexuality / bioethics / contraception
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2012, 4-18

DOI: 10.2298/FID1204004P

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/528
Collections
  • Glavna kolekcija
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/528
AB  - Permissibility of contraception as a method of birth control is closely connected with issues of moral justification of reproductive autonomy, namely the question whether or not individuals should be allowed to autonomously and freely decide if they are going to have children, when and how many. The development of medical and scientific technologies led to the usage of artificial methods of contraception that can prevent conception with the goal of postponing and planning the birth of a child. In the first part I analyse the bioethical arguments that appear in debates about reproductive autonomy and which can be mobilized against the permissibility of contraception. In the second part I have compared the bioethical arguments to those used against the artificial contraception in the literature about the philosophy of sexuality. In the third and final part, I have argued against the stance of G.E.M. Anscombe and J. Finnis that there is morally relevant distinction between artificial and natural methods of birth control.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation
T1  - Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji
SP  - 4
EP  - 18
DO  - 10.2298/FID1204004P
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Permissibility of contraception as a method of birth control is closely connected with issues of moral justification of reproductive autonomy, namely the question whether or not individuals should be allowed to autonomously and freely decide if they are going to have children, when and how many. The development of medical and scientific technologies led to the usage of artificial methods of contraception that can prevent conception with the goal of postponing and planning the birth of a child. In the first part I analyse the bioethical arguments that appear in debates about reproductive autonomy and which can be mobilized against the permissibility of contraception. In the second part I have compared the bioethical arguments to those used against the artificial contraception in the literature about the philosophy of sexuality. In the third and final part, I have argued against the stance of G.E.M. Anscombe and J. Finnis that there is morally relevant distinction between artificial and natural methods of birth control.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation, Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji",
pages = "4-18",
doi = "10.2298/FID1204004P"
}
Milidrag, P.,& Prijić-Samaržija, S.. (2012). The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 4-18.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204004P
Milidrag P, Prijić-Samaržija S. The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:4-18.
doi:10.2298/FID1204004P .
Milidrag, Predrag, Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana, "The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2012):4-18,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204004P . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB