In Defense of Hegel's Madness
Апстракт
The article is a confrontation with Robert Brandom’s reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, his attempt to systematically “renormalize” Hegel, i.e., to reduce his extravagant formulations to the criteria of common sense. The article analyses a number of Brandom’s “domestications” of Hegel’s speculative concepts: self-relating, determinate negation, mediation, In-itself, action, knowledge, Spirit, reconciliation, history. On the basis of the examples from Marx, Freud, structuralism, Lévi-Strauss, Althusser, Lacan, Adorno, the text defends Hegel’s “madness”, the irreducible speculative, non-interpretable core of his philosophy. Hegel’s statements have to shock us, and this excess cannot be explained away through interpretation since the truth they deliver hinges on that.
Кључне речи:
Hegel, Georg Vilhelm Fridrih / Brandom / in-itself / action / historyИзвор:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2015, 785-812Издавач:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Žižek, Slavoj PY - 2015 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/353 AB - The article is a confrontation with Robert Brandom’s reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, his attempt to systematically “renormalize” Hegel, i.e., to reduce his extravagant formulations to the criteria of common sense. The article analyses a number of Brandom’s “domestications” of Hegel’s speculative concepts: self-relating, determinate negation, mediation, In-itself, action, knowledge, Spirit, reconciliation, history. On the basis of the examples from Marx, Freud, structuralism, Lévi-Strauss, Althusser, Lacan, Adorno, the text defends Hegel’s “madness”, the irreducible speculative, non-interpretable core of his philosophy. Hegel’s statements have to shock us, and this excess cannot be explained away through interpretation since the truth they deliver hinges on that. PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - In Defense of Hegel's Madness SP - 785 EP - 812 DO - 10.2298/FID1504785Z ER -
@article{ editor = "Jovanov, Rastko", author = "Žižek, Slavoj", year = "2015", abstract = "The article is a confrontation with Robert Brandom’s reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, his attempt to systematically “renormalize” Hegel, i.e., to reduce his extravagant formulations to the criteria of common sense. The article analyses a number of Brandom’s “domestications” of Hegel’s speculative concepts: self-relating, determinate negation, mediation, In-itself, action, knowledge, Spirit, reconciliation, history. On the basis of the examples from Marx, Freud, structuralism, Lévi-Strauss, Althusser, Lacan, Adorno, the text defends Hegel’s “madness”, the irreducible speculative, non-interpretable core of his philosophy. Hegel’s statements have to shock us, and this excess cannot be explained away through interpretation since the truth they deliver hinges on that.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "In Defense of Hegel's Madness", pages = "785-812", doi = "10.2298/FID1504785Z" }
Jovanov, R.,& Žižek, S.. (2015). In Defense of Hegel's Madness. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 785-812. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1504785Z
Jovanov R, Žižek S. In Defense of Hegel's Madness. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2015;:785-812. doi:10.2298/FID1504785Z .
Jovanov, Rastko, Žižek, Slavoj, "In Defense of Hegel's Madness" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2015):785-812, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1504785Z . .