Show simple item record

Ka teoriji teorijskih formacija: od Altisera ka Lenjinu

dc.creatorDedić, Nikola
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-25T09:09:31Z
dc.date.available2023-10-25T09:09:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3034
dc.description.abstractIn his theoretical efforts, Lenin made two excursions into philosophy – first in the book Materialism and Empirio-criticism and then in Philosophical Notebooks. There are obvious differences between these two works, which are reflected in the attitude towards Hegel (first rejection and then enthusiasm and acceptance of Hegel’s dialectical method), but also significant similarities. The paper points out that what links Lenin’s two books is the concept of theoretical formation. We derive the term theoretical formation from Lenin’s concept of socio-economic formation: in every society, a large number of modes of production coexist, which are overdetermined by one mode as dominant. Society is thus not a complete and rounded form, but a contradictory overdeterimned formation. The main thesis of the paper is that Lenin applies the concept of overdetermined formation to the reading of philosophy. Philosophical discourse is never whole but is split between two irreconcilable tendencies – materialism and idealism. Philosophical work is nothing but a struggle for the theoretical dominance of one tendency over another. This struggle between philosophical tendencies is, as Louis Althusser points out, an extension of the class struggle in theory and takes place both in the entire history of philosophy and within each individual philosophical text. The philosophical text is thus a contradictory formation of unequal and combined development.sr
dc.description.abstractU svom teorijskom radu Lenjin je napravio dva izleta u filozofiju – prvo u knjizi Materijalizam i empiriokriticizam, a zatim u Filozofskim sveskama. Između ova dva dela postoje očigledne razlike koje se ogledaju u odnosu prema Hegelu (prvo odbacivanje, a zatim oduševljenje i prihvatanje Hegelovog dijalektičkog metoda) ali i značajne sličnosti. U radu se ističe da je ono što povezuje Lenjinove dve knjige koncept teorijske formacije. Termin teorijska formacija izvodimo iz Lenjinovog koncepta društveno-ekonomske formacije: u svakom društvu koegzistira veći broj oblika proizvodnje ali su ovi nadodređeni jednim oblikom kao dominantnim. Društvo, dakle, nije celovita i zaokružena forma, već je kontradiktorna nadodređena formacija. Glavna teza rada je da Lenjin primenjuje koncept naodređene formacije na čitanje filozofije. Filozofski diskurs nikada nije ceo, već je podeljen između dve nepomirljive tendencije – materijalizma i idealizma. Filozofski rad nije ništa drugo do borba za teorijsku prevlast jedne tendencije nad drugom. Ova borba između filozofskih tendencija je, kako ističe Luj Altiser, produžetak klasne borbe u teoriji i odvija se kako u celokupnoj istoriji filozofije tako i unutar svakog pojedinačnog filozofskog teksta. Filozofski tekst je dakle kontradiktorna formacija nejednakog i kombinovanog razvoja.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teorijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Societysr
dc.subjectLeninsr
dc.subjectAlthussersr
dc.subjectHegelsr
dc.subjectdialectical materialismsr
dc.subjectsocio-economic formationsr
dc.subjecttheoretical formationsr
dc.subjectunequal and combined developmentsr
dc.titleTowards a Theory of Theoretical Formations: From Althusser to Leninsr
dc.titleKa teoriji teorijskih formacija: od Altisera ka Lenjinusr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.volume34
dc.citation.spage399
dc.citation.epage423
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID2303399D
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/10472/bitstream_10472.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record