Show simple item record

How to Concieve Republic: Four Visions

dc.creatorKrstic, Predrag
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-19T10:32:27Z
dc.date.available2023-10-19T10:32:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2303-5862
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3005
dc.description.abstractRad ukazuje na nepomirljive razlike i unutrašnje tenzije koje pod terminom „republika“ baštini, prevashodno, njoj naklonjeni osamnaesti vek. Ta nesaglasja i ambivalencije, koje u dobroj meri određuju i savremenu teoriju, izlažu se, redom, kroz razumevanja republike u prosvetiteljstvu, romantizmu, republikanizmu i u tradiciji „Republike ljudi od pera“. Zaključuje se da emancipatorski potencijal koji se investira(o) u republiku, ako i ima istu ili sličnu tačku otpora – recimo: monarhiju, crkvenu dominaciju društvenim životom, ono što se nekad jezgrovitom krilaticom nazivalo „tron i oltar“, ukidanje privatizovanih i/ili partikularnih monopola odlučivanja i svih zabluda, predrasuda, te autoriteta koji ih ozakonjuju – uopšte nema ni približno istu ili sličnu viziju poželjnog stanja pošto se prevrat odigra, odnosno u ime čega se ustanovljuje republika.sr
dc.description.abstractThe work points to irreconcilable differences and internal tensions that under the term ‘republic’ are inherited, primarily, by the eighteenth century, which was favorable to it. Those disagreements and ambivalences, which determine modern theory to a good extent, are presented, respectively, through understandings of the republic in the Enlightenment, romanticism, republicanism and in the tradition of the ‘republic of letters’. It is concluded that the emancipatory potential that is invested in the republic, if it has the same or a similar point of resistance – for example: monarchy, church domination of social life, what was once called the concise catchphrase ‘throne and altar’, the abolition of privatized and/or particular decision-making monopolies and all misconceptions, prejudices, and the authorities that legitimize them – did not have at all the same or a similar vision of the desirable state after the coup has taken place, that is, in the name of what the republic should be established.sr
dc.language.isosrsr
dc.publisherBeograd : Filozofsko društvo Srbijesr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceTheoriasr
dc.subjectrepublikasr
dc.subjectprosvetiteljstvosr
dc.subjectromantizamsr
dc.subjectrepublikanizamsr
dc.subjectRepublika ljudi od perasr
dc.subjectosamnaesti veksr
dc.subjectrepublicsr
dc.subjectEnlightenmentsr
dc.subjectromanticismsr
dc.subjectrepublicanismsr
dc.subjectRepublic of letterssr
dc.subjecteighteenth centurysr
dc.titleKako (za)misliti republiku: četiri predstavesr
dc.titleHow to Concieve Republic: Four Visionssr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.volume66
dc.citation.spage107
dc.citation.epage123
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/THEO2303107K
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/10343/0351-22742303107K.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record