Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Uvid u neke metodološke dileme i sporenja u istraživanju intelektualne istorije

Insight Into Some Methodological Issues and Disputes in the Research of Intellectual History

Thumbnail
2023
Intelektualna istorija (581.0Kb)
Authors
Antonijević, Pavle
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Intelektualna istorija predstavlja vrlo širok i neod ređen pojam, praćen sporenjima i nesaglasnošću među istoričarima koju pokušavaju da ga preciznije definišu. Stoga, rad predstavlja skroman pokušaj da se na što pregledniji način pruži uvid u nekoliko metodoloških problema i dilema koji prate ovu raspravu. Najpre su predstavljeni pojedini aspekti u sporu oko predmeta i određenja discipline, da bi, potom, bilo razmotreno i nekoliko metodoloških pristupa. Analiziran je tradicionalni metod „istorije ideja“ u SAD, lingvistički kontekstualizam „kembričke škole“, odnos postmodernizma i intelektualne istorije, kao i društvena intelektualna istorija. U završnom delu se raspravlja o određenim savremenim tokovima u okviru discipline, kao i jednom od potencijalnih rešenja za ranije krize i metodološke teškoće.
The article attempts to present some methodological approaches, controversies, and dilemmas in the research of intellectual history. First, the paper shows a dispute over the subject matter and the definition of the discipline from the perspective of influential scholars in the field. The major part of the study aims to show several methodological approaches: the traditional method of the “history of ideas” in the USA, the linguistic contextualism of the “Cambridge school”, the relationship between postmodernism and intellectual history, as well as social intellectual history. Similarities and differences between selected approaches are discussed considering their contributions and shortcomings. The final part of the article examines contemporary trends within the discipline, offering one of the potential solutions for earlier crises and methodological difficulties.
Keywords:
intelektualna istorija / istorija filozofije / metodologija / istorija ideja / lingvistički kontekstualizam / poststrukturalizam
Source:
Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju, 2023, volume:XXX, 1, 109-136
Publisher:
  • Beograd: Udruženje za društvenu istoriju
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200025 (University of Belgrade, Institute for Phylosophy and Social Theory) (RS-200025)

ISSN: 0354-5318

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2883
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2883
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Antonijević, Pavle
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2883
AB  - Intelektualna istorija predstavlja vrlo širok i neod ređen pojam, praćen sporenjima i nesaglasnošću među istoričarima koju pokušavaju da ga preciznije definišu. Stoga, rad predstavlja skroman pokušaj da se na što pregledniji način pruži uvid u nekoliko metodoloških problema i dilema koji prate ovu raspravu. Najpre su predstavljeni pojedini aspekti u sporu oko predmeta i određenja discipline, da bi, potom, bilo razmotreno i nekoliko metodoloških pristupa. Analiziran je tradicionalni metod „istorije ideja“ u SAD, lingvistički kontekstualizam „kembričke škole“, odnos postmodernizma i intelektualne istorije, kao i društvena intelektualna istorija. U završnom delu se raspravlja o određenim savremenim tokovima u okviru discipline, kao i jednom od potencijalnih rešenja za ranije krize i metodološke teškoće.
AB  - The article attempts to present some methodological approaches, controversies, and
dilemmas in the research of intellectual history. First, the paper shows a dispute over the
subject matter and the definition of the discipline from the perspective of influential scholars
in the field. The major part of the study aims to show several methodological approaches:
the traditional method of the “history of ideas” in the USA, the linguistic contextualism of
the “Cambridge school”, the relationship between postmodernism and intellectual history, as
well as social intellectual history. Similarities and differences between selected approaches
are discussed considering their contributions and shortcomings. The final part of the article
examines contemporary trends within the discipline, offering one of the potential solutions
for earlier crises and methodological difficulties.
PB  - Beograd: Udruženje za društvenu istoriju
T2  - Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju
T1  - Uvid u neke metodološke dileme i sporenja u istraživanju intelektualne istorije
T1  - Insight Into Some Methodological Issues and Disputes in the Research of Intellectual History
IS  - 1
VL  - volume:XXX
SP  - 109
EP  - 136
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2883
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Antonijević, Pavle",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Intelektualna istorija predstavlja vrlo širok i neod ređen pojam, praćen sporenjima i nesaglasnošću među istoričarima koju pokušavaju da ga preciznije definišu. Stoga, rad predstavlja skroman pokušaj da se na što pregledniji način pruži uvid u nekoliko metodoloških problema i dilema koji prate ovu raspravu. Najpre su predstavljeni pojedini aspekti u sporu oko predmeta i određenja discipline, da bi, potom, bilo razmotreno i nekoliko metodoloških pristupa. Analiziran je tradicionalni metod „istorije ideja“ u SAD, lingvistički kontekstualizam „kembričke škole“, odnos postmodernizma i intelektualne istorije, kao i društvena intelektualna istorija. U završnom delu se raspravlja o određenim savremenim tokovima u okviru discipline, kao i jednom od potencijalnih rešenja za ranije krize i metodološke teškoće., The article attempts to present some methodological approaches, controversies, and
dilemmas in the research of intellectual history. First, the paper shows a dispute over the
subject matter and the definition of the discipline from the perspective of influential scholars
in the field. The major part of the study aims to show several methodological approaches:
the traditional method of the “history of ideas” in the USA, the linguistic contextualism of
the “Cambridge school”, the relationship between postmodernism and intellectual history, as
well as social intellectual history. Similarities and differences between selected approaches
are discussed considering their contributions and shortcomings. The final part of the article
examines contemporary trends within the discipline, offering one of the potential solutions
for earlier crises and methodological difficulties.",
publisher = "Beograd: Udruženje za društvenu istoriju",
journal = "Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju",
title = "Uvid u neke metodološke dileme i sporenja u istraživanju intelektualne istorije, Insight Into Some Methodological Issues and Disputes in the Research of Intellectual History",
number = "1",
volume = "volume:XXX",
pages = "109-136",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2883"
}
Antonijević, P.. (2023). Uvid u neke metodološke dileme i sporenja u istraživanju intelektualne istorije. in Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju
Beograd: Udruženje za društvenu istoriju., volume:XXX(1), 109-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2883
Antonijević P. Uvid u neke metodološke dileme i sporenja u istraživanju intelektualne istorije. in Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju. 2023;volume:XXX(1):109-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2883 .
Antonijević, Pavle, "Uvid u neke metodološke dileme i sporenja u istraživanju intelektualne istorije" in Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju, volume:XXX, no. 1 (2023):109-136,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2883 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB