Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

In defense of integrative violence: How can philosophical practice augment organic social control?

Thumbnail
2021
bitstream_9437.pdf (358.9Kb)
Authors
Fatić, Aleksandar
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The paper explores the relationship between organic and institutional forms of social control from a potential contribution by philosophical practice to understanding social sanctions. The argumentation begins from the point of empirical fact that laws and constitutions of various countries define the purpose of punishment in a utilitarian light in their preambles. This operational-utilitarian character of institutional social control is similar to the utilitarian nature of philosophical consulting as practice. When control, which presupposes a form of violence, is viewed in a broader understanding of the notion of violence, space opens for a discussion on a challenging and controversial question about whether or not can violence be integrative either in the sense of integrating values or in the sense of confirming someone’s social status after a transgression, and to what a larger degree than by institutionalised and from an individual conceptually relatively distant forms of sa...nction.

Keywords:
organicism / institutional penalties / social control / philosophical counselling / integrative practices
Source:
Synthesis Philosophica, 2021, 36, 1, 109-124
Publisher:
  • Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko drustvo i Filozofski fakultet
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200025 (University of Belgrade, Institute for Phylosophy and Social Theory) (RS-200025)

DOI: 10.21464/sp36107

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2703
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fatić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2703
AB  - The paper explores the relationship between organic and institutional forms of social control from a potential contribution by philosophical practice to understanding social sanctions. The argumentation begins from the point of empirical fact that laws and constitutions
of various countries define the purpose of punishment in a utilitarian light in their preambles. This operational-utilitarian character of institutional social control is similar to the
utilitarian nature of philosophical consulting as practice. When control, which presupposes
a form of violence, is viewed in a broader understanding of the notion of violence, space
opens for a discussion on a challenging and controversial question about whether or not
can violence be integrative either in the sense of integrating values or in the sense of confirming someone’s social status after a transgression, and to what a larger degree than by
institutionalised and from an individual conceptually relatively distant forms of sanction.
PB  - Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko drustvo i Filozofski fakultet
T2  - Synthesis Philosophica
T1  - In defense of integrative violence: How can philosophical practice augment organic social control?
IS  - 1
VL  - 36
SP  - 109
EP  - 124
DO  - 10.21464/sp36107
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Fatić, Aleksandar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The paper explores the relationship between organic and institutional forms of social control from a potential contribution by philosophical practice to understanding social sanctions. The argumentation begins from the point of empirical fact that laws and constitutions
of various countries define the purpose of punishment in a utilitarian light in their preambles. This operational-utilitarian character of institutional social control is similar to the
utilitarian nature of philosophical consulting as practice. When control, which presupposes
a form of violence, is viewed in a broader understanding of the notion of violence, space
opens for a discussion on a challenging and controversial question about whether or not
can violence be integrative either in the sense of integrating values or in the sense of confirming someone’s social status after a transgression, and to what a larger degree than by
institutionalised and from an individual conceptually relatively distant forms of sanction.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko drustvo i Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Synthesis Philosophica",
title = "In defense of integrative violence: How can philosophical practice augment organic social control?",
number = "1",
volume = "36",
pages = "109-124",
doi = "10.21464/sp36107"
}
Fatić, A.. (2021). In defense of integrative violence: How can philosophical practice augment organic social control?. in Synthesis Philosophica
Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko drustvo i Filozofski fakultet., 36(1), 109-124.
https://doi.org/10.21464/sp36107
Fatić A. In defense of integrative violence: How can philosophical practice augment organic social control?. in Synthesis Philosophica. 2021;36(1):109-124.
doi:10.21464/sp36107 .
Fatić, Aleksandar, "In defense of integrative violence: How can philosophical practice augment organic social control?" in Synthesis Philosophica, 36, no. 1 (2021):109-124,
https://doi.org/10.21464/sp36107 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB