Приказ основних података о документу

Kriza mudrosti i psihoanaliza

dc.creatorGovedarica, Milanko
dc.creatorPrica, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T09:55:41Z
dc.date.available2022-07-06T09:55:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2658
dc.description.abstractThe topic of this paper is an examination of the practical dimension of contemporary philosophical culture, both in relation to the idea of wisdom in traditional philosophy and in relation to psychoanalytical practice. In the first part of the paper, we determine what philosophical culture is, primarily by emphasizing the differences between that culture and the scientific-technological culture. In the second part of the paper, we show that such a philosophical culture has fallen into a crisis. In the third part of paper, we offer a way out of that crisis, in the form of psychoanalysis, which criticizes the primacy that philosophical culture accords to consciousness, logic, diachronic and linear ways of thinking. In the fourth and last part of the paper, we present the shortcomings of this psychoanalytical model. As a solution, we offer a new model of philosophical culture, created by the synthesis of philosophy, psychoanalysis, but also other discipline of human thought, which has similarities with Nietzsche’s anticipation of Gay Science, as well as with Jasper’s idea of transcendence.sr
dc.description.abstractTema ovog rada tiče se ispitivanja praktične dimenzije savremene filozofske kulture, kako u odnosu na ideju mudrosti u tradicionalnoj filozofiji, tako i u relaciji prema psihoanalitičkoj praksi. U prvom delu rada određujemo šta je to filozofska kultura, prvenstveno tako što stavljamo naglasak na razlike između nje i naučno-tehnološke kulture. U drugom delu rada pokazujemo na koji način je takva filozofska kultura došla u krizu. U trećem delu rada nudimo izlaz iz te krize u vidu psihoanalize, koja kritikuje primat koji je dotadašnja filozofska kultura davala svesti, logici, dijahronijskom i linearnom načinu mišljenja, ali, još značajnije, nudi jedan alternativni model u odnosu na nju. U četvrtom, poslednjem delu rada, predstavljamo i manjkavosti ovog psihoanalitičkog modela. Kao rešenje, nudimo novi model filozofske kulture, nastao sintezom filozofije, psihoanalize, ali i drugih disciplina ljudskog mišljenja, koji ima sličnosti kako sa Ničeovom anticipacijom vesele nauke, tako i sa Jaspersovom idejom transcedencije.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teorijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Societysr
dc.subjectphilosophysr
dc.subjectphilosophical culturesr
dc.subjectwisdomsr
dc.subjectpsychoanalysissr
dc.subjectFreudsr
dc.subjecthermeneutics of suspicionsr
dc.subjectNietzschesr
dc.subjectJasperssr
dc.titleThe Crisis of Wisdom and Psychoanalysissr
dc.titleKriza mudrosti i psihoanalizasr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume33
dc.citation.spage433
dc.citation.epage446
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID2202433G .
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/9294/bitstream_9294.pdf


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу