Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorJeftić, Andrej
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T10:21:39Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T10:21:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2393-4727
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2596
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines whether St Gregory Palamas could be attributed with teaching some sort of the doctrinal development. That this is the case has been argued in various forms by theologians and scholars of the 20th century, both those who have criticized Palamas and those who have often been regarded as representatives of what is called the Neo-Palamite theology of the Orthodox Church. Such thesis has relied heavily on his use of the term anaptyxis in the Tomos of the 1351. Synod. In the paper it is argued that such self-understanding of his relation to the patristic tradition cannot be justified by textual evidence. Through the analysis of the Tomos of 1341, his polemical writings against Gregory Akindynos and the Tomos of 1351 it is shown that Palamas consistently presented his own teaching as a faithful exposition of the words of the Holy Fathers rather than their development.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherAsociaţiunea Transilvană pentru Literatura Română şi Cultura Poporului Românsr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceAstra Salvensissr
dc.subjectexplication of faithsr
dc.subjectanaptyxissr
dc.subjectNeo-Palamismsr
dc.subjectJohn Henry Newmansr
dc.subjectdoctrinal developmentsr
dc.titleDid Saint Gregory Palamas Teach The Development Of The Doctrine?sr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.issue17
dc.citation.volume19
dc.citation.spage115
dc.citation.epage124
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/9087/bitstream_9087.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2596


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу