Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Rekonstrukcija jednog spora: Delezova kritika Kantove upotrebe zajedničkog čula

Reconstruction of a Dispute: Deleuze’s Critique of Kant’s use of Sensus Communis

Thumbnail
2022
bitstream_9032.pdf (185.8Kb)
Authors
Milenković, Ivan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Jedan od glavnih Delezovih prigovora Kantu jeste da ovaj nije uspeo transcendentalno polje da oslobodi elemenata empirije, odnosno sensus communisa. Ovaj tekst nastoji da pokaže zbog čega je i na ko-jim mestima Kantu bilo potrebno da u pomoć prizove sensus commu-nis – naročito u trećoj svojoj Kritici – te zbog čega Delez sensus communis vidi kao skriveni temelj Kantove konstrukcije. Upravo zbog uvođenja sensus communis u argumentaciju Kant, prema Dele-zu, ne uspeva u istorijskom zadatku filozofije: da započne filozofiju bez pretpostavki, te ostaje zatočenikom dogmatske slike mišljenja koja počiva na prirodnosti mišljenja, dobroj volji za mišljenjem i neu-pitnoj želji za istinom.
One of the major Deleuze’s objections directed to Kant states that Kant has not man-aged to free the transcendental field from empirical elements i.e., from sensus com-munis. In this study we show why Kant needed the help of sensus communis, and in what places he did that use that help (especially in his Third Critique), and also why Deleuze sees sensus communis as a hidden foundation of Kantian philosophy. Deleuze is convinced that the introduction of sensus communis is the very reason why Kant is not able to offer the solution to the task that history has given to philosophy: Kant does not enter philosophy free of presuppositions and he remains shackled to a dog-matic notion according to which thought hinges on naturalness, good will and unques-tionable striving towards truth.
Keywords:
Kant / Deleuze / sensus communis / transcendental / understanding / imagination / con-cept / schematic / ability / concordia facultatum
Source:
Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 2022, 3, 1
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200025 (University of Belgrade, Institute for Phylosophy and Social Theory) (RS-200025)

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6591705

ISSN: 2683-5940

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2564
Collections
  • Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milenković, Ivan
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2564
AB  - Jedan od glavnih Delezovih prigovora Kantu jeste da ovaj nije uspeo transcendentalno  polje  da  oslobodi  elemenata  empirije,  odnosno  sensus communisa. Ovaj tekst nastoji da pokaže zbog čega je i na ko-jim mestima Kantu bilo potrebno da u pomoć prizove sensus commu-nis  –  naročito  u  trećoj  svojoj  Kritici  –  te  zbog  čega  Delez  sensus communis  vidi  kao  skriveni  temelj  Kantove  konstrukcije.  Upravo  zbog uvođenja sensus communis u argumentaciju Kant, prema Dele-zu,  ne  uspeva  u  istorijskom  zadatku  filozofije:  da  započne  filozofiju  bez  pretpostavki,  te  ostaje  zatočenikom  dogmatske  slike  mišljenja  koja počiva na prirodnosti mišljenja, dobroj volji za mišljenjem i neu-pitnoj želji za istinom.
AB  - One of the major Deleuze’s objections directed to Kant states that Kant has not man-aged to free the transcendental field from empirical elements i.e., from sensus com-munis. In this study we show why Kant needed the help of sensus communis, and in what places he did that use that help (especially in his Third Critique), and also why Deleuze sees sensus communis as a hidden foundation of Kantian philosophy. Deleuze is convinced that the introduction of sensus communis is the very reason why Kant is not able to offer the solution to the task that history has given to philosophy: Kant does not enter philosophy free of presuppositions and he remains shackled to a dog-matic notion according to which thought hinges on naturalness, good will and unques-tionable striving towards truth.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Rekonstrukcija jednog spora: Delezova kritika Kantove upotrebe zajedničkog čula
T1  - Reconstruction of a Dispute: Deleuze’s Critique of Kant’s use of Sensus Communis
IS  - 1
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.6591705
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Milenković, Ivan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Jedan od glavnih Delezovih prigovora Kantu jeste da ovaj nije uspeo transcendentalno  polje  da  oslobodi  elemenata  empirije,  odnosno  sensus communisa. Ovaj tekst nastoji da pokaže zbog čega je i na ko-jim mestima Kantu bilo potrebno da u pomoć prizove sensus commu-nis  –  naročito  u  trećoj  svojoj  Kritici  –  te  zbog  čega  Delez  sensus communis  vidi  kao  skriveni  temelj  Kantove  konstrukcije.  Upravo  zbog uvođenja sensus communis u argumentaciju Kant, prema Dele-zu,  ne  uspeva  u  istorijskom  zadatku  filozofije:  da  započne  filozofiju  bez  pretpostavki,  te  ostaje  zatočenikom  dogmatske  slike  mišljenja  koja počiva na prirodnosti mišljenja, dobroj volji za mišljenjem i neu-pitnoj želji za istinom., One of the major Deleuze’s objections directed to Kant states that Kant has not man-aged to free the transcendental field from empirical elements i.e., from sensus com-munis. In this study we show why Kant needed the help of sensus communis, and in what places he did that use that help (especially in his Third Critique), and also why Deleuze sees sensus communis as a hidden foundation of Kantian philosophy. Deleuze is convinced that the introduction of sensus communis is the very reason why Kant is not able to offer the solution to the task that history has given to philosophy: Kant does not enter philosophy free of presuppositions and he remains shackled to a dog-matic notion according to which thought hinges on naturalness, good will and unques-tionable striving towards truth.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Rekonstrukcija jednog spora: Delezova kritika Kantove upotrebe zajedničkog čula, Reconstruction of a Dispute: Deleuze’s Critique of Kant’s use of Sensus Communis",
number = "1",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.6591705"
}
Milenković, I.. (2022). Rekonstrukcija jednog spora: Delezova kritika Kantove upotrebe zajedničkog čula. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591705
Milenković I. Rekonstrukcija jednog spora: Delezova kritika Kantove upotrebe zajedničkog čula. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2022;3(1).
doi:10.5281/zenodo.6591705 .
Milenković, Ivan, "Rekonstrukcija jednog spora: Delezova kritika Kantove upotrebe zajedničkog čula" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 3, no. 1 (2022),
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591705 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB