Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Hanslikov formalizam kao začetak savremene estetike muzike

Hanslick’s Formalism as The Beginning of The Contemporary Aesthetics of Music

Thumbnail
2021
bitstream_8734.pdf (190.5Kb)
Authors
Srećković, Sanja M.
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Tekst prikazuje Hanslikov muzički formalizam kao početnu epizodu savremene estetike muzike. Hanslikov najznačajniji spis O muzički lepom se pozicionira u odnosu na najbliže prethodnike Herbarta i Kanta, u čijim radovima se pojavljuju naznake gledišta koje će Hanslik na sistematičan način razviti. U tekstu se pokazuje na koji način se Hanslik obračunao sa tradicionalnim uverenjima o muzici kao izrazu emocija kompozitora, kako bi pripremio teren za izlaganje svoje pozitivne teze o muzičkoj vrednosti. Hanslikov pristup muzičkoj estetici predstavlja prvu sistematičnu raspravu o prirodi i vrednosti muzike. Tezama iznetim u navedenom spisu, Hanslik postavlja pitanja koja ostaju aktuelna i plodna i u savremenoj analitičkoj estetici muzike.
The article presents Hanslick’s aesthetic formalism as the starting point of the con temporary aesthetics of music. His book, written in the 19th century, is considered contemporary because it still proves to be influential and fruitful in the contemporary theoretical circles, especially in the modern analytic aesthetics of music, where it is widely cited and discussed. The article positions Hanslick’s book in relation to his nearest predecessors Kant and Herbart, and to the neighbouring area where the for malistic view appeared, namely in Fidler’s visual formalism in fine arts. It is shown that by being the first piece of writing to attempt to systematically and comprehensively determine the essence and the content of music, and the criteria for evaluation of musical worth, Hanslick’s book sets the foundation for a rigorous examination of the aesthetics of music, and also breaks off with the widely ingrained preconceptions of music, which were in themselves an obstacle to ...establishing the aesthetics of music as a scientific discipline.

Keywords:
estetika muzike / estetički formalizam / muzika / lepota / umetnička vrednost / istorija estetike / savremena estetika
Source:
Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 2021, 2, 2, 299-314
Publisher:
  • Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5732516

ISSN: 2683-5959

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://kritika.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/kc/article/view/68
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2472
Collections
  • Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Srećković, Sanja M.
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://kritika.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/kc/article/view/68
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2472
AB  - Tekst prikazuje Hanslikov muzički formalizam kao početnu epizodu savremene estetike muzike. Hanslikov najznačajniji spis O muzički lepom se pozicionira u odnosu na najbliže prethodnike Herbarta i Kanta, u čijim radovima se pojavljuju naznake gledišta koje će Hanslik na sistematičan način razviti. U tekstu se pokazuje na koji način se Hanslik obračunao sa tradicionalnim uverenjima o muzici kao izrazu emocija kompozitora, kako bi pripremio teren za izlaganje svoje pozitivne teze o muzičkoj vrednosti. Hanslikov pristup muzičkoj estetici predstavlja prvu sistematičnu raspravu o prirodi i vrednosti muzike. Tezama iznetim u navedenom spisu, Hanslik postavlja pitanja koja ostaju aktuelna i plodna i u savremenoj analitičkoj estetici muzike.
AB  - The article presents Hanslick’s aesthetic formalism as the starting point of the con temporary aesthetics of music. His book, written in the 19th century, is considered 
contemporary because it still proves to be influential and fruitful in the contemporary 
theoretical circles, especially in the modern analytic aesthetics of music, where it is 
widely cited and discussed. The article positions Hanslick’s book in relation to his 
nearest predecessors Kant and Herbart, and to the neighbouring area where the for malistic view appeared, namely in Fidler’s visual formalism in fine arts. It is shown that 
by being the first piece of writing to attempt to systematically and comprehensively 
determine the essence and the content of music, and the criteria for evaluation of musical worth, Hanslick’s book sets the foundation for a rigorous examination of the aesthetics of music, and also breaks off with the widely ingrained preconceptions of music, which were in themselves an obstacle to establishing the aesthetics of music as a 
scientific discipline.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Hanslikov formalizam kao začetak savremene estetike muzike
T1  - Hanslick’s Formalism as The Beginning of The Contemporary Aesthetics of Music
IS  - 2
VL  - 2
SP  - 299
EP  - 314
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.5732516
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Srećković, Sanja M.",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Tekst prikazuje Hanslikov muzički formalizam kao početnu epizodu savremene estetike muzike. Hanslikov najznačajniji spis O muzički lepom se pozicionira u odnosu na najbliže prethodnike Herbarta i Kanta, u čijim radovima se pojavljuju naznake gledišta koje će Hanslik na sistematičan način razviti. U tekstu se pokazuje na koji način se Hanslik obračunao sa tradicionalnim uverenjima o muzici kao izrazu emocija kompozitora, kako bi pripremio teren za izlaganje svoje pozitivne teze o muzičkoj vrednosti. Hanslikov pristup muzičkoj estetici predstavlja prvu sistematičnu raspravu o prirodi i vrednosti muzike. Tezama iznetim u navedenom spisu, Hanslik postavlja pitanja koja ostaju aktuelna i plodna i u savremenoj analitičkoj estetici muzike., The article presents Hanslick’s aesthetic formalism as the starting point of the con temporary aesthetics of music. His book, written in the 19th century, is considered 
contemporary because it still proves to be influential and fruitful in the contemporary 
theoretical circles, especially in the modern analytic aesthetics of music, where it is 
widely cited and discussed. The article positions Hanslick’s book in relation to his 
nearest predecessors Kant and Herbart, and to the neighbouring area where the for malistic view appeared, namely in Fidler’s visual formalism in fine arts. It is shown that 
by being the first piece of writing to attempt to systematically and comprehensively 
determine the essence and the content of music, and the criteria for evaluation of musical worth, Hanslick’s book sets the foundation for a rigorous examination of the aesthetics of music, and also breaks off with the widely ingrained preconceptions of music, which were in themselves an obstacle to establishing the aesthetics of music as a 
scientific discipline.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Hanslikov formalizam kao začetak savremene estetike muzike, Hanslick’s Formalism as The Beginning of The Contemporary Aesthetics of Music",
number = "2",
volume = "2",
pages = "299-314",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.5732516"
}
Srećković, S. M.. (2021). Hanslikov formalizam kao začetak savremene estetike muzike. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 2(2), 299-314.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5732516
Srećković SM. Hanslikov formalizam kao začetak savremene estetike muzike. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2021;2(2):299-314.
doi:10.5281/zenodo.5732516 .
Srećković, Sanja M., "Hanslikov formalizam kao začetak savremene estetike muzike" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 2, no. 2 (2021):299-314,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5732516 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB