Simulakrum i kritika: Delezovo tumačenje platon(izm)a

Abstract

Delezovo razumevanje kritike, koje je izneo u delu Niče i filozofija predstavlja sistemski metod koji će Delez koristiti u svojim kasnijim delima. Zastupajući ovu tezu, rad analizira problem simulakruma, koji Delez uočava kod Platona, pokazujući na koji način je Delezovo razumevanje kritike prisutno u njegovom sagledavanju platon(izm)a. Premda se Delezov kritički metod unutar ovog rada u najvećoj meri posmatra i ispituje kroz njegovo razumevanje Platona i simulakruma, rad takođe nagoveštava mogućnost šireg razumevanje uloge kritike kod Deleza: može li se kritika razumeti kao konstantan metodski pristup kojem Delez pribegava? Takva pozicija otvara prostor unutar kog se čitava Razlika i ponavljanje može razumeti kao veliki kritički projekat, na šta Delez delimično i sam upućuje.

Deleuze’s understanding of criticism, presented in his work „Nietzsche and Philoso phy“, is a systematic method that Deleuze will use many times later. Advocating this thesis, the paper analyzes the problem of simulacrum, which Deleuze sees in Plato’s philosophy, showing how Deleuze’s understanding of critique is present in his percep tion of Plato. Although the idea of Deleuze’s critique as a method is in this paper largely observed and examined through his understanding of Plato and the simulacrum, the paper also suggests the possibility of a broader understanding of the role of criticism in Deleuze: can critique be understood as a constant methodological approach used by Deleuze? Such a position opens a space within which Difference and Repetition can be read as a great critical project, an Idea, which Deleuze himself partially refers to.