Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Re-interpreting Tradition: Maximus the Confessor on Creation in Ambigua ad Ioannem

Thumbnail
2021
bitstream_8558.pdf (882.6Kb)
Authors
Cvetkovic, Vladimir
Contributors
Demulder, Bram
Van Deun, Peter
Book part (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Maximus the Confessor’s Ambigua ad Ioannem represents a composition of 66 elucidations on ambiguous passages from the works of Gregory Nazianzen. The collection was written between 628 and 630 and dedicated to a certain John, whose identity is still under scholarly scrutiny. Although Ambigua, as a collection of various scholia, is mainly an exegetical work it may be to some extent subsumed under the popular Byzantine literary genre of erotapokriseis or question-and-answer literature, since the recipient of the work had selected different passages from Gregory and asked Maximus to ponder over their meaning. One of Maximus’ intentions in writing this work is the dismissal of Gregory’s alleged Origenistic or heterodox leaning (as in Ambiguum 7) and the justification of Gregory’s virtual infallibility and of his designation the ‘Theologian’ (as in Ambiguum 21). Moreover, Maximus displays his immense capacity to synthesize divergent theological traditions and to present them as parts of one... coherent theological system.

Source:
Questioning the World. Greek Patristic and Byzantine Question and Answer Literature, 2021, 147-179
Publisher:
  • Turnhout: Brepols
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200025 (University of Belgrade, Institute for Phylosophy and Social Theory) (RS-200025)

DOI: 10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.121071

ISBN: 978-2-503-59075-2

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2426
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Cvetkovic, Vladimir
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2426
AB  - Maximus the Confessor’s Ambigua ad Ioannem represents a composition of 66 elucidations on ambiguous passages from the works of Gregory Nazianzen. The collection was written between 628 and 630 and dedicated to a certain John, whose identity is still under scholarly scrutiny. Although Ambigua, as a collection of various scholia, is mainly an exegetical work it may be to some extent subsumed under the popular Byzantine literary genre of erotapokriseis or question-and-answer literature, since the recipient of the work had selected different passages from Gregory and asked Maximus to ponder over their meaning. One of Maximus’ intentions in writing this work is the dismissal of Gregory’s alleged Origenistic or heterodox leaning (as in Ambiguum 7) and the justification of Gregory’s virtual infallibility and of his designation the ‘Theologian’ (as in Ambiguum 21). Moreover, Maximus displays his immense capacity to synthesize divergent theological traditions and to present them as parts of one coherent theological system.
PB  - Turnhout: Brepols
T2  - Questioning the World. Greek Patristic and Byzantine Question and Answer Literature
T1  - Re-interpreting Tradition: Maximus the Confessor on Creation in Ambigua ad Ioannem
SP  - 147
EP  - 179
DO  - 10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.121071
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Cvetkovic, Vladimir",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Maximus the Confessor’s Ambigua ad Ioannem represents a composition of 66 elucidations on ambiguous passages from the works of Gregory Nazianzen. The collection was written between 628 and 630 and dedicated to a certain John, whose identity is still under scholarly scrutiny. Although Ambigua, as a collection of various scholia, is mainly an exegetical work it may be to some extent subsumed under the popular Byzantine literary genre of erotapokriseis or question-and-answer literature, since the recipient of the work had selected different passages from Gregory and asked Maximus to ponder over their meaning. One of Maximus’ intentions in writing this work is the dismissal of Gregory’s alleged Origenistic or heterodox leaning (as in Ambiguum 7) and the justification of Gregory’s virtual infallibility and of his designation the ‘Theologian’ (as in Ambiguum 21). Moreover, Maximus displays his immense capacity to synthesize divergent theological traditions and to present them as parts of one coherent theological system.",
publisher = "Turnhout: Brepols",
journal = "Questioning the World. Greek Patristic and Byzantine Question and Answer Literature",
booktitle = "Re-interpreting Tradition: Maximus the Confessor on Creation in Ambigua ad Ioannem",
pages = "147-179",
doi = "10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.121071"
}
Cvetkovic, V.. (2021). Re-interpreting Tradition: Maximus the Confessor on Creation in Ambigua ad Ioannem. in Questioning the World. Greek Patristic and Byzantine Question and Answer Literature
Turnhout: Brepols., 147-179.
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.121071
Cvetkovic V. Re-interpreting Tradition: Maximus the Confessor on Creation in Ambigua ad Ioannem. in Questioning the World. Greek Patristic and Byzantine Question and Answer Literature. 2021;:147-179.
doi:10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.121071 .
Cvetkovic, Vladimir, "Re-interpreting Tradition: Maximus the Confessor on Creation in Ambigua ad Ioannem" in Questioning the World. Greek Patristic and Byzantine Question and Answer Literature (2021):147-179,
https://doi.org/10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.121071 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB