Приказ основних података о документу

dc.contributorKnežević, Mikonja
dc.creatorCvetkovic, Vladimir
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T07:51:43Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T07:51:43Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn9781936773688
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2413
dc.description.abstractThe rediscovery of Maximus the Confessor by western scholarship in the mid twentieth century led to a straightforward examination of Aristotelian elements in his works. Scholars such as Hans Urs von Balthasar and Polycarp Sherwood rushed to link Maximus with Aristotle, either by claiming direct influence in regard to the former’s views on movement or regarding the essence – energy distinction, or by suggesting that Maximus refutes the Stagirite’s stances on providence, or on the eternity of the world. Although there were a few isolated voices that denied Aristotle’s direct influence on Maximus, the question of their relationship was not thoroughly examined until the nineteen-nineties.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherAlhambra, CA: Sebastian Presssr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200025/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceAristotle in Byzantiumsr
dc.titleLogoi, Porphyrian Tree and Maximus the Confessor’s Rethinking of Aristotelian Logicsr
dc.typebookPartsr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dc.citation.spage191
dc.citation.epage216
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/8543/bitstream_8543.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2413


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу