Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai

Klasična kritička teorija, epistemološka dijalektika i opšta ekonomija. Odgovor na kritike iz Beograda i Šangaja

Thumbnail
2021
bitstream_8473.pdf (414.3Kb)
Authors
Sørensen, Asger
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
In my response, I initially defend my preference for classical Critical Theory, emphasizing its continued relevance in capitalist modernity, stressing that the epistemological approach does not imply dogmatism with regards to scientific theory or Historical Materialism, just as it does not imply closure with regards to political democracy. When it comes to the dialectics of the classics, I also defend an epistemological approach, arguing that the dialectics aiming for truth implies critique and negativity. However, confronted with the duality of transcendental ideas and historical relativity, I express my confidence in human intuition. Following Hegel, determinate negation must sublate the intuitively conceived universality to a new conception that contains the result of the negation. Finally, I do not see how the conceptual aporias of general economy can be solved by the current political degrowth project. Still, politics is what we need more of, namely social democracy.
Na početku, branim svoju privrženost klasičnoj kritičkoj teoriji, naglašavajući njenu kontinuiranu relevantnost u kapitalističkoj modernosti, ističući da epistemološki pristup ne implicira dogmatizam u pogledu teorije saznanja ili istorijskog materijalizma, dovršenost u pogledu političke demokratije. Kada je u pitanju dijalektika u klasičnom smislu, takođe branim epistemološki pristup, argumentujući da dijalektika koja stremi istini implicira kritiku i negativnost. Međutim, suočen sa dualnošću transcendentnih ideja i istorijske relativnosti, izražavam svoje poverenje u ljudsku intuiciju. Sledeći Hegela, negacija neposredno datog mora da uključi intuitivno shvaćenu univerzalnost u novu koncepciju koja sadrži rezultat negacije. Takođe, ne vidim kako se pojmovne aporije opšte ekonomije mogu rešiti unutar savremene politike ,od-rastaʻ (Degrowth). Ipak, treba nam više a ne manje politike, i to one socijal-demokratske.
Keywords:
dialectics / capitalism / critical theory / epistemology / negation / general economy
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2021, 32, 1, 40-64
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju

DOI: 10.2298/FID2101040S

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2392
Collections
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Sørensen, Asger
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2392
AB  - In my response, I initially defend my preference for classical Critical Theory, emphasizing its continued relevance in capitalist modernity, stressing that the epistemological approach does not imply dogmatism with regards to scientific theory or Historical Materialism, just as it does not imply closure with regards to political democracy. When it comes to the dialectics of the classics, I also defend an epistemological approach, arguing that the dialectics aiming for truth implies critique and negativity. However, confronted with the duality of transcendental ideas and historical relativity, I express my confidence in human intuition. Following Hegel, determinate negation must sublate the intuitively conceived universality to a new conception that contains the result of the negation. Finally, I do not see how the conceptual aporias of general economy can be solved by the current political degrowth project. Still, politics is what we need more of, namely social democracy.
AB  - Na početku, branim svoju privrženost klasičnoj kritičkoj teoriji, naglašavajući njenu kontinuiranu relevantnost u kapitalističkoj modernosti, ističući da epistemološki pristup ne implicira 
dogmatizam u pogledu teorije saznanja ili istorijskog materijalizma, dovršenost u pogledu 
političke demokratije. Kada je u pitanju dijalektika u klasičnom smislu, takođe branim epistemološki pristup, argumentujući da dijalektika koja stremi istini implicira kritiku i negativnost. 
Međutim, suočen sa dualnošću transcendentnih ideja i istorijske relativnosti, izražavam svoje 
poverenje u ljudsku intuiciju. Sledeći Hegela, negacija neposredno datog mora da uključi intuitivno shvaćenu univerzalnost u novu koncepciju koja sadrži rezultat negacije. Takođe, ne 
vidim kako se pojmovne aporije opšte ekonomije mogu rešiti unutar savremene politike 
,od-rastaʻ (Degrowth). Ipak, treba nam više a ne manje politike, i to one socijal-demokratske.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai
T1  - Klasična kritička teorija, epistemološka dijalektika i opšta ekonomija.  Odgovor na kritike iz Beograda i Šangaja
IS  - 1
VL  - 32
SP  - 40
EP  - 64
DO  - 10.2298/FID2101040S
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Sørensen, Asger",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In my response, I initially defend my preference for classical Critical Theory, emphasizing its continued relevance in capitalist modernity, stressing that the epistemological approach does not imply dogmatism with regards to scientific theory or Historical Materialism, just as it does not imply closure with regards to political democracy. When it comes to the dialectics of the classics, I also defend an epistemological approach, arguing that the dialectics aiming for truth implies critique and negativity. However, confronted with the duality of transcendental ideas and historical relativity, I express my confidence in human intuition. Following Hegel, determinate negation must sublate the intuitively conceived universality to a new conception that contains the result of the negation. Finally, I do not see how the conceptual aporias of general economy can be solved by the current political degrowth project. Still, politics is what we need more of, namely social democracy., Na početku, branim svoju privrženost klasičnoj kritičkoj teoriji, naglašavajući njenu kontinuiranu relevantnost u kapitalističkoj modernosti, ističući da epistemološki pristup ne implicira 
dogmatizam u pogledu teorije saznanja ili istorijskog materijalizma, dovršenost u pogledu 
političke demokratije. Kada je u pitanju dijalektika u klasičnom smislu, takođe branim epistemološki pristup, argumentujući da dijalektika koja stremi istini implicira kritiku i negativnost. 
Međutim, suočen sa dualnošću transcendentnih ideja i istorijske relativnosti, izražavam svoje 
poverenje u ljudsku intuiciju. Sledeći Hegela, negacija neposredno datog mora da uključi intuitivno shvaćenu univerzalnost u novu koncepciju koja sadrži rezultat negacije. Takođe, ne 
vidim kako se pojmovne aporije opšte ekonomije mogu rešiti unutar savremene politike 
,od-rastaʻ (Degrowth). Ipak, treba nam više a ne manje politike, i to one socijal-demokratske.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai, Klasična kritička teorija, epistemološka dijalektika i opšta ekonomija.  Odgovor na kritike iz Beograda i Šangaja",
number = "1",
volume = "32",
pages = "40-64",
doi = "10.2298/FID2101040S"
}
Sørensen, A.. (2021). Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 32(1), 40-64.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101040S
Sørensen A. Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2021;32(1):40-64.
doi:10.2298/FID2101040S .
Sørensen, Asger, "Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 32, no. 1 (2021):40-64,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101040S . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB