Dialectics as Immanent Critique. Or, Dialectics as Both Ontology and Epistemology with a Practical Intention
Dijalektika kao imanentna kritika. Ili, dijalektika kao ontologija i epistemologija s praktičnom intencijom
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
This response to Asger Sørensen’s paper From Ontology to Epistemology: Tong, Mao and Hegel is made on the basis of a reflection on the author’s intellectual development with special reference to the idea of ‘dialectics’. This development is mainly composed of three periods, in which the author formed his strong antipathy toward dialectics as a mere tool of power (in the 1970s), learnt to understand the importance of ‘dialogical logic’ in providing conceptual tools for human knowledge of a type of reality which is both objective and subjective – human practices (in the 1980s) – and attempted to understand the ‘dialectics of rationalization’ by integrating ‘dialectics’ in the Western tradition of Critical Theory with the Chinese tradition of ‘dialectics’ systematically interpreted by Feng Qi (1915-1995) since the 1990s.
Ovaj odgovor na poglavlje Asgera Serensena Od ontologije do epistemologije: Tong, Mao i Hegel
je formulisan na temelju refleksije o autorovom intelektualnom razvoju sa posebnim osvrtom
na ideju ,dijalektikeʻ. Ovaj razvoj se sastoji iz tri perioda, u kojima je autor razvio jaku antipatiju
prema dijalektici kao jednostavnoj alatki moći (u 1970-im), i razumeo značaj ,dijaloške logikeʻ
u pružanju pojmovnih oruđa za ljudsko spoznavanje one vrste realnosti koja je istovremeno
objektivna i subjetivan – ljudskih praksi (u 1980-im) – i pokušao da razume ,dijalektiku racio nalizacijeʻ integrišući ,dijalektikuʻ iz zapadne tradicije kritičke teorije sa kineskom tradicijom
,dijalektikeʻ sistematski interpretiranom u delima Feng Ćija (1915-1995) u 1990-im.
Кључне речи:
dialectics / ontology / epistemology / Mao / Hegel / critical theoryИзвор:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2021, 32, 1, 29-39Издавач:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
URI
https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/956http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2391
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Tong, Shijun PY - 2021 UR - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/956 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2391 AB - This response to Asger Sørensen’s paper From Ontology to Epistemology: Tong, Mao and Hegel is made on the basis of a reflection on the author’s intellectual development with special reference to the idea of ‘dialectics’. This development is mainly composed of three periods, in which the author formed his strong antipathy toward dialectics as a mere tool of power (in the 1970s), learnt to understand the importance of ‘dialogical logic’ in providing conceptual tools for human knowledge of a type of reality which is both objective and subjective – human practices (in the 1980s) – and attempted to understand the ‘dialectics of rationalization’ by integrating ‘dialectics’ in the Western tradition of Critical Theory with the Chinese tradition of ‘dialectics’ systematically interpreted by Feng Qi (1915-1995) since the 1990s. AB - Ovaj odgovor na poglavlje Asgera Serensena Od ontologije do epistemologije: Tong, Mao i Hegel je formulisan na temelju refleksije o autorovom intelektualnom razvoju sa posebnim osvrtom na ideju ,dijalektikeʻ. Ovaj razvoj se sastoji iz tri perioda, u kojima je autor razvio jaku antipatiju prema dijalektici kao jednostavnoj alatki moći (u 1970-im), i razumeo značaj ,dijaloške logikeʻ u pružanju pojmovnih oruđa za ljudsko spoznavanje one vrste realnosti koja je istovremeno objektivna i subjetivan – ljudskih praksi (u 1980-im) – i pokušao da razume ,dijalektiku racio nalizacijeʻ integrišući ,dijalektikuʻ iz zapadne tradicije kritičke teorije sa kineskom tradicijom ,dijalektikeʻ sistematski interpretiranom u delima Feng Ćija (1915-1995) u 1990-im. PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - Dialectics as Immanent Critique. Or, Dialectics as Both Ontology and Epistemology with a Practical Intention T1 - Dijalektika kao imanentna kritika. Ili, dijalektika kao ontologija i epistemologija s praktičnom intencijom IS - 1 VL - 32 SP - 29 EP - 39 DO - 10.2298/FID2101029S ER -
@article{ author = "Tong, Shijun", year = "2021", abstract = "This response to Asger Sørensen’s paper From Ontology to Epistemology: Tong, Mao and Hegel is made on the basis of a reflection on the author’s intellectual development with special reference to the idea of ‘dialectics’. This development is mainly composed of three periods, in which the author formed his strong antipathy toward dialectics as a mere tool of power (in the 1970s), learnt to understand the importance of ‘dialogical logic’ in providing conceptual tools for human knowledge of a type of reality which is both objective and subjective – human practices (in the 1980s) – and attempted to understand the ‘dialectics of rationalization’ by integrating ‘dialectics’ in the Western tradition of Critical Theory with the Chinese tradition of ‘dialectics’ systematically interpreted by Feng Qi (1915-1995) since the 1990s., Ovaj odgovor na poglavlje Asgera Serensena Od ontologije do epistemologije: Tong, Mao i Hegel je formulisan na temelju refleksije o autorovom intelektualnom razvoju sa posebnim osvrtom na ideju ,dijalektikeʻ. Ovaj razvoj se sastoji iz tri perioda, u kojima je autor razvio jaku antipatiju prema dijalektici kao jednostavnoj alatki moći (u 1970-im), i razumeo značaj ,dijaloške logikeʻ u pružanju pojmovnih oruđa za ljudsko spoznavanje one vrste realnosti koja je istovremeno objektivna i subjetivan – ljudskih praksi (u 1980-im) – i pokušao da razume ,dijalektiku racio nalizacijeʻ integrišući ,dijalektikuʻ iz zapadne tradicije kritičke teorije sa kineskom tradicijom ,dijalektikeʻ sistematski interpretiranom u delima Feng Ćija (1915-1995) u 1990-im.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "Dialectics as Immanent Critique. Or, Dialectics as Both Ontology and Epistemology with a Practical Intention, Dijalektika kao imanentna kritika. Ili, dijalektika kao ontologija i epistemologija s praktičnom intencijom", number = "1", volume = "32", pages = "29-39", doi = "10.2298/FID2101029S" }
Tong, S.. (2021). Dialectics as Immanent Critique. Or, Dialectics as Both Ontology and Epistemology with a Practical Intention. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 32(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101029S
Tong S. Dialectics as Immanent Critique. Or, Dialectics as Both Ontology and Epistemology with a Practical Intention. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2021;32(1):29-39. doi:10.2298/FID2101029S .
Tong, Shijun, "Dialectics as Immanent Critique. Or, Dialectics as Both Ontology and Epistemology with a Practical Intention" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 32, no. 1 (2021):29-39, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101029S . .