Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Mediji i političko ubeđivanje

Thumbnail
2014
bitstream_8336.pdf (366.1Kb)
Authors
Bojić, Ljubiša
Conference object (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Public opinion is important for political decisions. Politicians change public attitudes. They often turn public disagreement to predominant support for some policies (Mutz, etal. 1996). Long term change of political attitudes is caused by slow development of personality types (Riesman 1950). Research efforts in the field of political persuasion were based on personality stability, rather than media influence. On the other hand, changes in public opinion and social conditions occur frequently. According to Lewin (1936) attitudes are function of people and circumstances. If individual attitudes change according to the circumstances it makes no sense to perceive their dependance on slow personality change. In recent times researchers have been measuring attitudes as specters of possible acceptance and rejection of ideas, not as points of estimates. Starting point of political attitude change research is variability of public opinion. Research examine how politicians use media for fram...ing and priming. They use chosen arguments to change public perception. Thus, changing the balance of arguments is essential for attitude change. Power of media is not telling the citizens what to think, but rather what to think about. Dealing with public matters politicians often behave strategically, rarely sincere. They speak about general issues, not concrete political decisions. Citizens form their attitudes based on cues. They are aware of main media messages, while ignoring most of news and reports. Citizens interpret interpretations. Politicians think ahead about interpretations, shaping their messages to achieve desired effects.

Keywords:
political persuasion / media influence / election campaign / public opinion / attitude change / digilab
Source:
41. Nacionalna konferencija o kvalitetu, Kragujevac, Srbija, 22-23 maj 2014, 2014, 271-278

ISBN: 978-86-6335-005-2

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2352
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2352
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - CONF
AU  - Bojić, Ljubiša
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2352
AB  - Public opinion is important for political decisions. Politicians change public attitudes. They often turn public disagreement to predominant support for some policies (Mutz, etal. 1996).
Long term change of political attitudes is caused by slow development of personality types (Riesman 1950). Research efforts in the field of political persuasion were based on personality stability, rather than media influence.
On the other hand, changes in public opinion and social conditions occur frequently. According to Lewin (1936) attitudes are function of people and circumstances. If individual attitudes change according to the circumstances it makes no sense to perceive their dependance on slow personality change. In recent times researchers have been measuring attitudes as specters of possible acceptance and rejection of ideas, not as points of estimates.
Starting point of political attitude change research is variability of public opinion. Research examine how politicians use media for framing and priming. They use chosen arguments to change public perception. Thus, changing the balance of arguments is essential for attitude change. Power of media is not telling the citizens what to think, but rather what to think about.
Dealing with public matters politicians often behave strategically, rarely sincere. They speak about general issues, not concrete political decisions. Citizens form their attitudes based on cues. They are aware of main media messages, while ignoring most of news and reports. Citizens interpret interpretations. Politicians think ahead about interpretations, shaping their messages to achieve desired effects.
C3  - 41. Nacionalna konferencija o kvalitetu, Kragujevac, Srbija, 22-23 maj 2014
T1  - Mediji i političko ubeđivanje
SP  - 271
EP  - 278
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2352
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Bojić, Ljubiša",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Public opinion is important for political decisions. Politicians change public attitudes. They often turn public disagreement to predominant support for some policies (Mutz, etal. 1996).
Long term change of political attitudes is caused by slow development of personality types (Riesman 1950). Research efforts in the field of political persuasion were based on personality stability, rather than media influence.
On the other hand, changes in public opinion and social conditions occur frequently. According to Lewin (1936) attitudes are function of people and circumstances. If individual attitudes change according to the circumstances it makes no sense to perceive their dependance on slow personality change. In recent times researchers have been measuring attitudes as specters of possible acceptance and rejection of ideas, not as points of estimates.
Starting point of political attitude change research is variability of public opinion. Research examine how politicians use media for framing and priming. They use chosen arguments to change public perception. Thus, changing the balance of arguments is essential for attitude change. Power of media is not telling the citizens what to think, but rather what to think about.
Dealing with public matters politicians often behave strategically, rarely sincere. They speak about general issues, not concrete political decisions. Citizens form their attitudes based on cues. They are aware of main media messages, while ignoring most of news and reports. Citizens interpret interpretations. Politicians think ahead about interpretations, shaping their messages to achieve desired effects.",
journal = "41. Nacionalna konferencija o kvalitetu, Kragujevac, Srbija, 22-23 maj 2014",
title = "Mediji i političko ubeđivanje",
pages = "271-278",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2352"
}
Bojić, L.. (2014). Mediji i političko ubeđivanje. in 41. Nacionalna konferencija o kvalitetu, Kragujevac, Srbija, 22-23 maj 2014, 271-278.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2352
Bojić L. Mediji i političko ubeđivanje. in 41. Nacionalna konferencija o kvalitetu, Kragujevac, Srbija, 22-23 maj 2014. 2014;:271-278.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2352 .
Bojić, Ljubiša, "Mediji i političko ubeđivanje" in 41. Nacionalna konferencija o kvalitetu, Kragujevac, Srbija, 22-23 maj 2014 (2014):271-278,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2352 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB