Show simple item record

dc.creatorCvejić, Igor
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-23T07:25:58Z
dc.date.available2021-10-23T07:25:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2307
dc.description.abstractIn the following chapter, I will attempt to argue that feelings, and, above all, pleasure in mere reflection, ought to be understood as intentional states, and moreover, as feeling-intentionality sui generis. In the first portion of the text, I present the fundamentals of the Kantian understanding of feelings, and attempt to demonstrate why we should reject some of the conclusions of interpretations offered by Paul Guyer and Rachel Zuckert. In part two, I outline some of the particulars of pleasure in mere reflection. In part three, I detail problems relating to the question of the object of pleasure in the context of mere reflection. Finally, in part four, I propose an approach in which intentionality of pleasure in mere reflection can be understood as feeling-intentionality sui generis, explain why this understanding should be ascribed to Kant, and discuss how this might resolve some of the problems surveyed in part three.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBerlin, Boston: De Gruytersr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200025/RS//sr
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesssr
dc.sourceant on Emotions: Critical Essays in the Contemporary Context, edited by Mariannina Failla and Nuria Sánchez Madridsr
dc.titleIntentionality Sui Generis of Pleasure in Mere Reflectionsr
dc.typebookPartsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dcterms.abstractЦвејић, Игор;
dc.citation.spage87
dc.citation.epage106
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110720730-008
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record