This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in
just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and
one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither
one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented
and modified by an ethic of responsibility.
Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu
minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja
zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo
dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti.
Keywords:
proportionality / responsibility / asymmetric warfare / just war theory
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2020, 31, 3, 363-381
Publisher:
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
TY - JOUR
AU - Walzer, Michael
PY - 2020
UR - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/issue/view/53
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2186
AB - This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in
just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and
one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither
one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented
and modified by an ethic of responsibility.
AB - Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu
minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja
zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo
dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti.
PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Proportionality and responsibility
T1 - Proporcionalnost i odgovornost
IS - 3
VL - 31
SP - 363
EP - 381
DO - 10.2298/FID2003385W
ER -
@article{
author = "Walzer, Michael",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This article examines two versions of the proportionality constraint in
just war theory, one minimalist, prohibiting almost no military acts, and
one maximalist, prohibiting pretty much everything. I argue that neither
one meets the needs of the theory and that they should be supplemented
and modified by an ethic of responsibility., Ovaj članak ispituje dve verzije ograničenja proporcionalnosti u teoriji pravednog rata, jednu
minimalističku, koja ne zabranjuje gotovo nijedna vojna dejstva, i jednu maksimalističku, koja
zabranjuje gotovo sve. Tvrdim da nijedna ne zadovoljava potrebe teorije i da bi ih trebalo
dopuniti i modifikovati etikom odgovornosti.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Proportionality and responsibility, Proporcionalnost i odgovornost",
number = "3",
volume = "31",
pages = "363-381",
doi = "10.2298/FID2003385W"
}
Walzer, M.. (2020). Proportionality and responsibility. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(3), 363-381.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003385W
Walzer M. Proportionality and responsibility. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(3):363-381.
doi:10.2298/FID2003385W .
Walzer, Michael, "Proportionality and responsibility" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 3 (2020):363-381,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003385W . .
