Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign

Tišina drugog: glas i znak

Thumbnail
2020
bitstream_7646.pdf (228.1Kb)
Authors
Popović, Una
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This paper is about the interconnectedness of the realm of language with that of social interactions, constitutive of all human communities. Arguing against the traditional and still present primacy of the rationally based understanding of language, I wish to stress the possibility of another approach to language, strongly related to the question of the Other. Relying on the idea that the Other is a constitutive part of any linguistic situation, I wish to inspect how it is possible for the voice of the Other to be suppressed or silenced, and if that is the case, how we should understand the silence of the Other. The main result of my findings is that the silence of the Other is not only meaningful, but that it can have positive social and political effects, including the enhancement of the sensitivity for the various modalities of the voice of the Other.
U ovom radu bavimo se povezanošću domena jezika i domena društvenih interakcija, koji konstituišu svaku ljudsku zajednicu. Na pozadini kritike tradicionalnog, pa i sada u mnogome prisutnog primata razumevanja jezika zasnovanog na razumu, nameravamo da istaknemo mogućnost drugačijeg pristupa jeziku, takvog koji je bitno povezan sa pitanjem Drugog. Osla-njajući se na ideju da je Drugi konstitutivni aspekt bilo koje jezičke situacije, želimo da ispi-tamo kako je moguće da glas drugog bude suspendovan ili ućutkan, i – ako je to slučaj – kako bi trebalo da razumemo tišinu Drugog. Ključni rezultat naših analiza je da tišina Drugog nije samo obremenjena značenjem, već da ona može imati pozitivne društvene i političke posle-dice, uključujući tu i unapređivanje senzitivnosti za različite modalitete glasa Drugog.
Keywords:
silence / voice / sign / language / the Other / society / presence / absence
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2020, 31, 4, 569-576
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju

DOI: 10.2298/FID2004569P

ISSN: 0353-5738

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/921/743
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2128
Collections
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Una
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/921/743
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2128
AB  - This paper is about the interconnectedness of the realm of language with that of social interactions, constitutive of all human communities. Arguing against the traditional and still present primacy of the rationally based understanding of language, I wish to stress the possibility of another approach to language, strongly related to the question of the Other. Relying on the idea that the Other is a constitutive part of any linguistic situation, I wish to inspect how it is possible for the voice of the Other to be suppressed or silenced, and if that is the case, how we should understand the silence of the Other. The main result of my findings is that the silence of the Other is not only meaningful, but that it can have positive social and political effects, including the enhancement of the sensitivity for the various modalities of the voice of the Other.
AB  - U ovom radu bavimo se povezanošću domena jezika i domena društvenih interakcija, koji konstituišu svaku ljudsku zajednicu. Na pozadini kritike tradicionalnog, pa i sada u mnogome prisutnog primata razumevanja jezika zasnovanog na razumu, nameravamo da istaknemo mogućnost drugačijeg pristupa jeziku, takvog koji je bitno povezan sa pitanjem Drugog. Osla-njajući se na ideju da je Drugi konstitutivni aspekt bilo koje jezičke situacije, želimo da ispi-tamo kako je moguće da glas drugog bude suspendovan ili ućutkan, i – ako je to slučaj – kako bi trebalo da razumemo tišinu Drugog. Ključni rezultat naših analiza je da tišina Drugog nije samo obremenjena značenjem, već da ona može imati pozitivne društvene i političke posle-dice, uključujući tu i unapređivanje senzitivnosti za različite modalitete glasa Drugog.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign
T1  - Tišina drugog: glas i znak
IS  - 4
VL  - 31
SP  - 569
EP  - 576
DO  - 10.2298/FID2004569P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Una",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This paper is about the interconnectedness of the realm of language with that of social interactions, constitutive of all human communities. Arguing against the traditional and still present primacy of the rationally based understanding of language, I wish to stress the possibility of another approach to language, strongly related to the question of the Other. Relying on the idea that the Other is a constitutive part of any linguistic situation, I wish to inspect how it is possible for the voice of the Other to be suppressed or silenced, and if that is the case, how we should understand the silence of the Other. The main result of my findings is that the silence of the Other is not only meaningful, but that it can have positive social and political effects, including the enhancement of the sensitivity for the various modalities of the voice of the Other., U ovom radu bavimo se povezanošću domena jezika i domena društvenih interakcija, koji konstituišu svaku ljudsku zajednicu. Na pozadini kritike tradicionalnog, pa i sada u mnogome prisutnog primata razumevanja jezika zasnovanog na razumu, nameravamo da istaknemo mogućnost drugačijeg pristupa jeziku, takvog koji je bitno povezan sa pitanjem Drugog. Osla-njajući se na ideju da je Drugi konstitutivni aspekt bilo koje jezičke situacije, želimo da ispi-tamo kako je moguće da glas drugog bude suspendovan ili ućutkan, i – ako je to slučaj – kako bi trebalo da razumemo tišinu Drugog. Ključni rezultat naših analiza je da tišina Drugog nije samo obremenjena značenjem, već da ona može imati pozitivne društvene i političke posle-dice, uključujući tu i unapređivanje senzitivnosti za različite modalitete glasa Drugog.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign, Tišina drugog: glas i znak",
number = "4",
volume = "31",
pages = "569-576",
doi = "10.2298/FID2004569P"
}
Popović, U.. (2020). The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(4), 569-576.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2004569P
Popović U. The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(4):569-576.
doi:10.2298/FID2004569P .
Popović, Una, "The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 4 (2020):569-576,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2004569P . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB