The Work of Art as fictio personae
Umetničko delo kao fictio personae
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
The article investigates how and why we treat works of art as persons. From rhetoric to jurisprudence, various disciplines have dealt with the practice of attributing human features and abilities to insensate objects. The agency of works of art acting as fictitious persons is not only recognized at the level of aesthetic experience, but also outside it, because there have been cases in which they were subject to legal liability. Personhood is not reducible to individual human beings. However, since works of art lack senses and consciousness, there is ultimately a limit to the personifying metaphor.
Članak istražuje kako i zašto tretiramo umetnička dela kao osobe. Od retorike do filozofije prava, različite discipline bavile su se praksom kojom se neživim objektima pridavaju ljudske osobine i sposobnosti. Moć delovanja umetničkih dela kao fiktivnih osoba nije prepoznata samo na nivou estetskog doživljaja, već i izvan njega, jer su zabeleženi slučajevi u kojima su bila podvrgnuta krivičnoj odgovornosti. Ličnost nije svodiva na pojedinačna ljudska bića. Međutim, pošto umetničkim delima nedostaju čula i svest, na kraju krajeva personifikujuća metafora ima granicu.
Кључне речи:
fictitious person / art / personification / rhetoric / law / aesthetics / Miguel Tamen / Maurizio FerrarisИзвор:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2020, 31, 2, 242-259Издавач:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
URI
http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002242Chttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2084
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Ćipranić, Miloš PY - 2020 UR - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002242C UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2084 AB - The article investigates how and why we treat works of art as persons. From rhetoric to jurisprudence, various disciplines have dealt with the practice of attributing human features and abilities to insensate objects. The agency of works of art acting as fictitious persons is not only recognized at the level of aesthetic experience, but also outside it, because there have been cases in which they were subject to legal liability. Personhood is not reducible to individual human beings. However, since works of art lack senses and consciousness, there is ultimately a limit to the personifying metaphor. AB - Članak istražuje kako i zašto tretiramo umetnička dela kao osobe. Od retorike do filozofije prava, različite discipline bavile su se praksom kojom se neživim objektima pridavaju ljudske osobine i sposobnosti. Moć delovanja umetničkih dela kao fiktivnih osoba nije prepoznata samo na nivou estetskog doživljaja, već i izvan njega, jer su zabeleženi slučajevi u kojima su bila podvrgnuta krivičnoj odgovornosti. Ličnost nije svodiva na pojedinačna ljudska bića. Međutim, pošto umetničkim delima nedostaju čula i svest, na kraju krajeva personifikujuća metafora ima granicu. PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - The Work of Art as fictio personae T1 - Umetničko delo kao fictio personae IS - 2 VL - 31 SP - 242 EP - 259 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2084 ER -
@article{ author = "Ćipranić, Miloš", year = "2020", abstract = "The article investigates how and why we treat works of art as persons. From rhetoric to jurisprudence, various disciplines have dealt with the practice of attributing human features and abilities to insensate objects. The agency of works of art acting as fictitious persons is not only recognized at the level of aesthetic experience, but also outside it, because there have been cases in which they were subject to legal liability. Personhood is not reducible to individual human beings. However, since works of art lack senses and consciousness, there is ultimately a limit to the personifying metaphor., Članak istražuje kako i zašto tretiramo umetnička dela kao osobe. Od retorike do filozofije prava, različite discipline bavile su se praksom kojom se neživim objektima pridavaju ljudske osobine i sposobnosti. Moć delovanja umetničkih dela kao fiktivnih osoba nije prepoznata samo na nivou estetskog doživljaja, već i izvan njega, jer su zabeleženi slučajevi u kojima su bila podvrgnuta krivičnoj odgovornosti. Ličnost nije svodiva na pojedinačna ljudska bića. Međutim, pošto umetničkim delima nedostaju čula i svest, na kraju krajeva personifikujuća metafora ima granicu.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "The Work of Art as fictio personae, Umetničko delo kao fictio personae", number = "2", volume = "31", pages = "242-259", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2084" }
Ćipranić, M.. (2020). The Work of Art as fictio personae. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(2), 242-259. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2084
Ćipranić M. The Work of Art as fictio personae. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(2):242-259. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2084 .
Ćipranić, Miloš, "The Work of Art as fictio personae" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 2 (2020):242-259, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2084 .