Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Erotic/Aesthetic Quality Seen from the Perspective of Levinas’s Ethical An-archaeology

Erotsko/estetsko u perspektivi levinasove etičke an-arheologije

Thumbnail
2020
bitstream_6293.pdf (219.0Kb)
Authors
Maraš, Srđan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This paper emphasizes the place and the role of the aesthetic quality and the role of the erotic in Levinas’s project that deals with ethical an-archaeology. Despite Levinas’s categorical statements that there are irreconcilable differences between ethics and aesthetics, i.e. between ethics and the erotic, above all, it is emphasized here that these differences do not represent a stark or sharp contrast, but quite contrary, they often constitute a subversive ontological element. On the other hand, somewhat unexpectedly, with its ethical anti-aestheticism Levinas’s “noncontemporary” thought appears to be, at the same time, both significant and critical, elementary, emancipatory and contemporary in relation to present-day reactionary reactualization and revitalization of the aesthetic quality which mechanically proceeds to develop on the margins of Levinas’s emancipatory past.
U ovom članku naznačuje se mesto i uloga onog estetskog u Levinasovom projektu etičke an-arheologije, kao i status koji erotika ima u tom projektu. Naglašava se u prvom redu da uprkos autorovim izričitim postavkama o nepomirljivosti etike i estetike, odnosno etike i erotike, ta opozicija ne funkcioniše kao oštar i rezak kontrast, nego se, upravo obrnuto, neretko pokazuje kao subverzivna ontološka sprega. S druge strane, u odnosu na današnju reakcionarnu reaktualizaciju i revitalizaciju estetskog, koja se tek mehanički odvija na rubovima njegove emancipatorske prošlosti, Levinasova „nesavremena“ misao se svojim etičkim antiesteticizmom, donekle neočekivano, ipak ujedno ukazuje kao jedno još uvek bitno kritičko i elementarno emancipatorsko savremeno mišljenje.
Keywords:
the erotic / aesthetics / phenomenology / ontology / ethics / an‑archaeology
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2020, 31, 1, 98-107
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju

DOI: 10.2298/FID2001098M

ISSN: 0353-5738

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001098M
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2070
Collections
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Maraš, Srđan
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001098M
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2070
AB  - This paper emphasizes the place and the role of the aesthetic quality and the role of the erotic in Levinas’s project that deals with ethical an-archaeology. Despite Levinas’s categorical statements that there are irreconcilable differences between ethics and aesthetics, i.e. between ethics and the erotic, above all, it is emphasized here that these differences do not represent a stark or sharp contrast, but quite contrary, they often constitute a subversive ontological element. On the other hand, somewhat unexpectedly, with its ethical anti-aestheticism Levinas’s “noncontemporary” thought appears to be, at the same time, both significant and critical, elementary, emancipatory and contemporary in relation to present-day reactionary reactualization and revitalization of the aesthetic quality which mechanically proceeds to develop on the margins of Levinas’s emancipatory past.
AB  - U ovom članku naznačuje se mesto i uloga onog estetskog u Levinasovom projektu etičke an-arheologije, kao i status koji erotika ima u tom projektu. Naglašava se u prvom redu da uprkos autorovim izričitim postavkama o nepomirljivosti etike i estetike, odnosno etike i erotike, ta opozicija ne funkcioniše kao oštar i rezak kontrast, nego se, upravo obrnuto, neretko pokazuje kao subverzivna ontološka sprega. S druge strane, u odnosu na današnju reakcionarnu reaktualizaciju i revitalizaciju estetskog, koja se tek mehanički odvija na rubovima njegove emancipatorske prošlosti, Levinasova „nesavremena“ misao se svojim etičkim antiesteticizmom, donekle neočekivano, ipak ujedno ukazuje kao jedno još uvek bitno kritičko i elementarno emancipatorsko savremeno mišljenje.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Erotic/Aesthetic Quality Seen from the Perspective of Levinas’s Ethical An-archaeology
T1  - Erotsko/estetsko u perspektivi levinasove etičke an-arheologije
IS  - 1
VL  - 31
SP  - 98
EP  - 107
DO  - 10.2298/FID2001098M
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Maraš, Srđan",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This paper emphasizes the place and the role of the aesthetic quality and the role of the erotic in Levinas’s project that deals with ethical an-archaeology. Despite Levinas’s categorical statements that there are irreconcilable differences between ethics and aesthetics, i.e. between ethics and the erotic, above all, it is emphasized here that these differences do not represent a stark or sharp contrast, but quite contrary, they often constitute a subversive ontological element. On the other hand, somewhat unexpectedly, with its ethical anti-aestheticism Levinas’s “noncontemporary” thought appears to be, at the same time, both significant and critical, elementary, emancipatory and contemporary in relation to present-day reactionary reactualization and revitalization of the aesthetic quality which mechanically proceeds to develop on the margins of Levinas’s emancipatory past., U ovom članku naznačuje se mesto i uloga onog estetskog u Levinasovom projektu etičke an-arheologije, kao i status koji erotika ima u tom projektu. Naglašava se u prvom redu da uprkos autorovim izričitim postavkama o nepomirljivosti etike i estetike, odnosno etike i erotike, ta opozicija ne funkcioniše kao oštar i rezak kontrast, nego se, upravo obrnuto, neretko pokazuje kao subverzivna ontološka sprega. S druge strane, u odnosu na današnju reakcionarnu reaktualizaciju i revitalizaciju estetskog, koja se tek mehanički odvija na rubovima njegove emancipatorske prošlosti, Levinasova „nesavremena“ misao se svojim etičkim antiesteticizmom, donekle neočekivano, ipak ujedno ukazuje kao jedno još uvek bitno kritičko i elementarno emancipatorsko savremeno mišljenje.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Erotic/Aesthetic Quality Seen from the Perspective of Levinas’s Ethical An-archaeology, Erotsko/estetsko u perspektivi levinasove etičke an-arheologije",
number = "1",
volume = "31",
pages = "98-107",
doi = "10.2298/FID2001098M"
}
Maraš, S.. (2020). The Erotic/Aesthetic Quality Seen from the Perspective of Levinas’s Ethical An-archaeology. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(1), 98-107.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001098M
Maraš S. The Erotic/Aesthetic Quality Seen from the Perspective of Levinas’s Ethical An-archaeology. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(1):98-107.
doi:10.2298/FID2001098M .
Maraš, Srđan, "The Erotic/Aesthetic Quality Seen from the Perspective of Levinas’s Ethical An-archaeology" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 1 (2020):98-107,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001098M . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB