Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution
Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
My intention in this text is to present the most significant contribution of some French philosophers and anthropologists to the notion of reconstruction and advancement of institutions. The paradox of change, reform or transformation of the institution – is an entirely new institution possible? How do institutions die? – lies in the difficulty or even impossibility to change something that manifests what we are as a group. If institutions really present or represent the relations among all of us, how can they be changed in the first place? Whence the capacity for change? What allows for the idea of the “new”?
U ovom tekstu mi je namera da pokazem najvažniji prilog nekih francuskih filozofa i antro-pologa u vezi sa rekonstrukcijom i poboljšanjem institucija. Paradoks promene, reforme ili transformacije institucije (da li je moguća potpuno nova institucija i kako umiru institucije?) zasniva se na teškoći ili nemogućnosti da se promeni nesto što manifestuje ono sto mi kao grupa jesmo. Ako institucije predstavljaju ili pokazuju zapravo relacije koje postoje između svih nas, kako je moguće menjati ih? Odakle kapacitet za promenu i kako je uopšte moguća ideja „novog“?
Keywords:
institution / engagement / change / restauration / EuropeSource:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2019, 30, 4, 465-475Publisher:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Funding / projects:
- Studying climate change and its influence on environment: impacts, adaptation and mitigation (RS-43007)
URI
http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1904465Bhttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2045
Institution/Community
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Bojanić, Petar PY - 2019 UR - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1904465B UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2045 AB - My intention in this text is to present the most significant contribution of some French philosophers and anthropologists to the notion of reconstruction and advancement of institutions. The paradox of change, reform or transformation of the institution – is an entirely new institution possible? How do institutions die? – lies in the difficulty or even impossibility to change something that manifests what we are as a group. If institutions really present or represent the relations among all of us, how can they be changed in the first place? Whence the capacity for change? What allows for the idea of the “new”? AB - U ovom tekstu mi je namera da pokazem najvažniji prilog nekih francuskih filozofa i antro-pologa u vezi sa rekonstrukcijom i poboljšanjem institucija. Paradoks promene, reforme ili transformacije institucije (da li je moguća potpuno nova institucija i kako umiru institucije?) zasniva se na teškoći ili nemogućnosti da se promeni nesto što manifestuje ono sto mi kao grupa jesmo. Ako institucije predstavljaju ili pokazuju zapravo relacije koje postoje između svih nas, kako je moguće menjati ih? Odakle kapacitet za promenu i kako je uopšte moguća ideja „novog“? PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution T1 - Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije IS - 4 VL - 30 SP - 465 EP - 475 DO - 10.2298//FID1904465B ER -
@article{ author = "Bojanić, Petar", year = "2019", abstract = "My intention in this text is to present the most significant contribution of some French philosophers and anthropologists to the notion of reconstruction and advancement of institutions. The paradox of change, reform or transformation of the institution – is an entirely new institution possible? How do institutions die? – lies in the difficulty or even impossibility to change something that manifests what we are as a group. If institutions really present or represent the relations among all of us, how can they be changed in the first place? Whence the capacity for change? What allows for the idea of the “new”?, U ovom tekstu mi je namera da pokazem najvažniji prilog nekih francuskih filozofa i antro-pologa u vezi sa rekonstrukcijom i poboljšanjem institucija. Paradoks promene, reforme ili transformacije institucije (da li je moguća potpuno nova institucija i kako umiru institucije?) zasniva se na teškoći ili nemogućnosti da se promeni nesto što manifestuje ono sto mi kao grupa jesmo. Ako institucije predstavljaju ili pokazuju zapravo relacije koje postoje između svih nas, kako je moguće menjati ih? Odakle kapacitet za promenu i kako je uopšte moguća ideja „novog“?", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution, Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije", number = "4", volume = "30", pages = "465-475", doi = "10.2298//FID1904465B" }
Bojanić, P.. (2019). Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(4), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.2298//FID1904465B
Bojanić P. Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(4):465-475. doi:10.2298//FID1904465B .
Bojanić, Petar, "Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 30, no. 4 (2019):465-475, https://doi.org/10.2298//FID1904465B . .