Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

How does the use of “culture” and “tradition” shape the women’s rights discourse in transitional Serbia?

Kako upotreba „kulture“ i „tradicije“ oblikuje diskurs o ženskim pravima u tranzicionoj Srbiji?

Thumbnail
2016
bitstream_4197.pdf (187.6Kb)
Authors
Petrovski, Sara
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Although social anthropologists have mostly abandoned the essentialist view of “culture” and “tradition”, these static notions are still frequently used in Serbian public discourse regarding women’s rights. I believe that analysing the production of cultural meaning and knowledge among different social actors and the state is important when exploring the implementation, transformation and protection of women’s rights at a local level. In this article, I shall investigate how “culture” and “tradition” are being constructed and used by certain right wing groups, political leaders, intellectuals and by the Serbian Orthodox Church. On one side, arguments of “culture” and “tradition” are used in order to “preserve the national identity” and save it from “imposed Western norms” and “Western imperialism”, while on the other, they are used to explain the cultural obstacles regarding the effective protection of women’s rights. “Tradition”, often constructed as a linear project of inherited “cul...tural” and “moral” values and practices, stands in opposition to the EU; therefore, it calls to be nurtured and protected or changed and abandoned. Consequently, I see women rights issues trapped into a pro-EU or against EU, pro-traditional values or pro-liberal values discourse. I conclude that women rights in Serbia are and probably will be affected more by the use and abuse of different concepts of “culture” and “tradition”.

Keywords:
culture / tradition / women’s rights / public discourse / EU / Serbia / Balkan
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2016, 27, 3, 679-694
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju

DOI: 10.2298/FID1603685P

ISSN: 0353-5738

WoS: 000408372100022

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=391
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1872
Collections
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Petrovski, Sara
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=391
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1872
AB  - Although social anthropologists have mostly abandoned the essentialist view of “culture” and “tradition”, these static notions are still frequently used in Serbian public discourse regarding women’s rights. I believe that analysing the production of cultural meaning and knowledge among different social actors and the state is important when exploring the implementation, transformation and protection of women’s rights at a local level. In this article, I shall investigate how “culture” and “tradition” are being constructed and used by certain right wing groups, political leaders, intellectuals and by the Serbian Orthodox Church. On one side, arguments of “culture” and “tradition” are used in order to “preserve the national identity” and save it from “imposed Western norms” and “Western imperialism”, while on the other, they are used to explain the cultural obstacles regarding the effective protection of women’s rights. “Tradition”, often constructed as a linear project of inherited “cultural” and “moral” values and practices, stands in opposition to the EU; therefore, it calls to be nurtured and protected or changed and abandoned. Consequently, I see women rights issues trapped into a pro-EU or against EU, pro-traditional values or pro-liberal values discourse. I conclude that women rights in Serbia are and probably will be affected more by the use and abuse of different concepts of “culture” and “tradition”.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - How does the use of “culture” and “tradition” shape the women’s rights discourse in transitional Serbia?
T1  - Kako upotreba „kulture“ i „tradicije“ oblikuje diskurs o ženskim pravima u tranzicionoj Srbiji?
IS  - 3
VL  - 27
SP  - 679
EP  - 694
DO  - 10.2298/FID1603685P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Petrovski, Sara",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Although social anthropologists have mostly abandoned the essentialist view of “culture” and “tradition”, these static notions are still frequently used in Serbian public discourse regarding women’s rights. I believe that analysing the production of cultural meaning and knowledge among different social actors and the state is important when exploring the implementation, transformation and protection of women’s rights at a local level. In this article, I shall investigate how “culture” and “tradition” are being constructed and used by certain right wing groups, political leaders, intellectuals and by the Serbian Orthodox Church. On one side, arguments of “culture” and “tradition” are used in order to “preserve the national identity” and save it from “imposed Western norms” and “Western imperialism”, while on the other, they are used to explain the cultural obstacles regarding the effective protection of women’s rights. “Tradition”, often constructed as a linear project of inherited “cultural” and “moral” values and practices, stands in opposition to the EU; therefore, it calls to be nurtured and protected or changed and abandoned. Consequently, I see women rights issues trapped into a pro-EU or against EU, pro-traditional values or pro-liberal values discourse. I conclude that women rights in Serbia are and probably will be affected more by the use and abuse of different concepts of “culture” and “tradition”.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "How does the use of “culture” and “tradition” shape the women’s rights discourse in transitional Serbia?, Kako upotreba „kulture“ i „tradicije“ oblikuje diskurs o ženskim pravima u tranzicionoj Srbiji?",
number = "3",
volume = "27",
pages = "679-694",
doi = "10.2298/FID1603685P"
}
Petrovski, S.. (2016). How does the use of “culture” and “tradition” shape the women’s rights discourse in transitional Serbia?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(3), 679-694.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1603685P
Petrovski S. How does the use of “culture” and “tradition” shape the women’s rights discourse in transitional Serbia?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(3):679-694.
doi:10.2298/FID1603685P .
Petrovski, Sara, "How does the use of “culture” and “tradition” shape the women’s rights discourse in transitional Serbia?" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 27, no. 3 (2016):679-694,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1603685P . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB