Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Polemology and xenology: Waldenfels and the sting of the alien

Polemologija i ksenologija: Valdenfels i žaoka stranog

Thumbnail
2018
bitstream_4027.pdf (263.3Kb)
Authors
Prole, Dragan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
After explaining why phenomenology of the alien cannot be counted among traditional philosophical disciplines, the author explores why all of European history can be read as the “shading of the alien” (Verblendung des Fremden), although not in the sense of mere disregarding, neglecting or denying of the alien, but disciplining it, manipulating and exploiting it. The alien has not been forgotten for centuries, it was always in the European focus, but only as an instance through which the sense of power was traditionally constructed. Following the basic presumptions of Bernhard Waldenfels’ phenomenology of the alien the article presents the shading of the alien as analogous to the process of its naturalization. As if the tradition of European colonialism can be best understood in the key of maître et possesseur de’l étranger. That is to say, the European legacy shows, in an extraordinary manner, that the alien can be transformed into a resource, from which we can appropriate... and assimilate everything. A crucial insight for Waldenfels is also that strangeness is not reducible to a narrow segment of reality, whether it is culture, religion or art-based, because strangeness is a radical dimension that transcends all regions.

Nakon razjašnjavanja zbog čega fenomenologija stranog ne može biti ubrojana među tradicionalne filozofske discipline, autor ispituje zašto bi celokupna evropska istorija mogla biti čitana kao „zasenčenje stranog“, ali ne u smislu pukog odbacivanja, zanemarivanja ili poricanja stranog, nego njegovog disciplinovanja, manipulisanja, eksploatisanja. Strano nije bilo vekovima zaboravljeno, ono je uvek bilo u evropskom fokusu, ali samo kao instanca posredstvom koje je tradicionalno konstruisan osećaj moći. Prateći osnovne pretpostavke fenomenologije stranog Bernharda Valdenfelsa, članak uočava zasenčenje stranog kao analogno procesu njegove naturalizacije. Kao da tradicija evropskog kolonijalizma može biti najbolje shvaćena zahvaljujući ključu gospodar i vlasnik stranog. Rečju, evropsko nasleđe na izuzetan način pokazuje da strano može biti transformisano u resurs od kojeg možemo da prisvojimo i asimilujemo sve što nam može biti od koristi. Valdenfelsov presudan uvid glasi da stranost ne mož...e biti svedena na uzak segment realnosti, bila ona vezana za kulturu, umetnost ili religiju, jer je ona radikalna dimenzija koja transcendira sve regije.

Keywords:
Valdenfels / Waldenfels / fenomenologija / strano / polemologija / ksenologija / phenomenology / alien / polemology / xenology
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2018, 29, 3
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju

ISSN: 0353-5738

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1819
URI
http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=679
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1819
Collections
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prole, Dragan
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=679
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1819
AB  - After explaining why phenomenology of the alien cannot be counted
among traditional philosophical disciplines, the author explores why all
of European history can be read as the “shading of the alien” (Verblendung
des Fremden), although not in the sense of mere disregarding, neglecting
or denying of the alien, but disciplining it, manipulating and exploiting
it. The alien has not been forgotten for centuries, it was always in the
European focus, but only as an instance through which the sense of
power was traditionally constructed. Following the basic presumptions
of Bernhard Waldenfels’ phenomenology of the alien the article presents
the shading of the alien as analogous to the process of its naturalization.
As if the tradition of European colonialism can be best understood in
the key of maître et possesseur de’l étranger. That is to say, the European
legacy shows, in an extraordinary manner, that the alien can be transformed
into a resource, from which we can appropriate and assimilate everything.
A crucial insight for Waldenfels is also that strangeness is not reducible
to a narrow segment of reality, whether it is culture, religion or art-based,
because strangeness is a radical dimension that transcends all regions.
AB  - Nakon razjašnjavanja zbog čega fenomenologija stranog ne može biti ubrojana među tradicionalne filozofske discipline, autor ispituje zašto bi celokupna evropska istorija mogla biti čitana kao „zasenčenje stranog“, ali ne u smislu pukog odbacivanja, zanemarivanja ili poricanja stranog, nego njegovog disciplinovanja, manipulisanja, eksploatisanja. Strano nije bilo vekovima zaboravljeno, ono je uvek bilo u evropskom fokusu, ali samo kao instanca posredstvom koje je tradicionalno konstruisan osećaj moći. Prateći osnovne pretpostavke fenomenologije stranog Bernharda Valdenfelsa, članak uočava zasenčenje stranog kao analogno procesu njegove naturalizacije. Kao da tradicija evropskog kolonijalizma može biti najbolje shvaćena zahvaljujući ključu gospodar i vlasnik stranog. Rečju, evropsko nasleđe na izuzetan način pokazuje da strano može biti transformisano u resurs od kojeg možemo da prisvojimo i asimilujemo sve što nam može biti od koristi. Valdenfelsov presudan uvid glasi da stranost ne može biti svedena na uzak segment realnosti, bila ona vezana za kulturu, umetnost ili religiju, jer je ona radikalna dimenzija koja transcendira sve regije.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Polemology and xenology: Waldenfels and the sting of the alien
T1  - Polemologija i ksenologija: Valdenfels i žaoka stranog
IS  - 3
VL  - 29
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1819
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prole, Dragan",
year = "2018",
abstract = "After explaining why phenomenology of the alien cannot be counted
among traditional philosophical disciplines, the author explores why all
of European history can be read as the “shading of the alien” (Verblendung
des Fremden), although not in the sense of mere disregarding, neglecting
or denying of the alien, but disciplining it, manipulating and exploiting
it. The alien has not been forgotten for centuries, it was always in the
European focus, but only as an instance through which the sense of
power was traditionally constructed. Following the basic presumptions
of Bernhard Waldenfels’ phenomenology of the alien the article presents
the shading of the alien as analogous to the process of its naturalization.
As if the tradition of European colonialism can be best understood in
the key of maître et possesseur de’l étranger. That is to say, the European
legacy shows, in an extraordinary manner, that the alien can be transformed
into a resource, from which we can appropriate and assimilate everything.
A crucial insight for Waldenfels is also that strangeness is not reducible
to a narrow segment of reality, whether it is culture, religion or art-based,
because strangeness is a radical dimension that transcends all regions., Nakon razjašnjavanja zbog čega fenomenologija stranog ne može biti ubrojana među tradicionalne filozofske discipline, autor ispituje zašto bi celokupna evropska istorija mogla biti čitana kao „zasenčenje stranog“, ali ne u smislu pukog odbacivanja, zanemarivanja ili poricanja stranog, nego njegovog disciplinovanja, manipulisanja, eksploatisanja. Strano nije bilo vekovima zaboravljeno, ono je uvek bilo u evropskom fokusu, ali samo kao instanca posredstvom koje je tradicionalno konstruisan osećaj moći. Prateći osnovne pretpostavke fenomenologije stranog Bernharda Valdenfelsa, članak uočava zasenčenje stranog kao analogno procesu njegove naturalizacije. Kao da tradicija evropskog kolonijalizma može biti najbolje shvaćena zahvaljujući ključu gospodar i vlasnik stranog. Rečju, evropsko nasleđe na izuzetan način pokazuje da strano može biti transformisano u resurs od kojeg možemo da prisvojimo i asimilujemo sve što nam može biti od koristi. Valdenfelsov presudan uvid glasi da stranost ne može biti svedena na uzak segment realnosti, bila ona vezana za kulturu, umetnost ili religiju, jer je ona radikalna dimenzija koja transcendira sve regije.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Polemology and xenology: Waldenfels and the sting of the alien, Polemologija i ksenologija: Valdenfels i žaoka stranog",
number = "3",
volume = "29",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1819"
}
Prole, D.. (2018). Polemology and xenology: Waldenfels and the sting of the alien. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(3).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1819
Prole D. Polemology and xenology: Waldenfels and the sting of the alien. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;29(3).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1819 .
Prole, Dragan, "Polemology and xenology: Waldenfels and the sting of the alien" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29, no. 3 (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1819 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB