Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The methodology of philosophical practice: Eclecticism and/or integrativeness?

No Thumbnail
Authors
Fatić, Aleksandar
Contributors
Zagorac, Ivana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The need for philosophical practice to integrate various methods, both conceptual and those based on the use of emotions, raises the question as to whether its methodology is necessarily eclectic, in terms of the collection of various methodologies used in philosophy, or whether there is a way to move beyond eclecticism. This is the main subject of this paper. In other words, the question is whether there is such a thing as an ‘integrative’ methodology and, if so, what distinguishes such a method from mere eclecticism. In this text, we define the methodological procedure of integrativeness as the process of systematizing perspectives into an orientational answer to the demands of a specific problem. What differentiates such an approach from mere summation is a new contribution that results from a synergistic and systematic meeting of positions and argumentations whose final result differs from its initial elements. Diversity in the form of a multidimensional relationship towards life a...nd the world results in numerous perspectives, which is a value that should be cultivated and integrated into a reflective and actional perception of the world.

Keywords:
philosophical practice / methodology / eclecticism / pluri-perspectivism / Integrativeness
Source:
Philosophia, 2016, 44, 4, 1419-1438
Publisher:
  • Amsterdam : Springer Netherlands
Funding / projects:
  • Politics of Social Memory and National Identity: Regional and European Context (RS-179049)

DOI: 10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3

WoS: 000398199100028

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84991694081
[ Google Scholar ]
2
3
URI
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1799
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fatić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1799
AB  - The need for philosophical practice to integrate various methods, both conceptual and those based on the use of emotions, raises the question as to whether its methodology is necessarily eclectic, in terms of the collection of various methodologies used in philosophy, or whether there is a way to move beyond eclecticism. This is the main subject of this paper. In other words, the question is whether there is such a thing as an ‘integrative’ methodology and, if so, what distinguishes such a method from mere eclecticism. In this text, we define the methodological procedure of integrativeness as the process of systematizing perspectives into an orientational answer to the demands of a specific problem. What differentiates such an approach from mere summation is a new contribution that results from a synergistic and systematic meeting of positions and argumentations whose final result differs from its initial elements. Diversity in the form of a multidimensional relationship towards life and the world results in numerous perspectives, which is a value that should be cultivated and integrated into a reflective and actional perception of the world.
PB  - Amsterdam : Springer Netherlands
T2  - Philosophia
T1  - The methodology of philosophical practice: Eclecticism and/or integrativeness?
IS  - 4
VL  - 44
SP  - 1419
EP  - 1438
DO  - 10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Fatić, Aleksandar",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The need for philosophical practice to integrate various methods, both conceptual and those based on the use of emotions, raises the question as to whether its methodology is necessarily eclectic, in terms of the collection of various methodologies used in philosophy, or whether there is a way to move beyond eclecticism. This is the main subject of this paper. In other words, the question is whether there is such a thing as an ‘integrative’ methodology and, if so, what distinguishes such a method from mere eclecticism. In this text, we define the methodological procedure of integrativeness as the process of systematizing perspectives into an orientational answer to the demands of a specific problem. What differentiates such an approach from mere summation is a new contribution that results from a synergistic and systematic meeting of positions and argumentations whose final result differs from its initial elements. Diversity in the form of a multidimensional relationship towards life and the world results in numerous perspectives, which is a value that should be cultivated and integrated into a reflective and actional perception of the world.",
publisher = "Amsterdam : Springer Netherlands",
journal = "Philosophia",
title = "The methodology of philosophical practice: Eclecticism and/or integrativeness?",
number = "4",
volume = "44",
pages = "1419-1438",
doi = "10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3"
}
Fatić, A.. (2016). The methodology of philosophical practice: Eclecticism and/or integrativeness?. in Philosophia
Amsterdam : Springer Netherlands., 44(4), 1419-1438.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3
Fatić A. The methodology of philosophical practice: Eclecticism and/or integrativeness?. in Philosophia. 2016;44(4):1419-1438.
doi:10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3 .
Fatić, Aleksandar, "The methodology of philosophical practice: Eclecticism and/or integrativeness?" in Philosophia, 44, no. 4 (2016):1419-1438,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB