This volume attempts contribute to the discussion about the nation, nationalism and its inevitable attendant, enmity. In what sense have friendship and hostility (Schmitt 1996, Derrida 1994, Bojanić 1995; 2015) gained new meanings, and what would those meanings be? Does nation-building always involve a common enemy one has to fight? Or does it meet its limits with being a mere remedy for contemporary forms of inequality, or a tranquilizer for those unsettled by the complexity and insecurity brought up by globalized capitalism? These questions become increasingly important as we witness the crisis of the collectivity-building process of the European Union. Do the contemporary politics of difference contest the notion of enmity or, quite to the contrary,
reaffirm it?
TY - BOOK
AU - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU - Meka, Eltion
AU - Pavlović, Aleksandar
PY - 2018
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1611
AB - This volume attempts contribute to the discussion about the nation, nationalism and its inevitable attendant, enmity. In what sense have friendship and hostility (Schmitt 1996, Derrida 1994, Bojanić 1995; 2015) gained new meanings, and what would those meanings be? Does nation-building always involve a common enemy one has to fight? Or does it meet its limits with being a mere remedy for contemporary forms of inequality, or a tranquilizer for those unsettled by the complexity and insecurity brought up by globalized capitalism? These questions become increasingly important as we witness the crisis of the collectivity-building process of the European Union. Do the contemporary politics of difference contest the notion of enmity or, quite to the contrary,
reaffirm it?
PB - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1 - Politics of Enmity
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1611
ER -
@book{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Meka, Eltion and Pavlović, Aleksandar",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This volume attempts contribute to the discussion about the nation, nationalism and its inevitable attendant, enmity. In what sense have friendship and hostility (Schmitt 1996, Derrida 1994, Bojanić 1995; 2015) gained new meanings, and what would those meanings be? Does nation-building always involve a common enemy one has to fight? Or does it meet its limits with being a mere remedy for contemporary forms of inequality, or a tranquilizer for those unsettled by the complexity and insecurity brought up by globalized capitalism? These questions become increasingly important as we witness the crisis of the collectivity-building process of the European Union. Do the contemporary politics of difference contest the notion of enmity or, quite to the contrary,
reaffirm it?",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Politics of Enmity",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1611"
}
Pudar Draško, G., Meka, E.,& Pavlović, A.. (2018). Politics of Enmity.
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1611
Pudar Draško G, Meka E, Pavlović A. Politics of Enmity. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1611 .
,