Javni prostor i slobodno delanje: Fuko vs. Lefevr
Public space and free action: Foucault vs. Lefebvre
Abstract
U ovom članku nastojaćemo da ostvarimo sistematičan uvid u odnos između
svakodnevnih praksi i javnog prostora. Kroz analizu radova dvojice uticajnih teoretičara iz
ove oblasti, Fukoa i Lefevra, pokušaćemo da pružimo teorijsko obrazloženje intuiciji da
(javni) prostor predstavlja jedan od osnovnih konstitutivnih elementa slobodnog delanja. U
prvom delu članka, analiziraćemo Fukoov pojam heterotopije kako bismo ukazali na
mogućnost one „prostorno posredovane“ samorefleksije koja veoma nalikuje na filozofsku
askezu iz takozvane kasne faze njegovog dela. Potom ćemo razmotriti u kojoj meri Lefevrovo
stanovište da javni prostor predstavlja hegelijansku konkretnu apstrakciju – koja sobom
povlači dijalektičku analizu i praćenje složenih istorijskih protivrečnosti – dopunjuje i
produbljuje vizuru koju uspostavlja Fuko svojim pojmom heterotopija. U tom smislu, biće
pokazano da, uprkos svim razlikama u teorijskim polazištima, oba autora brane ideju jednog
javnog prostora u kojem se bri...šu doznačavanja – kako bi se „otvorio prostor“ slobodnom
delatniku.
In this paper we will try to offer a systematic insight into the relation of everyday practices and public space. By examining the work of two of the most influential authors in this field, Foucault and Lefebvre, we will try to provide a theoretical explanation of intuition that (public) space represents one of the key constitutive elements of free action. In the first part of the paper, we will consider Foucault’s notion of heterotopia in the interest of pointing towards a “spatially intermediated” self-reflection which, to a great degree, resembles the philosophical askesis form his so called letter work. Afterwards, we will consider in which sense Lefebvre’s position that public space represents a Hegelian concrete abstraction - which entails dialectical analysis and tracking of complex historical contradictions - complements and deepens perspective that Foucault puts before us in his heterotopias. In that vein, it will be shown that both authors, despite the difference in their the...oretical starting points, defend the idea of such a public space in which all signifiers are removed in the interest of „opening space” for the free agent
Keywords:
javni prostor / slobodni delatnik / svakodnevna praksa / Michel Foucault / heterotopija / filozofska askeza / Henri Lefebvre / dijalektika / neokapitalizam / public space / free agent / everyday practice / heterotopy / philosophical askesis / dialectic / neocapitalismSource:
Sociologija, 2012, 54, 3, 423-436Publisher:
- Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore
- Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja
Funding / projects:
- Rare Diseases:Molecular Pathophysiology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Modalities and Social, Ethical and Legal Aspects (RS-41004)
- Studying climate change and its influence on environment: impacts, adaptation and mitigation (RS-43007)
Collections
Institution/Community
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Prodanović, Srđan AU - Krstić, Predrag PY - 2012 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1425 AB - U ovom članku nastojaćemo da ostvarimo sistematičan uvid u odnos između svakodnevnih praksi i javnog prostora. Kroz analizu radova dvojice uticajnih teoretičara iz ove oblasti, Fukoa i Lefevra, pokušaćemo da pružimo teorijsko obrazloženje intuiciji da (javni) prostor predstavlja jedan od osnovnih konstitutivnih elementa slobodnog delanja. U prvom delu članka, analiziraćemo Fukoov pojam heterotopije kako bismo ukazali na mogućnost one „prostorno posredovane“ samorefleksije koja veoma nalikuje na filozofsku askezu iz takozvane kasne faze njegovog dela. Potom ćemo razmotriti u kojoj meri Lefevrovo stanovište da javni prostor predstavlja hegelijansku konkretnu apstrakciju – koja sobom povlači dijalektičku analizu i praćenje složenih istorijskih protivrečnosti – dopunjuje i produbljuje vizuru koju uspostavlja Fuko svojim pojmom heterotopija. U tom smislu, biće pokazano da, uprkos svim razlikama u teorijskim polazištima, oba autora brane ideju jednog javnog prostora u kojem se brišu doznačavanja – kako bi se „otvorio prostor“ slobodnom delatniku. AB - In this paper we will try to offer a systematic insight into the relation of everyday practices and public space. By examining the work of two of the most influential authors in this field, Foucault and Lefebvre, we will try to provide a theoretical explanation of intuition that (public) space represents one of the key constitutive elements of free action. In the first part of the paper, we will consider Foucault’s notion of heterotopia in the interest of pointing towards a “spatially intermediated” self-reflection which, to a great degree, resembles the philosophical askesis form his so called letter work. Afterwards, we will consider in which sense Lefebvre’s position that public space represents a Hegelian concrete abstraction - which entails dialectical analysis and tracking of complex historical contradictions - complements and deepens perspective that Foucault puts before us in his heterotopias. In that vein, it will be shown that both authors, despite the difference in their theoretical starting points, defend the idea of such a public space in which all signifiers are removed in the interest of „opening space” for the free agent PB - Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore PB - Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja T2 - Sociologija T1 - Javni prostor i slobodno delanje: Fuko vs. Lefevr T1 - Public space and free action: Foucault vs. Lefebvre IS - 3 VL - 54 SP - 423 EP - 436 DO - 10.2298/SOC1203423P ER -
@article{ author = "Prodanović, Srđan and Krstić, Predrag", year = "2012", abstract = "U ovom članku nastojaćemo da ostvarimo sistematičan uvid u odnos između svakodnevnih praksi i javnog prostora. Kroz analizu radova dvojice uticajnih teoretičara iz ove oblasti, Fukoa i Lefevra, pokušaćemo da pružimo teorijsko obrazloženje intuiciji da (javni) prostor predstavlja jedan od osnovnih konstitutivnih elementa slobodnog delanja. U prvom delu članka, analiziraćemo Fukoov pojam heterotopije kako bismo ukazali na mogućnost one „prostorno posredovane“ samorefleksije koja veoma nalikuje na filozofsku askezu iz takozvane kasne faze njegovog dela. Potom ćemo razmotriti u kojoj meri Lefevrovo stanovište da javni prostor predstavlja hegelijansku konkretnu apstrakciju – koja sobom povlači dijalektičku analizu i praćenje složenih istorijskih protivrečnosti – dopunjuje i produbljuje vizuru koju uspostavlja Fuko svojim pojmom heterotopija. U tom smislu, biće pokazano da, uprkos svim razlikama u teorijskim polazištima, oba autora brane ideju jednog javnog prostora u kojem se brišu doznačavanja – kako bi se „otvorio prostor“ slobodnom delatniku., In this paper we will try to offer a systematic insight into the relation of everyday practices and public space. By examining the work of two of the most influential authors in this field, Foucault and Lefebvre, we will try to provide a theoretical explanation of intuition that (public) space represents one of the key constitutive elements of free action. In the first part of the paper, we will consider Foucault’s notion of heterotopia in the interest of pointing towards a “spatially intermediated” self-reflection which, to a great degree, resembles the philosophical askesis form his so called letter work. Afterwards, we will consider in which sense Lefebvre’s position that public space represents a Hegelian concrete abstraction - which entails dialectical analysis and tracking of complex historical contradictions - complements and deepens perspective that Foucault puts before us in his heterotopias. In that vein, it will be shown that both authors, despite the difference in their theoretical starting points, defend the idea of such a public space in which all signifiers are removed in the interest of „opening space” for the free agent", publisher = "Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja", journal = "Sociologija", title = "Javni prostor i slobodno delanje: Fuko vs. Lefevr, Public space and free action: Foucault vs. Lefebvre", number = "3", volume = "54", pages = "423-436", doi = "10.2298/SOC1203423P" }
Prodanović, S.,& Krstić, P.. (2012). Javni prostor i slobodno delanje: Fuko vs. Lefevr. in Sociologija Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore., 54(3), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1203423P
Prodanović S, Krstić P. Javni prostor i slobodno delanje: Fuko vs. Lefevr. in Sociologija. 2012;54(3):423-436. doi:10.2298/SOC1203423P .
Prodanović, Srđan, Krstić, Predrag, "Javni prostor i slobodno delanje: Fuko vs. Lefevr" in Sociologija, 54, no. 3 (2012):423-436, https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1203423P . .