The paper analyzes the theoretical opus of Bruno Latour and his treatment of
the concept of critique. In the first section “actor-network theory” is presented
through its key notions (actant, network, translation, associations) together with Latour’s theory of modernity. In the second section various aspects of the relation between Latour and critique are discussed – first his own criticism of others (standard
sociology and especially “critical”, i.e. Bourdieu’s sociology), then the criticisms
aimed at his work, to conclude with the political ambivalences of Latour’s attempt to
develop an “acritical” social theory
Keywords:
Bruno Latur / teorija aktera / kritika / modernity / sociology / mreže
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2007, 43-72
Publisher:
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
TY - JOUR
AU - Spasić, Ivana
PY - 2007
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/13
AB - The paper analyzes the theoretical opus of Bruno Latour and his treatment of
the concept of critique. In the first section “actor-network theory” is presented
through its key notions (actant, network, translation, associations) together with Latour’s theory of modernity. In the second section various aspects of the relation between Latour and critique are discussed – first his own criticism of others (standard
sociology and especially “critical”, i.e. Bourdieu’s sociology), then the criticisms
aimed at his work, to conclude with the political ambivalences of Latour’s attempt to
develop an “acritical” social theory
PB - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Bruno Latur, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije
SP - 43
EP - 72
DO - 10.2298/FID0702043S
ER -
@article{
author = "Spasić, Ivana",
year = "2007",
abstract = "The paper analyzes the theoretical opus of Bruno Latour and his treatment of
the concept of critique. In the first section “actor-network theory” is presented
through its key notions (actant, network, translation, associations) together with Latour’s theory of modernity. In the second section various aspects of the relation between Latour and critique are discussed – first his own criticism of others (standard
sociology and especially “critical”, i.e. Bourdieu’s sociology), then the criticisms
aimed at his work, to conclude with the political ambivalences of Latour’s attempt to
develop an “acritical” social theory",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Bruno Latur, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije",
pages = "43-72",
doi = "10.2298/FID0702043S"
}
Spasić, I.. (2007). Bruno Latur, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 43-72.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702043S
Spasić I. Bruno Latur, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2007;:43-72.
doi:10.2298/FID0702043S .
Spasić, Ivana, "Bruno Latur, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2007):43-72,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702043S . .
