Taking into account the difference between the ancient and modern (even postmodern) understandings of corruption, I am curious to explore why the bond linking corruption and sex seems so obvious. I have no intention of investigating both phenomena in the context of any moral category. What then did Flaubert have on his mind when he wrote that Rodolphe “treated Emma quite sans façon. He made of her something supple and corrupt.” What underpins the irresistible attraction between corruption and sex? Why is it impossible to eradicate corruption and repress sex and perceive them as solely functional strategies of generation and reproduction? This short outline follows certain philosophical remarks of Luce Irigaray and her thematization of the sexual difference in the demarcation of generation and corruption.
Keywords:
korupcija / corruption / sex / sexual difference / generation / Aristotle / irigaray / Madame Bovary / Flaubert / seks / polna razlika / nastajanje i propadanje / Aristotel / irigare / Gospođa Bovari / Flober
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2013, 21-32
TY - JOUR
AU - Milutinović Bojanić, Sanja
PY - 2013
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1324
AB - Taking into account the difference between the ancient and modern (even postmodern) understandings of corruption, I am curious to explore why the bond linking corruption and sex seems so obvious. I have no intention of investigating both phenomena in the context of any moral category. What then did Flaubert have on his mind when he wrote that Rodolphe “treated Emma quite sans façon. He made of her something supple and corrupt.” What underpins the irresistible attraction between corruption and sex? Why is it impossible to eradicate corruption and repress sex and perceive them as solely functional strategies of generation and reproduction? This short outline follows certain philosophical remarks of Luce Irigaray and her thematization of the sexual difference in the demarcation of generation and corruption.
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Korupcija i seks
T1 - Corruption and Sex
SP - 21
EP - 32
DO - 10.2298/FID1301021M
ER -
@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Milutinović Bojanić, Sanja",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Taking into account the difference between the ancient and modern (even postmodern) understandings of corruption, I am curious to explore why the bond linking corruption and sex seems so obvious. I have no intention of investigating both phenomena in the context of any moral category. What then did Flaubert have on his mind when he wrote that Rodolphe “treated Emma quite sans façon. He made of her something supple and corrupt.” What underpins the irresistible attraction between corruption and sex? Why is it impossible to eradicate corruption and repress sex and perceive them as solely functional strategies of generation and reproduction? This short outline follows certain philosophical remarks of Luce Irigaray and her thematization of the sexual difference in the demarcation of generation and corruption.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Korupcija i seks, Corruption and Sex",
pages = "21-32",
doi = "10.2298/FID1301021M"
}
Jovanov, R.,& Milutinović Bojanić, S.. (2013). Korupcija i seks. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 21-32.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1301021M
Jovanov R, Milutinović Bojanić S. Korupcija i seks. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2013;:21-32.
doi:10.2298/FID1301021M .
Jovanov, Rastko, Milutinović Bojanić, Sanja, "Korupcija i seks" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2013):21-32,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1301021M . .
