Liberalism Without Perfection elaborates a generally Rawlsian conception of public justification in order to defend antiperfectionist liberalism.
This critical response raises questions about the link between the two parts of the project. On the hand, it is possible to reject that demand that reasons
for political decisions pass a qualified acceptability requirement even if one is strictly opposed to paternalism. On the other hand, the commitment to public justifiability does not rule out all perfectionism, if there are some claims about the good that are not reasonably rejectable.
Keywords:
liberalism / public justification / perfectionism / javni um
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2014, 12-34
Publisher:
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
TY - JOUR
AU - Lister, Andrew
PY - 2014
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1300
AB - Liberalism Without Perfection elaborates a generally Rawlsian conception of public justification in order to defend antiperfectionist liberalism.
This critical response raises questions about the link between the two parts of the project. On the hand, it is possible to reject that demand that reasons
for political decisions pass a qualified acceptability requirement even if one is strictly opposed to paternalism. On the other hand, the commitment to public justifiability does not rule out all perfectionism, if there are some claims about the good that are not reasonably rejectable.
PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Public Reason and Perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s Liberalism Without Perfection
T1 - Javni um i perfekcionizam: komentari na Kvongovu knjigu Liberalizam bez savršenstva
SP - 12
EP - 34
DO - 10.2298/FID1401012L
ER -
@article{
author = "Lister, Andrew",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Liberalism Without Perfection elaborates a generally Rawlsian conception of public justification in order to defend antiperfectionist liberalism.
This critical response raises questions about the link between the two parts of the project. On the hand, it is possible to reject that demand that reasons
for political decisions pass a qualified acceptability requirement even if one is strictly opposed to paternalism. On the other hand, the commitment to public justifiability does not rule out all perfectionism, if there are some claims about the good that are not reasonably rejectable.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Public Reason and Perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s Liberalism Without Perfection, Javni um i perfekcionizam: komentari na Kvongovu knjigu Liberalizam bez savršenstva",
pages = "12-34",
doi = "10.2298/FID1401012L"
}
Lister, A.. (2014). Public Reason and Perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s Liberalism Without Perfection. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 12-34.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1401012L
Lister A. Public Reason and Perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s Liberalism Without Perfection. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2014;:12-34.
doi:10.2298/FID1401012L .
Lister, Andrew, "Public Reason and Perfectionism: Comments on Quong’s Liberalism Without Perfection" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2014):12-34,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1401012L . .
