All Publications

Link to this page

The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests

Ivković, Marjan; Petrović Trifunović, Tamara; Prodanović, Srđan


                                            

                                            
Ivković, M., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S..The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy
Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge., 61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591
Ivković M, Petrović Trifunović T, Prodanović S. The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy.:61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .
Ivković, Marjan, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests" in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy:61-79,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .

Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji

Prodanović, Srđan


                                            

                                            
Prodanović, S..Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji. in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 14(1), 203-222-203–222.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2590
Prodanović S. Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji. in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology.14(1):203-222-203–222.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2590 .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji" in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 14, no. 1:203-222-203–222,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2590 .

Izložbeni plakati "Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu"

Albahari, Biljana; Rezinović, Ornela

TY  - GEN
AU  - Albahari, Biljana
AU  - Rezinović, Ornela
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1912
UR  - http://www.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/secanje-na-holokaust/
AB  - Regionalni naučni centar Instituta za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju organizovao je u Novom Sadu od 18. do 21. aprila 2017. godine seriju događaja „Sećanje na Holokaust“, koja je sadržavala konferenciju „Holokaust i filozofija“, tribinu istoričara „Jevrejski identitet, antisemitizam i Holokaust“, jedan školski dan o Holokaustu „Lekcije za budućnost“ i simpozijum „Učiti o Holokaustu: utopija ili šansa – obrazovne prakse i pedagoški izazovi“. Čitavo događanje otvoreno je koncertom hora Jevrejske opštine Novi Sad – „Hašira“ i izložbom u novosadskoj Sinagogi pod nazivom „Pisanje stradanja: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu“ autorke, Bilјane Albahari i dizajnerke Ornele Rezinović. Izložbu je pratio katalog  koji ima odlike samostalne knjige. 
Cilј izložbe bio je da se jednim savremenim, a temi odgovarajućim dizajnerskim rešenjem, na upečatlјiv način predstavi izbor preko stotinu knjiga koje su o Holokaustu štampane u Srbiji i da se na taj način ukaže na neke od najvažnijih elemenata i događaja vezanih za istoriju Holokausta u okupiranoj Srbiji. Autorke se nadaju da su na taj način uspele da usklade zahteve profesionalnog izraza i neophodnog pijeteta primerenog težini teme. Izložbeni plakati tematski i hronološki prate odigravanje Holokausta: počinju od spalјivanja knjiga i Kristalne noći u nacističkoj Nemačkoj, preko nastajanja sabirnih centara, stratišta i internacijskih i koncentracionih logora, do tragičnih učinaka nastojanja da se masovno uništi jevrejski narod. Kroz individualne sudbine, lične i porodične priče, istoriografske dokumente i arhivsku građu svedoči se o jednom od najvećih zločina u istoriji čovečanstva. Deo izložbe koji se odnosi na posleratni period govori o hvatanju počinitelјa ratnih zločina, pravednicima koji su pomagali jevrejskim porodicama da prežive racije i progone, tumačenju Holokausta, kao i o pedagoškom radu na izučavanje Holokausta.
Izložbenu postavku obišli su učenici tokom školskog dana „Lekcije za budućnost“, koji se odvijao u sklopu ove manifestacije. Tom prilikom se potvrdilo da se predstavlјeni plakati (u štampanoj i digitalnoj formi), koje je Institut poklonio Narodnoj biblioteci Srbije, zajedno sa knjigom-katalogom mogu koristiti kao pokretna izložba ili kao dopunski, edukativni i prateći materijal za različite seminare, interaktivne časove i radionice posvećene ovoj temi.
AB  - 16 plakata u koloru veličine 70 x 100 cm
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Konferencija "Sećanje na Holokaust", 18-22 april 2017.
T1  - Izložbeni plakati "Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu"
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1912
ER  - 
@misc{
author = "Albahari, Biljana and Rezinović, Ornela",
abstract = "Regionalni naučni centar Instituta za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju organizovao je u Novom Sadu od 18. do 21. aprila 2017. godine seriju događaja „Sećanje na Holokaust“, koja je sadržavala konferenciju „Holokaust i filozofija“, tribinu istoričara „Jevrejski identitet, antisemitizam i Holokaust“, jedan školski dan o Holokaustu „Lekcije za budućnost“ i simpozijum „Učiti o Holokaustu: utopija ili šansa – obrazovne prakse i pedagoški izazovi“. Čitavo događanje otvoreno je koncertom hora Jevrejske opštine Novi Sad – „Hašira“ i izložbom u novosadskoj Sinagogi pod nazivom „Pisanje stradanja: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu“ autorke, Bilјane Albahari i dizajnerke Ornele Rezinović. Izložbu je pratio katalog  koji ima odlike samostalne knjige. 
Cilј izložbe bio je da se jednim savremenim, a temi odgovarajućim dizajnerskim rešenjem, na upečatlјiv način predstavi izbor preko stotinu knjiga koje su o Holokaustu štampane u Srbiji i da se na taj način ukaže na neke od najvažnijih elemenata i događaja vezanih za istoriju Holokausta u okupiranoj Srbiji. Autorke se nadaju da su na taj način uspele da usklade zahteve profesionalnog izraza i neophodnog pijeteta primerenog težini teme. Izložbeni plakati tematski i hronološki prate odigravanje Holokausta: počinju od spalјivanja knjiga i Kristalne noći u nacističkoj Nemačkoj, preko nastajanja sabirnih centara, stratišta i internacijskih i koncentracionih logora, do tragičnih učinaka nastojanja da se masovno uništi jevrejski narod. Kroz individualne sudbine, lične i porodične priče, istoriografske dokumente i arhivsku građu svedoči se o jednom od najvećih zločina u istoriji čovečanstva. Deo izložbe koji se odnosi na posleratni period govori o hvatanju počinitelјa ratnih zločina, pravednicima koji su pomagali jevrejskim porodicama da prežive racije i progone, tumačenju Holokausta, kao i o pedagoškom radu na izučavanje Holokausta.
Izložbenu postavku obišli su učenici tokom školskog dana „Lekcije za budućnost“, koji se odvijao u sklopu ove manifestacije. Tom prilikom se potvrdilo da se predstavlјeni plakati (u štampanoj i digitalnoj formi), koje je Institut poklonio Narodnoj biblioteci Srbije, zajedno sa knjigom-katalogom mogu koristiti kao pokretna izložba ili kao dopunski, edukativni i prateći materijal za različite seminare, interaktivne časove i radionice posvećene ovoj temi., 16 plakata u koloru veličine 70 x 100 cm",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Konferencija "Sećanje na Holokaust", 18-22 april 2017.",
title = "Izložbeni plakati "Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu"",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1912"
}
Albahari, B.,& Rezinović, O..Izložbeni plakati "Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu". in Konferencija "Sećanje na Holokaust", 18-22 april 2017.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1912
Albahari B, Rezinović O. Izložbeni plakati "Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu". in Konferencija "Sećanje na Holokaust", 18-22 april 2017...
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1912 .
Albahari, Biljana, Rezinović, Ornela, "Izložbeni plakati "Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama: vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu"" in Konferencija "Sećanje na Holokaust", 18-22 april 2017.,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1912 .

Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma

Radovanovic, Bojana; Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanovic, Bojana
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3205
AB  - U ovom radu autori nastoje da ponude pregled različitih učenja koja se
svrstavaju pod kapu humanizma. Mada se rad prevashodno usredsređuje na humani-
stičke doktrine, teoriju humanizma često nije jednostavno razlučiti od huma-
nizma u praksi, te će svakako biti referisano na različite praktične programe
humanizma. I u jednom i u drugom slučaju ispostavlja se da je humanizam toliko
razuđen, ako ne i bezobalan pojam, da je možda uputnije govoriti o humanizmima, u
množini. Iako jedan pregledni članak ne može da predoči podrobnu i sveobuhvatnu
istoriju (ideje) humanizma i sve varijacije kroz koje je on prošao i prolazi kod
svojih značajnih zastupnika, autori veruju da čitaocima može pružiti osnov za
razumevanje i okvir za dalja istraživanja i promišljanja humanizma/humanizama.
AB  - In this paper, the authors have offered an overview of various teachings that fall
under the umbrella of humanism. Although the paper primarily focuses on the humanist
doctrine, it is often not easy to distinguish the theory of humanism from humanism in
practice. In both cases, it turns out that humanism is such a wide-ranging concept that
perhaps it is instructive to talk about humanisms instead. Although a single review article
cannot present a detailed and comprehensive history of (the idea of) humanism and all
the variations it has gone through, the authors believe that this work can provide readers
with a basis for understanding and a framework for further research and reflection on
humanism/humanisms.
PB  - Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka
T2  - Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy
T1  - Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma
VL  - 177
SP  - 5
EP  - 21
DO  - 10.5937/kultura2277005K
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Radovanovic, Bojana and Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
abstract = "U ovom radu autori nastoje da ponude pregled različitih učenja koja se
svrstavaju pod kapu humanizma. Mada se rad prevashodno usredsređuje na humani-
stičke doktrine, teoriju humanizma često nije jednostavno razlučiti od huma-
nizma u praksi, te će svakako biti referisano na različite praktične programe
humanizma. I u jednom i u drugom slučaju ispostavlja se da je humanizam toliko
razuđen, ako ne i bezobalan pojam, da je možda uputnije govoriti o humanizmima, u
množini. Iako jedan pregledni članak ne može da predoči podrobnu i sveobuhvatnu
istoriju (ideje) humanizma i sve varijacije kroz koje je on prošao i prolazi kod
svojih značajnih zastupnika, autori veruju da čitaocima može pružiti osnov za
razumevanje i okvir za dalja istraživanja i promišljanja humanizma/humanizama., In this paper, the authors have offered an overview of various teachings that fall
under the umbrella of humanism. Although the paper primarily focuses on the humanist
doctrine, it is often not easy to distinguish the theory of humanism from humanism in
practice. In both cases, it turns out that humanism is such a wide-ranging concept that
perhaps it is instructive to talk about humanisms instead. Although a single review article
cannot present a detailed and comprehensive history of (the idea of) humanism and all
the variations it has gone through, the authors believe that this work can provide readers
with a basis for understanding and a framework for further research and reflection on
humanism/humanisms.",
publisher = "Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka",
journal = "Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy",
title = "Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma",
volume = "177",
pages = "5-21",
doi = "10.5937/kultura2277005K"
}
Radovanovic, B.,& Krstić, P.. (2023). Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma. in Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy
Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka., 177, 5-21.
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2277005K
Radovanovic B, Krstić P. Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma. in Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy. 2023;177:5-21.
doi:10.5937/kultura2277005K .
Radovanovic, Bojana, Krstić, Predrag, "Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma" in Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy, 177 (2023):5-21,
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2277005K . .

Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme

Radovanovic, Bojana; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanovic, Bojana
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3008
AB  - Rad se bavi preciznijim određivanjem pojmova opšteg dobra, javnog
interesa i zajedničkog sagledavajući njihovu upotrebu u političkoj filozofiji i
političkim naukama u istorijskoj perspektivi. Opšte dobro je od davnina bila jedna
od ključnih tema moralne i političke filozofije. Danas se kao sinonim za termin
opšteg dobra često koristi pojam javnog interesa. Ipak, nastojaćemo da pokažemo
da oni nose donekle drugačije značenje. Skorašnji značajan odjek dugovekovne
debate o opštem dobru može se prepoznati u raspravama oko pojma zajedničkog
(eng. commons) koji se odnosi na kulturne, materijalne i intelektualne resurse na
čije korišćenje pravo polažu svi članovi određene zajednice. Sva tri pojma pomažu
dubljem razumevanju dobrobiti zajednice i načina da se ta dobrobit ostvari, iako
proučavani autori u svojim teorijama različito naglašavaju značaj kolektiviteta ili
individue. Pojam opšteg dobra se, posebno za predmoderne mislioce, odnosio na
dobro zajednice iz kojeg sledi dobro njenih članova, pa se stoga pozivanje na interese
pojedinaca smatralo nemoralnim. Kasnije, s razvojem koncepta javnog interesa,
pojedinac je postavljen u centar promišljanja, a dobrobit zajednice dovedena
u vezu sa onim što je u interesu njenih članova. Naposletku, pojam zajedničkog
vraća kolektivitet u igru, a „zajedništvo“ postaje ključni termin u rešavanju pitanja
degradacije i održivosti širokog spektra dobara.
AB  - The paper endeavours to offer a closer definition of the concepts
of common good, public interest and the commons, analysing their usage in a
contemporary and historical perspective. The common good has been one of the key
subjects of moral and political philosophy since ancient times. Today, the term public
interest is often used as a synonym for the term common good. However, we will try
to show that they carry a somewhat different meaning. A recent significant echo of
the long-standing debate on the common good can be recognized in the discussions
surrounding the concept of commons, which refers to cultural, material and
intellectual resources to which all members of a community claim the right to use.
All three notions contribute to a deeper understanding of community well-being and
the way to realize that well-being. However, authors that are studied in the paper
emphasize differently the importance of the collectivity and the individual in that
process. The concept of the common good, especially for pre-modern thinkers, refers
to the good of the community from which follows the good of its members, while
the appealing to the interests of individuals is considered immoral. Later, with the
development of the concept of public interest, the individual is placed in the centre
of consideration, and the well-being of the community is brought into relation with
what is in the interest of its members. Ultimately, the notion of the commons brings
the collectivity back to focus, and “togetherness” becomes a key term in addressing
the issues of degradation and sustainability of a wide range of goods.
PB  - Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme
IS  - 3
VL  - LXV
SP  - 337
EP  - 355
DO  - 10.2298/SOC221116015R
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Radovanovic, Bojana and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Rad se bavi preciznijim određivanjem pojmova opšteg dobra, javnog
interesa i zajedničkog sagledavajući njihovu upotrebu u političkoj filozofiji i
političkim naukama u istorijskoj perspektivi. Opšte dobro je od davnina bila jedna
od ključnih tema moralne i političke filozofije. Danas se kao sinonim za termin
opšteg dobra često koristi pojam javnog interesa. Ipak, nastojaćemo da pokažemo
da oni nose donekle drugačije značenje. Skorašnji značajan odjek dugovekovne
debate o opštem dobru može se prepoznati u raspravama oko pojma zajedničkog
(eng. commons) koji se odnosi na kulturne, materijalne i intelektualne resurse na
čije korišćenje pravo polažu svi članovi određene zajednice. Sva tri pojma pomažu
dubljem razumevanju dobrobiti zajednice i načina da se ta dobrobit ostvari, iako
proučavani autori u svojim teorijama različito naglašavaju značaj kolektiviteta ili
individue. Pojam opšteg dobra se, posebno za predmoderne mislioce, odnosio na
dobro zajednice iz kojeg sledi dobro njenih članova, pa se stoga pozivanje na interese
pojedinaca smatralo nemoralnim. Kasnije, s razvojem koncepta javnog interesa,
pojedinac je postavljen u centar promišljanja, a dobrobit zajednice dovedena
u vezu sa onim što je u interesu njenih članova. Naposletku, pojam zajedničkog
vraća kolektivitet u igru, a „zajedništvo“ postaje ključni termin u rešavanju pitanja
degradacije i održivosti širokog spektra dobara., The paper endeavours to offer a closer definition of the concepts
of common good, public interest and the commons, analysing their usage in a
contemporary and historical perspective. The common good has been one of the key
subjects of moral and political philosophy since ancient times. Today, the term public
interest is often used as a synonym for the term common good. However, we will try
to show that they carry a somewhat different meaning. A recent significant echo of
the long-standing debate on the common good can be recognized in the discussions
surrounding the concept of commons, which refers to cultural, material and
intellectual resources to which all members of a community claim the right to use.
All three notions contribute to a deeper understanding of community well-being and
the way to realize that well-being. However, authors that are studied in the paper
emphasize differently the importance of the collectivity and the individual in that
process. The concept of the common good, especially for pre-modern thinkers, refers
to the good of the community from which follows the good of its members, while
the appealing to the interests of individuals is considered immoral. Later, with the
development of the concept of public interest, the individual is placed in the centre
of consideration, and the well-being of the community is brought into relation with
what is in the interest of its members. Ultimately, the notion of the commons brings
the collectivity back to focus, and “togetherness” becomes a key term in addressing
the issues of degradation and sustainability of a wide range of goods.",
publisher = "Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme",
number = "3",
volume = "LXV",
pages = "337-355",
doi = "10.2298/SOC221116015R"
}
Radovanovic, B.,& Prodanović, S.. (2023). Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme. in Sociologija
Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije., LXV(3), 337-355.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC221116015R
Radovanovic B, Prodanović S. Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme. in Sociologija. 2023;LXV(3):337-355.
doi:10.2298/SOC221116015R .
Radovanovic, Bojana, Prodanović, Srđan, "Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme" in Sociologija, LXV, no. 3 (2023):337-355,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC221116015R . .

Humanitarizam vs. humanizam

Krstic, Predrag; Radovanović, Bojana

(Zagreb : Udruga za promicanje filozofije, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstic, Predrag
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3656
AB  - Rad predstavlja svojevrsnu apologiju humanitarizma. U njemu se navode motivi i argumenti koji ga suprotstavljaju humanizmu. Prvi dio rada posvećen je, međutim, njihovom zajedničkom povijesnom nastupu – ne bi li se uočilo da se ne mogu neproturječno smatrati istovjetnim ili nadopunjavajućim. Drugi dio rada izlaže glavne tipove suvremene kritike humanizma i proishodećih “ideologija”, dok se u trećem dijelu rada, nadovezujući se na njih, ilustrativno zagovara humanitaristička alternativa kao protuotrov humanističkoj “aroganciji”. U završnom dijelu rada iskušavaju se dileme i granice važenja humanitarizma, ne bi li se, u protustavu prema humanizmu, odredila domena njegovog prava i predložio jedan njegov odmjeren – korektivni i regulatorni – diskurzivni i djelatni status.
AB  - The work represents a kind of apology for humanitarianism. It states the motives and arguments that oppose it to humanism. However, the first part of the work is dedicated to their joint historical appearance––to notice that they cannot be considered identical or complementary without contradiction. The second part of the paper presents the main types of contemporary criticism of humanism and the resulting “ideologies” while the third part of the paper, building on them, illustratively advocates a humanitarian alternative as an antidote to humanistic “arrogance.” In the final part of the work, the dilemmas and limits of the validity of humanitarianism are tested to determine the domain of its right in opposition to humanism and propose its well-measured––corrective and regulatory––discursive and effective status.
PB  - Zagreb : Udruga za promicanje filozofije
T2  - Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju
T1  - Humanitarizam vs. humanizam
IS  - 2
VL  - 22
SP  - 207
EP  - 229
DO  - 10.26362/20230203
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstic, Predrag and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Rad predstavlja svojevrsnu apologiju humanitarizma. U njemu se navode motivi i argumenti koji ga suprotstavljaju humanizmu. Prvi dio rada posvećen je, međutim, njihovom zajedničkom povijesnom nastupu – ne bi li se uočilo da se ne mogu neproturječno smatrati istovjetnim ili nadopunjavajućim. Drugi dio rada izlaže glavne tipove suvremene kritike humanizma i proishodećih “ideologija”, dok se u trećem dijelu rada, nadovezujući se na njih, ilustrativno zagovara humanitaristička alternativa kao protuotrov humanističkoj “aroganciji”. U završnom dijelu rada iskušavaju se dileme i granice važenja humanitarizma, ne bi li se, u protustavu prema humanizmu, odredila domena njegovog prava i predložio jedan njegov odmjeren – korektivni i regulatorni – diskurzivni i djelatni status., The work represents a kind of apology for humanitarianism. It states the motives and arguments that oppose it to humanism. However, the first part of the work is dedicated to their joint historical appearance––to notice that they cannot be considered identical or complementary without contradiction. The second part of the paper presents the main types of contemporary criticism of humanism and the resulting “ideologies” while the third part of the paper, building on them, illustratively advocates a humanitarian alternative as an antidote to humanistic “arrogance.” In the final part of the work, the dilemmas and limits of the validity of humanitarianism are tested to determine the domain of its right in opposition to humanism and propose its well-measured––corrective and regulatory––discursive and effective status.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Udruga za promicanje filozofije",
journal = "Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju",
title = "Humanitarizam vs. humanizam",
number = "2",
volume = "22",
pages = "207-229",
doi = "10.26362/20230203"
}
Krstic, P.,& Radovanović, B.. (2023). Humanitarizam vs. humanizam. in Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju
Zagreb : Udruga za promicanje filozofije., 22(2), 207-229.
https://doi.org/10.26362/20230203
Krstic P, Radovanović B. Humanitarizam vs. humanizam. in Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju. 2023;22(2):207-229.
doi:10.26362/20230203 .
Krstic, Predrag, Radovanović, Bojana, "Humanitarizam vs. humanizam" in Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju, 22, no. 2 (2023):207-229,
https://doi.org/10.26362/20230203 . .

Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam

Cvetković, Vladimir

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Cvetković, Vladimir
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3468
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci
T2  - Holokaust i teologija
T1  - Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam
SP  - 92
EP  - 126
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Cvetković, Vladimir",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci",
journal = "Holokaust i teologija",
booktitle = "Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam",
pages = "92-126",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468"
}
Cvetković, V.. (2023). Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam. in Holokaust i teologija
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci., 92-126.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468
Cvetković V. Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam. in Holokaust i teologija. 2023;:92-126.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468 .
Cvetković, Vladimir, "Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam" in Holokaust i teologija (2023):92-126,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468 .

Nasleđe Edipove sfinge: udes samoidentifikovanja

Krstić, Predrag M.

(Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag M.
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3217
AB  - Рад излаже историју саморазумевања човека пратећи промене кроз које је пролазило разумевање митског сусрета Едипа и Сфинге. Прво се детектује образац према коме модерна у Едипу препознаје и слави тријумф човека над природом и његово одговарајуће уздизање у сувереног субјекта. Средишњи део рада нуди преглед савремених (ре)интерпретација Сфингиног наслеђа које сугеришу пожељност или неопходност „нове митологије”. Оне врхуне у налазу да је Едип, у компулзивном настојању да потпуно рашчара свет, прогнао сваку тајну и занос из њега, па је дошло доба за његово „поновно зачаравање”. Завршни део рада искушава и препоручује трећу стратегију: просветитељско демитологизовање просветитељства као последњег мита, разоткривење да је Едип тајна Сфинге, да је она његов конструкт. Стога је на њему да преузме одговорност за пројекције произашле из несигурности у властити идентитет и статус у свету, уместо да митским
представама обнавља образац непријатељског држања према природи и свему различитом од себе.
AB  - The paper seeks to signalize the history of human self-understanding through the changes that the mythical encounter between Oedipus and the Sphinx underwent. First, a pattern is detected according to which the modern in Oedipus recognizes and celebrates the triumph of man over nature and his corresponding elevation into a sovereign subject. The central part of the paper offers an overview of contemporary (re)interpretations that restore the right to the Sphinx and suggest the desirability or necessity of a “new mythology”. The central part of the paper offers an overview of those contemporary (re)interpretations that restore the right of the Sphinx and suggests the desirability or necessity of a “new mythology”. The finding is that Oedipus, in a compulsive endeavour to completely disenchant the world, banished every secret
and ecstasy from it, so the time has come for its “re-enchantment”. The final part of the paper tests and recommends a third strategy: the Enlightenment’s demythologization of the Enlightenment as the last myth, revealing that Oedipus is the secret of the Sphinx, his construct. That is why it is his responsibility for insecurity into his own identity and status in the world not to move narcissistically onto projections of everything different from himself that he has subjugated or will subjugate, but, for the sake of both himself and the world, less intimidated, more peacefully and in solidarity approach to it.
PB  - Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет
T2  - Наслеђе: часопис за књижевност, језик, уметност и културу
T1  - Nasleđe Edipove sfinge: udes samoidentifikovanja
T1  - The heritage of Oedipus’ Sphinx: the destiny of self-identification
IS  - 55
VL  - 20
SP  - 167
EP  - 181
DO  - 141.319.8:7.046.1
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag M.",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Рад излаже историју саморазумевања човека пратећи промене кроз које је пролазило разумевање митског сусрета Едипа и Сфинге. Прво се детектује образац према коме модерна у Едипу препознаје и слави тријумф човека над природом и његово одговарајуће уздизање у сувереног субјекта. Средишњи део рада нуди преглед савремених (ре)интерпретација Сфингиног наслеђа које сугеришу пожељност или неопходност „нове митологије”. Оне врхуне у налазу да је Едип, у компулзивном настојању да потпуно рашчара свет, прогнао сваку тајну и занос из њега, па је дошло доба за његово „поновно зачаравање”. Завршни део рада искушава и препоручује трећу стратегију: просветитељско демитологизовање просветитељства као последњег мита, разоткривење да је Едип тајна Сфинге, да је она његов конструкт. Стога је на њему да преузме одговорност за пројекције произашле из несигурности у властити идентитет и статус у свету, уместо да митским
представама обнавља образац непријатељског држања према природи и свему различитом од себе., The paper seeks to signalize the history of human self-understanding through the changes that the mythical encounter between Oedipus and the Sphinx underwent. First, a pattern is detected according to which the modern in Oedipus recognizes and celebrates the triumph of man over nature and his corresponding elevation into a sovereign subject. The central part of the paper offers an overview of contemporary (re)interpretations that restore the right to the Sphinx and suggest the desirability or necessity of a “new mythology”. The central part of the paper offers an overview of those contemporary (re)interpretations that restore the right of the Sphinx and suggests the desirability or necessity of a “new mythology”. The finding is that Oedipus, in a compulsive endeavour to completely disenchant the world, banished every secret
and ecstasy from it, so the time has come for its “re-enchantment”. The final part of the paper tests and recommends a third strategy: the Enlightenment’s demythologization of the Enlightenment as the last myth, revealing that Oedipus is the secret of the Sphinx, his construct. That is why it is his responsibility for insecurity into his own identity and status in the world not to move narcissistically onto projections of everything different from himself that he has subjugated or will subjugate, but, for the sake of both himself and the world, less intimidated, more peacefully and in solidarity approach to it.",
publisher = "Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет",
journal = "Наслеђе: часопис за књижевност, језик, уметност и културу",
title = "Nasleđe Edipove sfinge: udes samoidentifikovanja, The heritage of Oedipus’ Sphinx: the destiny of self-identification",
number = "55",
volume = "20",
pages = "167-181",
doi = "141.319.8:7.046.1"
}
Krstić, P. M.. (2023). Nasleđe Edipove sfinge: udes samoidentifikovanja. in Наслеђе: часопис за књижевност, језик, уметност и културу
Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет., 20(55), 167-181.
https://doi.org/141.319.8:7.046.1
Krstić PM. Nasleđe Edipove sfinge: udes samoidentifikovanja. in Наслеђе: часопис за књижевност, језик, уметност и културу. 2023;20(55):167-181.
doi:141.319.8:7.046.1 .
Krstić, Predrag M., "Nasleđe Edipove sfinge: udes samoidentifikovanja" in Наслеђе: часопис за књижевност, језик, уметност и културу, 20, no. 55 (2023):167-181,
https://doi.org/141.319.8:7.046.1 . .

Ja sam onaj koji nisam: prilog aporiji individualizma "Brianova života"

Krstić, Predrag

(Zagreb : Hrvatski filmski savez, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3169
AB  - U ovom članku se moderne dileme razumevanja pojedinca izlažu kroz jednu scenu filma "Brianov život" (Life of Brian, Terry Jones, 1979). Brianov govor okupljenim sledbenicima i reakcije na njega, na tipičan i duhovit način reprezentuju konceptualne nevolje kako prosvetiteljske "ideologije individualizma" koja pojedinca suprotstavlja i pretpostavlja kolektivu tako i njenog nejednoznačnag nastavka u romantičarskom favorizovanju "individualnosti". Posebna pažnja se pritom posvećuje dinamičnoj putanji kojom je istovremeno i forsirana i proširivana posebnost pojedinačne ličnosti, sve do njenog utapanja u nadlične entitete. U
zaključku se sugeriše da se savremeno shvatanje "pojedinca" i po cenu paradoksa koji svedoči o njegovoj krhkoj teorijskoj konstrukciji, sa "poslednje nedeljivosti" pomerilo ka negaciji svake podvedenosti, uključujući i onu koja ga afirmiše.
PB  - Zagreb : Hrvatski filmski savez
T2  - Hrvatski filmski ljetopis
T1  - Ja sam onaj koji nisam: prilog aporiji individualizma "Brianova života"
IS  - 113
VL  - 29
SP  - 41
EP  - 52
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3169
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
abstract = "U ovom članku se moderne dileme razumevanja pojedinca izlažu kroz jednu scenu filma "Brianov život" (Life of Brian, Terry Jones, 1979). Brianov govor okupljenim sledbenicima i reakcije na njega, na tipičan i duhovit način reprezentuju konceptualne nevolje kako prosvetiteljske "ideologije individualizma" koja pojedinca suprotstavlja i pretpostavlja kolektivu tako i njenog nejednoznačnag nastavka u romantičarskom favorizovanju "individualnosti". Posebna pažnja se pritom posvećuje dinamičnoj putanji kojom je istovremeno i forsirana i proširivana posebnost pojedinačne ličnosti, sve do njenog utapanja u nadlične entitete. U
zaključku se sugeriše da se savremeno shvatanje "pojedinca" i po cenu paradoksa koji svedoči o njegovoj krhkoj teorijskoj konstrukciji, sa "poslednje nedeljivosti" pomerilo ka negaciji svake podvedenosti, uključujući i onu koja ga afirmiše.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Hrvatski filmski savez",
journal = "Hrvatski filmski ljetopis",
title = "Ja sam onaj koji nisam: prilog aporiji individualizma "Brianova života"",
number = "113",
volume = "29",
pages = "41-52",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3169"
}
Krstić, P.. (2023). Ja sam onaj koji nisam: prilog aporiji individualizma "Brianova života". in Hrvatski filmski ljetopis
Zagreb : Hrvatski filmski savez., 29(113), 41-52.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3169
Krstić P. Ja sam onaj koji nisam: prilog aporiji individualizma "Brianova života". in Hrvatski filmski ljetopis. 2023;29(113):41-52.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3169 .
Krstić, Predrag, "Ja sam onaj koji nisam: prilog aporiji individualizma "Brianova života"" in Hrvatski filmski ljetopis, 29, no. 113 (2023):41-52,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3169 .

Ženski rod prosvećenosti: između elitnih i egalitarnih salona

Krstić, Predrag

(Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3105
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Salon i društvenost: žene od/za pera?
T1  - Ženski rod prosvećenosti: između elitnih i egalitarnih salona
SP  - 9
EP  - 30
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3105
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Salon i društvenost: žene od/za pera?",
booktitle = "Ženski rod prosvećenosti: između elitnih i egalitarnih salona",
pages = "9-30",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3105"
}
Krstić, P.. (2023). Ženski rod prosvećenosti: između elitnih i egalitarnih salona. in Salon i društvenost: žene od/za pera?
Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 9-30.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3105
Krstić P. Ženski rod prosvećenosti: između elitnih i egalitarnih salona. in Salon i društvenost: žene od/za pera?. 2023;:9-30.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3105 .
Krstić, Predrag, "Ženski rod prosvećenosti: između elitnih i egalitarnih salona" in Salon i društvenost: žene od/za pera? (2023):9-30,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3105 .

Empirical Embodiment of Critical Rationalism: Deliberative Theory and Open Society

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Krstić, Predrag

(Budapest ; Vienna ; New York : CEU Press, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3104
PB  - Budapest ; Vienna ; New York : CEU Press
T2  - Open Society Unresolved: The Contemporary Relevance of a Contested Idea
T1  - Empirical Embodiment of Critical Rationalism: Deliberative Theory and Open Society
SP  - 59
EP  - 71
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3104
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Budapest ; Vienna ; New York : CEU Press",
journal = "Open Society Unresolved: The Contemporary Relevance of a Contested Idea",
booktitle = "Empirical Embodiment of Critical Rationalism: Deliberative Theory and Open Society",
pages = "59-71",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3104"
}
Pudar Draško, G.,& Krstić, P.. (2023). Empirical Embodiment of Critical Rationalism: Deliberative Theory and Open Society. in Open Society Unresolved: The Contemporary Relevance of a Contested Idea
Budapest ; Vienna ; New York : CEU Press., 59-71.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3104
Pudar Draško G, Krstić P. Empirical Embodiment of Critical Rationalism: Deliberative Theory and Open Society. in Open Society Unresolved: The Contemporary Relevance of a Contested Idea. 2023;:59-71.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3104 .
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Krstić, Predrag, "Empirical Embodiment of Critical Rationalism: Deliberative Theory and Open Society" in Open Society Unresolved: The Contemporary Relevance of a Contested Idea (2023):59-71,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3104 .

Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?

Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3103
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet
T2  - Holokaust i teologija
T1  - Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?
SP  - 204
EP  - 226
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Holokaust i teologija",
booktitle = "Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?",
pages = "204-226",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103"
}
Krstić, P.. (2023). Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?. in Holokaust i teologija
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet., 204-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103
Krstić P. Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?. in Holokaust i teologija. 2023;:204-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103 .
Krstić, Predrag, "Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?" in Holokaust i teologija (2023):204-226,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103 .

Kako TEO-retizovati Holokaust?

Krstić, Predrag; Mevorah, Vera; Šarić, Željko

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Mevorah, Vera
AU  - Šarić, Željko
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3102
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet
T2  - Holokaust i teologija
T1  - Kako TEO-retizovati Holokaust?
SP  - 7
EP  - 20
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3102
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Mevorah, Vera and Šarić, Željko",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Holokaust i teologija",
booktitle = "Kako TEO-retizovati Holokaust?",
pages = "7-20",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3102"
}
Krstić, P., Mevorah, V.,& Šarić, Ž.. (2023). Kako TEO-retizovati Holokaust?. in Holokaust i teologija
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet., 7-20.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3102
Krstić P, Mevorah V, Šarić Ž. Kako TEO-retizovati Holokaust?. in Holokaust i teologija. 2023;:7-20.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3102 .
Krstić, Predrag, Mevorah, Vera, Šarić, Željko, "Kako TEO-retizovati Holokaust?" in Holokaust i teologija (2023):7-20,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3102 .

Preobražaji republike ljudi od pera u doba prosvetitelj(stv)a

Krstić, Predrag

(Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3100
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike
T1  - Preobražaji republike ljudi od pera u doba prosvetitelj(stv)a
SP  - 9
EP  - 29
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3100
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike",
booktitle = "Preobražaji republike ljudi od pera u doba prosvetitelj(stv)a",
pages = "9-29",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3100"
}
Krstić, P.. (2023). Preobražaji republike ljudi od pera u doba prosvetitelj(stv)a. in Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike
Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 9-29.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3100
Krstić P. Preobražaji republike ljudi od pera u doba prosvetitelj(stv)a. in Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike. 2023;:9-29.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3100 .
Krstić, Predrag, "Preobražaji republike ljudi od pera u doba prosvetitelj(stv)a" in Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike (2023):9-29,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3100 .

Kako smo oduvek bili posthumani?

Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu ; Dosije sudio, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3023
AB  - Rad problematizuje opravdanost „postističkih“ revizija humanizma. U prvom delu rada izlaže se ona misaona linija razumevanja čoveka koja čoveka vidi kao hronično manjkavog za vlastitu „prirodu“ ili „suštinu“ i koja od te neukorenjenosti gradi njegov privilegovan status. Drugi deo rada posvećen je odnosu transhumanizma i kritičkog posthumanizma prema humanizmu. Nalazi se da transhumanizam skladno nastavlja i/ili radikalizuje humanistički projekt samotvoračkog i samotranscendirajućeg čoveka, dok kritički posthumanizam radije zagovara ponovno promišljanje i redeskripiciju čoveka s obzirom na ono što smatra da su bile pogubne posledice humanizma. Zaključni deo rada detektuje izvesnu proizvoljnost u razumevanju humanizma njegovih kritičara, podseća da su se i unutar humanizma baštinili kritički momenti kao njegov vlastiti sadržaj i korektiv, te da su možda suvišne objave radikalnih rezova i raskida sa humanističkom tradicijom. Sugeriše se jedno sinoptičko sagledavanje humanističkih orijentira i njihovih posthumanističkih osuda, koje bi uvažilo i baštinu humanističke misli i obavezu njenog kritičkog preispitivanja.
AB  - This paper problematises the justification of ‘postist’ revisions of humanism. In
the first part of the paper, a line of thought that persistently marks the self-perception of man is presented. It stretches from Plato, through Pico della Mirandola and
Kant, all the way to existentialism and philosophical anthropology in the twentieth
century. In it, man is understood as chronically deficient in their own ‘nature’ or
‘essence’, and his privileged status is built from this rootlessness. The second part
of the paper is dedicated to the relationship of transhumanism and critical posthumanism to humanism. Transhumanism is found to harmoniously continue and/or
radicalise the humanist project of self-creating and self-transcending man, while
critical posthumanism advocates a rethinking and redescription of man in view
of what are considered to have been the disastrous consequences of humanism: a
transgression in relation to everything different from man by anthropomorphising
it and anthropocentrically measuring it against himself. The concluding part of the
paper detects a certain arbitrariness in the understanding of humanism by its critics,
reminds that even within such a broadly understood humanism, critical moments
have been inherited as its own content and corrective, and that announcements of
radical cuts and ruptures with the humanistic tradition are perhaps redundant. It
is also noted that something non-negligible has changed with the contemporary
challenges of technoscience – artificial intelligence, informatics, robotics –but it is
contested that this change in social history requires a cardinal rejection, change or
neglect of the intellectual heritage that enables responses to it and/or a rational dispute about it. A synoptic overview of humanist landmarks and their post-humanist
condemnations is suggested, which would respect the heritage of humanist thought
and the right or even the obligation built into it of its critical review
AB  - L’article problématise le bien-fondé des révisions « postistes » de l’humanisme. Dans la première partie de ce travail est exposée cette ligne de pensée
qui conçoit l’homme comme chroniquement incomplet dans sa propre « nature
» ou « essence » et qui de ce déracinement construit son statut privilégié. La
deuxième partie de ce travail est consacrée au rapport du transhumanisme et du
posthumanisme critique envers l’humanisme. Il est démontré que le transhumanisme continue et/ou radicalise harmonieusement le projet humaniste de
l’homme autocréateur et autotranscendant, alors que le transhumanisme critique
préfère opter pour le réexamen et la redescription de l’homme étant donné ce
qu’il considère comme les conséquences néfastes de l’humanisme. La partie
conclusive de l’article détecte un certain arbitraire dans la compréhension de
l’humanisme de la part de ses critiques, rappelle qu’à l’intérieur de l’humanisme s’étaient aussi développés des éléments critiques qui faisaient partie de
son propre contenu et de son correctif, enfin que les annonces des séparations
et ruptures radicales avec la tradition humaniste sont peut-être superflues. Il est
suggéré qu’une analyse synoptique des repères humanistes et de leurs condamnations posthumanistes, prendrait en compte et le patrimoine de la pensée humaniste et l’obligation de son réexamen critique
PB  - Beograd : Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu ; Dosije sudio
T2  - Etnoantropološki problemi
T1  - Kako smo oduvek bili posthumani?
T1  - How Have We Always Been Posthuman?
IS  - 2
VL  - 18
SP  - 329
EP  - 350
DO  - 10.21301/eap.v18i2.1
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Rad problematizuje opravdanost „postističkih“ revizija humanizma. U prvom delu rada izlaže se ona misaona linija razumevanja čoveka koja čoveka vidi kao hronično manjkavog za vlastitu „prirodu“ ili „suštinu“ i koja od te neukorenjenosti gradi njegov privilegovan status. Drugi deo rada posvećen je odnosu transhumanizma i kritičkog posthumanizma prema humanizmu. Nalazi se da transhumanizam skladno nastavlja i/ili radikalizuje humanistički projekt samotvoračkog i samotranscendirajućeg čoveka, dok kritički posthumanizam radije zagovara ponovno promišljanje i redeskripiciju čoveka s obzirom na ono što smatra da su bile pogubne posledice humanizma. Zaključni deo rada detektuje izvesnu proizvoljnost u razumevanju humanizma njegovih kritičara, podseća da su se i unutar humanizma baštinili kritički momenti kao njegov vlastiti sadržaj i korektiv, te da su možda suvišne objave radikalnih rezova i raskida sa humanističkom tradicijom. Sugeriše se jedno sinoptičko sagledavanje humanističkih orijentira i njihovih posthumanističkih osuda, koje bi uvažilo i baštinu humanističke misli i obavezu njenog kritičkog preispitivanja., This paper problematises the justification of ‘postist’ revisions of humanism. In
the first part of the paper, a line of thought that persistently marks the self-perception of man is presented. It stretches from Plato, through Pico della Mirandola and
Kant, all the way to existentialism and philosophical anthropology in the twentieth
century. In it, man is understood as chronically deficient in their own ‘nature’ or
‘essence’, and his privileged status is built from this rootlessness. The second part
of the paper is dedicated to the relationship of transhumanism and critical posthumanism to humanism. Transhumanism is found to harmoniously continue and/or
radicalise the humanist project of self-creating and self-transcending man, while
critical posthumanism advocates a rethinking and redescription of man in view
of what are considered to have been the disastrous consequences of humanism: a
transgression in relation to everything different from man by anthropomorphising
it and anthropocentrically measuring it against himself. The concluding part of the
paper detects a certain arbitrariness in the understanding of humanism by its critics,
reminds that even within such a broadly understood humanism, critical moments
have been inherited as its own content and corrective, and that announcements of
radical cuts and ruptures with the humanistic tradition are perhaps redundant. It
is also noted that something non-negligible has changed with the contemporary
challenges of technoscience – artificial intelligence, informatics, robotics –but it is
contested that this change in social history requires a cardinal rejection, change or
neglect of the intellectual heritage that enables responses to it and/or a rational dispute about it. A synoptic overview of humanist landmarks and their post-humanist
condemnations is suggested, which would respect the heritage of humanist thought
and the right or even the obligation built into it of its critical review, L’article problématise le bien-fondé des révisions « postistes » de l’humanisme. Dans la première partie de ce travail est exposée cette ligne de pensée
qui conçoit l’homme comme chroniquement incomplet dans sa propre « nature
» ou « essence » et qui de ce déracinement construit son statut privilégié. La
deuxième partie de ce travail est consacrée au rapport du transhumanisme et du
posthumanisme critique envers l’humanisme. Il est démontré que le transhumanisme continue et/ou radicalise harmonieusement le projet humaniste de
l’homme autocréateur et autotranscendant, alors que le transhumanisme critique
préfère opter pour le réexamen et la redescription de l’homme étant donné ce
qu’il considère comme les conséquences néfastes de l’humanisme. La partie
conclusive de l’article détecte un certain arbitraire dans la compréhension de
l’humanisme de la part de ses critiques, rappelle qu’à l’intérieur de l’humanisme s’étaient aussi développés des éléments critiques qui faisaient partie de
son propre contenu et de son correctif, enfin que les annonces des séparations
et ruptures radicales avec la tradition humaniste sont peut-être superflues. Il est
suggéré qu’une analyse synoptique des repères humanistes et de leurs condamnations posthumanistes, prendrait en compte et le patrimoine de la pensée humaniste et l’obligation de son réexamen critique",
publisher = "Beograd : Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu ; Dosije sudio",
journal = "Etnoantropološki problemi",
title = "Kako smo oduvek bili posthumani?, How Have We Always Been Posthuman?",
number = "2",
volume = "18",
pages = "329-350",
doi = "10.21301/eap.v18i2.1"
}
Krstić, P.. (2023). Kako smo oduvek bili posthumani?. in Etnoantropološki problemi
Beograd : Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu ; Dosije sudio., 18(2), 329-350.
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v18i2.1
Krstić P. Kako smo oduvek bili posthumani?. in Etnoantropološki problemi. 2023;18(2):329-350.
doi:10.21301/eap.v18i2.1 .
Krstić, Predrag, "Kako smo oduvek bili posthumani?" in Etnoantropološki problemi, 18, no. 2 (2023):329-350,
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v18i2.1 . .

Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka

Mevorah, Vera; Krstić, Predrag; Velinov, Marija

(Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mevorah, Vera
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Velinov, Marija
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3022
AB  - Тема рада је историјска дебата око феномена тзв. индустрије Холокауста. У основи ове дебате налазе се питања „централности", јединствености, универзализације, американизације и инструментализације Шое. Након горуће јавне контроверзе, последично уништених каријера и политичког збијања редова, та питања остала су да лебде као претећи означитељи Zeitgeista савремене културе сећања, као отворена прича о етичности репрезентације Холокауста.
AB  - In three books published at the turn of the millennium, the authors talk about the phenomenon of the pronounced presence and significance of the Holocaust in American society: Hilene Flanzbaum’s Americanization of the Holocaust (1999), Peter Novick’s Holocaust in American Life (1999) and Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (2000). These works describe (and criticize) the post-Holocaust memorial world which is characterized by the commodification, commercialization and instrumentalization of the culture of remembrance. Even though each of these authors invoked/understood the term differently, the effect of their works was the introduction of the term „Holocaust industry“ into the public discourse. Today, it has has become an umbrella metaphor for a whole range of practices that represent the instrumentalization, commercialization and commodification of Holocaust remembrance. The paper deals with the process of (politicaleconomic) instrumentalization of the Holocaust, its normalization, naturalization, normativization and mechanization – in Western societies – and criticism of that process. The aim of the paper is to shed light on what is meant by the Holocaust industry and to open space for further reflection and problematization of the Holocaust discourse in the light of the warning that its current commodification and industrialization sends us.
PB  - Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka
T1  - Holocaust Industry? The (American) Debate on the Instrumentalization of the Shoah at the Turn of the Century
IS  - 2
VL  - 65
SP  - 279
EP  - 294
DO  - 10.2298/SOC220622009M
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mevorah, Vera and Krstić, Predrag and Velinov, Marija",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Тема рада је историјска дебата око феномена тзв. индустрије Холокауста. У основи ове дебате налазе се питања „централности", јединствености, универзализације, американизације и инструментализације Шое. Након горуће јавне контроверзе, последично уништених каријера и политичког збијања редова, та питања остала су да лебде као претећи означитељи Zeitgeista савремене културе сећања, као отворена прича о етичности репрезентације Холокауста., In three books published at the turn of the millennium, the authors talk about the phenomenon of the pronounced presence and significance of the Holocaust in American society: Hilene Flanzbaum’s Americanization of the Holocaust (1999), Peter Novick’s Holocaust in American Life (1999) and Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (2000). These works describe (and criticize) the post-Holocaust memorial world which is characterized by the commodification, commercialization and instrumentalization of the culture of remembrance. Even though each of these authors invoked/understood the term differently, the effect of their works was the introduction of the term „Holocaust industry“ into the public discourse. Today, it has has become an umbrella metaphor for a whole range of practices that represent the instrumentalization, commercialization and commodification of Holocaust remembrance. The paper deals with the process of (politicaleconomic) instrumentalization of the Holocaust, its normalization, naturalization, normativization and mechanization – in Western societies – and criticism of that process. The aim of the paper is to shed light on what is meant by the Holocaust industry and to open space for further reflection and problematization of the Holocaust discourse in the light of the warning that its current commodification and industrialization sends us.",
publisher = "Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka, Holocaust Industry? The (American) Debate on the Instrumentalization of the Shoah at the Turn of the Century",
number = "2",
volume = "65",
pages = "279-294",
doi = "10.2298/SOC220622009M"
}
Mevorah, V., Krstić, P.,& Velinov, M.. (2023). Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka. in Sociologija
Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije., 65(2), 279-294.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC220622009M
Mevorah V, Krstić P, Velinov M. Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka. in Sociologija. 2023;65(2):279-294.
doi:10.2298/SOC220622009M .
Mevorah, Vera, Krstić, Predrag, Velinov, Marija, "Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka" in Sociologija, 65, no. 2 (2023):279-294,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC220622009M . .

Salon i društvenost: Žene od/za pera?

Krstić, Predrag; Gudman, Dina; Lilti, Antoan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga, 2023)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Gudman, Dina
AU  - Lilti, Antoan
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2922
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga
T1  - Salon i društvenost: Žene od/za pera?
SP  - 1
EP  - 144
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2922
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Gudman, Dina and Lilti, Antoan",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga",
title = "Salon i društvenost: Žene od/za pera?",
pages = "1-144",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2922"
}
Krstić, P., Gudman, D.,& Lilti, A.. (2023). Salon i društvenost: Žene od/za pera?. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga., 1-144.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2922
Krstić P, Gudman D, Lilti A. Salon i društvenost: Žene od/za pera?. 2023;:1-144.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2922 .
Krstić, Predrag, Gudman, Dina, Lilti, Antoan, "Salon i društvenost: Žene od/za pera?" (2023):1-144,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2922 .

O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o putovanju : prilog kritici teleologije obrazovanja

Krstić, Predrag; Ostojić, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2023)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Ostojić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2921
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o putovanju : prilog kritici teleologije obrazovanja
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2921
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Ostojić, Aleksandar",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o putovanju : prilog kritici teleologije obrazovanja",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2921"
}
Krstić, P.,& Ostojić, A.. (2023). O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o putovanju : prilog kritici teleologije obrazovanja. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2921
Krstić P, Ostojić A. O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o putovanju : prilog kritici teleologije obrazovanja. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2921 .
Krstić, Predrag, Ostojić, Aleksandar, "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o putovanju : prilog kritici teleologije obrazovanja" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2921 .

Holokaust i teologija

Mevorah, Vera; Šarić, Željko; Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2023)


                                            

                                            
Mevorah, V., Šarić, Ž.,& Krstić, P.. (2023). Holokaust i teologija. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2920
Mevorah V, Šarić Ž, Krstić P. Holokaust i teologija. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2920 .
Mevorah, Vera, Šarić, Željko, Krstić, Predrag, "Holokaust i teologija" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2920 .

Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike

Krstić, Predrag; Vake, Fransoaz; Šaklton, Robert

(Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2023)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Vake, Fransoaz
AU  - Šaklton, Robert
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2871
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike
SP  - 1
EP  - 129
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2871
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Vake, Fransoaz and Šaklton, Robert",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike",
pages = "1-129",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2871"
}
Krstić, P., Vake, F.,& Šaklton, R.. (2023). Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike. 
Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 1-129.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2871
Krstić P, Vake F, Šaklton R. Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike. 2023;:1-129.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2871 .
Krstić, Predrag, Vake, Fransoaz, Šaklton, Robert, "Ljudi od pera i filozofi: (in)diskretni šarm politike" (2023):1-129,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2871 .

Holokaust i teološke dimenzije psihedeličkog iskustva

Lošonc, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Lošonc, Mark
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3652
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet
T2  - Holokaust i teologija
T1  - Holokaust i teološke dimenzije psihedeličkog iskustva
SP  - 180
EP  - 203
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Lošonc, Mark",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Holokaust i teologija",
booktitle = "Holokaust i teološke dimenzije psihedeličkog iskustva",
pages = "180-203"
}
Lošonc, M.. (2023). Holokaust i teološke dimenzije psihedeličkog iskustva. in Holokaust i teologija
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet., 180-203.
Lošonc M. Holokaust i teološke dimenzije psihedeličkog iskustva. in Holokaust i teologija. 2023;:180-203..
Lošonc, Mark, "Holokaust i teološke dimenzije psihedeličkog iskustva" in Holokaust i teologija (2023):180-203.

What is a Book?

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Berlin : Frank & Timme, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3650
PB  - Berlin : Frank & Timme
T2  - A Responsibility to the World: Saramago, Politics, Philosophy
T1  - What is a Book?
SP  - 243
EP  - 260
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Berlin : Frank & Timme",
journal = "A Responsibility to the World: Saramago, Politics, Philosophy",
booktitle = "What is a Book?",
pages = "243-260"
}
Ćipranić, M.. (2023). What is a Book?. in A Responsibility to the World: Saramago, Politics, Philosophy
Berlin : Frank & Timme., 243-260.
Ćipranić M. What is a Book?. in A Responsibility to the World: Saramago, Politics, Philosophy. 2023;:243-260..
Ćipranić, Miloš, "What is a Book?" in A Responsibility to the World: Saramago, Politics, Philosophy (2023):243-260.

Between the Primitive and Plastic: Deleuzian Ontology of Architectural Design

Ristić, Marko

(Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ristić, Marko
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3266
AB  - The discursive difference between the ideal and material architectural object could almost be completely reduced to the issue of translation of the former into the latter. Within such a perspective, it becomes difficult to think of architectural design beyond the order of precedence, which defines the Form’s ontological autonomy from its material expression. In my presentation, I will try to reinterpret this relationship using Deleuze’s theory of fold. Regarding Leibniz’s distinction between the primitive and (derivative) plastic forces, through which Deleuze interprets the difference between soul and matter as the difference between the one and many, the concept of fold offers the possibility of a “twofold” reading of design methodology. Such duality would refer to overcoming the paradigm of “materialization” of form, that is, the always one-way translation process, understood as the multiplication of the one. In other words, Leibnizian hylomorphism is reflected in the concept of the fold on the level of its position between the corresponding processes of unification and multiplication. Using the concept of harmony, which is the unity of the multiple, Deleuze defines this kind of correspondence as a necessary twofoldness, i.e. “the double operation of transcendental actualization and realization” – the former as intrinsic and the second as extrinsic folding. Nevertheless, their mutual order remains an order of precedence: the intrinsic folding is necessarily primitive, or primary since its only reference is the self. In the methodology of architectural design, however, this order becomes impossible with the question of form being posed with respect to the problem of morphogenesis. Between the actual and the real, the morphogenetic process itself then turns into an infinite correspondence, whereby the primitive quality of form would have to identify with its plasticity.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
C3  - 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference: Book of Abstracts
T1  - Between the Primitive and Plastic: Deleuzian Ontology of Architectural Design
SP  - 114
EP  - 114
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3266
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ristić, Marko",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The discursive difference between the ideal and material architectural object could almost be completely reduced to the issue of translation of the former into the latter. Within such a perspective, it becomes difficult to think of architectural design beyond the order of precedence, which defines the Form’s ontological autonomy from its material expression. In my presentation, I will try to reinterpret this relationship using Deleuze’s theory of fold. Regarding Leibniz’s distinction between the primitive and (derivative) plastic forces, through which Deleuze interprets the difference between soul and matter as the difference between the one and many, the concept of fold offers the possibility of a “twofold” reading of design methodology. Such duality would refer to overcoming the paradigm of “materialization” of form, that is, the always one-way translation process, understood as the multiplication of the one. In other words, Leibnizian hylomorphism is reflected in the concept of the fold on the level of its position between the corresponding processes of unification and multiplication. Using the concept of harmony, which is the unity of the multiple, Deleuze defines this kind of correspondence as a necessary twofoldness, i.e. “the double operation of transcendental actualization and realization” – the former as intrinsic and the second as extrinsic folding. Nevertheless, their mutual order remains an order of precedence: the intrinsic folding is necessarily primitive, or primary since its only reference is the self. In the methodology of architectural design, however, this order becomes impossible with the question of form being posed with respect to the problem of morphogenesis. Between the actual and the real, the morphogenetic process itself then turns into an infinite correspondence, whereby the primitive quality of form would have to identify with its plasticity.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory",
journal = "15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference: Book of Abstracts",
title = "Between the Primitive and Plastic: Deleuzian Ontology of Architectural Design",
pages = "114-114",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3266"
}
Ristić, M.. (2023). Between the Primitive and Plastic: Deleuzian Ontology of Architectural Design. in 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference: Book of Abstracts
Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory., 114-114.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3266
Ristić M. Between the Primitive and Plastic: Deleuzian Ontology of Architectural Design. in 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference: Book of Abstracts. 2023;:114-114.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3266 .
Ristić, Marko, "Between the Primitive and Plastic: Deleuzian Ontology of Architectural Design" in 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference: Book of Abstracts (2023):114-114,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3266 .

15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference Book of Abstracts

Hristov, Gorge; Mađanović, Milica; Žikić, Simona

(Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade; Faculty of Media and Communications; University of Plymouth, 2023)


                                            

                                            
Hristov, G., Mađanović, M.,& Žikić, S.. (2023). 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference Book of Abstracts. 
Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade; Faculty of Media and Communications; University of Plymouth..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3139
Hristov G, Mađanović M, Žikić S. 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference Book of Abstracts. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3139 .
Hristov, Gorge, Mađanović, Milica, Žikić, Simona, "15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference Book of Abstracts" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3139 .

Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe

Zaharijević, Adriana; Wawrzyniak, Joanna; Dohotariu, Anca

(SAGE, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Wawrzyniak, Joanna
AU  - Dohotariu, Anca
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3643
AB  - The introduction to the special section “Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe” identifies and analyzes its core concept—the narrative of return. Families of today are talked about differently, and how they are narrativized matters. The narrative that stresses that family is under threat and in need of defense or a special form of care, figuring care as restitution of natural, traditional, or family proper, is termed the narrative of return. The trope of return is strongly normative and non-descriptive, as it relies on mythical temporalities that ought to be restored in our present. The article first defines the choice of concepts—narrative, return, care, and threat. Second, it applies this conceptual frame in the transnational context, particularly within the transnational anti-gender campaigns in the populist moment. Third, it focuses on the postsocialist part of Europe, where, as the entire special section aims to demonstrate, the narrative of return gained particular currency. In Eastern Europe, these narratives are integral to larger projects of restoration of national agenda and serve as a tool of double emancipation: from the Soviet past and from the European Union present. Political actors using narrative(s) of return advocate and successfully push through fundamental changes in the political frameworks and value systems of the postsocialist countries. In sum, the article aims to demonstrate the conceptual background of a political tool.
PB  - SAGE
T2  - East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
T1  - Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe
DO  - 10.1177/088832542311988
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana and Wawrzyniak, Joanna and Dohotariu, Anca",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The introduction to the special section “Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe” identifies and analyzes its core concept—the narrative of return. Families of today are talked about differently, and how they are narrativized matters. The narrative that stresses that family is under threat and in need of defense or a special form of care, figuring care as restitution of natural, traditional, or family proper, is termed the narrative of return. The trope of return is strongly normative and non-descriptive, as it relies on mythical temporalities that ought to be restored in our present. The article first defines the choice of concepts—narrative, return, care, and threat. Second, it applies this conceptual frame in the transnational context, particularly within the transnational anti-gender campaigns in the populist moment. Third, it focuses on the postsocialist part of Europe, where, as the entire special section aims to demonstrate, the narrative of return gained particular currency. In Eastern Europe, these narratives are integral to larger projects of restoration of national agenda and serve as a tool of double emancipation: from the Soviet past and from the European Union present. Political actors using narrative(s) of return advocate and successfully push through fundamental changes in the political frameworks and value systems of the postsocialist countries. In sum, the article aims to demonstrate the conceptual background of a political tool.",
publisher = "SAGE",
journal = "East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures",
title = "Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe",
doi = "10.1177/088832542311988"
}
Zaharijević, A., Wawrzyniak, J.,& Dohotariu, A.. (2023). Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe. in East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
SAGE..
https://doi.org/10.1177/088832542311988
Zaharijević A, Wawrzyniak J, Dohotariu A. Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe. in East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures. 2023;.
doi:10.1177/088832542311988 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, Wawrzyniak, Joanna, Dohotariu, Anca, "Who Cares for Families? Narrative(s) of Return in Postsocialist Europe" in East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1177/088832542311988 . .