TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mitrović, Veselin
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/400
AB  - This text tries to shed some light on the origin of the idea of moral enhancement, on its epistemic and moral foundations. This requires a comparative analysis of similar ideas present in various trends of bioethics today – the analysis of the very roots of Poter’s global bioethics, the idea of moral enhancement, as well as the break between advocates of moral enhancement and John Harris, their transhumanist colleague, with whom they used to share the same perspective. In this article we identify some basic starting points, similarities and differences between global bioethics and moral enhancement, and draw lines of demarcation between transhumanism and moral enhancement.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Mit o moralnom poboljšanju: povratak u budućnost?
T1  - The Myth of the Moral Enhancement : Back to the Future?
SP  - 111
EP  - 123
DO  - 10.2298/FID1202111M
ER  - 

@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Mitrović, Veselin",
year = "2012",
abstract = "This text tries to shed some light on the origin of the idea of moral enhancement, on its epistemic and moral foundations. This requires a comparative analysis of similar ideas present in various trends of bioethics today – the analysis of the very roots of Poter’s global bioethics, the idea of moral enhancement, as well as the break between advocates of moral enhancement and John Harris, their transhumanist colleague, with whom they used to share the same perspective. In this article we identify some basic starting points, similarities and differences between global bioethics and moral enhancement, and draw lines of demarcation between transhumanism and moral enhancement.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Mit o moralnom poboljšanju: povratak u budućnost?, The Myth of the Moral Enhancement : Back to the Future?",
pages = "111-123",
doi = "10.2298/FID1202111M"
}

Milidrag, P.,& Mitrović, V.. (2012). Mit o moralnom poboljšanju: povratak u budućnost?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 111-123.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202111M

Milidrag P, Mitrović V. Mit o moralnom poboljšanju: povratak u budućnost?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:111-123.
doi:10.2298/FID1202111M .

Milidrag, Predrag, Mitrović, Veselin, "Mit o moralnom poboljšanju: povratak u budućnost?" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2012):111-123,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202111M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jeremić Molnar, Dragana
AU  - Molnar, Aleksandar
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/612
AB  - In this article the authors are reconstructing the dichotomies which the young Theodor Adorno was trying to detect in the music of the bourgeois epoch and personify in two antipodes – Franz Schubert and Ludwig van Beethoven. Although already a devotee of Arnold Schönberg and the 20th century music avant-gardism, Adorno was, in his works prior to his exile from Germany (1934), intensively dealing with Schubert and his opposition towards Beethoven. While Beethoven was a bold and progressive revolutionary, fascinated by the “practical reason” and the mission to rise up and reach the stars, Schubert wanted none of it (almost anticipating the failure of the whole revolutionary project). Instead, he was looking backwards, to primordial nature and the possibility of man to participate in its mythic cycles of death and regeneration. The lack of synthesis between this two opposing tendencies in the music of early bourgeois epoch lead to the “negative dialectics” of Schönberg and 20th century music avant-gardism and to the final separation of Beethovenian musical progress and Schubertian musical mimesis.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Šubert i Betoven – Adornovi prvobitni antipodi muzike građanske epohe
T1  - Schubert and Beethoven – Adorno’s Early Antipodes of the Music in Bourgeois Epoch
SP  - 221
EP  - 236
DO  - 10.2298/FID1203221J
ER  - 

@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Jeremić Molnar, Dragana and Molnar, Aleksandar",
year = "2012",
abstract = "In this article the authors are reconstructing the dichotomies which the young Theodor Adorno was trying to detect in the music of the bourgeois epoch and personify in two antipodes – Franz Schubert and Ludwig van Beethoven. Although already a devotee of Arnold Schönberg and the 20th century music avant-gardism, Adorno was, in his works prior to his exile from Germany (1934), intensively dealing with Schubert and his opposition towards Beethoven. While Beethoven was a bold and progressive revolutionary, fascinated by the “practical reason” and the mission to rise up and reach the stars, Schubert wanted none of it (almost anticipating the failure of the whole revolutionary project). Instead, he was looking backwards, to primordial nature and the possibility of man to participate in its mythic cycles of death and regeneration. The lack of synthesis between this two opposing tendencies in the music of early bourgeois epoch lead to the “negative dialectics” of Schönberg and 20th century music avant-gardism and to the final separation of Beethovenian musical progress and Schubertian musical mimesis.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Šubert i Betoven – Adornovi prvobitni antipodi muzike građanske epohe, Schubert and Beethoven – Adorno’s Early Antipodes of the Music in Bourgeois Epoch",
pages = "221-236",
doi = "10.2298/FID1203221J"
}

Milidrag, P., Jeremić Molnar, D.,& Molnar, A.. (2012). Šubert i Betoven – Adornovi prvobitni antipodi muzike građanske epohe. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 221-236.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1203221J

Milidrag P, Jeremić Molnar D, Molnar A. Šubert i Betoven – Adornovi prvobitni antipodi muzike građanske epohe. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:221-236.
doi:10.2298/FID1203221J .

Milidrag, Predrag, Jeremić Molnar, Dragana, Molnar, Aleksandar, "Šubert i Betoven – Adornovi prvobitni antipodi muzike građanske epohe" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2012):221-236,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1203221J . .