TY  - CHAP
AU  - Cvetković, Vladimir
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3468
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci
T2  - Holokaust i teologija
T1  - Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam
SP  - 92
EP  - 126
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Cvetković, Vladimir",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci",
journal = "Holokaust i teologija",
booktitle = "Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam",
pages = "92-126",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468"
}

Cvetković, V.. (2023). Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam. in Holokaust i teologija
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Banja Luka: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci., 92-126.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468

Cvetković V. Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam. in Holokaust i teologija. 2023;:92-126.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468 .

Cvetković, Vladimir, "Holokaust, srpsko bogoslovlje i istorijski revizionizam" in Holokaust i teologija (2023):92-126,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3468 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3103
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet
T2  - Holokaust i teologija
T1  - Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?
SP  - 204
EP  - 226
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Holokaust i teologija",
booktitle = "Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?",
pages = "204-226",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103"
}

Krstić, P.. (2023). Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?. in Holokaust i teologija
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju ; Banja Luka : Filozofski fakultet., 204-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103

Krstić P. Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?. in Holokaust i teologija. 2023;:204-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103 .

Krstić, Predrag, "Ka materijalističkoj teologiji?" in Holokaust i teologija (2023):204-226,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3103 .

TY  - GEN
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3029
AB  - The Women in the Holocaust is an inaugural conference of WHISC – Women
in the Holocaust International Study Center of the The Moreshet Mordechai
Anielevich Memorial Holocaust Study and Research Center – Givat Haviva,
Israel, organized in partnership with the ShoahLab: Holocaust Studies
Laboratory of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory University of
Belgrade and NGO Haver Srbija in Belgrade, Serbia 10–12 October 2023. The
conference seeks to foster scholarly discussion and debate on the various
divides, connections, and intersections that can be found in Holocaust and
gender studies about women in the Holocaust.
PB  - Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
PB  - Belgrade: Haver Srbija
PB  - Givat Haviva: Women in the Holocaust International Study Center
T1  - Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference Book of Abstracts
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3029
ER  - 

@misc{
year = "2023",
abstract = "The Women in the Holocaust is an inaugural conference of WHISC – Women
in the Holocaust International Study Center of the The Moreshet Mordechai
Anielevich Memorial Holocaust Study and Research Center – Givat Haviva,
Israel, organized in partnership with the ShoahLab: Holocaust Studies
Laboratory of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory University of
Belgrade and NGO Haver Srbija in Belgrade, Serbia 10–12 October 2023. The
conference seeks to foster scholarly discussion and debate on the various
divides, connections, and intersections that can be found in Holocaust and
gender studies about women in the Holocaust.",
publisher = "Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade: Haver Srbija, Givat Haviva: Women in the Holocaust International Study Center",
title = "Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference Book of Abstracts",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3029"
}

(2023). Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference Book of Abstracts. 
Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3029

Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference Book of Abstracts. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3029 .

"Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference Book of Abstracts" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3029 .

Mevorah, V., Šarić, Ž.,& Krstić, P.. (2023). Holokaust i teologija. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2920

Mevorah V, Šarić Ž, Krstić P. Holokaust i teologija. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2920 .

Mevorah, Vera, Šarić, Željko, Krstić, Predrag, "Holokaust i teologija" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2920 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mevorah, Vera
AU  - Guga, Jelena
AU  - Markov, Čedomir
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2827
AB  - People have always related art to the creation and transmission of myths. While myth as a theme in art has been thoroughly addressed, research about the “mythic” nature of the artist figure is far less common. The 20th and 21st centuries brought challenges to the status of art and artists in society, historically situated archetypes and stereotypes that we associate with the figure of the “artist” still survive to this day (e.g. “genius”, “subversive artists”, “child prodigy”, “eccentric”, etc.). In this paper, we set out to analyze various tropes used persistently to describe artists and explore how relevant the resulting myths are in (self) perceptions of Serbian contemporary artists. Our multidisciplinary approach to this topic combines a historical­theoretical and empirical perspective. Through historical research of the relevant literature, we described and mapped the key tropes of the (mythical) artist figure as it developed in Western culture. In the theoretical analysis we address the inseparability of digital culture with everyday life of people today, which we call postdigital. We explore how the transition into contemporaneity affects the determination of the “artist­figure”, i.e., how it impacts the contemporary process of myth­making. Following our historical­theoretical analysis, we conducted five in­depth interviews with contemporary Serbian artists to understand better how relevant the artist­ myth tropes are for their self­perception.
PB  - Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU
T2  - Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU
T1  - Divine Genius, Subversive Hero, or Creative Entrepreneur? Exploring Various Facets of the Artist as a Mythical Figure
IS  - 1
VL  - 71
SP  - 99
EP  - 121
DO  - 10.2298/GEI2301099M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Mevorah, Vera and Guga, Jelena and Markov, Čedomir",
year = "2023",
abstract = "People have always related art to the creation and transmission of myths. While myth as a theme in art has been thoroughly addressed, research about the “mythic” nature of the artist figure is far less common. The 20th and 21st centuries brought challenges to the status of art and artists in society, historically situated archetypes and stereotypes that we associate with the figure of the “artist” still survive to this day (e.g. “genius”, “subversive artists”, “child prodigy”, “eccentric”, etc.). In this paper, we set out to analyze various tropes used persistently to describe artists and explore how relevant the resulting myths are in (self) perceptions of Serbian contemporary artists. Our multidisciplinary approach to this topic combines a historical­theoretical and empirical perspective. Through historical research of the relevant literature, we described and mapped the key tropes of the (mythical) artist figure as it developed in Western culture. In the theoretical analysis we address the inseparability of digital culture with everyday life of people today, which we call postdigital. We explore how the transition into contemporaneity affects the determination of the “artist­figure”, i.e., how it impacts the contemporary process of myth­making. Following our historical­theoretical analysis, we conducted five in­depth interviews with contemporary Serbian artists to understand better how relevant the artist­ myth tropes are for their self­perception.",
publisher = "Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU",
journal = "Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU",
title = "Divine Genius, Subversive Hero, or Creative Entrepreneur? Exploring Various Facets of the Artist as a Mythical Figure",
number = "1",
volume = "71",
pages = "99-121",
doi = "10.2298/GEI2301099M"
}

Mevorah, V., Guga, J.,& Markov, Č.. (2023). Divine Genius, Subversive Hero, or Creative Entrepreneur? Exploring Various Facets of the Artist as a Mythical Figure. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU
Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU., 71(1), 99-121.
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2301099M

Mevorah V, Guga J, Markov Č. Divine Genius, Subversive Hero, or Creative Entrepreneur? Exploring Various Facets of the Artist as a Mythical Figure. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. 2023;71(1):99-121.
doi:10.2298/GEI2301099M .

Mevorah, Vera, Guga, Jelena, Markov, Čedomir, "Divine Genius, Subversive Hero, or Creative Entrepreneur? Exploring Various Facets of the Artist as a Mythical Figure" in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 71, no. 1 (2023):99-121,
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2301099M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljevic, Jelena
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2774
AB  - While the narratives of democratization and Europeanization had significant
mobilizing potential in the Western Balkans during the 1990s and early 2000s, their
relevance has been largely undermined by recent political developments in the region
and growing crises of solidarity within the EU. This article offers a novel perspective
for understanding the prospects of an EU future for the Western Balkans, through a
discussion of the ideas and practices of political solidarity. It introduces the need to
differentiate between reactive and institutional solidarity, and argues that institutional
solidarity has a unique potential to mobilize the attention and commitment of citizens
by offering a projection of a durable and sustainable political community organized
around the principles of social justice and equality. Operationalizing this has become a
necessary precondition not only for the “European future” of the Western Balkans but
also for the future of the European project itself.
PB  - Brill
T2  - Southeastern Europe
T1  - A Crisis of Political Solidarity in the European Union and the Western Balkans. Reactive vs. Institutional Solidarity
IS  - 3
VL  - 46
SP  - 225
EP  - 247
DO  - 10.30965/18763332-46030001
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljevic, Jelena",
year = "2023",
abstract = "While the narratives of democratization and Europeanization had significant
mobilizing potential in the Western Balkans during the 1990s and early 2000s, their
relevance has been largely undermined by recent political developments in the region
and growing crises of solidarity within the EU. This article offers a novel perspective
for understanding the prospects of an EU future for the Western Balkans, through a
discussion of the ideas and practices of political solidarity. It introduces the need to
differentiate between reactive and institutional solidarity, and argues that institutional
solidarity has a unique potential to mobilize the attention and commitment of citizens
by offering a projection of a durable and sustainable political community organized
around the principles of social justice and equality. Operationalizing this has become a
necessary precondition not only for the “European future” of the Western Balkans but
also for the future of the European project itself.",
publisher = "Brill",
journal = "Southeastern Europe",
title = "A Crisis of Political Solidarity in the European Union and the Western Balkans. Reactive vs. Institutional Solidarity",
number = "3",
volume = "46",
pages = "225-247",
doi = "10.30965/18763332-46030001"
}

Vasiljevic, J.. (2023). A Crisis of Political Solidarity in the European Union and the Western Balkans. Reactive vs. Institutional Solidarity. in Southeastern Europe
Brill., 46(3), 225-247.
https://doi.org/10.30965/18763332-46030001

Vasiljevic J. A Crisis of Political Solidarity in the European Union and the Western Balkans. Reactive vs. Institutional Solidarity. in Southeastern Europe. 2023;46(3):225-247.
doi:10.30965/18763332-46030001 .

Vasiljevic, Jelena, "A Crisis of Political Solidarity in the European Union and the Western Balkans. Reactive vs. Institutional Solidarity" in Southeastern Europe, 46, no. 3 (2023):225-247,
https://doi.org/10.30965/18763332-46030001 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3162
AB  - Attempts at defining solidarity inevitably face the following challenges (and possibly many more): 1) What is the “proper slot” for solidarity on the continuum from empathy to cooperation and mutual aid? 2) Are we discussing the same phenomenon when describing intra-group solidarity, in¬ter-group solidarity, communal solidarity, or international humanitarian solidarity (in what sense does the scale matter)? 3) Is it part of our biological predisposition (an evolutionary trait) or is it true that solidarity will not emerge spontaneously from social processes but can only be built (or eroded) through political action? 

For this reason, solidarity is typically approached through strategies of differentiation and classification. Efforts are made to distinguish between social, civic, and political solidarity, or inter- and intra-group solidarity; or to argue for the difference between solidary attitudes and emotions on the one hand, and behaviour and collective action on the other. In my presentation, I will argue that the distinctive feature of solidarity, as a form of prosocial behaviour, is that it is constitutive of political communities. In particular, I will try to define solidarity through its historical and ontological relevance to citizenship. 

I build on scholarship emphasizing the political nature of solidarity (Scholz), as “a principle that can inspire and guide action” (Arendt), as an ongoing commitment to “a community of interests, shared beliefs and goals” (hooks), “based on we-thinking” where “the target of concern” is “us together” rather than the wellbeing of the other (Laitinen and Pessi). I will also point to the fact that discourses and practices of solidarity play an important yet ambiguous role in any citizenship regime. It can promote interdependence and full inclusion, while at the same time solidifying the exclusionary “we” through the “destructive solidarity of us-against-them” (Sennett). The ambiguous role of solidarity, I argue, becomes especially obvious today, in neoliberal regimes, where calls for solidarity can be deployed to foster very distinct, arguably mutually opposing, kinds of political subjectivities and citizen activism.
C3  - Solidarity and Support in a Post-Welfare Era, international conference, Skopje, Norht Macedonia 14-15.9.2023.
T1  - Theorizing solidarity through citizenship
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3162
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Attempts at defining solidarity inevitably face the following challenges (and possibly many more): 1) What is the “proper slot” for solidarity on the continuum from empathy to cooperation and mutual aid? 2) Are we discussing the same phenomenon when describing intra-group solidarity, in¬ter-group solidarity, communal solidarity, or international humanitarian solidarity (in what sense does the scale matter)? 3) Is it part of our biological predisposition (an evolutionary trait) or is it true that solidarity will not emerge spontaneously from social processes but can only be built (or eroded) through political action? 

For this reason, solidarity is typically approached through strategies of differentiation and classification. Efforts are made to distinguish between social, civic, and political solidarity, or inter- and intra-group solidarity; or to argue for the difference between solidary attitudes and emotions on the one hand, and behaviour and collective action on the other. In my presentation, I will argue that the distinctive feature of solidarity, as a form of prosocial behaviour, is that it is constitutive of political communities. In particular, I will try to define solidarity through its historical and ontological relevance to citizenship. 

I build on scholarship emphasizing the political nature of solidarity (Scholz), as “a principle that can inspire and guide action” (Arendt), as an ongoing commitment to “a community of interests, shared beliefs and goals” (hooks), “based on we-thinking” where “the target of concern” is “us together” rather than the wellbeing of the other (Laitinen and Pessi). I will also point to the fact that discourses and practices of solidarity play an important yet ambiguous role in any citizenship regime. It can promote interdependence and full inclusion, while at the same time solidifying the exclusionary “we” through the “destructive solidarity of us-against-them” (Sennett). The ambiguous role of solidarity, I argue, becomes especially obvious today, in neoliberal regimes, where calls for solidarity can be deployed to foster very distinct, arguably mutually opposing, kinds of political subjectivities and citizen activism.",
journal = "Solidarity and Support in a Post-Welfare Era, international conference, Skopje, Norht Macedonia 14-15.9.2023.",
title = "Theorizing solidarity through citizenship",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3162"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2023). Theorizing solidarity through citizenship. in Solidarity and Support in a Post-Welfare Era, international conference, Skopje, Norht Macedonia 14-15.9.2023..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3162

Vasiljević J. Theorizing solidarity through citizenship. in Solidarity and Support in a Post-Welfare Era, international conference, Skopje, Norht Macedonia 14-15.9.2023.. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3162 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Theorizing solidarity through citizenship" in Solidarity and Support in a Post-Welfare Era, international conference, Skopje, Norht Macedonia 14-15.9.2023. (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3162 .

Hristov, G., Mađanović, M.,& Žikić, S.. (2023). Control and Archaism. in 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference Book of Abstracts
Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade; Faculty of Media and Communications; University of Plymouth., 70-71.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3139

Hristov G, Mađanović M, Žikić S. Control and Archaism. in 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference Book of Abstracts. 2023;:70-71.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3139 .

Hristov, Gorge, Mađanović, Milica, Žikić, Simona, "Control and Archaism" in 15th International Deleuze and Guattari Studies Conference Book of Abstracts (2023):70-71,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3139 .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Zarić, Zona
AU  - Mladenović, Ivica
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3589
PB  - Milano : Mimesis
T2  - Angažovane reči
T1  - Power, Profit and Prestige : On American and Chinese Imperialism. Philip Golub
SP  - 143
EP  - 154
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Zarić, Zona and Mladenović, Ivica",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Milano : Mimesis",
journal = "Angažovane reči",
title = "Power, Profit and Prestige : On American and Chinese Imperialism. Philip Golub",
pages = "143-154"
}

Zarić, Z.,& Mladenović, I.. (2023). Power, Profit and Prestige : On American and Chinese Imperialism. Philip Golub. in Angažovane reči
Milano : Mimesis., 143-154.

Zarić Z, Mladenović I. Power, Profit and Prestige : On American and Chinese Imperialism. Philip Golub. in Angažovane reči. 2023;:143-154..

Zarić, Zona, Mladenović, Ivica, "Power, Profit and Prestige : On American and Chinese Imperialism. Philip Golub" in Angažovane reči (2023):143-154.

TY  - GEN
AU  - Zarić, Zona
AU  - Mladenović, Ivica
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3588
PB  - Milano : Mimesis
T2  - Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
T1  - The War on Migration as a Sequel to War on Terror: Étienne Balibar
SP  - 77
EP  - 87
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Zarić, Zona and Mladenović, Ivica",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Milano : Mimesis",
journal = "Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals",
title = "The War on Migration as a Sequel to War on Terror: Étienne Balibar",
pages = "77-87"
}

Zarić, Z.,& Mladenović, I.. (2023). The War on Migration as a Sequel to War on Terror: Étienne Balibar. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
Milano : Mimesis., 77-87.

Zarić Z, Mladenović I. The War on Migration as a Sequel to War on Terror: Étienne Balibar. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals. 2023;:77-87..

Zarić, Zona, Mladenović, Ivica, "The War on Migration as a Sequel to War on Terror: Étienne Balibar" in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals (2023):77-87.

TY  - GEN
AU  - Mladenović, Ivica
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3590
PB  - Milano : Mimesis
T2  - Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
T1  - What’s the Point of Sociology If It’s Not Engaged. Michael Burawoy
SP  - 31
EP  - 90
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Mladenović, Ivica",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Milano : Mimesis",
journal = "Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals",
title = "What’s the Point of Sociology If It’s Not Engaged. Michael Burawoy",
pages = "31-90"
}

Mladenović, I.. (2023). What’s the Point of Sociology If It’s Not Engaged. Michael Burawoy. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
Milano : Mimesis., 31-90.

Mladenović I. What’s the Point of Sociology If It’s Not Engaged. Michael Burawoy. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals. 2023;:31-90..

Mladenović, Ivica, "What’s the Point of Sociology If It’s Not Engaged. Michael Burawoy" in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals (2023):31-90.

TY  - GEN
AU  - Zarić, Zona
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3591
PB  - Milano : Mimesis
T2  - Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
T1  - Intellectuals Should not Speak for Others, but with Them. Catherine Malabou
SP  - 21
EP  - 31
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Zarić, Zona",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Milano : Mimesis",
journal = "Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals",
title = "Intellectuals Should not Speak for Others, but with Them. Catherine Malabou",
pages = "21-31"
}

Zarić, Z.. (2023). Intellectuals Should not Speak for Others, but with Them. Catherine Malabou. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
Milano : Mimesis., 21-31.

Zarić Z. Intellectuals Should not Speak for Others, but with Them. Catherine Malabou. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals. 2023;:21-31..

Zarić, Zona, "Intellectuals Should not Speak for Others, but with Them. Catherine Malabou" in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals (2023):21-31.

TY  - GEN
AU  - Zarić, Zona
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3595
PB  - Milano : Mimesis
T2  - Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
T1  - How to Overcome Resentment. Cynthia Fleury
SP  - 69
EP  - 76
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Zarić, Zona",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Milano : Mimesis",
journal = "Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals",
title = "How to Overcome Resentment. Cynthia Fleury",
pages = "69-76"
}

Zarić, Z.. (2023). How to Overcome Resentment. Cynthia Fleury. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals
Milano : Mimesis., 69-76.

Zarić Z. How to Overcome Resentment. Cynthia Fleury. in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals. 2023;:69-76..

Zarić, Zona, "How to Overcome Resentment. Cynthia Fleury" in Refusing to be Silent. Engaged Conversations with Leading Intellectuals (2023):69-76.

Zarić, Z.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2023). Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals. 
Mimesis International..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3556

Zarić Z, Pudar Draško G. Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals. 2023;:null-221.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3556 .

Zarić, Zona, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3556 .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Fatic, Aleksandar
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3336
AB  - U savremenim razmatranjima racionalnosti u objašnjenju mogu se različiti različita shvatanja magijskog mišljenja, koje su obično predstavlja kao suprostavljeno racionalnom, pa čak i „razumnom“ verovanju kao temelju saznanja. Jedna od najznačajnijih interpretacija ove vrste kategorijalne podvojenosti između legitimnog i nelegitimnog uverenja, odnosno između magijskog verovanja i pravog saznanja, potiče od Džozefa Agasija (Joseph Agassi). Ovo izlaganje će se baviti Agassijevom klasifikacijom magijskog i racionalnog objašnjenja, i dovešće u pitanje racionalističku ideju o tome da se saznanje može normirati samo kao legitimno verovanje potkrepljeno optimalnim dokazima. Ispostaviće se da je magijsko verovanje, odnosno verovanje koje se često pokazuje kao istinito, a zasnovano je na saznajnim procedurama koje neka epoha, kultura ili čak profesionalna disciplina ne priznaju kao legitimne procese saznavanja i objašnjenja, jednako praktično i društveno vredno kao i legitimno „saznanje“. Jedan od najočiglednijih primera je psihoanaliza: pristup koji je poslednjih nekoliko decenija faktički isključen iz brojnih poslediplomskih programa studija psihologije i psihoterapije, pre svega zbog toga što se smatra „magijskim“, nasuprot „psihologiji zasnovanoj na dokazima“ (evidence-based psychology). Ipak, iskustvo je pokazalo da su ključne psihoanalitičke postavke ispravne u psihoterapeutskom procesu i da njihove filozofske i psihološke ramifikacije određuju čitave krupne oblasti psihoterapije.
Savremena normativna interpretacija ličnosti u filozofiji i psihologiji, a posebno u filozofiji psihijatrije i filozofiji psihoterapije, u najvećem svom delu bi se, strogo posmatrano, tretirala kao oblast magijskog objašnjenja, jer njene postavke i argumenti ne podležu neposrednoj verifikaciji i počivaju na širokim interpretativnim temeljima koji omogućavaju visok stepen diskrecije i kreativnosti u praktičnoj primeni. 
Neka od najznačajnijih dela koja su formirala istoriju filozofije, iz persketive „naučnosti“ saznanja i danas dominantnih kriterijuma za utvrđivanje „magijskog“ nasuprot „pravom“ ili „naučnom“, ili „racionalnom“ saznanju, spadaju u domen čistog magijskog objašnjenja. Dovoljno je, ograničavajući se na modernu filozofiju, pomenuti Ničea, Spinozu, ili Junga, čije razumevanje ličnosti je utemeljilo čitavu jednu filozofsko-psihološku tradiciju u razumevanju identiteta, da bi postalo jasno koliko je magijsko temeljno za filozofsko i psihološko mišljenje. Naglasak ovog izlaganja je na afirmaciji magijskog kao komplementarnog racionalnom objašnjenju, uz istovremeno razmatranje moguće komplementarnosti magijskog saznanja racionalnom saznanju, uz uzimanje u obzir savremenih pristupa magijskom objanjenju poput „somaestetike“ Ričarda Šustermana (Richard Shusterman).
T2  - Konferencija "Objašnjenje i razumevanje u filozofiji i nauci", organizatori Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti i Odeljenje za filozofiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Magijsko mišljenje i magijsko objašnjenje u filozofiji i psihologiji
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3336
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Fatic, Aleksandar",
year = "2023",
abstract = "U savremenim razmatranjima racionalnosti u objašnjenju mogu se različiti različita shvatanja magijskog mišljenja, koje su obično predstavlja kao suprostavljeno racionalnom, pa čak i „razumnom“ verovanju kao temelju saznanja. Jedna od najznačajnijih interpretacija ove vrste kategorijalne podvojenosti između legitimnog i nelegitimnog uverenja, odnosno između magijskog verovanja i pravog saznanja, potiče od Džozefa Agasija (Joseph Agassi). Ovo izlaganje će se baviti Agassijevom klasifikacijom magijskog i racionalnog objašnjenja, i dovešće u pitanje racionalističku ideju o tome da se saznanje može normirati samo kao legitimno verovanje potkrepljeno optimalnim dokazima. Ispostaviće se da je magijsko verovanje, odnosno verovanje koje se često pokazuje kao istinito, a zasnovano je na saznajnim procedurama koje neka epoha, kultura ili čak profesionalna disciplina ne priznaju kao legitimne procese saznavanja i objašnjenja, jednako praktično i društveno vredno kao i legitimno „saznanje“. Jedan od najočiglednijih primera je psihoanaliza: pristup koji je poslednjih nekoliko decenija faktički isključen iz brojnih poslediplomskih programa studija psihologije i psihoterapije, pre svega zbog toga što se smatra „magijskim“, nasuprot „psihologiji zasnovanoj na dokazima“ (evidence-based psychology). Ipak, iskustvo je pokazalo da su ključne psihoanalitičke postavke ispravne u psihoterapeutskom procesu i da njihove filozofske i psihološke ramifikacije određuju čitave krupne oblasti psihoterapije.
Savremena normativna interpretacija ličnosti u filozofiji i psihologiji, a posebno u filozofiji psihijatrije i filozofiji psihoterapije, u najvećem svom delu bi se, strogo posmatrano, tretirala kao oblast magijskog objašnjenja, jer njene postavke i argumenti ne podležu neposrednoj verifikaciji i počivaju na širokim interpretativnim temeljima koji omogućavaju visok stepen diskrecije i kreativnosti u praktičnoj primeni. 
Neka od najznačajnijih dela koja su formirala istoriju filozofije, iz persketive „naučnosti“ saznanja i danas dominantnih kriterijuma za utvrđivanje „magijskog“ nasuprot „pravom“ ili „naučnom“, ili „racionalnom“ saznanju, spadaju u domen čistog magijskog objašnjenja. Dovoljno je, ograničavajući se na modernu filozofiju, pomenuti Ničea, Spinozu, ili Junga, čije razumevanje ličnosti je utemeljilo čitavu jednu filozofsko-psihološku tradiciju u razumevanju identiteta, da bi postalo jasno koliko je magijsko temeljno za filozofsko i psihološko mišljenje. Naglasak ovog izlaganja je na afirmaciji magijskog kao komplementarnog racionalnom objašnjenju, uz istovremeno razmatranje moguće komplementarnosti magijskog saznanja racionalnom saznanju, uz uzimanje u obzir savremenih pristupa magijskom objanjenju poput „somaestetike“ Ričarda Šustermana (Richard Shusterman).",
journal = "Konferencija "Objašnjenje i razumevanje u filozofiji i nauci", organizatori Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti i Odeljenje za filozofiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Magijsko mišljenje i magijsko objašnjenje u filozofiji i psihologiji",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3336"
}

Fatic, A.. (2023). Magijsko mišljenje i magijsko objašnjenje u filozofiji i psihologiji. in Konferencija "Objašnjenje i razumevanje u filozofiji i nauci", organizatori Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti i Odeljenje za filozofiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3336

Fatic A. Magijsko mišljenje i magijsko objašnjenje u filozofiji i psihologiji. in Konferencija "Objašnjenje i razumevanje u filozofiji i nauci", organizatori Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti i Odeljenje za filozofiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3336 .

Fatic, Aleksandar, "Magijsko mišljenje i magijsko objašnjenje u filozofiji i psihologiji" in Konferencija "Objašnjenje i razumevanje u filozofiji i nauci", organizatori Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti i Odeljenje za filozofiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3336 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cvetković, Vladimir
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11212-023-09588-0
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3529
AB  - The aim of the paper is to offer an overview of the long-lasting friendship between
Georges Florovsky and St Justin Popović, as well as of their common project to build
an Orthodox theological synthesis on the basis of the patristic tradition. The paper
focuses on three periods from Florovsky’s and Popović’s lives, from late 1910 and to
early 1920, from late 1920s to late 1930s, and finally on 1940s. I argue that in the first
period both authors developed their theological visions relying on Solovyov and
Florensky, on the one hand, and in opposition to the ecclesial nationalism of the
Slavophiles and conservative Orthodox hierarchs, on the other hand. Further, I
investigate how during the late 1920s and 1930s both authors searched for an
Orthodox synthesis mostly in dialogue with their Orthodox predecessors, especially
Solovyov, Florensky and Bulgakov, as well as the modern western philosophical
tradition. The focus will shift then to the 1940s, which was characterized by frequent
meetings between Florovsky and Popović in Belgrade, Yugoslavia. I argue that in this
period the Church Fathers became for both authors the golden standard for Orthodox
theology, and the idea of the neo-patristic synthesis developed in the full scale.
PB  - Springer Nauture
T2  - Studies in East European Thought
T1  - Georges Florovsky and St Justin Popović: Brothers in arms for the Neopatristic Synthesis
DO  - 10.1007/s11212-023-09588-0
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Cvetković, Vladimir",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The aim of the paper is to offer an overview of the long-lasting friendship between
Georges Florovsky and St Justin Popović, as well as of their common project to build
an Orthodox theological synthesis on the basis of the patristic tradition. The paper
focuses on three periods from Florovsky’s and Popović’s lives, from late 1910 and to
early 1920, from late 1920s to late 1930s, and finally on 1940s. I argue that in the first
period both authors developed their theological visions relying on Solovyov and
Florensky, on the one hand, and in opposition to the ecclesial nationalism of the
Slavophiles and conservative Orthodox hierarchs, on the other hand. Further, I
investigate how during the late 1920s and 1930s both authors searched for an
Orthodox synthesis mostly in dialogue with their Orthodox predecessors, especially
Solovyov, Florensky and Bulgakov, as well as the modern western philosophical
tradition. The focus will shift then to the 1940s, which was characterized by frequent
meetings between Florovsky and Popović in Belgrade, Yugoslavia. I argue that in this
period the Church Fathers became for both authors the golden standard for Orthodox
theology, and the idea of the neo-patristic synthesis developed in the full scale.",
publisher = "Springer Nauture",
journal = "Studies in East European Thought",
title = "Georges Florovsky and St Justin Popović: Brothers in arms for the Neopatristic Synthesis",
doi = "10.1007/s11212-023-09588-0"
}

Cvetković, V.. (2023). Georges Florovsky and St Justin Popović: Brothers in arms for the Neopatristic Synthesis. in Studies in East European Thought
Springer Nauture..
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09588-0

Cvetković V. Georges Florovsky and St Justin Popović: Brothers in arms for the Neopatristic Synthesis. in Studies in East European Thought. 2023;.
doi:10.1007/s11212-023-09588-0 .

Cvetković, Vladimir, "Georges Florovsky and St Justin Popović: Brothers in arms for the Neopatristic Synthesis" in Studies in East European Thought (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09588-0 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cvetković, Vladimir
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3471
PB  - Universität Münster, Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät
T2  - Theologische Revue
T1  - Review of Luke Steven, Imitation, Knowledge and the Task of Christology in Maximus the Confessor
VL  - 119
DO  - 10.17879/thrv-2023-4626
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Cvetković, Vladimir",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Universität Münster, Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät",
journal = "Theologische Revue",
title = "Review of Luke Steven, Imitation, Knowledge and the Task of Christology in Maximus the Confessor",
volume = "119",
doi = "10.17879/thrv-2023-4626"
}

Cvetković, V.. (2023). Review of Luke Steven, Imitation, Knowledge and the Task of Christology in Maximus the Confessor. in Theologische Revue
Universität Münster, Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät., 119.
https://doi.org/10.17879/thrv-2023-4626

Cvetković V. Review of Luke Steven, Imitation, Knowledge and the Task of Christology in Maximus the Confessor. in Theologische Revue. 2023;119.
doi:10.17879/thrv-2023-4626 .

Cvetković, Vladimir, "Review of Luke Steven, Imitation, Knowledge and the Task of Christology in Maximus the Confessor" in Theologische Revue, 119 (2023),
https://doi.org/10.17879/thrv-2023-4626 . .

Cvetković, V.. (2023). Negative Theology | Christianity | Greek and Latin Patristics. in Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception: Negative Theology – Offspring
De Gruyter., 21, 11-13.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ebr.negativetheology

Cvetković V. Negative Theology | Christianity | Greek and Latin Patristics. in Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception: Negative Theology – Offspring. 2023;21:11-13.
doi:10.1515/ebr.negativetheology .

Cvetković, Vladimir, "Negative Theology | Christianity | Greek and Latin Patristics" in Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception: Negative Theology – Offspring, 21 (2023):11-13,
https://doi.org/10.1515/ebr.negativetheology . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Žarković, Petar
AU  - Bešlin, Milivoj
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2950
AB  - Sukob Jugoslavije sa Sovjetskim Savezom 1948, kao i jugoslovenska unutrašnjatransformacija koja je sledila, otvorili su značajnu debatu unutar radničkog pokreta o osnovnim pravcima razvitka socijalističke teorije i prakse. Sa jedne strane, jugoslovenski komunisti su u ogledanju sa sovjetskim („staljinističkim”) iskustvom, gradili početne temelje „demokratskog samoupravnog socijalizma”, dok susovjetski teoretičari osporavali jugoslovenske ideološke novine, smatrajući ih „revizionističkim”. Polemika je doživela vrhunac tokom 1960-ih godina, kada je Jugoslavija otpočela svobuhvatniji proces društvene i privredne reforme, a u Moskvi bilo započeto preispitivanje Hruščovljeve partijske linije „destaljinizacije”. Imajućiu vidu istorijski značaj sukoba, rad se koncentriše na jedno od suštinskih problemskih pitanja jugoslovensko-sovjetske polemike – uloge komunističke partije udruštvu, te da ispita na koji način su se kroz polemiku manifestovale karakteristike jugoslovenske liberalizacije, naročito u komparaciji sa ideološkim postavkama „realnog socijalizma” u Sovjetskom Savezu.
AB  - This research is aimed to critically analyse the Yugoslav-Soviet disputes, with a specific focus on the ideological question of Party reform as a central issue in their
differing interpretations. The methodology employed involves a comparative examination of the principles of Yugoslav “democratic socialism” and Soviet “real socialism” during the period of intense labour movement debates and the peak of Yugoslavia’s internal crisis, which led to the replacement of two reformist leaderships
in 1971/1972. The study highlights the importance of the clashes between the Yugoslav aspiration for autonomous development and the Soviet hegemonic model,
with the international context playing a crucial role in intensifying the debates. The
findings underscore the significance of ideology in shaping political events and the
trajectory of social development in both countries. Ultimately, this research provides a deeper understanding of the final outcomes of the Yugoslav-Soviet disputes
and sheds light on the evolution of the Yugoslav socialist system’s attempt to present itself as a distinct “progressive” (non-Soviet) development model. The analysis
demonstrates how the dynamics of ideological differences influenced the course of
socialist development, reflecting the complexities of post-Stalinist transitions and
the implications of these disputes for broader debates about socialist modernization on the left.
PB  - Podgorica : Center for Geopolitical Studies
T2  - Montenegrin Journal for Social Sciences
T1  - Od demokratskog do realnog socijalizma: jugoslovensko-sovjetski ideološki spor i njegovi rezultati
IS  - 1
VL  - 7
SP  - 9
EP  - 34
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2950
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Žarković, Petar and Bešlin, Milivoj",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Sukob Jugoslavije sa Sovjetskim Savezom 1948, kao i jugoslovenska unutrašnjatransformacija koja je sledila, otvorili su značajnu debatu unutar radničkog pokreta o osnovnim pravcima razvitka socijalističke teorije i prakse. Sa jedne strane, jugoslovenski komunisti su u ogledanju sa sovjetskim („staljinističkim”) iskustvom, gradili početne temelje „demokratskog samoupravnog socijalizma”, dok susovjetski teoretičari osporavali jugoslovenske ideološke novine, smatrajući ih „revizionističkim”. Polemika je doživela vrhunac tokom 1960-ih godina, kada je Jugoslavija otpočela svobuhvatniji proces društvene i privredne reforme, a u Moskvi bilo započeto preispitivanje Hruščovljeve partijske linije „destaljinizacije”. Imajućiu vidu istorijski značaj sukoba, rad se koncentriše na jedno od suštinskih problemskih pitanja jugoslovensko-sovjetske polemike – uloge komunističke partije udruštvu, te da ispita na koji način su se kroz polemiku manifestovale karakteristike jugoslovenske liberalizacije, naročito u komparaciji sa ideološkim postavkama „realnog socijalizma” u Sovjetskom Savezu., This research is aimed to critically analyse the Yugoslav-Soviet disputes, with a specific focus on the ideological question of Party reform as a central issue in their
differing interpretations. The methodology employed involves a comparative examination of the principles of Yugoslav “democratic socialism” and Soviet “real socialism” during the period of intense labour movement debates and the peak of Yugoslavia’s internal crisis, which led to the replacement of two reformist leaderships
in 1971/1972. The study highlights the importance of the clashes between the Yugoslav aspiration for autonomous development and the Soviet hegemonic model,
with the international context playing a crucial role in intensifying the debates. The
findings underscore the significance of ideology in shaping political events and the
trajectory of social development in both countries. Ultimately, this research provides a deeper understanding of the final outcomes of the Yugoslav-Soviet disputes
and sheds light on the evolution of the Yugoslav socialist system’s attempt to present itself as a distinct “progressive” (non-Soviet) development model. The analysis
demonstrates how the dynamics of ideological differences influenced the course of
socialist development, reflecting the complexities of post-Stalinist transitions and
the implications of these disputes for broader debates about socialist modernization on the left.",
publisher = "Podgorica : Center for Geopolitical Studies",
journal = "Montenegrin Journal for Social Sciences",
title = "Od demokratskog do realnog socijalizma: jugoslovensko-sovjetski ideološki spor i njegovi rezultati",
number = "1",
volume = "7",
pages = "9-34",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2950"
}

Žarković, P.,& Bešlin, M.. (2023). Od demokratskog do realnog socijalizma: jugoslovensko-sovjetski ideološki spor i njegovi rezultati. in Montenegrin Journal for Social Sciences
Podgorica : Center for Geopolitical Studies., 7(1), 9-34.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2950

Žarković P, Bešlin M. Od demokratskog do realnog socijalizma: jugoslovensko-sovjetski ideološki spor i njegovi rezultati. in Montenegrin Journal for Social Sciences. 2023;7(1):9-34.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2950 .

Žarković, Petar, Bešlin, Milivoj, "Od demokratskog do realnog socijalizma: jugoslovensko-sovjetski ideološki spor i njegovi rezultati" in Montenegrin Journal for Social Sciences, 7, no. 1 (2023):9-34,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2950 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Perunović, Andrea
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3270
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis
T1  - Burdijeova teoretizacija simboličkog
SP  - 130
EP  - 146
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3270
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Perunović, Andrea",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis",
booktitle = "Burdijeova teoretizacija simboličkog",
pages = "130-146",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3270"
}

Perunović, A.. (2023). Burdijeova teoretizacija simboličkog. in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 130-146.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3270

Perunović A. Burdijeova teoretizacija simboličkog. in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis. 2023;:130-146.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3270 .

Perunović, Andrea, "Burdijeova teoretizacija simboličkog" in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis (2023):130-146,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3270 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Urošević, Milan
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3163
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis
T1  - Pjer Burdije i Luj Altiser
SP  - 388
EP  - 408
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3163
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Urošević, Milan",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis",
booktitle = "Pjer Burdije i Luj Altiser",
pages = "388-408",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3163"
}

Urošević, M.. (2023). Pjer Burdije i Luj Altiser. in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 388-408.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3163

Urošević M. Pjer Burdije i Luj Altiser. in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis. 2023;:388-408.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3163 .

Urošević, Milan, "Pjer Burdije i Luj Altiser" in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praxis (2023):388-408,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3163 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zarić, Zona
AU  - Mladenović, Ivica
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1575
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2864
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Nadège Ragaru, And so the Bulgarian Jews were saved... Researching, Retelling, and Remembering the Holocaust in Bulgaria, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2020.
IS  - 2
VL  - 34
SP  - 367
EP  - 372
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2864
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zarić, Zona and Mladenović, Ivica",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Nadège Ragaru, And so the Bulgarian Jews were saved... Researching, Retelling, and Remembering the Holocaust in Bulgaria, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2020.",
number = "2",
volume = "34",
pages = "367-372",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2864"
}

Zarić, Z.,& Mladenović, I.. (2023). Nadège Ragaru, And so the Bulgarian Jews were saved... Researching, Retelling, and Remembering the Holocaust in Bulgaria, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2020.. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 34(2), 367-372.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2864

Zarić Z, Mladenović I. Nadège Ragaru, And so the Bulgarian Jews were saved... Researching, Retelling, and Remembering the Holocaust in Bulgaria, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2020.. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2023;34(2):367-372.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2864 .

Zarić, Zona, Mladenović, Ivica, "Nadège Ragaru, And so the Bulgarian Jews were saved... Researching, Retelling, and Remembering the Holocaust in Bulgaria, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2020." in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 34, no. 2 (2023):367-372,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2864 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bešlin, Milivoj
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3213
PB  - Pula : Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile
C3  - Šesti međunarodni znanstveni skup – Socijalizam na klupi. Krize i reforme
T1  - Privredne reforme u Jugoslaviji 1962. i 1965: Pokušaji kreiranja tržišnog socijalizma
SP  - 25
EP  - 26
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3213
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Bešlin, Milivoj",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Pula : Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile",
journal = "Šesti međunarodni znanstveni skup – Socijalizam na klupi. Krize i reforme",
title = "Privredne reforme u Jugoslaviji 1962. i 1965: Pokušaji kreiranja tržišnog socijalizma",
pages = "25-26",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3213"
}

Bešlin, M.. (2023). Privredne reforme u Jugoslaviji 1962. i 1965: Pokušaji kreiranja tržišnog socijalizma. in Šesti međunarodni znanstveni skup – Socijalizam na klupi. Krize i reforme
Pula : Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile., 25-26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3213

Bešlin M. Privredne reforme u Jugoslaviji 1962. i 1965: Pokušaji kreiranja tržišnog socijalizma. in Šesti međunarodni znanstveni skup – Socijalizam na klupi. Krize i reforme. 2023;:25-26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3213 .

Bešlin, Milivoj, "Privredne reforme u Jugoslaviji 1962. i 1965: Pokušaji kreiranja tržišnog socijalizma" in Šesti međunarodni znanstveni skup – Socijalizam na klupi. Krize i reforme (2023):25-26,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3213 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bešlin, Milivoj
AU  - Milošević, Srđan
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3212
AB  - The paper analyses the society of the newly created Kingdom of SCS/
Yugoslavia, which aroused great expectations from various members of the intellectual
elite. Majority of them, educated in the West as the “planned elite”, returned to the
country to help its social development. Nevertheless, the case of the Viennese professor,
the influential European pathologist and oncologist Prof Dr Đorđe Joannović (1871-
1932), although different from others, can be considered paradigmatic. Returning to
the country of his parents and leaving the comfortable life of Viennese scientific circle
Joannović devoted himself to building several medical institutions in Belgrade, from
the Faculty of Medicine to the Institute of Pathology. However, many who, like Dr
Joannović, enthusiastically came to the new country, ready to work and contribute to
its overall development, experienced severe disappointment, and even personal tragedy.
In this context, the fate of the famous doctor and distinguished Viennese professor, the
first Serbian oncologist, one of the world’s pioneers in the study of autoimmune diseases,
the founder of many medical institutions and the world-renowned scientist, is one of
the paradigms of the Yugoslav society. The strong connection with the students and
the support he provided to them, his loyalty to the principles of university autonomy
and his reluctance to put himself at the service of the authoritarian and repressive
government brought him into conflict with the bearers of the state terror of the Sixth of
January regime. From the conflicts and pressures to which he was exposed from the top
of the government, the well-known and recognised European scientist seeked salvation
in suicide.
PB  - Naučno društvo za istoriju zdravstvene kulture; Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
T2  - ACTA historiae medicinae, stomatologiae, pharmaciae, medicinae, veterinariae
T1  - The Kingdom of Yugoslavia an the return of the “planned elite“: The case of Professor Dr Đorđe Joannović
IS  - 42
SP  - 57
EP  - 69
DO  - 10.5937/acthist2301057B
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bešlin, Milivoj and Milošević, Srđan",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The paper analyses the society of the newly created Kingdom of SCS/
Yugoslavia, which aroused great expectations from various members of the intellectual
elite. Majority of them, educated in the West as the “planned elite”, returned to the
country to help its social development. Nevertheless, the case of the Viennese professor,
the influential European pathologist and oncologist Prof Dr Đorđe Joannović (1871-
1932), although different from others, can be considered paradigmatic. Returning to
the country of his parents and leaving the comfortable life of Viennese scientific circle
Joannović devoted himself to building several medical institutions in Belgrade, from
the Faculty of Medicine to the Institute of Pathology. However, many who, like Dr
Joannović, enthusiastically came to the new country, ready to work and contribute to
its overall development, experienced severe disappointment, and even personal tragedy.
In this context, the fate of the famous doctor and distinguished Viennese professor, the
first Serbian oncologist, one of the world’s pioneers in the study of autoimmune diseases,
the founder of many medical institutions and the world-renowned scientist, is one of
the paradigms of the Yugoslav society. The strong connection with the students and
the support he provided to them, his loyalty to the principles of university autonomy
and his reluctance to put himself at the service of the authoritarian and repressive
government brought him into conflict with the bearers of the state terror of the Sixth of
January regime. From the conflicts and pressures to which he was exposed from the top
of the government, the well-known and recognised European scientist seeked salvation
in suicide.",
publisher = "Naučno društvo za istoriju zdravstvene kulture; Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.",
journal = "ACTA historiae medicinae, stomatologiae, pharmaciae, medicinae, veterinariae",
title = "The Kingdom of Yugoslavia an the return of the “planned elite“: The case of Professor Dr Đorđe Joannović",
number = "42",
pages = "57-69",
doi = "10.5937/acthist2301057B"
}

Bešlin, M.,& Milošević, S.. (2023). The Kingdom of Yugoslavia an the return of the “planned elite“: The case of Professor Dr Đorđe Joannović. in ACTA historiae medicinae, stomatologiae, pharmaciae, medicinae, veterinariae
Naučno društvo za istoriju zdravstvene kulture; Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu..(42), 57-69.
https://doi.org/10.5937/acthist2301057B

Bešlin M, Milošević S. The Kingdom of Yugoslavia an the return of the “planned elite“: The case of Professor Dr Đorđe Joannović. in ACTA historiae medicinae, stomatologiae, pharmaciae, medicinae, veterinariae. 2023;(42):57-69.
doi:10.5937/acthist2301057B .

Bešlin, Milivoj, Milošević, Srđan, "The Kingdom of Yugoslavia an the return of the “planned elite“: The case of Professor Dr Đorđe Joannović" in ACTA historiae medicinae, stomatologiae, pharmaciae, medicinae, veterinariae, no. 42 (2023):57-69,
https://doi.org/10.5937/acthist2301057B . .

Цветковић, В.. (2023). Неопатристичка синтеза. in Родољуб Кубат (ур.), Речник библијске херменаутике
Београд : Службени гласник; Филон - Средиште за изучавање Библије и националне културе., 410-411.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3470

Цветковић В. Неопатристичка синтеза. in Родољуб Кубат (ур.), Речник библијске херменаутике. 2023;:410-411.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3470 .

Цветковић, Владимир, "Неопатристичка синтеза" in Родољуб Кубат (ур.), Речник библијске херменаутике (2023):410-411,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3470 .