TY  - JOUR
AU  - Korolija, Aleksandar
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://kritika.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/kc/article/view/67
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2471
AB  - U radu se razmatra Gramšijevo shvatanje političkog i građanskog društva pozivajući se na kritiku Perija Andersona koji ovaj problem označava kao antinomiju u Gramšijevom radu. Osnovni problem je razlikovanje hegemonije i dominacije, prilikom kojeg se hegemonija svrstava unutar građanskog, a dominacija unutar političkog društva. U takvom razdvajanju nivoa dolazi do problema države i njene pripadnosti jednom od ova dva nivoa. Kroz ponovno čitanje Gramšija se pokušava doći do odgovora na problem koji Anderson primećuje i pridaje mu status antinomije. Kako bi se odgovor našao daje se celovit uvid Gramšija u predmete poput odnosa baze i nadgradnje, građanskog i političkog društva, kao i odnosa snaga i države.
AB  - This work considers Gramsci’s understanding of civil and political society. Following 
Perry Anderson’s critique, an attempt was made to find a distinction between civil and 
political society which wouldn’t have a form of antinomy that Anderson attributes to 
it. In this representation, the reader can find arguments for and against Anderson’s 
claims. This is not the last word on this subject, we rather hope it is a further illumina tion of the problem and its reactualisation. The concept of hegemony that Gramsci 
built at the level of civil society and that implies consent also has a place within this 
consideration, while political society provides domination. In that division of levels, a 
specific problem is the place of the state which fluctuates between civil and political 
society. With the concept of ethical state, Gramsci signifies the transition of state 
from political society and domination to civil society and consent. This problematic 
is engaged in a totalized manner with the presentation of Gramsci’s insights into the 
relation of base and superstructure, hegemony, political and civil society, relations of 
force and state. These concepts can offer a closer insight into Gramsci’s understanding of ideological hegemony only when they are considered in their unity.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Distinkcija građanskog i političkog društva u delu Gramšija
T1  - The Distinction of Civil and Political Society in The Work of Gramsci
IS  - 2
VL  - 2
SP  - 273
EP  - 298
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.5732520
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Korolija, Aleksandar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "U radu se razmatra Gramšijevo shvatanje političkog i građanskog društva pozivajući se na kritiku Perija Andersona koji ovaj problem označava kao antinomiju u Gramšijevom radu. Osnovni problem je razlikovanje hegemonije i dominacije, prilikom kojeg se hegemonija svrstava unutar građanskog, a dominacija unutar političkog društva. U takvom razdvajanju nivoa dolazi do problema države i njene pripadnosti jednom od ova dva nivoa. Kroz ponovno čitanje Gramšija se pokušava doći do odgovora na problem koji Anderson primećuje i pridaje mu status antinomije. Kako bi se odgovor našao daje se celovit uvid Gramšija u predmete poput odnosa baze i nadgradnje, građanskog i političkog društva, kao i odnosa snaga i države., This work considers Gramsci’s understanding of civil and political society. Following 
Perry Anderson’s critique, an attempt was made to find a distinction between civil and 
political society which wouldn’t have a form of antinomy that Anderson attributes to 
it. In this representation, the reader can find arguments for and against Anderson’s 
claims. This is not the last word on this subject, we rather hope it is a further illumina tion of the problem and its reactualisation. The concept of hegemony that Gramsci 
built at the level of civil society and that implies consent also has a place within this 
consideration, while political society provides domination. In that division of levels, a 
specific problem is the place of the state which fluctuates between civil and political 
society. With the concept of ethical state, Gramsci signifies the transition of state 
from political society and domination to civil society and consent. This problematic 
is engaged in a totalized manner with the presentation of Gramsci’s insights into the 
relation of base and superstructure, hegemony, political and civil society, relations of 
force and state. These concepts can offer a closer insight into Gramsci’s understanding of ideological hegemony only when they are considered in their unity.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Distinkcija građanskog i političkog društva u delu Gramšija, The Distinction of Civil and Political Society in The Work of Gramsci",
number = "2",
volume = "2",
pages = "273-298",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.5732520"
}

Korolija, A.. (2021). Distinkcija građanskog i političkog društva u delu Gramšija. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 2(2), 273-298.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5732520

Korolija A. Distinkcija građanskog i političkog društva u delu Gramšija. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2021;2(2):273-298.
doi:10.5281/zenodo.5732520 .

Korolija, Aleksandar, "Distinkcija građanskog i političkog društva u delu Gramšija" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 2, no. 2 (2021):273-298,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5732520 . .