Hristov, Đorđe

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
a573d460-6768-4ff6-a26a-5eedfe340f85
  • Hristov, Đorđe (4)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Roman Courage and Constitution in Hegel's Philosophy of Right

Hristov, Đorđe

(Cambridge University Press, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hristov, Đorđe
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2525
AB  - This article argues that the citizens of Hegel's state cannot maintain themselves as politically free because they are susceptible to mutual enslavement. I demonstrate this by focusing on the Roman republican background of Hegel's constitution, the potential trajectory of its dissolution and the accompanying means of its cyclical fortification through courage. Hegel, by integrating aspects of the Roman mixed constitution also adopts the idea of decadence within his conception of civil society. After locating the source of decadence in the contractual relations of peace and the bourgeois inability to overcome the fear of death, I go on to argue that war for Hegel provides a theatre where freedom may be regenerated through courage. However, I also show that modern wars do not provide sufficient means of perpetuating Hegel's constitution. To demonstrate this, I distinguish three forms of war: colonial, limited and total war, arguing that only the latter offers a solution to decay of political disposition and loss of freedom, but that—by being itself susceptible to decadence—it cannot salvage Hegel's state from dissolution and reduction to contractual relations.
PB  - Cambridge University Press
T2  - Hegel Bulletin
T1  - Roman Courage and Constitution in Hegel's Philosophy of Right
DO  - 10.1017/hgl.2022.2
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hristov, Đorđe",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This article argues that the citizens of Hegel's state cannot maintain themselves as politically free because they are susceptible to mutual enslavement. I demonstrate this by focusing on the Roman republican background of Hegel's constitution, the potential trajectory of its dissolution and the accompanying means of its cyclical fortification through courage. Hegel, by integrating aspects of the Roman mixed constitution also adopts the idea of decadence within his conception of civil society. After locating the source of decadence in the contractual relations of peace and the bourgeois inability to overcome the fear of death, I go on to argue that war for Hegel provides a theatre where freedom may be regenerated through courage. However, I also show that modern wars do not provide sufficient means of perpetuating Hegel's constitution. To demonstrate this, I distinguish three forms of war: colonial, limited and total war, arguing that only the latter offers a solution to decay of political disposition and loss of freedom, but that—by being itself susceptible to decadence—it cannot salvage Hegel's state from dissolution and reduction to contractual relations.",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
journal = "Hegel Bulletin",
title = "Roman Courage and Constitution in Hegel's Philosophy of Right",
doi = "10.1017/hgl.2022.2"
}
Hristov, Đ.. (2022). Roman Courage and Constitution in Hegel's Philosophy of Right. in Hegel Bulletin
Cambridge University Press..
https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2022.2
Hristov Đ. Roman Courage and Constitution in Hegel's Philosophy of Right. in Hegel Bulletin. 2022;.
doi:10.1017/hgl.2022.2 .
Hristov, Đorđe, "Roman Courage and Constitution in Hegel's Philosophy of Right" in Hegel Bulletin (2022),
https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2022.2 . .
4

Okrutnost, teror i cinizam: Delez,Gatari i marksizam

Hristov, Đorđe

(Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hristov, Đorđe
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2526
AB  - Rad  prezentuje  Delezovu  i  Gatarijevu  univerzalnu  istoriju  iz Anti-Edipasa ciljem  osvrta  na  centralne  momente  ovog  dela  koji  se  nadovezuju  na  Marksove  teze  iz Grundrisse. Svrha rada je da pokaže na koji način Delez i Gatari preformulišu klasični marksistički  problem  ideologije  u  pitanje  konstitucije  subjektivnosti.  Polazeći  od Marksovog  manuskripta  o  pretkapitalističkim  formama  proizvodnje  iz Grundrisseprikazujemo tri različita režima koje Delez i Gatari formulišu: primitivizam, despotizam i kapitalizam, sa posebnim fokusom na poslednji i na formu subjektivnosti koju ovaj režim pretpostavlja.  Konačno  se  u  radu  osvrćemo  i  na  probleme  sa  kojima  se  Delezova  i Gatarijeva istoriografija suočava.
PB  - Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad
T2  - Arhe
T1  - Okrutnost, teror i cinizam: Delez,Gatari i marksizam
VL  - 33
VL  - 1820-0958
DO  - 10.19090/arhe.2020.33
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hristov, Đorđe",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Rad  prezentuje  Delezovu  i  Gatarijevu  univerzalnu  istoriju  iz Anti-Edipasa ciljem  osvrta  na  centralne  momente  ovog  dela  koji  se  nadovezuju  na  Marksove  teze  iz Grundrisse. Svrha rada je da pokaže na koji način Delez i Gatari preformulišu klasični marksistički  problem  ideologije  u  pitanje  konstitucije  subjektivnosti.  Polazeći  od Marksovog  manuskripta  o  pretkapitalističkim  formama  proizvodnje  iz Grundrisseprikazujemo tri različita režima koje Delez i Gatari formulišu: primitivizam, despotizam i kapitalizam, sa posebnim fokusom na poslednji i na formu subjektivnosti koju ovaj režim pretpostavlja.  Konačno  se  u  radu  osvrćemo  i  na  probleme  sa  kojima  se  Delezova  i Gatarijeva istoriografija suočava.",
publisher = "Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad",
journal = "Arhe",
title = "Okrutnost, teror i cinizam: Delez,Gatari i marksizam",
volume = "33, 1820-0958",
doi = "10.19090/arhe.2020.33"
}
Hristov, Đ.. (2020). Okrutnost, teror i cinizam: Delez,Gatari i marksizam. in Arhe
Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad., 33.
https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2020.33
Hristov Đ. Okrutnost, teror i cinizam: Delez,Gatari i marksizam. in Arhe. 2020;33.
doi:10.19090/arhe.2020.33 .
Hristov, Đorđe, "Okrutnost, teror i cinizam: Delez,Gatari i marksizam" in Arhe, 33 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2020.33 . .

Hegel, Deleuze/Guattari and Political Immanence: The Sons of Rousseau

Hristov, Đorđe

(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hristov, Đorđe
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2524
AB  - In the article I argue that Hegel and Deleuze/Guattari construct two distinct political paths toward immanence. Both of these paths have as their starting point Rousseau’s bourgeois. I show that both thinkers follow Rousseau in his attempt to construct political immanence and abandon the position of private man. However, in doing so they move in opposite directions. Hegel seeks to convert the bourgeois into the citizen, with the intention of reformulating the immanence of state-life presented in the The Social Contract by extending mutual recognition a distinct space in the form of civil society. In contrast Deleuze/Guattari move in the direction of becoming-animal along the lines of the Discourse on Inequality, by reformulating the relationship between life and society. At the same time, I argue that the overcoming of the problems that Hegel and Deleuze/Guattari identified in Rousseau introduces new ones and that the dangers inherent in the project of immanence cannot disappear.
PB  - Cambridge University Press
T2  - Hegel Bulletin
T1  - Hegel, Deleuze/Guattari and Political Immanence: The Sons of Rousseau
VL  - 39
DO  - 10.1017/hgl.2018.19
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hristov, Đorđe",
year = "2018",
abstract = "In the article I argue that Hegel and Deleuze/Guattari construct two distinct political paths toward immanence. Both of these paths have as their starting point Rousseau’s bourgeois. I show that both thinkers follow Rousseau in his attempt to construct political immanence and abandon the position of private man. However, in doing so they move in opposite directions. Hegel seeks to convert the bourgeois into the citizen, with the intention of reformulating the immanence of state-life presented in the The Social Contract by extending mutual recognition a distinct space in the form of civil society. In contrast Deleuze/Guattari move in the direction of becoming-animal along the lines of the Discourse on Inequality, by reformulating the relationship between life and society. At the same time, I argue that the overcoming of the problems that Hegel and Deleuze/Guattari identified in Rousseau introduces new ones and that the dangers inherent in the project of immanence cannot disappear.",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
journal = "Hegel Bulletin",
title = "Hegel, Deleuze/Guattari and Political Immanence: The Sons of Rousseau",
volume = "39",
doi = "10.1017/hgl.2018.19"
}
Hristov, Đ.. (2018). Hegel, Deleuze/Guattari and Political Immanence: The Sons of Rousseau. in Hegel Bulletin
Cambridge University Press., 39.
https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2018.19
Hristov Đ. Hegel, Deleuze/Guattari and Political Immanence: The Sons of Rousseau. in Hegel Bulletin. 2018;39.
doi:10.1017/hgl.2018.19 .
Hristov, Đorđe, "Hegel, Deleuze/Guattari and Political Immanence: The Sons of Rousseau" in Hegel Bulletin, 39 (2018),
https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2018.19 . .

Control and the Nation-State

Hristov, Đorđe

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Hristov, Đorđe
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2567
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
C3  - Thinking Beyond Capitalism
T1  - Control and the Nation-State
SP  - 158
EP  - 175
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Hristov, Đorđe",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Thinking Beyond Capitalism",
title = "Control and the Nation-State",
pages = "158-175"
}
Hristov, Đ.. (2016). Control and the Nation-State. in Thinking Beyond Capitalism
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 158-175.
Hristov Đ. Control and the Nation-State. in Thinking Beyond Capitalism. 2016;:158-175..
Hristov, Đorđe, "Control and the Nation-State" in Thinking Beyond Capitalism (2016):158-175.