TY  - CONF
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3156
AB  - This presentation is divided into two segments. The first explores the woman’s perspective from a male viewpoint, while the second delves into the woman’s perspective from a female standpoint. The Mauthausen Trilogy, known as The Ballad of Mauthausen, composed by Greek artist Mikis Theodorakis, serves as a poignant example of Holocaust narratives. Within this trilogy, the Song of Songs, which features evocative lyrics by the Greek poet Iakovos Kambanellis, provides a glimpse into the human experience of love and loss within the harrowing context of the Holocaust. Namely, the Song of Songs (Asma asmaton) captures Kambanellis’ affection for a Lithuanian-Jewish woman. Kambanellis, himself a survivor of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp, subsequently channeled his personal Holocaust experiences into an autobiographical novel. While acknowledging the predominant male perspectives on Holocaust experiences, this presentation also devotes special attention to the often-overlooked female voices. One of the most renowned and impactful female testimonies of the Holocaust is The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank which provides an intimate and personal account of Anne’s experiences and emotions while hiding from Nazi persecution. In addition, a special focus will be on the testimonies of Ruth Klüger, who wrote about her Holocaust experience in her autobiography Still Alive: A Holocaust Girlhood Remembered. In the concluding segment of this presentation, a key objective is to explore the commonalities and distinctions among these works in relation to the emotions of love, fear, and hope. By examining these motives, we aim to discern the shared elements and divergences within the testimonies discussed. Additionally, we will try to critically examine the notion of generalizing from individual experiences, questioning whether it is possible to extract overarching conclusions from the multifaceted and deeply personal accounts presented.
PB  - Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade
C3  - Book of Abstracts / Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference, 10-12 October 2023, Belgrade
T1  - Unveiling the Emotions of Love, Fear, and Hope: Women of the Holocaust
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3156
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2023",
abstract = "This presentation is divided into two segments. The first explores the woman’s perspective from a male viewpoint, while the second delves into the woman’s perspective from a female standpoint. The Mauthausen Trilogy, known as The Ballad of Mauthausen, composed by Greek artist Mikis Theodorakis, serves as a poignant example of Holocaust narratives. Within this trilogy, the Song of Songs, which features evocative lyrics by the Greek poet Iakovos Kambanellis, provides a glimpse into the human experience of love and loss within the harrowing context of the Holocaust. Namely, the Song of Songs (Asma asmaton) captures Kambanellis’ affection for a Lithuanian-Jewish woman. Kambanellis, himself a survivor of the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp, subsequently channeled his personal Holocaust experiences into an autobiographical novel. While acknowledging the predominant male perspectives on Holocaust experiences, this presentation also devotes special attention to the often-overlooked female voices. One of the most renowned and impactful female testimonies of the Holocaust is The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank which provides an intimate and personal account of Anne’s experiences and emotions while hiding from Nazi persecution. In addition, a special focus will be on the testimonies of Ruth Klüger, who wrote about her Holocaust experience in her autobiography Still Alive: A Holocaust Girlhood Remembered. In the concluding segment of this presentation, a key objective is to explore the commonalities and distinctions among these works in relation to the emotions of love, fear, and hope. By examining these motives, we aim to discern the shared elements and divergences within the testimonies discussed. Additionally, we will try to critically examine the notion of generalizing from individual experiences, questioning whether it is possible to extract overarching conclusions from the multifaceted and deeply personal accounts presented.",
publisher = "Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade",
journal = "Book of Abstracts / Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference, 10-12 October 2023, Belgrade",
title = "Unveiling the Emotions of Love, Fear, and Hope: Women of the Holocaust",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3156"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2023). Unveiling the Emotions of Love, Fear, and Hope: Women of the Holocaust. in Book of Abstracts / Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference, 10-12 October 2023, Belgrade
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3156

Plećaš T. Unveiling the Emotions of Love, Fear, and Hope: Women of the Holocaust. in Book of Abstracts / Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference, 10-12 October 2023, Belgrade. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3156 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Unveiling the Emotions of Love, Fear, and Hope: Women of the Holocaust" in Book of Abstracts / Women in the Holocaust International Scientific Conference, 10-12 October 2023, Belgrade (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3156 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3155
AB  - Na koje se sve načine može misliti i ispitivati moralna odgovornost prema onima koji tek dolaze jeste kompleksno pitanje. Iz perspektive istorije filozofije, jedan od prvih podsticaja ili nagovora da budemo odgovorni pred onim drugima koji/e su nam „jednaki/e“, ali i onim drugima kojih još uvek nema, dolazi od stoika. Nadovezujući se na grčku etičku tradiciju, rimski stoici smatraju da čovek prirodno teži „zajednici sa drugima; jer su ljudi bića [...] određena za zajednicu“ (Aurelije, Med. 5.16). Tako je Seneka isticao neophodnost kultivisanja čovečnosti (humanitas), posebno jer se „moralne obaveze“ prostiru dalje od „pravnih pravila“ i onoga što može da se pronađe u „pravnim tablicama i stranicama zakonika“ (Seneka, Ir. 2.28). Pored čovečnosti, među moralne obaveze ubraja i pravičnost (iustitia), kao i plemenitost i ljubaznost (liberalitas) prema svim ljudima. To jest, stoička etika više ne priznaje one oštre razlike prethodno, u većoj ili manjoj meri, isticane u staroj Grčkoj, poput razlike između Grka i varvara, slobodnih i robova, muškaraca i žena. Podstiče se briga o svakom pojedinačnom čoveku, ali i društvu u celini (Seneka, Cl. 2.5), a ta briga se preliva i na buduće generacije (posteri) koje mogu da izvuku korist iz stoičkih spisa (Seneka, Ep. 8.2).
AB  - Examining moral responsibility towards those who are yet to come is a complex question. From the perspective of the history of philosophy, one of the first incentives or persuasions to be responsible to those who are our “equals” and to those who are not yet born comes from the Stoics. Building on the Greek ethical tradition, the Roman Stoics believed that humans naturally strive for communion with others, as human beings “were formed for society” (Aurelius, Med. 5.16). Seneca emphasized the necessity of cultivating humanity (humanitas), especially since moral obligations or “the norm of appropriate actions” extend beyond “the rule of law” and what can be found in “the tablets of the law” (Seneca, Ir. 2.28). In addition to humanity, justice (iustitia), as well as generosity and kindness (liberalitas) towards all people, are among moral obligations. Stoic ethics no longer recognizes the sharp distinctions previously emphasized to a greater or lesser extent in ancient Greece, such as the distinction between Greeks and barbarians, freemen and slaves, and men and women. Kindness and care are encouraged for each individual person, as well as for society (Seneca, Cl. 2.5), and this extends to future generations (posteri) as well, who can benefit from the Stoic writings (Seneca, Ep. 8.2).
PB  - Beograd : Filozofski fakultet, Institut za filozofiju
C3  - Knjiga apstrakata [Elektronski izvor] / Okrugli sto Moralna odgovornost i problemi savremenog društva, Beograd, 14. novembra 2023. ; [organizator Institut za filozofiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu] ; uredili Jelena Mijić i Igor Živanović.
T1  - Moralna odgovornost prema budućim generacijama: stoički pogled
T1  - Moral Responsibility Towards Future Generations: the Stoic Preview
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3155
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Na koje se sve načine može misliti i ispitivati moralna odgovornost prema onima koji tek dolaze jeste kompleksno pitanje. Iz perspektive istorije filozofije, jedan od prvih podsticaja ili nagovora da budemo odgovorni pred onim drugima koji/e su nam „jednaki/e“, ali i onim drugima kojih još uvek nema, dolazi od stoika. Nadovezujući se na grčku etičku tradiciju, rimski stoici smatraju da čovek prirodno teži „zajednici sa drugima; jer su ljudi bića [...] određena za zajednicu“ (Aurelije, Med. 5.16). Tako je Seneka isticao neophodnost kultivisanja čovečnosti (humanitas), posebno jer se „moralne obaveze“ prostiru dalje od „pravnih pravila“ i onoga što može da se pronađe u „pravnim tablicama i stranicama zakonika“ (Seneka, Ir. 2.28). Pored čovečnosti, među moralne obaveze ubraja i pravičnost (iustitia), kao i plemenitost i ljubaznost (liberalitas) prema svim ljudima. To jest, stoička etika više ne priznaje one oštre razlike prethodno, u većoj ili manjoj meri, isticane u staroj Grčkoj, poput razlike između Grka i varvara, slobodnih i robova, muškaraca i žena. Podstiče se briga o svakom pojedinačnom čoveku, ali i društvu u celini (Seneka, Cl. 2.5), a ta briga se preliva i na buduće generacije (posteri) koje mogu da izvuku korist iz stoičkih spisa (Seneka, Ep. 8.2)., Examining moral responsibility towards those who are yet to come is a complex question. From the perspective of the history of philosophy, one of the first incentives or persuasions to be responsible to those who are our “equals” and to those who are not yet born comes from the Stoics. Building on the Greek ethical tradition, the Roman Stoics believed that humans naturally strive for communion with others, as human beings “were formed for society” (Aurelius, Med. 5.16). Seneca emphasized the necessity of cultivating humanity (humanitas), especially since moral obligations or “the norm of appropriate actions” extend beyond “the rule of law” and what can be found in “the tablets of the law” (Seneca, Ir. 2.28). In addition to humanity, justice (iustitia), as well as generosity and kindness (liberalitas) towards all people, are among moral obligations. Stoic ethics no longer recognizes the sharp distinctions previously emphasized to a greater or lesser extent in ancient Greece, such as the distinction between Greeks and barbarians, freemen and slaves, and men and women. Kindness and care are encouraged for each individual person, as well as for society (Seneca, Cl. 2.5), and this extends to future generations (posteri) as well, who can benefit from the Stoic writings (Seneca, Ep. 8.2).",
publisher = "Beograd : Filozofski fakultet, Institut za filozofiju",
journal = "Knjiga apstrakata [Elektronski izvor] / Okrugli sto Moralna odgovornost i problemi savremenog društva, Beograd, 14. novembra 2023. ; [organizator Institut za filozofiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu] ; uredili Jelena Mijić i Igor Živanović.",
title = "Moralna odgovornost prema budućim generacijama: stoički pogled, Moral Responsibility Towards Future Generations: the Stoic Preview",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3155"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2023). Moralna odgovornost prema budućim generacijama: stoički pogled. in Knjiga apstrakata [Elektronski izvor] / Okrugli sto Moralna odgovornost i problemi savremenog društva, Beograd, 14. novembra 2023. ; [organizator Institut za filozofiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu] ; uredili Jelena Mijić i Igor Živanović.
Beograd : Filozofski fakultet, Institut za filozofiju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3155

Plećaš T. Moralna odgovornost prema budućim generacijama: stoički pogled. in Knjiga apstrakata [Elektronski izvor] / Okrugli sto Moralna odgovornost i problemi savremenog društva, Beograd, 14. novembra 2023. ; [organizator Institut za filozofiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu] ; uredili Jelena Mijić i Igor Živanović.. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3155 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Moralna odgovornost prema budućim generacijama: stoički pogled" in Knjiga apstrakata [Elektronski izvor] / Okrugli sto Moralna odgovornost i problemi savremenog društva, Beograd, 14. novembra 2023. ; [organizator Institut za filozofiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu] ; uredili Jelena Mijić i Igor Živanović. (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3155 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
AU  - Đorđević, Ana
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-0861/2023/0350-08612301045P.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2849
AB  - This paper will primarily focus on the philosophical depictions of Medea’s character and actions. The following identities will be examined: gender (which roles defined a woman in antiquity and are these definitions still relevant today), political (what does it mean to be a foreigner and not belong to a particular political community), and psychological (do passions inevitably lead to a split in the psyche or, on the contrary, constitute it). These will serve as frames that outline Medea’s exceptional (in)humanness in the Greco-Roman society.
PB  - Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU
T2  - Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU
T1  - Medea: Greek myth and peculiar identity
IS  - 1
VL  - 71
SP  - 45
EP  - 62
DO  - 10.2298/GEI2301045P
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara and Đorđević, Ana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "This paper will primarily focus on the philosophical depictions of Medea’s character and actions. The following identities will be examined: gender (which roles defined a woman in antiquity and are these definitions still relevant today), political (what does it mean to be a foreigner and not belong to a particular political community), and psychological (do passions inevitably lead to a split in the psyche or, on the contrary, constitute it). These will serve as frames that outline Medea’s exceptional (in)humanness in the Greco-Roman society.",
publisher = "Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU",
journal = "Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU",
title = "Medea: Greek myth and peculiar identity",
number = "1",
volume = "71",
pages = "45-62",
doi = "10.2298/GEI2301045P"
}

Plećaš, T.,& Đorđević, A.. (2023). Medea: Greek myth and peculiar identity. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU
Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU., 71(1), 45-62.
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2301045P

Plećaš T, Đorđević A. Medea: Greek myth and peculiar identity. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. 2023;71(1):45-62.
doi:10.2298/GEI2301045P .

Plećaš, Tamara, Đorđević, Ana, "Medea: Greek myth and peculiar identity" in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 71, no. 1 (2023):45-62,
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI2301045P . .

TY  - DATA
AU  - Marković, Vukan
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1553
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2813
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Pregled tribina i konferencija u Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju za 2022. godinu
IS  - 1
VL  - 34
SP  - 201
EP  - 216
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2813
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Marković, Vukan and Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Pregled tribina i konferencija u Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju za 2022. godinu",
number = "1",
volume = "34",
pages = "201-216",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2813"
}

Marković, V.,& Plećaš, T.. (2023). Pregled tribina i konferencija u Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju za 2022. godinu. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 34(1), 201-216.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2813

Marković V, Plećaš T. Pregled tribina i konferencija u Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju za 2022. godinu. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2023;34(1):201-216.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2813 .

Marković, Vukan, Plećaš, Tamara, "Pregled tribina i konferencija u Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju za 2022. godinu" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 34, no. 1 (2023):201-216,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2813 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1539
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2802
AB  - The idea that learning liberates or that education emancipates is hardly a novelty, and it can be traced to ancient times and Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy. Thus, in this paper, we aim to express that some of the ideas (like the idea that women and men are equally subject to moral virtue because of their rationality) and educational practices (such as those that encourage students to use their voices and reason independently from any authorities) embraced by well-known Roman Stoics did have emancipatory potential. Particularly important was a requirement that philosophy should be lived outside the classrooms.
AB  - Ideja da učenje oslobađa ili, preciznije da obrazovanje emancipuje teško da predstavlja neku novinu, budući da se ta ideja može pratiti sve do antičkog perioda, odnosno grčke i rimske filozofske misli. U ovom radu nastojimo da pokažemo da su neke od ideja (poput ideje da su i žene i muškarci zbog svoje racionalne prirode podjednako podložni vrlini) i obrazovnih praksi (poput prakse kojom se podsticalo iznošenje sopstvenih stavova i korišćenja vlastitog razuma, bez oslanjanja na spoljne autoritete) koje su zastupali neki od dobro poznatih rimskih stoika imale emancipatorski potencijal. Posebnu važnost je nosio zahtev u skladu sa kojim filozofija treba da se živi i van učionica.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Roman Stoics on the Emancipatory Potential of the Philosophical Paideia
T1  - Rimski stoici o emancipatorskom potencijalu filozofskog obrazovanja
IS  - 1
VL  - 34
SP  - 59
EP  - 69
DO  - 10.2298/FID2301059P
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The idea that learning liberates or that education emancipates is hardly a novelty, and it can be traced to ancient times and Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy. Thus, in this paper, we aim to express that some of the ideas (like the idea that women and men are equally subject to moral virtue because of their rationality) and educational practices (such as those that encourage students to use their voices and reason independently from any authorities) embraced by well-known Roman Stoics did have emancipatory potential. Particularly important was a requirement that philosophy should be lived outside the classrooms., Ideja da učenje oslobađa ili, preciznije da obrazovanje emancipuje teško da predstavlja neku novinu, budući da se ta ideja može pratiti sve do antičkog perioda, odnosno grčke i rimske filozofske misli. U ovom radu nastojimo da pokažemo da su neke od ideja (poput ideje da su i žene i muškarci zbog svoje racionalne prirode podjednako podložni vrlini) i obrazovnih praksi (poput prakse kojom se podsticalo iznošenje sopstvenih stavova i korišćenja vlastitog razuma, bez oslanjanja na spoljne autoritete) koje su zastupali neki od dobro poznatih rimskih stoika imale emancipatorski potencijal. Posebnu važnost je nosio zahtev u skladu sa kojim filozofija treba da se živi i van učionica.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Roman Stoics on the Emancipatory Potential of the Philosophical Paideia, Rimski stoici o emancipatorskom potencijalu filozofskog obrazovanja",
number = "1",
volume = "34",
pages = "59-69",
doi = "10.2298/FID2301059P"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2023). The Roman Stoics on the Emancipatory Potential of the Philosophical Paideia. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 34(1), 59-69.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2301059P

Plećaš T. The Roman Stoics on the Emancipatory Potential of the Philosophical Paideia. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2023;34(1):59-69.
doi:10.2298/FID2301059P .

Plećaš, Tamara, "The Roman Stoics on the Emancipatory Potential of the Philosophical Paideia" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 34, no. 1 (2023):59-69,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2301059P . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
AU  - Nišavić, Ivan
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2753
AB  - Zadovoljstvo (ἡδονή) se kod epikurejaca i stoika tumači na različite načine, što ujedno predstavlja i najznačajniju tačku neslaganja između ove dve hele­ nističke škole mišljenja, posebno ukoliko govorimo o njihovim etičkim pozicijama. Imajući u vidu da zadovoljstvo može da proistekne i iz određenih društvenih odnosa (i uloga), ovde se u kraćim crtama ispituje stoičko i epikurejsko shvatanje prijateljstva i braka, odnosno političkog delanja – ukazivanjem na sličnosti, ali i razlike koje mogu da se povuku između ove dve helenističke škole.
AB  - Epicureans and Roman Stoics interpreted pleasure (ἡδονή) differently from each 
other: for the Epicureans, pleasure was the ultimate good, while most Stoics perceived 
pleasure as something indifferent. This difference in understanding of pleasure is the 
crucial point of a disagreement between these two Hellenistic schools of philosophy, 
in particular if we consider their ethics. This paper examines this difference and highli ghts the significant similarities between the Roman Stoic and the Epicurean positions. 
Further, it briefly explores the Epicurean and the Roman Stoic understanding of social 
relations and philosophers’ role in politics and society.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Rimski stoici Seneka i Epiktet o epikurejskom hedonizmu i društvenim ulogama filozofa
T1  - Roman Stoics Seneca and Epictetus on Epicurean Hedonism and the Social  Roles of Philosophers
IS  - 3
VL  - 65
SP  - 5
EP  - 19
DO  - 10.2298/THEO2203005P
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara and Nišavić, Ivan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Zadovoljstvo (ἡδονή) se kod epikurejaca i stoika tumači na različite načine, što ujedno predstavlja i najznačajniju tačku neslaganja između ove dve hele­ nističke škole mišljenja, posebno ukoliko govorimo o njihovim etičkim pozicijama. Imajući u vidu da zadovoljstvo može da proistekne i iz određenih društvenih odnosa (i uloga), ovde se u kraćim crtama ispituje stoičko i epikurejsko shvatanje prijateljstva i braka, odnosno političkog delanja – ukazivanjem na sličnosti, ali i razlike koje mogu da se povuku između ove dve helenističke škole., Epicureans and Roman Stoics interpreted pleasure (ἡδονή) differently from each 
other: for the Epicureans, pleasure was the ultimate good, while most Stoics perceived 
pleasure as something indifferent. This difference in understanding of pleasure is the 
crucial point of a disagreement between these two Hellenistic schools of philosophy, 
in particular if we consider their ethics. This paper examines this difference and highli ghts the significant similarities between the Roman Stoic and the Epicurean positions. 
Further, it briefly explores the Epicurean and the Roman Stoic understanding of social 
relations and philosophers’ role in politics and society.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Rimski stoici Seneka i Epiktet o epikurejskom hedonizmu i društvenim ulogama filozofa, Roman Stoics Seneca and Epictetus on Epicurean Hedonism and the Social  Roles of Philosophers",
number = "3",
volume = "65",
pages = "5-19",
doi = "10.2298/THEO2203005P"
}

Plećaš, T.,& Nišavić, I.. (2022). Rimski stoici Seneka i Epiktet o epikurejskom hedonizmu i društvenim ulogama filozofa. in Theoria
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 65(3), 5-19.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2203005P

Plećaš T, Nišavić I. Rimski stoici Seneka i Epiktet o epikurejskom hedonizmu i društvenim ulogama filozofa. in Theoria. 2022;65(3):5-19.
doi:10.2298/THEO2203005P .

Plećaš, Tamara, Nišavić, Ivan, "Rimski stoici Seneka i Epiktet o epikurejskom hedonizmu i društvenim ulogama filozofa" in Theoria, 65, no. 3 (2022):5-19,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2203005P . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3154
AB  - Aristotel o prijateljstvu govori u nekoliko spisa. Posebno se izdvajaju osma i deveta knjiga Nikomahove etike o kojima diskutuje i filozofkinja Ksenija Atanasijević u svom tekstu „Aristotelovo shvatanje prijateljstva“. Tekst je objavljen 1928. godine u časopisu Srpski književni glasnik, gotovo trideset godina pre nego što je Nikomahovu etiku na srpski jezik prevela Radmila Šalabalić. Tokom izlaganja, oslanjaćemo se prvenstveno na taj, ali i na druge tekstove Ksenije Atanasijević, kao što su „O emancipaciji žena kod Platona“ (iz 1923. g.) i „Pesnikinje i filosofkinje stare Grčke“ (iz 1924. g.). Aristotel navodi da su, kada je reč o „problemu prijateljstva“, mnoge stvari sporne. Analizirajući i Aristotelovu poziciju, Ksenija Atanasijević ističe da o prijateljstvu „nijednu novu reč vremena koja dolaze“ neće znati da saopšte. Štaviše, stiče se utisak da je ono najvažnije o prijateljstvu, već
saopštio, ako ne i razrešio, upravo Aristotel. Aristotelu pripisuje istančan osećaj za psihologiju, iako je i on povremeno naivan i sklon greškama. Naime, kada je reč o „jednakim prijateljstvima“, Aristotel greši jer ne smatra prijateljstvo „jednom od velikih retkosti“, već i odnose zasnovane na korisnosti i zadovoljstvu naziva prijateljskim. Kada je reč o „nejednakim prijateljstvima“, gde se ubraja i prijateljstvo između muškarca i žene, konstatuje se da Aristotel neupadljivo ističe razliku koja postoji u pravnim i prijateljskim odnosima. Međutim, time se ne problematizuje Aristotelov odnos prema ženama, što može da deluje neobično, posebno ako imamo u vidu feminističku misao koju je Ksenija Atanasijević izrazila u pomenutim tekstovima iz 1923. i 1924. godine.
AB  - Aristotle speaks on the subject of friendship in several of his writings. The eighth and ninth books of his Nicomachean ethics are notable among them, which Ksenija Atanasijević discusses in her paper “Aristotle on Friendship”. The paper was published in 1928 in the journal The Serbian Literary Herald, thirty years before Nicomachean ethics was translated to Serbian by Radmila Šalabalić. In this presentation, we will concentrate on that and other essays of Ksenija Atanasijević, such as “On Emancipation of Women in Plato” (1923) and “Women Poets and Philosophers of Ancient Greece” (1924). Aristotle notes that many things are disputable when it comes to “the problem of friendship”. However, in her analysis of Aristotle, Atanasijević accentuates that nothing new about friendship will be conveyed in the forthcoming times. Furthermore, one can get the impression that the most confusing issues have already been solved by Aristotle as far as the question of friendship is concerned. Ksenija Atanasijević ascribes a refined sense of psychology to Aristotle despite of his sporadic naivety and tendency to make fallacies. Namely, Aristotle is wrong when it comes to “equal friendships”, because he did not consider friendship one of the greatest rarities, but classified relationships based on utility and pleasure as friendships as well. When it comes to “unequal friendships”, one of them being friendship between husband and wife, Atanasijević says that Aristotle emphasized the difference between legal relationships and friendships. However, Ksenija Atanasijević does not problematize Aristotle’s attitude towards women, which seems potentially controversial, especially considering her feminism expressed in earlier essays.
PB  - Beograd : Univerzitet, Filozofski fakultet
C3  - Knjiga apstrakata / Međunarodna naučna konferencija Filozofija Ksenije Atanasijević, Beograd, 26–27. maja 2022. ; uredile Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan = Book of abstracts / International Scientific Conference The Philosophy of Ksenija Atanasijević, Belgrade, 26–27 May 2022 ; editors Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan.
T1  - Ksenija Atanasijević o greškama u Aristotelovom razumevanju prijateljstva
T1  - Atanasijević on Fallacies in Aristotle’s Understanding of Friendship
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3154
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Aristotel o prijateljstvu govori u nekoliko spisa. Posebno se izdvajaju osma i deveta knjiga Nikomahove etike o kojima diskutuje i filozofkinja Ksenija Atanasijević u svom tekstu „Aristotelovo shvatanje prijateljstva“. Tekst je objavljen 1928. godine u časopisu Srpski književni glasnik, gotovo trideset godina pre nego što je Nikomahovu etiku na srpski jezik prevela Radmila Šalabalić. Tokom izlaganja, oslanjaćemo se prvenstveno na taj, ali i na druge tekstove Ksenije Atanasijević, kao što su „O emancipaciji žena kod Platona“ (iz 1923. g.) i „Pesnikinje i filosofkinje stare Grčke“ (iz 1924. g.). Aristotel navodi da su, kada je reč o „problemu prijateljstva“, mnoge stvari sporne. Analizirajući i Aristotelovu poziciju, Ksenija Atanasijević ističe da o prijateljstvu „nijednu novu reč vremena koja dolaze“ neće znati da saopšte. Štaviše, stiče se utisak da je ono najvažnije o prijateljstvu, već
saopštio, ako ne i razrešio, upravo Aristotel. Aristotelu pripisuje istančan osećaj za psihologiju, iako je i on povremeno naivan i sklon greškama. Naime, kada je reč o „jednakim prijateljstvima“, Aristotel greši jer ne smatra prijateljstvo „jednom od velikih retkosti“, već i odnose zasnovane na korisnosti i zadovoljstvu naziva prijateljskim. Kada je reč o „nejednakim prijateljstvima“, gde se ubraja i prijateljstvo između muškarca i žene, konstatuje se da Aristotel neupadljivo ističe razliku koja postoji u pravnim i prijateljskim odnosima. Međutim, time se ne problematizuje Aristotelov odnos prema ženama, što može da deluje neobično, posebno ako imamo u vidu feminističku misao koju je Ksenija Atanasijević izrazila u pomenutim tekstovima iz 1923. i 1924. godine., Aristotle speaks on the subject of friendship in several of his writings. The eighth and ninth books of his Nicomachean ethics are notable among them, which Ksenija Atanasijević discusses in her paper “Aristotle on Friendship”. The paper was published in 1928 in the journal The Serbian Literary Herald, thirty years before Nicomachean ethics was translated to Serbian by Radmila Šalabalić. In this presentation, we will concentrate on that and other essays of Ksenija Atanasijević, such as “On Emancipation of Women in Plato” (1923) and “Women Poets and Philosophers of Ancient Greece” (1924). Aristotle notes that many things are disputable when it comes to “the problem of friendship”. However, in her analysis of Aristotle, Atanasijević accentuates that nothing new about friendship will be conveyed in the forthcoming times. Furthermore, one can get the impression that the most confusing issues have already been solved by Aristotle as far as the question of friendship is concerned. Ksenija Atanasijević ascribes a refined sense of psychology to Aristotle despite of his sporadic naivety and tendency to make fallacies. Namely, Aristotle is wrong when it comes to “equal friendships”, because he did not consider friendship one of the greatest rarities, but classified relationships based on utility and pleasure as friendships as well. When it comes to “unequal friendships”, one of them being friendship between husband and wife, Atanasijević says that Aristotle emphasized the difference between legal relationships and friendships. However, Ksenija Atanasijević does not problematize Aristotle’s attitude towards women, which seems potentially controversial, especially considering her feminism expressed in earlier essays.",
publisher = "Beograd : Univerzitet, Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Knjiga apstrakata / Međunarodna naučna konferencija Filozofija Ksenije Atanasijević, Beograd, 26–27. maja 2022. ; uredile Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan = Book of abstracts / International Scientific Conference The Philosophy of Ksenija Atanasijević, Belgrade, 26–27 May 2022 ; editors Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan.",
title = "Ksenija Atanasijević o greškama u Aristotelovom razumevanju prijateljstva, Atanasijević on Fallacies in Aristotle’s Understanding of Friendship",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3154"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2022). Ksenija Atanasijević o greškama u Aristotelovom razumevanju prijateljstva. in Knjiga apstrakata / Međunarodna naučna konferencija Filozofija Ksenije Atanasijević, Beograd, 26–27. maja 2022. ; uredile Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan = Book of abstracts / International Scientific Conference The Philosophy of Ksenija Atanasijević, Belgrade, 26–27 May 2022 ; editors Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan.
Beograd : Univerzitet, Filozofski fakultet..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3154

Plećaš T. Ksenija Atanasijević o greškama u Aristotelovom razumevanju prijateljstva. in Knjiga apstrakata / Međunarodna naučna konferencija Filozofija Ksenije Atanasijević, Beograd, 26–27. maja 2022. ; uredile Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan = Book of abstracts / International Scientific Conference The Philosophy of Ksenija Atanasijević, Belgrade, 26–27 May 2022 ; editors Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan.. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3154 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Ksenija Atanasijević o greškama u Aristotelovom razumevanju prijateljstva" in Knjiga apstrakata / Međunarodna naučna konferencija Filozofija Ksenije Atanasijević, Beograd, 26–27. maja 2022. ; uredile Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan = Book of abstracts / International Scientific Conference The Philosophy of Ksenija Atanasijević, Belgrade, 26–27 May 2022 ; editors Ana Katić, Jelena Mijić, Katarina Njegovan. (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3154 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2727
AB  - U ovom radu se pozivamo na prepisku koju su vodili princeza Elizabeta od Boemije (1618-1680) i francuski filozof Rene Dekart (1596-1650). Analizom određenih segmenata pisama koja su upućivali jedno drugome, uočava se da je Dekart, savetujući Elizabetu i preporučujući joj da čita Seneku, ujedno i sam sledio jednu antičku, ili preciznije, stoičku terapeutsku tehniku. Naime, čini se da je i on, poput stoika, smatrao da filozofija može da pruži svojevrsnu utehu ili potporu u momentima krize, odnosno tokom perioda u kojima se dešavaju određeni životni preokreti.
AB  - This paper looks at the correspondence between Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia (1618-1680) and the French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650). Analyzing specific segments of the letters they addressed to each other, it emerges that Descartes, advising Elizabeth and recommending her to read Seneca, was also following an ancient, or more precisely, Stoic therapeutic technique. Namely, it seems that he, like the Stoics, believed that philosophy could provide a kind of consolation or support in moments of crisis, that is, during specific turbulent moments in life.
PB  - Beograd: Srpsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Oslanjanje na Seneku u kriznim trenucima: slučaj princeze Elizabete od Boemije
T1  - Relying on Seneca in Moments of Crisis: The Case of Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia
IS  - 4
VL  - 65
SP  - 159
EP  - 168
DO  - 10.2298/THEO2204159P
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U ovom radu se pozivamo na prepisku koju su vodili princeza Elizabeta od Boemije (1618-1680) i francuski filozof Rene Dekart (1596-1650). Analizom određenih segmenata pisama koja su upućivali jedno drugome, uočava se da je Dekart, savetujući Elizabetu i preporučujući joj da čita Seneku, ujedno i sam sledio jednu antičku, ili preciznije, stoičku terapeutsku tehniku. Naime, čini se da je i on, poput stoika, smatrao da filozofija može da pruži svojevrsnu utehu ili potporu u momentima krize, odnosno tokom perioda u kojima se dešavaju određeni životni preokreti., This paper looks at the correspondence between Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia (1618-1680) and the French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650). Analyzing specific segments of the letters they addressed to each other, it emerges that Descartes, advising Elizabeth and recommending her to read Seneca, was also following an ancient, or more precisely, Stoic therapeutic technique. Namely, it seems that he, like the Stoics, believed that philosophy could provide a kind of consolation or support in moments of crisis, that is, during specific turbulent moments in life.",
publisher = "Beograd: Srpsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Oslanjanje na Seneku u kriznim trenucima: slučaj princeze Elizabete od Boemije, Relying on Seneca in Moments of Crisis: The Case of Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia",
number = "4",
volume = "65",
pages = "159-168",
doi = "10.2298/THEO2204159P"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2022). Oslanjanje na Seneku u kriznim trenucima: slučaj princeze Elizabete od Boemije. in Theoria
Beograd: Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 65(4), 159-168.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2204159P

Plećaš T. Oslanjanje na Seneku u kriznim trenucima: slučaj princeze Elizabete od Boemije. in Theoria. 2022;65(4):159-168.
doi:10.2298/THEO2204159P .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Oslanjanje na Seneku u kriznim trenucima: slučaj princeze Elizabete od Boemije" in Theoria, 65, no. 4 (2022):159-168,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2204159P . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2552
AB  - Autorka ispituje zašto su određenim piscima komedije, i uopšte onima
koji se u svojim spisima služe humorom, ljubitelji mudrosti, jedna
od omiljenih i lakih meta. Pored toga, ovaj ogled ima za cilj da pokaže
da se stoici, interpretirajući smeh, delom nadovezuju i na Platonove
uvide iz Države. Ispostavlja se kako ni Platon ni stoici nisu preterano
naklonjeni smešnom, uprkos tome što se služe humorom u svojim
delima. Filozofi, naime, prema Platonovom i stoičkom sudu, treba da
budu dostojanstveni i iznad poroka. Osim toga, filozofi treba žive u
skladu sa svojom filozofijom. Upitno je, međutim, da li filozofi mogu,
i da li uspevaju sasvim (ako uopšte) da zadovolje ove kriterijume. Štaviše,
doksografska tradicija, ali i drugi pisci, ubeđuju da to nije slučaj,
tako što ukazuju na svojevrsni raskorak koji, makar iz njihove perspektive,
postoji između teorijske pozicije koju filozofi zastupaju, i
načina na koji oni žive. Taj raskorak, koji može da se razume i kao
greška, podstiče, izaziva, stavlja u pitanje, a naposletku i (do)vodi do
(pod)smeha.
AB  - In this paper, the author examines why comedy writers, and in general those who use humor in their writings, perceive the philosophers as one of their favorite and easy targets. In addition, we aim to show that the Stoics partially follow Plato’s insights from the Republic in their interpretation of laughter. Neither Plato nor the Stoics have been overly fond of the funny or excessive laughter, even though they use humor and some of the characteristics of comedy in their works. According to Plato’s and the Stoic’ opinion, philosophers should be dignified and reluctant to vice. Moreover, the philosopher should live virtuously and follow their philosophy. However, it is questionable whether philosophers can and whether they succeed in meeting these criteria. The doxographical tradition, including the other writers, is convinced that this is not the case by pointing out a kind of discrepancy that, at least from their perspective, exists between the theoretical position that philosophers advocate and the way they live. This discrepancy can be understood as a mistake. However, this discrepancy could encourage, challenge, question, and ultimately lead to laughter.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Ogled o onima koji bi da budu mudri i o onima koji im se smeju
T1  - An Essay on those who want to be wise and those who laugh at them
IS  - 1
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.6591688
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Autorka ispituje zašto su određenim piscima komedije, i uopšte onima
koji se u svojim spisima služe humorom, ljubitelji mudrosti, jedna
od omiljenih i lakih meta. Pored toga, ovaj ogled ima za cilj da pokaže
da se stoici, interpretirajući smeh, delom nadovezuju i na Platonove
uvide iz Države. Ispostavlja se kako ni Platon ni stoici nisu preterano
naklonjeni smešnom, uprkos tome što se služe humorom u svojim
delima. Filozofi, naime, prema Platonovom i stoičkom sudu, treba da
budu dostojanstveni i iznad poroka. Osim toga, filozofi treba žive u
skladu sa svojom filozofijom. Upitno je, međutim, da li filozofi mogu,
i da li uspevaju sasvim (ako uopšte) da zadovolje ove kriterijume. Štaviše,
doksografska tradicija, ali i drugi pisci, ubeđuju da to nije slučaj,
tako što ukazuju na svojevrsni raskorak koji, makar iz njihove perspektive,
postoji između teorijske pozicije koju filozofi zastupaju, i
načina na koji oni žive. Taj raskorak, koji može da se razume i kao
greška, podstiče, izaziva, stavlja u pitanje, a naposletku i (do)vodi do
(pod)smeha., In this paper, the author examines why comedy writers, and in general those who use humor in their writings, perceive the philosophers as one of their favorite and easy targets. In addition, we aim to show that the Stoics partially follow Plato’s insights from the Republic in their interpretation of laughter. Neither Plato nor the Stoics have been overly fond of the funny or excessive laughter, even though they use humor and some of the characteristics of comedy in their works. According to Plato’s and the Stoic’ opinion, philosophers should be dignified and reluctant to vice. Moreover, the philosopher should live virtuously and follow their philosophy. However, it is questionable whether philosophers can and whether they succeed in meeting these criteria. The doxographical tradition, including the other writers, is convinced that this is not the case by pointing out a kind of discrepancy that, at least from their perspective, exists between the theoretical position that philosophers advocate and the way they live. This discrepancy can be understood as a mistake. However, this discrepancy could encourage, challenge, question, and ultimately lead to laughter.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Ogled o onima koji bi da budu mudri i o onima koji im se smeju, An Essay on those who want to be wise and those who laugh at them",
number = "1",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.6591688"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2022). Ogled o onima koji bi da budu mudri i o onima koji im se smeju. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591688

Plećaš T. Ogled o onima koji bi da budu mudri i o onima koji im se smeju. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2022;3(1).
doi:10.5281/zenodo.6591688 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Ogled o onima koji bi da budu mudri i o onima koji im se smeju" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 3, no. 1 (2022),
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591688 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3120
AB  - Iako se ističe da je uticaj koji su stoici izvršili na Spinozu sveobuhvatan, u ovom radu se prvenstveno ispituje i povlači svojevrsna paralela između stoičkog i Spinozinog shvatanja moralnog dobra i vrednosti uopšte, ali i njihovog razumevanja „života u saglasnosti sa prirodom“. Pritom se ukazuje da razlika između stoika i Spinoze nije velika, barem kada je reč o pitanjima koja se ovde razmatraju, pošto je i Spinoza, poput stoika, smatrao da je moralno dobro istovremeno i korisno, te da se ono slaže sa našom prirodom.
AB  - The author draws a parallel between the Stoics’ and Spinoza’s understanding of moral good and values in general, and their understanding of „living in agreement with nature”. It is indicated that the difference between the Stoics and Spinoza is slight when it comes to issues discussed in this paper. Spinoza, like the Stoics, held that moral good could be merely useful and that it is found in „living in agreement with nature”.
PB  - Beograd: Filozofsko društvo Srbije
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Spinoza and the Stoics: Moral good and „living in agreement with nature”
T1  - Spinoza i stoici: moralno dobro i „život u saglasnosti sa prirodom“
IS  - 2
VL  - 64
SP  - 39
EP  - 48
DO  - 10.2298/THEO2102039P
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Iako se ističe da je uticaj koji su stoici izvršili na Spinozu sveobuhvatan, u ovom radu se prvenstveno ispituje i povlači svojevrsna paralela između stoičkog i Spinozinog shvatanja moralnog dobra i vrednosti uopšte, ali i njihovog razumevanja „života u saglasnosti sa prirodom“. Pritom se ukazuje da razlika između stoika i Spinoze nije velika, barem kada je reč o pitanjima koja se ovde razmatraju, pošto je i Spinoza, poput stoika, smatrao da je moralno dobro istovremeno i korisno, te da se ono slaže sa našom prirodom., The author draws a parallel between the Stoics’ and Spinoza’s understanding of moral good and values in general, and their understanding of „living in agreement with nature”. It is indicated that the difference between the Stoics and Spinoza is slight when it comes to issues discussed in this paper. Spinoza, like the Stoics, held that moral good could be merely useful and that it is found in „living in agreement with nature”.",
publisher = "Beograd: Filozofsko društvo Srbije",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Spinoza and the Stoics: Moral good and „living in agreement with nature”, Spinoza i stoici: moralno dobro i „život u saglasnosti sa prirodom“",
number = "2",
volume = "64",
pages = "39-48",
doi = "10.2298/THEO2102039P"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2021). Spinoza and the Stoics: Moral good and „living in agreement with nature”. in Theoria
Beograd: Filozofsko društvo Srbije., 64(2), 39-48.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2102039P

Plećaš T. Spinoza and the Stoics: Moral good and „living in agreement with nature”. in Theoria. 2021;64(2):39-48.
doi:10.2298/THEO2102039P .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Spinoza and the Stoics: Moral good and „living in agreement with nature”" in Theoria, 64, no. 2 (2021):39-48,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2102039P . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2729
AB  - U radu se ispituje razlika između filozofije i sofistike. Preciznije, raspravlja se o onome što razlikuje Sokrata od sofista svoga vremena te o onome što razlikuje Epikteta od sofista uopće. Dok su sofisti bili prvi profesionalni učitelji, Epiktet slovi za jednog od najvećih učitelja (stoičke) filozofije ikada, a Sokrat je, sudeći po Platonovim riječima, poricao da je uopće bio učitelj, unatoč velikom broju onih koji su smatrali suprotno. Nadaleko poznati po svojim besjedama, sofisti su ponajviše privlačili one koji su željeli biti uspješni političari. Sokrat i Epiktet također su bili izvrsni govornici koje su okruživali političari Atene, odnosno Rima. Ipak, to ih nije činilo sofistima. Ono čemu i Sokrat i Epiktet teže život je u skladu s vrlinom, tj. život u skladu s razumom i filozofijom. Retorika ima instrumentalnu vrijednost i njome se netko može potaknuti na bavljenje filozofijom, ali ona nije dobro po sebi.
AB  - The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.
PB  - Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Filozofska istraživanja
T1  - Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista
T1  - Socrates and Epictetus vs. the First and the Second Generation of Sophists
IS  - 162
VL  - 41
SP  - 279
EP  - 291
DO  - 10.21464/fi41204
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2021",
abstract = "U radu se ispituje razlika između filozofije i sofistike. Preciznije, raspravlja se o onome što razlikuje Sokrata od sofista svoga vremena te o onome što razlikuje Epikteta od sofista uopće. Dok su sofisti bili prvi profesionalni učitelji, Epiktet slovi za jednog od najvećih učitelja (stoičke) filozofije ikada, a Sokrat je, sudeći po Platonovim riječima, poricao da je uopće bio učitelj, unatoč velikom broju onih koji su smatrali suprotno. Nadaleko poznati po svojim besjedama, sofisti su ponajviše privlačili one koji su željeli biti uspješni političari. Sokrat i Epiktet također su bili izvrsni govornici koje su okruživali političari Atene, odnosno Rima. Ipak, to ih nije činilo sofistima. Ono čemu i Sokrat i Epiktet teže život je u skladu s vrlinom, tj. život u skladu s razumom i filozofijom. Retorika ima instrumentalnu vrijednost i njome se netko može potaknuti na bavljenje filozofijom, ali ona nije dobro po sebi., The paper discusses the difference between philosophy and sophistry. More precisely, it discusses the differences between Socrates and Sophists of the first generation, as well as the differences between Epictetus and Sophists of both first and second generation. While Sophists were the first professional teachers and Epictetus one of the greatest Stoic teachers of all times, Socrates, according to Plato, denied being a teacher by any means, despite many who thought otherwise. Sophists were known for their speeches that most attracted those with a wish to be successful politicians. Socrates and Epictetus were also excellent orators surrounded by Athenian and Roman politicians. However, that didn’t make them Sophists. Socrates and Epictetus opted for a life in accordance with excellence (virtue) that could be achieved by philosophy rather than rhetoric. Rhetoric could only have instrumental value, not an intrinsic one.",
publisher = "Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Filozofska istraživanja",
title = "Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista, Socrates and Epictetus vs. the First and the Second Generation of Sophists",
number = "162",
volume = "41",
pages = "279-291",
doi = "10.21464/fi41204"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2021). Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista. in Filozofska istraživanja
Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo., 41(162), 279-291.
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi41204

Plećaš T. Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista. in Filozofska istraživanja. 2021;41(162):279-291.
doi:10.21464/fi41204 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Sokrat i Epiktet vs. prva i druga generacija sofista" in Filozofska istraživanja, 41, no. 162 (2021):279-291,
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi41204 . .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2728
AB  - This paper aims to show that the idea of a female friendship in Ancient Greece and Rome is possible, even in terms of an “ideal” friendship, i.e. form of a friendship ancient philosophers aspired to. The author of this paper will elucidate the position of women in Greece and Rome and points out that various women actively participated in the work of the philosophical schools and women’s societies. In accordance with the philosophical ideals, “ideal,” “perfect” or “genuine” friends could only be those who possess or at least strive for moral virtue (ἀρετή), while education (παιδεία) was seen as a precondition for acquiring moral virtue. Having in mind that various women met that precondition, it is emphasized that the ideal friendship could be ascribed not only to virtuous men but also to virtuous women. Thus, educated women could potentially be both, “ideal” and “ordinary” friends.
AB  - Циљ овог текста је да покаже да је идеја женског пријатељства, током периода античке Грчке и Рима, могућа, па чак и када је реч о „идеалном“ пријатељству, тј. облику пријатељства коме су стремили неки од најпознатијих античких филозофа. Да би то показала, ауторка овог текста, анализира позицију жена у Грчкој и Риму, указујући да су неке од њих активно учествовале у раду филозофских школа или да су биле чланице женских удружења. У складу са филозофским идеалима, „савршено“ или „идеално“ пријатељство је било могуће само међу онима који су поседовали, или макар тежили томе да остваре моралну врлину (ἀρετή), док се образовање (παιδεία) посматрало као предуслов за стицање врлине. Ако имамо у виду да су одређене жене могле да испуне тај предуслов, закључује се да се савршено пријатељство може приписати подједнако и женама и мушкарцима. Наиме, образоване жене могу, у начелу, да буду и „идеалне“, а не само „свакодневне“ пријатељице.
PB  - Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy
T2  - Women in Times of Crisis
T1  - Female Friendship in Ancient Greece and Rome in Times of Crisis
SP  - 21
EP  - 33
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2728
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This paper aims to show that the idea of a female friendship in Ancient Greece and Rome is possible, even in terms of an “ideal” friendship, i.e. form of a friendship ancient philosophers aspired to. The author of this paper will elucidate the position of women in Greece and Rome and points out that various women actively participated in the work of the philosophical schools and women’s societies. In accordance with the philosophical ideals, “ideal,” “perfect” or “genuine” friends could only be those who possess or at least strive for moral virtue (ἀρετή), while education (παιδεία) was seen as a precondition for acquiring moral virtue. Having in mind that various women met that precondition, it is emphasized that the ideal friendship could be ascribed not only to virtuous men but also to virtuous women. Thus, educated women could potentially be both, “ideal” and “ordinary” friends., Циљ овог текста је да покаже да је идеја женског пријатељства, током периода античке Грчке и Рима, могућа, па чак и када је реч о „идеалном“ пријатељству, тј. облику пријатељства коме су стремили неки од најпознатијих античких филозофа. Да би то показала, ауторка овог текста, анализира позицију жена у Грчкој и Риму, указујући да су неке од њих активно учествовале у раду филозофских школа или да су биле чланице женских удружења. У складу са филозофским идеалима, „савршено“ или „идеално“ пријатељство је било могуће само међу онима који су поседовали, или макар тежили томе да остваре моралну врлину (ἀρετή), док се образовање (παιδεία) посматрало као предуслов за стицање врлине. Ако имамо у виду да су одређене жене могле да испуне тај предуслов, закључује се да се савршено пријатељство може приписати подједнако и женама и мушкарцима. Наиме, образоване жене могу, у начелу, да буду и „идеалне“, а не само „свакодневне“ пријатељице.",
publisher = "Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy",
journal = "Women in Times of Crisis",
title = "Female Friendship in Ancient Greece and Rome in Times of Crisis",
pages = "21-33",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2728"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2021). Female Friendship in Ancient Greece and Rome in Times of Crisis. in Women in Times of Crisis
Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy., 21-33.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2728

Plećaš T. Female Friendship in Ancient Greece and Rome in Times of Crisis. in Women in Times of Crisis. 2021;:21-33.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2728 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Female Friendship in Ancient Greece and Rome in Times of Crisis" in Women in Times of Crisis (2021):21-33,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2728 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://kritika.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/kc/article/view/18/93
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2116
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Epiktet, razgovori, Loznica: Karpos, 2017 Epiktet, o pitanjima karaktera i moralnog izbora, Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga, 2019
IS  - 1
VL  - 1
SP  - 189
EP  - 194
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2116
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Epiktet, razgovori, Loznica: Karpos, 2017 Epiktet, o pitanjima karaktera i moralnog izbora, Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga, 2019",
number = "1",
volume = "1",
pages = "189-194",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2116"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2020). Epiktet, razgovori, Loznica: Karpos, 2017 Epiktet, o pitanjima karaktera i moralnog izbora, Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga, 2019. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 1(1), 189-194.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2116

Plećaš T. Epiktet, razgovori, Loznica: Karpos, 2017 Epiktet, o pitanjima karaktera i moralnog izbora, Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga, 2019. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2020;1(1):189-194.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2116 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Epiktet, razgovori, Loznica: Karpos, 2017 Epiktet, o pitanjima karaktera i moralnog izbora, Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga, 2019" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 1, no. 1 (2020):189-194,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2116 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Plećaš, Tamara
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=514&path%5B%5D=480
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1539
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, and Christoph Horn (Eds.), Space in Hellenistic Philosophy. Critical Studies in Ancient Physics, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014.
IS  - 1
VL  - 28
SP  - 191
EP  - 192
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1539
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Plećaš, Tamara",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, and Christoph Horn (Eds.), Space in Hellenistic Philosophy. Critical Studies in Ancient Physics, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014.",
number = "1",
volume = "28",
pages = "191-192",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1539"
}

Plećaš, T.. (2017). Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, and Christoph Horn (Eds.), Space in Hellenistic Philosophy. Critical Studies in Ancient Physics, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(1), 191-192.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1539

Plećaš T. Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, and Christoph Horn (Eds.), Space in Hellenistic Philosophy. Critical Studies in Ancient Physics, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(1):191-192.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1539 .

Plećaš, Tamara, "Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, and Christoph Horn (Eds.), Space in Hellenistic Philosophy. Critical Studies in Ancient Physics, De Gruyter, Berlin 2014." in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28, no. 1 (2017):191-192,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1539 .