TY  - JOUR
AU  - Žakula, Sonja
PY  - 2024
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3803
AB  - This paper arose from a discussion of Maria Kronfeldner’s book What’s Left of Human Nature? In it, I am chiefly concerned with two things: the role that other animals are afforded in discussions about and attempts at defining “human nature”, and a critique of the concept of nature that is utilized in the book. Furthermore, I view science as storytelling practice, and scholarly narratives about “human nature” as important stories in order to pose the question of accountability of telling such stories in the Anthropocene.
AB  - Ovaj rad je nastao kao rezultat diskusije o knjizi Marije Kronfeldner What’s Left of Human
Nature? U njemu se prevashodno bavim dvema temama: ulogom koja je ostalim životinjama
pripisana u diskusijama o i pokušajima definisanja „ljudske prirode“, i kritikom koncepta prirode koji se koristi u knjizi. Nadalje, nauku posmatram kao praksu pričanja priča, a akademske narative o „ljudskoj prirodi“ kao posebno važne vrste priča, kako bih postavila pitanje o
odgovornosti koju pričanje takvih priča sa sobom nosi u Antropocenu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Human Exceptionalism and the Lot of Animals: Telling Stories About “Human Nature” in the Anthropocene
T1  - Ljudska izuzetnost i sudbina životinja: pričanje priča o „ljudskoj prirodi“ u antropocenu
IS  - 1
VL  - 35
SP  - 35
EP  - 51
DO  - 10.2298/FID2401035Z
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Žakula, Sonja",
year = "2024",
abstract = "This paper arose from a discussion of Maria Kronfeldner’s book What’s Left of Human Nature? In it, I am chiefly concerned with two things: the role that other animals are afforded in discussions about and attempts at defining “human nature”, and a critique of the concept of nature that is utilized in the book. Furthermore, I view science as storytelling practice, and scholarly narratives about “human nature” as important stories in order to pose the question of accountability of telling such stories in the Anthropocene., Ovaj rad je nastao kao rezultat diskusije o knjizi Marije Kronfeldner What’s Left of Human
Nature? U njemu se prevashodno bavim dvema temama: ulogom koja je ostalim životinjama
pripisana u diskusijama o i pokušajima definisanja „ljudske prirode“, i kritikom koncepta prirode koji se koristi u knjizi. Nadalje, nauku posmatram kao praksu pričanja priča, a akademske narative o „ljudskoj prirodi“ kao posebno važne vrste priča, kako bih postavila pitanje o
odgovornosti koju pričanje takvih priča sa sobom nosi u Antropocenu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Human Exceptionalism and the Lot of Animals: Telling Stories About “Human Nature” in the Anthropocene, Ljudska izuzetnost i sudbina životinja: pričanje priča o „ljudskoj prirodi“ u antropocenu",
number = "1",
volume = "35",
pages = "35-51",
doi = "10.2298/FID2401035Z"
}

Žakula, S.. (2024). Human Exceptionalism and the Lot of Animals: Telling Stories About “Human Nature” in the Anthropocene. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 35(1), 35-51.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2401035Z

Žakula S. Human Exceptionalism and the Lot of Animals: Telling Stories About “Human Nature” in the Anthropocene. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2024;35(1):35-51.
doi:10.2298/FID2401035Z .

Žakula, Sonja, "Human Exceptionalism and the Lot of Animals: Telling Stories About “Human Nature” in the Anthropocene" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 35, no. 1 (2024):35-51,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2401035Z . .