TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jovićević, Andrej
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2696
AB  - The radical redefinition of the landscape of physics that followed the contributions of Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg at the start of the 20th century led to plethora [of] new perspectives on age-old metaphysical questions on determinism and the nature of reality. The main contention of this article is that the work of Gilbert Simondon – whose magnum opus possesses a scope uniting the most basic philosophical concerns with the (then) most recent breakthroughs in natural sciences – is highly relevant for an adequate understanding of the split between determinism and indeterminism, as well as the underlying presuppositions which have driven some influential contributions to this topic. To this end, the article shows that the more deterministic interpretation of quantum mechanics offered by David Bohm and Louis de Broglie proves to be a valuable reference point for a more precise use and understanding of Simondon’s transductive logic – especially when its philosophical lapses are considered closely. Finally, following the considerations of both thinkers, we aim at a more precise reconsideration of the stakes of indeterminism in modern physics, as well as a restructuration of what is often understood as a polarization.
AB  - Temeljno redefinisanje polja fizike usled doprinosa Nilsa Bora i Vernera Hajzenberga na početku 20. veka dovelo je do mnoštva novih pogleda na vekovna metafizička pitanja u vezi sa determinizmom i prirodom stvarnosti. Glavna tvrdnja ovog članka je da je rad Žilbera Simondona, čiji magnum opus objedinjuje najosnovnija filozofska pitanja sa (tada) najnovijim otkrićima u prirodnim naukama, relevantan za adekvatno razumevanje podele između determinizma i indeterminizma, kao i osnovnih pretpostavki koje su značajno uticale na ovu temu. U okviru ovog cilja, tvrdimo da je tumačenje kvantne mehanike naklonjeno determinizmu, koje nude Dejvid Bom i Luj de Broj, vredna referentna tačka za precizniju upotrebu Simondonove transduktivne logike — posebno kada se pažljivo razmotre njeni filozofski propusti. Konačno, prateći razmatranja oba mislioca, ciljamo na preciznije preispitivanje uloge indeterminizma u savremenoj fizici, kao i na ponovno strukturiranje onoga što je često shvaćeno kao polarizacija.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Simondon and Bohm between Determinism and Indeterminism
T1  - Simondon i Bom između determinizma i indeterminizma
IS  - 3
VL  - 33
SP  - 648
EP  - 670
DO  - 10.2298/FID2203648J
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Jovićević, Andrej",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The radical redefinition of the landscape of physics that followed the contributions of Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg at the start of the 20th century led to plethora [of] new perspectives on age-old metaphysical questions on determinism and the nature of reality. The main contention of this article is that the work of Gilbert Simondon – whose magnum opus possesses a scope uniting the most basic philosophical concerns with the (then) most recent breakthroughs in natural sciences – is highly relevant for an adequate understanding of the split between determinism and indeterminism, as well as the underlying presuppositions which have driven some influential contributions to this topic. To this end, the article shows that the more deterministic interpretation of quantum mechanics offered by David Bohm and Louis de Broglie proves to be a valuable reference point for a more precise use and understanding of Simondon’s transductive logic – especially when its philosophical lapses are considered closely. Finally, following the considerations of both thinkers, we aim at a more precise reconsideration of the stakes of indeterminism in modern physics, as well as a restructuration of what is often understood as a polarization., Temeljno redefinisanje polja fizike usled doprinosa Nilsa Bora i Vernera Hajzenberga na početku 20. veka dovelo je do mnoštva novih pogleda na vekovna metafizička pitanja u vezi sa determinizmom i prirodom stvarnosti. Glavna tvrdnja ovog članka je da je rad Žilbera Simondona, čiji magnum opus objedinjuje najosnovnija filozofska pitanja sa (tada) najnovijim otkrićima u prirodnim naukama, relevantan za adekvatno razumevanje podele između determinizma i indeterminizma, kao i osnovnih pretpostavki koje su značajno uticale na ovu temu. U okviru ovog cilja, tvrdimo da je tumačenje kvantne mehanike naklonjeno determinizmu, koje nude Dejvid Bom i Luj de Broj, vredna referentna tačka za precizniju upotrebu Simondonove transduktivne logike — posebno kada se pažljivo razmotre njeni filozofski propusti. Konačno, prateći razmatranja oba mislioca, ciljamo na preciznije preispitivanje uloge indeterminizma u savremenoj fizici, kao i na ponovno strukturiranje onoga što je često shvaćeno kao polarizacija.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Simondon and Bohm between Determinism and Indeterminism, Simondon i Bom između determinizma i indeterminizma",
number = "3",
volume = "33",
pages = "648-670",
doi = "10.2298/FID2203648J"
}

Jovićević, A.. (2022). Simondon and Bohm between Determinism and Indeterminism. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 33(3), 648-670.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2203648J

Jovićević A. Simondon and Bohm between Determinism and Indeterminism. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2022;33(3):648-670.
doi:10.2298/FID2203648J .

Jovićević, Andrej, "Simondon and Bohm between Determinism and Indeterminism" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 33, no. 3 (2022):648-670,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2203648J . .