Prodanović, Srđan

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0002-3444-6989
  • Prodanović, Srđan (35)
  • Prodanović, Srđan M. (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests

Ivković, Marjan; Petrović Trifunović, Tamara; Prodanović, Srđan


                                            

                                            
Ivković, M., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S..The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy
Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge., 61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591
Ivković M, Petrović Trifunović T, Prodanović S. The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy.:61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .
Ivković, Marjan, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests" in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy:61-79,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .

Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji

Prodanović, Srđan


                                            

                                            
Prodanović, S..Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji. in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 14(1), 203-222-203–222.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2590
Prodanović S. Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji. in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology.14(1):203-222-203–222.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2590 .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Između heterotopije i ideologije: o realnostima rijaliti programa u Srbiji" in Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 14, no. 1:203-222-203–222,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2590 .

Habitus and Higher Order Desires: Going Beyond Determinism

Prodanović, Srđan

(2023-03)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2023-03
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2882
AB  - In this paper, I will try to consider the usual allegations of determinism that are directed towards Bourdieu’s notion of habitus from a slightly different perspective. One of the most common arguments found in these types of charges is that Bourdieu unsuccessfully attempted to reconcile objective and subjective aspects of social life under one notion. According to critics, habitus is not a viable solution to structure vs. agency debate simply because it cannot be both determined by social structure and open to contingency of autonomous subjective interpretations of the social world. I will show that this critique of Bourdieu actually is inspired by incompatibilist philosophy which maintains that regarding human action either determinism or free will can be true. However, those sociologists who, in criticising Bourdieu’s understanding of habitus, follow the incompatibilist line of reasoning usually overlook the compatibilist side of this old debate in moral philosophy. In that regard, I will argue that Frankfurt and Taylor’s compatibilist account of second order desires and strong evaluations can help us to better understand how habitus can be determined by environmental social factors and, at the same, time not only foster free will, but also provide a theoretical insight into radical forms of social change.
T2  - The American Sociologist
T1  - Habitus and Higher Order Desires: Going Beyond Determinism
IS  - 1
VL  - 54
SP  - 176
EP  - 192
DO  - 10.1007/s12108-022-09561-0
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2023-03",
abstract = "In this paper, I will try to consider the usual allegations of determinism that are directed towards Bourdieu’s notion of habitus from a slightly different perspective. One of the most common arguments found in these types of charges is that Bourdieu unsuccessfully attempted to reconcile objective and subjective aspects of social life under one notion. According to critics, habitus is not a viable solution to structure vs. agency debate simply because it cannot be both determined by social structure and open to contingency of autonomous subjective interpretations of the social world. I will show that this critique of Bourdieu actually is inspired by incompatibilist philosophy which maintains that regarding human action either determinism or free will can be true. However, those sociologists who, in criticising Bourdieu’s understanding of habitus, follow the incompatibilist line of reasoning usually overlook the compatibilist side of this old debate in moral philosophy. In that regard, I will argue that Frankfurt and Taylor’s compatibilist account of second order desires and strong evaluations can help us to better understand how habitus can be determined by environmental social factors and, at the same, time not only foster free will, but also provide a theoretical insight into radical forms of social change.",
journal = "The American Sociologist",
title = "Habitus and Higher Order Desires: Going Beyond Determinism",
number = "1",
volume = "54",
pages = "176-192",
doi = "10.1007/s12108-022-09561-0"
}
Prodanović, S.. (2023-03). Habitus and Higher Order Desires: Going Beyond Determinism. in The American Sociologist, 54(1), 176-192.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-022-09561-0
Prodanović S. Habitus and Higher Order Desires: Going Beyond Determinism. in The American Sociologist. 2023;54(1):176-192.
doi:10.1007/s12108-022-09561-0 .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Habitus and Higher Order Desires: Going Beyond Determinism" in The American Sociologist, 54, no. 1 (2023-03):176-192,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-022-09561-0 . .

Intuitions, Trust, and Social Change in Times of Crisis

Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1562
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2855
AB  - In this paper, I will investigate the complex relationship between intuition, trustworthiness, and trust. I will first examine some of the more prevalent accounts of trust which either (over)emphasize the cognitive aspect of generating trustworthiness, or indeed acknowledge the importance of affects and emotions, but only as part of a neatly organized dual structure − which is in essence complementary with the cognitive understanding of how we start trusting each other. I will argue that intuitions provide a more detailed insight into trustworthiness because they are simultaneously cognitive and affective in nature. I will also consider how inferential and holistic intuitions might influence our understanding of trustworthiness, especially in times of crisis.
AB  - U ovom radu ć u istražiti složen odnos između intuicije, pouzdanosti i poverenja. Prvo ć u ispitati neka od preovlađujuć ih tumačenja poverenja koja ili (pre)naglašavaju kognitivni aspekt generisanja poverenja, ili pak priznaju važnost afekta i emocija, ali samo kao deo uredno organizovane dualne strukture – što je u suštini komplementarno sa kognitivnim razumevanjem toga kako uspostavljamo međusobno poverenje. Tvrdiću da intuicije pružaju detaljniji uvid u pouzdanost jer su istovremeno kognitivne i afektivne prirode. Takođe ć emo razmotriti kako inferencijalne i holističke intuicije mogu uticati na naše razumevanje pouzdanosti, posebno u vremenima kriza.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Intuitions, Trust, and Social Change in Times of Crisis
T1  - Intuicije, poverenje i društvena promena u vremenima krize
IS  - 2
VL  - 34
SP  - 233
EP  - 247
DO  - 10.2298/FID2302233P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2023",
abstract = "In this paper, I will investigate the complex relationship between intuition, trustworthiness, and trust. I will first examine some of the more prevalent accounts of trust which either (over)emphasize the cognitive aspect of generating trustworthiness, or indeed acknowledge the importance of affects and emotions, but only as part of a neatly organized dual structure − which is in essence complementary with the cognitive understanding of how we start trusting each other. I will argue that intuitions provide a more detailed insight into trustworthiness because they are simultaneously cognitive and affective in nature. I will also consider how inferential and holistic intuitions might influence our understanding of trustworthiness, especially in times of crisis., U ovom radu ć u istražiti složen odnos između intuicije, pouzdanosti i poverenja. Prvo ć u ispitati neka od preovlađujuć ih tumačenja poverenja koja ili (pre)naglašavaju kognitivni aspekt generisanja poverenja, ili pak priznaju važnost afekta i emocija, ali samo kao deo uredno organizovane dualne strukture – što je u suštini komplementarno sa kognitivnim razumevanjem toga kako uspostavljamo međusobno poverenje. Tvrdiću da intuicije pružaju detaljniji uvid u pouzdanost jer su istovremeno kognitivne i afektivne prirode. Takođe ć emo razmotriti kako inferencijalne i holističke intuicije mogu uticati na naše razumevanje pouzdanosti, posebno u vremenima kriza.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Intuitions, Trust, and Social Change in Times of Crisis, Intuicije, poverenje i društvena promena u vremenima krize",
number = "2",
volume = "34",
pages = "233-247",
doi = "10.2298/FID2302233P"
}
Prodanović, S.. (2023). Intuitions, Trust, and Social Change in Times of Crisis. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 34(2), 233-247.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2302233P
Prodanović S. Intuitions, Trust, and Social Change in Times of Crisis. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2023;34(2):233-247.
doi:10.2298/FID2302233P .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Intuitions, Trust, and Social Change in Times of Crisis" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 34, no. 2 (2023):233-247,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2302233P . .

Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije

Prodanović, Srđan; Ivković, Marjan; Janković, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2022)

TY  - GEN
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Janković, Miloš
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2894
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd: Institut za demokratski angažman jugoistočne Evrope
T1  - Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije
ER  - 
@misc{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan and Ivković, Marjan and Janković, Miloš",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd: Institut za demokratski angažman jugoistočne Evrope",
title = "Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije"
}
Prodanović, S., Ivković, M.,& Janković, M.. (2022). Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Prodanović S, Ivković M, Janković M. Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije. 2022;..
Prodanović, Srđan, Ivković, Marjan, Janković, Miloš, "Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije" (2022).

Smehom do društvene promene: o savremenoj upotrebi političkog humora

Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2553
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo neke od savremenih teorijskih
specifičnosti političke upotrebe humora. Osnovno polazište
glasi da politički humor podrazumeva da se ismeva upravo ono ponašanje
koje se isuviše rigidno zasniva na normama, konvencijama ili
predrasudama koje su od presudne važnosti za reprodukciju datog
društvenog poretka. Humor utoliko nužno referira na ono što je opšte
u društvenom delanju i upravo taj njegov aspekt ga čini privlačnim za
političku upotrebu i društveni angažman. Na osnovu ovih apstraktnih
uvida, nastojaćemo da ponudimo tri smera političke upotrebe humora.
Naročitu pažnju ćemo posvetiti tome na koji način sama stabilnost
sistema utiče na političke domete humorističkog sagledavanja
političkih događaja.
AB  - In this paper, we will try to examine some of the contemporary theoretical specifics of the political use of humor. The main starting point is that political humor ridicules precisely those behaviors that are too rigidly based on norms, conventions or prejudices that are crucial for the reproduction of a given social order. Humor thus necessarily refers to what is general in social action, and it is this aspect of it that makes it attractive for political use and social engagement. Based on these abstract insights, I will try to offer three directions of political use of humor. I will pay special attention to the way in which the overall stability of the system itself affects the political achievements of the humorous view of political events.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Smehom do društvene promene: o savremenoj upotrebi političkog humora
T1  - Social Change Through Laughter: On The Contemporary Use of Political Humor
IS  - 1
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.6591701
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo neke od savremenih teorijskih
specifičnosti političke upotrebe humora. Osnovno polazište
glasi da politički humor podrazumeva da se ismeva upravo ono ponašanje
koje se isuviše rigidno zasniva na normama, konvencijama ili
predrasudama koje su od presudne važnosti za reprodukciju datog
društvenog poretka. Humor utoliko nužno referira na ono što je opšte
u društvenom delanju i upravo taj njegov aspekt ga čini privlačnim za
političku upotrebu i društveni angažman. Na osnovu ovih apstraktnih
uvida, nastojaćemo da ponudimo tri smera političke upotrebe humora.
Naročitu pažnju ćemo posvetiti tome na koji način sama stabilnost
sistema utiče na političke domete humorističkog sagledavanja
političkih događaja., In this paper, we will try to examine some of the contemporary theoretical specifics of the political use of humor. The main starting point is that political humor ridicules precisely those behaviors that are too rigidly based on norms, conventions or prejudices that are crucial for the reproduction of a given social order. Humor thus necessarily refers to what is general in social action, and it is this aspect of it that makes it attractive for political use and social engagement. Based on these abstract insights, I will try to offer three directions of political use of humor. I will pay special attention to the way in which the overall stability of the system itself affects the political achievements of the humorous view of political events.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Smehom do društvene promene: o savremenoj upotrebi političkog humora, Social Change Through Laughter: On The Contemporary Use of Political Humor",
number = "1",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.6591701"
}
Prodanović, S.. (2022). Smehom do društvene promene: o savremenoj upotrebi političkog humora. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591701
Prodanović S. Smehom do društvene promene: o savremenoj upotrebi političkog humora. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2022;3(1).
doi:10.5281/zenodo.6591701 .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Smehom do društvene promene: o savremenoj upotrebi političkog humora" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 3, no. 1 (2022),
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591701 . .

Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique

Ivković, Marjan; Prodanović, Srđan; Urošević, Milan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Urošević, Milan
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/955
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2389
AB  - This paper presents three interconnected examinations of Asger Sørensen’s arguments in Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, which thematize Sørensen’s overarching understanding of the relationship between theory and practice: his general methodological perspective on critical theory, its distinctive epistemology and its anchoring in the empirical world. The paper authors each try to push Sørensen on these crucial points by considering how Sørensen’s variant of critical theory actually operates, scrutinizing in more detail the particular relationship between the ‘experience of injustice’, which for Sørensen constitutes the empirical foothold for critical theory, and the theoretical diagnosis of social reality which the critical theorist should formulate against the backdrop of this experience.
AB  - Ovaj rad predstavlja tri povezana ispitivanja argumentacije Asgera Serensena u Kapitalizmu, 
otuđenju i kritici, koja tematizuju Serensenovo generalno razumevanje odnosa teorije i prak se, drugim rečima njegovu metodološku perspektivu u pogledu kritičke teorije, njene speci fične epistemologije i njene ukorenjenosti u empirijskom svetu. Marjan Ivković, Srđan Pro danović i Milan Urošević nastoje da problematizuju Serensenovo stanovište razmatrajući 
način na koji Serensenova kritička teorija zapravo funkcioniše, analizirajući detaljnije odnos 
između ,iskustva nepravdeʻ, koje za Serensena predstavlja empirijsko uporište kritičke teo rije, i teorijske dijagnoze društvene stvarnosti koju kritički teoretičar formuliše na temelju 
tog iskustva
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique
T1  - Teorija uhvaćena u dijalektiku: neke refleksije o Kapitalizmu, otuđenju  i kritici Asgera Serensena
IS  - 1
VL  - 32
SP  - 11
EP  - 21
DO  - 10.2298/FID2101011I
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan and Urošević, Milan",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This paper presents three interconnected examinations of Asger Sørensen’s arguments in Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, which thematize Sørensen’s overarching understanding of the relationship between theory and practice: his general methodological perspective on critical theory, its distinctive epistemology and its anchoring in the empirical world. The paper authors each try to push Sørensen on these crucial points by considering how Sørensen’s variant of critical theory actually operates, scrutinizing in more detail the particular relationship between the ‘experience of injustice’, which for Sørensen constitutes the empirical foothold for critical theory, and the theoretical diagnosis of social reality which the critical theorist should formulate against the backdrop of this experience., Ovaj rad predstavlja tri povezana ispitivanja argumentacije Asgera Serensena u Kapitalizmu, 
otuđenju i kritici, koja tematizuju Serensenovo generalno razumevanje odnosa teorije i prak se, drugim rečima njegovu metodološku perspektivu u pogledu kritičke teorije, njene speci fične epistemologije i njene ukorenjenosti u empirijskom svetu. Marjan Ivković, Srđan Pro danović i Milan Urošević nastoje da problematizuju Serensenovo stanovište razmatrajući 
način na koji Serensenova kritička teorija zapravo funkcioniše, analizirajući detaljnije odnos 
između ,iskustva nepravdeʻ, koje za Serensena predstavlja empirijsko uporište kritičke teo rije, i teorijske dijagnoze društvene stvarnosti koju kritički teoretičar formuliše na temelju 
tog iskustva",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique, Teorija uhvaćena u dijalektiku: neke refleksije o Kapitalizmu, otuđenju  i kritici Asgera Serensena",
number = "1",
volume = "32",
pages = "11-21",
doi = "10.2298/FID2101011I"
}
Ivković, M., Prodanović, S.,& Urošević, M.. (2021). Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 32(1), 11-21.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101011I
Ivković M, Prodanović S, Urošević M. Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2021;32(1):11-21.
doi:10.2298/FID2101011I .
Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, Urošević, Milan, "Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 32, no. 1 (2021):11-21,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101011I . .

O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o neznanju: pohvala grešci

Prodanović, Srđan; Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2021)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2258
AB  - Ovo nije knjiga o gluposti: njenu istoriju, teoriju i „fenomenologiju“ 
mnogi su već ispisali (među drugima, Tabori 2006; Gliksman 1986). 
Ali ovo jeste knjiga koja ima veze sa onim s čim se glupost obično 
povezuje, sa neznanjem i greškom. Veza sreće i gluposti odvajkada je 
zapravo bila, ako ne neposredno asociranje prvog pojma sa manjkom 
znanja, onda svakako upozorenje na blisko srodstvo nesreće i znanja
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o neznanju: pohvala grešci
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2258
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan and Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Ovo nije knjiga o gluposti: njenu istoriju, teoriju i „fenomenologiju“ 
mnogi su već ispisali (među drugima, Tabori 2006; Gliksman 1986). 
Ali ovo jeste knjiga koja ima veze sa onim s čim se glupost obično 
povezuje, sa neznanjem i greškom. Veza sreće i gluposti odvajkada je 
zapravo bila, ako ne neposredno asociranje prvog pojma sa manjkom 
znanja, onda svakako upozorenje na blisko srodstvo nesreće i znanja",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o neznanju: pohvala grešci",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2258"
}
Prodanović, S.,& Krstić, P.. (2021). O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o neznanju: pohvala grešci. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2258
Prodanović S, Krstić P. O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o neznanju: pohvala grešci. 2021;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2258 .
Prodanović, Srđan, Krstić, Predrag, "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o neznanju: pohvala grešci" (2021),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2258 .

ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action

Ivković, Marjan; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2875
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875"
}
Ivković, M.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875
Ivković M, Prodanović S. ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875 .
Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, "ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875 .

The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution

Ivković, Marjan; Petrović Trifunović, Tamara; Prodanović, Srđan

(Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Petrović Trifunović, Tamara
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2589
PB  - Cambridge University Press (CUP)
T2  - Nationalities Papers
T1  - The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution
IS  - 4
VL  - 47
SP  - 597
EP  - 612
DO  - 10.1017/nps.2019.40
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Petrović Trifunović, Tamara and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press (CUP)",
journal = "Nationalities Papers",
title = "The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution",
number = "4",
volume = "47",
pages = "597-612",
doi = "10.1017/nps.2019.40"
}
Ivković, M., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution. in Nationalities Papers
Cambridge University Press (CUP)., 47(4), 597-612.
https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.40
Ivković M, Petrović Trifunović T, Prodanović S. The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution. in Nationalities Papers. 2019;47(4):597-612.
doi:10.1017/nps.2019.40 .
Ivković, Marjan, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution" in Nationalities Papers, 47, no. 4 (2019):597-612,
https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.40 . .
3

Otete institucije u Srbiji

Velinov, Marija; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Velinov, Marija
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2383
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Otete institucije u Srbiji
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2383
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Velinov, Marija and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Otete institucije u Srbiji",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2383"
}
Velinov, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). Otete institucije u Srbiji. 
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2383
Velinov M, Pudar Draško G, Prodanović S. Otete institucije u Srbiji. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2383 .
Velinov, Marija, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Prodanović, Srđan, "Otete institucije u Srbiji" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2383 .

Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse

Velinov, Marija; Prodanović, Srđan; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Velinov, Marija
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2059
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa
T1  - Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse
SP  - 6
EP  - 12
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2059
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Velinov, Marija and Prodanović, Srđan and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa",
booktitle = "Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse",
pages = "6-12",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2059"
}
Velinov, M., Prodanović, S.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2019). Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse. in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 6-12.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2059
Velinov M, Prodanović S, Pudar Draško G. Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse. in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa. 2019;:6-12.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2059 .
Velinov, Marija, Prodanović, Srđan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse" in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa (2019):6-12,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2059 .

Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018

Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=794
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2057
AB  - Srđan Prodanović
(Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018)
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018
IS  - 4
VL  - 30
SP  - 640
EP  - 642
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2057
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Srđan Prodanović
(Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018)",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018",
number = "4",
volume = "30",
pages = "640-642",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2057"
}
Prodanović, S.. (2019). Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(4), 640-642.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2057
Prodanović S. Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(4):640-642.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2057 .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Lik Boltanski i Nensi Frejzer, Dominacija i emancipacija, prev. Olja Petronić, Mediterran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2018" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 30, no. 4 (2019):640-642,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2057 .

Šta zdrav razum može da učini za društvenu teoriju: ka pragmatičkom shvatanju prakse

Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1603
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Šta zdrav razum može da učini za društvenu teoriju: ka pragmatičkom shvatanju prakse
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1603
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Šta zdrav razum može da učini za društvenu teoriju: ka pragmatičkom shvatanju prakse",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1603"
}
Prodanović, S.. (2017). Šta zdrav razum može da učini za društvenu teoriju: ka pragmatičkom shvatanju prakse. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1603
Prodanović S. Šta zdrav razum može da učini za društvenu teoriju: ka pragmatičkom shvatanju prakse. 2017;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1603 .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Šta zdrav razum može da učini za društvenu teoriju: ka pragmatičkom shvatanju prakse" (2017),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1603 .

Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism

Ferrara, Alessandro; Ivković, Marjan; Lončar, Jelena; Prodanović, Srđan; Simeunović, Bojana

(London: SAGE Publications LTD., 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ferrara, Alessandro
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Lončar, Jelena
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Simeunović, Bojana
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1428
AB  - In this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.
PB  - London: SAGE Publications LTD.
PB  - London : Political Studies Association
T2  - Political Studies Review
T1  - Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism
IS  - 3
VL  - 15
SP  - 368
EP  - 390
DO  - 10.1177/1478929916645359
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ferrara, Alessandro and Ivković, Marjan and Lončar, Jelena and Prodanović, Srđan and Simeunović, Bojana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "In this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.",
publisher = "London: SAGE Publications LTD., London : Political Studies Association",
journal = "Political Studies Review",
title = "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism",
number = "3",
volume = "15",
pages = "368-390",
doi = "10.1177/1478929916645359"
}
Ferrara, A., Ivković, M., Lončar, J., Prodanović, S.,& Simeunović, B.. (2017). Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. in Political Studies Review
London: SAGE Publications LTD.., 15(3), 368-390.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916645359
Ferrara A, Ivković M, Lončar J, Prodanović S, Simeunović B. Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. in Political Studies Review. 2017;15(3):368-390.
doi:10.1177/1478929916645359 .
Ferrara, Alessandro, Ivković, Marjan, Lončar, Jelena, Prodanović, Srđan, Simeunović, Bojana, "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism" in Political Studies Review, 15, no. 3 (2017):368-390,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916645359 . .

Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira

Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1427
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo pokušati da razmotrimo kritički potencijal sociologije Ervinga Gofmana. Polazna hipoteza će biti da Gofmanovo shavatanje zdravog razuma koje je ponudio u Analizi okvira otvara mogućnost za formulaciju kritičkog uvida u strukturalne datosti svakodnevne društvene prakse. Pokušaćemo takođe da pokažemo da je ovakvo Gofmanovo razumevanje zdravog razuma bilo pod jakim uticajem pragmatizma i fenomenologije, te da su često zanemarene epistemološke razlike između ova dva teorijska pravca ostavile posledice i na gofmanovsku sociologiju. Naime, u Analizi okvira možemo uvek iznova da iščitamo svojevrsnu teorijsku napetost između pragmatičkog insistiranja na autonomnom teorijskom značaju zdravog razuma i redukcionističkih nastojanja koje su fenomenolozi gajili spram ove forme mišljenja. Shodno tome, tvrdićemo da je upravo ova ambivalencija po pitanju uloge zdravog razuma u tumačenju društvene stvarnosti predstavlja glavni razlog što kritički potencijal Gofmanove sociologije ostaje u velikoj meri implicitan po svom karakteru.
AB  - In this paper, I will try to appraise the critique potential of Erving Goffman’s sociology. The starting hypothesis will be that Goffman’s understanding of common sense offered in Frame Analysis opens the possibility of attaining a critical insight into the structural givens of everyday practice. I will also try to show that Goffman’s understanding of common sense was under heavy influence of pragmatism and phenomenology - and that the often-overseen epistemological differences between these two schools of thought had significant consequences on his sociology. Namely, in the Frame Analysis we can easily find a certain tension between insistence on the autonomous theoretical importance of common sense put forward by the pragmatist and reductionist tendencies towards this type of thought found among the phenomenologists. Therefore, I will argue that this ambivalence regarding the role of common sense in interpreting social realty is the main reason why critique potential of Goffman’s sociology remains implicit in its character.
PB  - Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore
PB  - Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta 
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike  Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira
T1  - Critique potential of common sense in Goffman’s frame analysis
IS  - 2
VL  - 59
SP  - 139
EP  - 155
DO  - 10.2298/SOC1702139P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2017",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo pokušati da razmotrimo kritički potencijal sociologije Ervinga Gofmana. Polazna hipoteza će biti da Gofmanovo shavatanje zdravog razuma koje je ponudio u Analizi okvira otvara mogućnost za formulaciju kritičkog uvida u strukturalne datosti svakodnevne društvene prakse. Pokušaćemo takođe da pokažemo da je ovakvo Gofmanovo razumevanje zdravog razuma bilo pod jakim uticajem pragmatizma i fenomenologije, te da su često zanemarene epistemološke razlike između ova dva teorijska pravca ostavile posledice i na gofmanovsku sociologiju. Naime, u Analizi okvira možemo uvek iznova da iščitamo svojevrsnu teorijsku napetost između pragmatičkog insistiranja na autonomnom teorijskom značaju zdravog razuma i redukcionističkih nastojanja koje su fenomenolozi gajili spram ove forme mišljenja. Shodno tome, tvrdićemo da je upravo ova ambivalencija po pitanju uloge zdravog razuma u tumačenju društvene stvarnosti predstavlja glavni razlog što kritički potencijal Gofmanove sociologije ostaje u velikoj meri implicitan po svom karakteru., In this paper, I will try to appraise the critique potential of Erving Goffman’s sociology. The starting hypothesis will be that Goffman’s understanding of common sense offered in Frame Analysis opens the possibility of attaining a critical insight into the structural givens of everyday practice. I will also try to show that Goffman’s understanding of common sense was under heavy influence of pragmatism and phenomenology - and that the often-overseen epistemological differences between these two schools of thought had significant consequences on his sociology. Namely, in the Frame Analysis we can easily find a certain tension between insistence on the autonomous theoretical importance of common sense put forward by the pragmatist and reductionist tendencies towards this type of thought found among the phenomenologists. Therefore, I will argue that this ambivalence regarding the role of common sense in interpreting social realty is the main reason why critique potential of Goffman’s sociology remains implicit in its character.",
publisher = "Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta ",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike  Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira, Critique potential of common sense in Goffman’s frame analysis",
number = "2",
volume = "59",
pages = "139-155",
doi = "10.2298/SOC1702139P"
}
Prodanović, S.. (2017). Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike  Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira. in Sociologija
Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore., 59(2), 139-155.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1702139P
Prodanović S. Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike  Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira. in Sociologija. 2017;59(2):139-155.
doi:10.2298/SOC1702139P .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Potencijal zdravorazumske kritike  Gofmanovoj sociologiji okvira" in Sociologija, 59, no. 2 (2017):139-155,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1702139P . .

Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije

Ivković, Marjan; Prodanović, Srđan; Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1686
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton
T2  - Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
T1  - Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan and Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara",
year = "2016",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton",
journal = "Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa",
booktitle = "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686"
}
Ivković, M., Prodanović, S.,& Petrović-Trifunović, T.. (2016). Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686
Ivković M, Prodanović S, Petrović-Trifunović T. Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa. 2016;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686 .
Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara, "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije" in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa (2016),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686 .

Pragmatic Epistemology and the Community of Engaged Actors

Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=386
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1853
AB  - In this paper I will explore the relation between engagement and
social science. I will try to argue that positivist epistemology found in the early
days of social sciences still greatly influences our understanding of social engagement.
In the first part of the paper, I will analyze the epistemology of social sciences
advocated by Fourier and Saint-Simon and try to show that, for them, scientific
method was primarily the means for taming social change, as well as projecting
private desires and plans onto the public sphere. In the second part, I will offer
an alternative account of social engagement using the epistemic role of the
community found in pragmatism.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Pragmatic Epistemology and the Community of Engaged Actors
T1  - Pragmatička epistemologija i zajednica angažovanih delatnika
IS  - 2
VL  - 27
SP  - 398
EP  - 406
DO  - 10.2298/FID1602398P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2016",
abstract = "In this paper I will explore the relation between engagement and
social science. I will try to argue that positivist epistemology found in the early
days of social sciences still greatly influences our understanding of social engagement.
In the first part of the paper, I will analyze the epistemology of social sciences
advocated by Fourier and Saint-Simon and try to show that, for them, scientific
method was primarily the means for taming social change, as well as projecting
private desires and plans onto the public sphere. In the second part, I will offer
an alternative account of social engagement using the epistemic role of the
community found in pragmatism.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Pragmatic Epistemology and the Community of Engaged Actors, Pragmatička epistemologija i zajednica angažovanih delatnika",
number = "2",
volume = "27",
pages = "398-406",
doi = "10.2298/FID1602398P"
}
Prodanović, S.. (2016). Pragmatic Epistemology and the Community of Engaged Actors. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(2), 398-406.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602398P
Prodanović S. Pragmatic Epistemology and the Community of Engaged Actors. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(2):398-406.
doi:10.2298/FID1602398P .
Prodanović, Srđan, "Pragmatic Epistemology and the Community of Engaged Actors" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 27, no. 2 (2016):398-406,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602398P . .

Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism

Ferrara, Alessandro; Ivković, Marjan; Prodanović, Srđan; Lončar, Jelena; Simeunović, Bojana

(Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ferrara, Alessandro
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Lončar, Jelena
AU  - Simeunović, Bojana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1683
AB  - n this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.
PB  - Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications
T2  - Political Studies Review
T1  - Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism
IS  - 1
VL  - 23
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1683
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ferrara, Alessandro and Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan and Lončar, Jelena and Simeunović, Bojana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "n this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.",
publisher = "Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications",
journal = "Political Studies Review",
title = "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism",
number = "1",
volume = "23",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1683"
}
Ferrara, A., Ivković, M., Prodanović, S., Lončar, J.,& Simeunović, B.. (2016). Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. in Political Studies Review
Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications., 23(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1683
Ferrara A, Ivković M, Prodanović S, Lončar J, Simeunović B. Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. in Political Studies Review. 2016;23(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1683 .
Ferrara, Alessandro, Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, Lončar, Jelena, Simeunović, Bojana, "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism" in Political Studies Review, 23, no. 1 (2016),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1683 .

Engaging Foucault Volume 2

Ivković, Marjan; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2015)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2874
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Engaging Foucault Volume 2
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2874
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2015",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Engaging Foucault Volume 2",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2874"
}
Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Prodanović, S.. (2015). Engaging Foucault Volume 2. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2874
Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Prodanović S. Engaging Foucault Volume 2. 2015;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2874 .
Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Prodanović, Srđan, "Engaging Foucault Volume 2" (2015),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2874 .

Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije

Ivković, Marjan; Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : KPZ Beton, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1614
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.
AB  - In this paper we examine to which extent was egalitarian vocabulary of Yugoslav socialism
able to provide an alternative framework for interpretation of Serbian-Albanian
relations. Our initial hypothesis is that – due to the experimental nature of Yugoslav
self-management socialism, which implied certain compromises with liberal
capitalism – the Yugoslav elite was structurally bound to systematically negate the
social aspect of protests that took place in Kosovo in 1968, 1981 and 1988. Using critical
discourse analysis on daily newspapers (Politika, Večernje novosti and Borba), we
show how the nomenclature treated the complex social-political aspects of the social
uprisings exclusively as a manifestation of nationalism. To the actors involved, this
discursive strategy suggested that nationalism is a common denominator for economic,
political and ethnic equality. Final consequences of these discursive strategies will
be shown through analysis of media coverage of protests in Kosovo and the “Brotherhood
and Unity” meeting that took place Belgrade in 1988, wherein we can see that
there is little space left for non-nationalistic interpretation of any kind of social uprising,
both in media and actors’ perspective.
PB  - Beograd : KPZ Beton
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
T1  - Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije
T1  - Serbian-Albanian Relations in Socialist Yugoslavia: Protests in Kosovo and the Burden of Systemic Legitimization
SP  - 153
EP  - 173
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2015",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu., In this paper we examine to which extent was egalitarian vocabulary of Yugoslav socialism
able to provide an alternative framework for interpretation of Serbian-Albanian
relations. Our initial hypothesis is that – due to the experimental nature of Yugoslav
self-management socialism, which implied certain compromises with liberal
capitalism – the Yugoslav elite was structurally bound to systematically negate the
social aspect of protests that took place in Kosovo in 1968, 1981 and 1988. Using critical
discourse analysis on daily newspapers (Politika, Večernje novosti and Borba), we
show how the nomenclature treated the complex social-political aspects of the social
uprisings exclusively as a manifestation of nationalism. To the actors involved, this
discursive strategy suggested that nationalism is a common denominator for economic,
political and ethnic equality. Final consequences of these discursive strategies will
be shown through analysis of media coverage of protests in Kosovo and the “Brotherhood
and Unity” meeting that took place Belgrade in 1988, wherein we can see that
there is little space left for non-nationalistic interpretation of any kind of social uprising,
both in media and actors’ perspective.",
publisher = "Beograd : KPZ Beton, Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa",
booktitle = "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije, Serbian-Albanian Relations in Socialist Yugoslavia: Protests in Kosovo and the Burden of Systemic Legitimization",
pages = "153-173",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614"
}
Ivković, M., Petrović-Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S.. (2015). Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
Beograd : KPZ Beton., 153-173.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614
Ivković M, Petrović-Trifunović T, Prodanović S. Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa. 2015;:153-173.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614 .
Ivković, Marjan, Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije" in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa (2015):153-173,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614 .

Status zdravog razuma u savremenoj sociološkoj teoriji

Prodanović, Srđan M.

(Београд : Институт за филозофију и друштвену теорију, 2015)

TY  - THES
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan M.
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=2411
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:10416/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=526271895
UR  - http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/123456789/4549
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1362
AB  - Predmet istraživanja ovog rada biće istorijski prikaz i kritička analiza teorijskihsličnosti i razlika između pragmatizma i sociologije. U središtu našeg interesovanja ćebiti teorijski uvidi u zdravorazumsko mišljenje koji su prisutni u savremenoj sociologijii pragmatizmu. Pažnju ćemo pre svega posvetiti autorima interpretativne sociologije isavremenim teoretičarima prakse. U radu ćemo ispitati kakvu ulogu je pragmatičkoshvatanje zdravog razuma igralo pri formulaciji teorijskih uvida o svakodnevnomiskustvu koji se nude u interpretativnoj sociologiji i novim teorijama prakse. Pored toga,razmotrićemo značaj ovih istorijskih preklapanja izmenu pragmatizma i sociologije zapotencijalnu rekonceptualizaciju međusobnog odnosa teorijskog znanja i svakodnevneprakse.Metod koji ćemo koristiti će pre svega podrazumevati istraživačke postupke skojima se srećemo u studijama koje se bave međusobnim uticajem teorijskih ideja kaošto su: poređenje ideja, teza i teorijskih polazišta; ispitivanje evolucije teorijskihstanovišta; ispitivanje kontekstualnih uslova nastanka i razvoja teorijskih ideja. Ovapoređenja ćemo vršiti sa namerom da pokažemo da je konceptualizacijazdravorazumskog mišljenja igrala važnu ulogu pri stvaranju novih pristupa i pravaca usavremenoj sociologiji. Metod će takođe biti analitički kada su u pitanju procenelogičke koherentnosti teorijskih određenja zdravog razuma u delima autora koji će biti ufokusu istraživanja.Cilj rada je da pokaže da pragmatičko poimanje zdravog razuma može daposluži kao teorijski okvir za povezivanje društvene teorije i svakodnevne prakse.Nastojaćemo da dokažemo da kontinuitet između zdravorazumskog načina mišljenja isociološke teorije koji ne podrazumeva podrivanje kritičkog potencijala same društveneteorije.U uvodnom delu rada u kome ćemo se ukratko osvrnuti na radove klasičnihpragmatista i sociologa, Džona Djuija i Emila Dirkema. Videćemo da je između dvojiceautora postojalo teorijsko saglasje po pitanju razumevanja osnova fenomenadruštvenosti, te da su se razlike uglavnom bazirale na različitim epistemološkomuvidima. Naime, naturalizam koji je svojstven Djuievom pragmatizmu je u određenojmeri podrazumevao kontinuitet između zdravorazumskog i naučnog mišljenja, a ovakvogledište je pak bilo u suprotnosti sa Direkemovom verzijom pozitivizma u kome5svakodnevno, zdravorazumsko znanje nikada ne može samerljivo sa naučnom istinom.Tvrdićemo da je ova razlika temeljno pratila dalji razvoj odnosa sociologije ipragmatizma. Međutim, značaj Dirkemovih epistemoloških gledišta se svakako najvišeogledao u činjenici da su upravo ovi uvidi odigrali jednu od ključnih uloga u formiranjufunkcionalizma, kao jednog od najuticajnih teorijskih struja u savremenoj sociologiji. Uprvom poglavlju ćemo tako nastojati da objasnimo na koji način su fenomenologija ipragmatizam stvorile osnovu za prevazilaženje ove paradigme. Naročito pažnju ćemoposvetiti radovima Alfreda Šica i Džordža Herberta Mida koji su značajno uticale nainterpretativnu sociologiju. U drugom poglavlju ćemo kritički razmotriti teorijske uvidedvojice prominentnih interpretativnih sociologa, Harolda Garfinkela i ErvingaGofmana. Usredsredićemo se na njihovo tvrdnju da nesvodivosti konkretnogzdravorazumskog znanja na opšte obrasce razumevanja društvene stvarnosti, kao i naustaljeni prigovor da se u okvirima njihovih sociologija ne mogu osvetliti odnosi moći udruštvu. U trećem poglavlju analiziraćemo radove Pjera Burdijea i Lika Boltanskog kojisu u okviru pravca novih teorija prakse upravo pokušali da formulišu sintezupartikularnog zdravorazumskog znanja i univerzalnog jezika teorijske kritike. Učetvrtom poglavlju promatraćemo u kojoj meri nam uvidi neopragmatista RičardaRortija i Donalda Dejvidsona omogućavaju da prevaziđemo određene manjkavati novihteorija prakse.U zaključnom delu rada tvrdićemo da nam naša analiza sugeriše nužnostuviđanja strukture zdravog razuma. Shodno tome, obrazložićemo distinkciju izmeđusvojstava konkretnog, svakodnevnog znanja zdravog razuma i zdravorazumskih kvaziteorija. Pokazaćemo da se prva vrsta znanja ne može univerzalizovati i sledi uvide kojesu formulisali Garfinkel i Gofman, dok druga vrsta znanja često reprodukuje odnosemoći i nejednakosti i zahteva teorijsku kritiku.
AB  - The object of the research conducted in this thesis will be an historical reviewand critical analysis of theoretical similarities and differences between pragmatism andsociology. The focus of my interest will be on the theoretical insights into commonsense that can be found in contemporary sociology and pragmatism. I will mainlydedicate my attention to the authors of interpretive sociology and new theories ofpractice. In the thesis I will investigate the role that the pragmatic view on commonsense had on the formulation of theoretical insights into everyday experience offered bythe interpretive sociology and new theories of practice. Aside from this, I will alsoreflect on the importance that the theoretical overlapping between pragmatism andsociology had for the potential reconceptualization of the relation between theoreticalknowledge and everyday practice.The method that I am going to rely on generally entails research procedures thatcan be found in studies that deal with mutual influence of theoretical ideas such as:comparison of ideas and theoretical standpoints; investigation of evolution of theoreticalinsights; investigation of contextual factors that influence the emergence anddevelopment of theoretical ideas. The goal of these comparisons that I will be making isto prove that conceptualization of common sense played an important role in creation ofnew approaches and paradigms in contemporary sociology. The method will also beanalytical in the sense that I will systematically question logical coherence of theoreticaldesignations of common sense in the works of authors that will be in the focus of thiswork.The goal of this thesis is to show that pragmatic understating of common sensecould serve as a theoretical frame in which social theory and everyday practice mightbecome closer. I will try to prove that there is continuity between common sense andsociological theory which does not imply that the critical potential of the social theorybecomes undermined by this fact.In the introductory part of the thesis, we will shorty review the works of twoclassical pragmatists and sociologist, John Dewey and Emile Durkheim. We will seethat there was a theoretical accordance between the two authors regarding the basis ofthe phenomena of sociability, and that the differences were mainly grounded onepistemological insights. Namely, Dewey’s naturalism largely entailed a certain amount7of continuity between commonsense and scientific ways of thinking and this view wasin opposition with Durkheim’s positivism, which implied that everyday knowledge ofcommon sense can ever be commensurable with scientific truth. I will maintain that thisdifference thoroughly followed further development of both sociology and pragmatism.However, the importance of Durkheim’s epistemological insights can primarily befound in the fact that they played a crucial role in the appearance of functionalism, asone of the most influential theoretical currents in modern sociology. Therefore, in thefirst chapter I will try to explain how phenomenology and pragmatism laid thefoundation for the overcoming of this paradigm. I will especially focus my attention tothe works of Alfred Schutz and George Herbert Mead that profoundly influencedinterpretative sociology. In the second chapter, I will critically reflect on the theoreticalinsights of two prominent interpretative sociologists, Harold Garfinkel and ErvingGoffman. We will center our analysis on their claim that the concrete everydayknowledge can never be reduced to general forms of understanding social reality, aswell as on the typical objection to their work according to which this kind of sociologycannot shed light on power relations present in the society. In the third chapter we willanalyze the works of Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski in which they tried toformulate a synthesis of particular common sense knowledge and universal language ofsocial critique. In the fourth chapter we will consider to which extent the views of theneopragmatists, Richard Rorty and Donald Davidson can help us to overcome some ofthe shortcomings of the new theories of practice.In the concluding part of the thesis I will claim that our examination suggeststhat we must take into account the structure of common sense. Therefore, we I willexplain the distinction between the properties of concrete everyday knowledge ofcommon sense and commonsensical quasi theories. I will show that the first kind ofknowledge cannot be universalized and that it follows the insights Garfinkel andGoffman, while the second kind of knowledge often reproduces the power relations andinequality and demands a theoretical critique.
PB  - Београд : Институт  за филозофију и друштвену теорију
T2  - Универзитет у Београду
T1  - Status zdravog razuma u savremenoj sociološkoj teoriji
T1  - The status of common sense in contemporary social theory: toward a pragmatic reconceptualization of the relationship between theory and practice
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4549
ER  - 
@phdthesis{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan M.",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Predmet istraživanja ovog rada biće istorijski prikaz i kritička analiza teorijskihsličnosti i razlika između pragmatizma i sociologije. U središtu našeg interesovanja ćebiti teorijski uvidi u zdravorazumsko mišljenje koji su prisutni u savremenoj sociologijii pragmatizmu. Pažnju ćemo pre svega posvetiti autorima interpretativne sociologije isavremenim teoretičarima prakse. U radu ćemo ispitati kakvu ulogu je pragmatičkoshvatanje zdravog razuma igralo pri formulaciji teorijskih uvida o svakodnevnomiskustvu koji se nude u interpretativnoj sociologiji i novim teorijama prakse. Pored toga,razmotrićemo značaj ovih istorijskih preklapanja izmenu pragmatizma i sociologije zapotencijalnu rekonceptualizaciju međusobnog odnosa teorijskog znanja i svakodnevneprakse.Metod koji ćemo koristiti će pre svega podrazumevati istraživačke postupke skojima se srećemo u studijama koje se bave međusobnim uticajem teorijskih ideja kaošto su: poređenje ideja, teza i teorijskih polazišta; ispitivanje evolucije teorijskihstanovišta; ispitivanje kontekstualnih uslova nastanka i razvoja teorijskih ideja. Ovapoređenja ćemo vršiti sa namerom da pokažemo da je konceptualizacijazdravorazumskog mišljenja igrala važnu ulogu pri stvaranju novih pristupa i pravaca usavremenoj sociologiji. Metod će takođe biti analitički kada su u pitanju procenelogičke koherentnosti teorijskih određenja zdravog razuma u delima autora koji će biti ufokusu istraživanja.Cilj rada je da pokaže da pragmatičko poimanje zdravog razuma može daposluži kao teorijski okvir za povezivanje društvene teorije i svakodnevne prakse.Nastojaćemo da dokažemo da kontinuitet između zdravorazumskog načina mišljenja isociološke teorije koji ne podrazumeva podrivanje kritičkog potencijala same društveneteorije.U uvodnom delu rada u kome ćemo se ukratko osvrnuti na radove klasičnihpragmatista i sociologa, Džona Djuija i Emila Dirkema. Videćemo da je između dvojiceautora postojalo teorijsko saglasje po pitanju razumevanja osnova fenomenadruštvenosti, te da su se razlike uglavnom bazirale na različitim epistemološkomuvidima. Naime, naturalizam koji je svojstven Djuievom pragmatizmu je u određenojmeri podrazumevao kontinuitet između zdravorazumskog i naučnog mišljenja, a ovakvogledište je pak bilo u suprotnosti sa Direkemovom verzijom pozitivizma u kome5svakodnevno, zdravorazumsko znanje nikada ne može samerljivo sa naučnom istinom.Tvrdićemo da je ova razlika temeljno pratila dalji razvoj odnosa sociologije ipragmatizma. Međutim, značaj Dirkemovih epistemoloških gledišta se svakako najvišeogledao u činjenici da su upravo ovi uvidi odigrali jednu od ključnih uloga u formiranjufunkcionalizma, kao jednog od najuticajnih teorijskih struja u savremenoj sociologiji. Uprvom poglavlju ćemo tako nastojati da objasnimo na koji način su fenomenologija ipragmatizam stvorile osnovu za prevazilaženje ove paradigme. Naročito pažnju ćemoposvetiti radovima Alfreda Šica i Džordža Herberta Mida koji su značajno uticale nainterpretativnu sociologiju. U drugom poglavlju ćemo kritički razmotriti teorijske uvidedvojice prominentnih interpretativnih sociologa, Harolda Garfinkela i ErvingaGofmana. Usredsredićemo se na njihovo tvrdnju da nesvodivosti konkretnogzdravorazumskog znanja na opšte obrasce razumevanja društvene stvarnosti, kao i naustaljeni prigovor da se u okvirima njihovih sociologija ne mogu osvetliti odnosi moći udruštvu. U trećem poglavlju analiziraćemo radove Pjera Burdijea i Lika Boltanskog kojisu u okviru pravca novih teorija prakse upravo pokušali da formulišu sintezupartikularnog zdravorazumskog znanja i univerzalnog jezika teorijske kritike. Učetvrtom poglavlju promatraćemo u kojoj meri nam uvidi neopragmatista RičardaRortija i Donalda Dejvidsona omogućavaju da prevaziđemo određene manjkavati novihteorija prakse.U zaključnom delu rada tvrdićemo da nam naša analiza sugeriše nužnostuviđanja strukture zdravog razuma. Shodno tome, obrazložićemo distinkciju izmeđusvojstava konkretnog, svakodnevnog znanja zdravog razuma i zdravorazumskih kvaziteorija. Pokazaćemo da se prva vrsta znanja ne može univerzalizovati i sledi uvide kojesu formulisali Garfinkel i Gofman, dok druga vrsta znanja često reprodukuje odnosemoći i nejednakosti i zahteva teorijsku kritiku., The object of the research conducted in this thesis will be an historical reviewand critical analysis of theoretical similarities and differences between pragmatism andsociology. The focus of my interest will be on the theoretical insights into commonsense that can be found in contemporary sociology and pragmatism. I will mainlydedicate my attention to the authors of interpretive sociology and new theories ofpractice. In the thesis I will investigate the role that the pragmatic view on commonsense had on the formulation of theoretical insights into everyday experience offered bythe interpretive sociology and new theories of practice. Aside from this, I will alsoreflect on the importance that the theoretical overlapping between pragmatism andsociology had for the potential reconceptualization of the relation between theoreticalknowledge and everyday practice.The method that I am going to rely on generally entails research procedures thatcan be found in studies that deal with mutual influence of theoretical ideas such as:comparison of ideas and theoretical standpoints; investigation of evolution of theoreticalinsights; investigation of contextual factors that influence the emergence anddevelopment of theoretical ideas. The goal of these comparisons that I will be making isto prove that conceptualization of common sense played an important role in creation ofnew approaches and paradigms in contemporary sociology. The method will also beanalytical in the sense that I will systematically question logical coherence of theoreticaldesignations of common sense in the works of authors that will be in the focus of thiswork.The goal of this thesis is to show that pragmatic understating of common sensecould serve as a theoretical frame in which social theory and everyday practice mightbecome closer. I will try to prove that there is continuity between common sense andsociological theory which does not imply that the critical potential of the social theorybecomes undermined by this fact.In the introductory part of the thesis, we will shorty review the works of twoclassical pragmatists and sociologist, John Dewey and Emile Durkheim. We will seethat there was a theoretical accordance between the two authors regarding the basis ofthe phenomena of sociability, and that the differences were mainly grounded onepistemological insights. Namely, Dewey’s naturalism largely entailed a certain amount7of continuity between commonsense and scientific ways of thinking and this view wasin opposition with Durkheim’s positivism, which implied that everyday knowledge ofcommon sense can ever be commensurable with scientific truth. I will maintain that thisdifference thoroughly followed further development of both sociology and pragmatism.However, the importance of Durkheim’s epistemological insights can primarily befound in the fact that they played a crucial role in the appearance of functionalism, asone of the most influential theoretical currents in modern sociology. Therefore, in thefirst chapter I will try to explain how phenomenology and pragmatism laid thefoundation for the overcoming of this paradigm. I will especially focus my attention tothe works of Alfred Schutz and George Herbert Mead that profoundly influencedinterpretative sociology. In the second chapter, I will critically reflect on the theoreticalinsights of two prominent interpretative sociologists, Harold Garfinkel and ErvingGoffman. We will center our analysis on their claim that the concrete everydayknowledge can never be reduced to general forms of understanding social reality, aswell as on the typical objection to their work according to which this kind of sociologycannot shed light on power relations present in the society. In the third chapter we willanalyze the works of Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski in which they tried toformulate a synthesis of particular common sense knowledge and universal language ofsocial critique. In the fourth chapter we will consider to which extent the views of theneopragmatists, Richard Rorty and Donald Davidson can help us to overcome some ofthe shortcomings of the new theories of practice.In the concluding part of the thesis I will claim that our examination suggeststhat we must take into account the structure of common sense. Therefore, we I willexplain the distinction between the properties of concrete everyday knowledge ofcommon sense and commonsensical quasi theories. I will show that the first kind ofknowledge cannot be universalized and that it follows the insights Garfinkel andGoffman, while the second kind of knowledge often reproduces the power relations andinequality and demands a theoretical critique.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт  за филозофију и друштвену теорију",
journal = "Универзитет у Београду",
title = "Status zdravog razuma u savremenoj sociološkoj teoriji, The status of common sense in contemporary social theory: toward a pragmatic reconceptualization of the relationship between theory and practice",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4549"
}
Prodanović, S. M.. (2015). Status zdravog razuma u savremenoj sociološkoj teoriji. in Универзитет у Београду
Београд : Институт  за филозофију и друштвену теорију..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4549
Prodanović SM. Status zdravog razuma u savremenoj sociološkoj teoriji. in Универзитет у Београду. 2015;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4549 .
Prodanović, Srđan M., "Status zdravog razuma u savremenoj sociološkoj teoriji" in Универзитет у Београду (2015),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4549 .

Pragmatička kritika poimanja svakodnevne prakse u kulturnoj sociologiji Džefrija Aleksandera

Jovanov, Rastko; Prodanović, Srđan

(2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/654
AB  - This paper tries to critically analyse Jeffrey Alexander’s cultural sociology. In the first part of the paper I will examine Alexander’s conception of hermeneutical structuralism which argues that conventional systemic sociology and richness of experience found in everyday praxis can be reconciled. In the next section I will provide a critique of this kind of approach to social theory and maintain that Alexander’s sociology is, in principle, reductionist regarding everyday life. In addition, I will also point out some of the comparative advantages that pragmatically oriented theory has in the attempt of integrating theoretical and practical knowledge. In the final section of the paper, I will try to illustrate some of the major shortcomings of Alexander’s sociology on the concrete example of advances in computer technology.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Pragmatička kritika poimanja svakodnevne prakse u kulturnoj sociologiji Džefrija Aleksandera
T1  - A Pragmatic Critique of the Conception of Everyday Praxis Within Jeffrey Alexander’s Cultural Sociology
SP  - 423
EP  - 443
DO  - 10.2298/FID1301423P
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2013",
abstract = "This paper tries to critically analyse Jeffrey Alexander’s cultural sociology. In the first part of the paper I will examine Alexander’s conception of hermeneutical structuralism which argues that conventional systemic sociology and richness of experience found in everyday praxis can be reconciled. In the next section I will provide a critique of this kind of approach to social theory and maintain that Alexander’s sociology is, in principle, reductionist regarding everyday life. In addition, I will also point out some of the comparative advantages that pragmatically oriented theory has in the attempt of integrating theoretical and practical knowledge. In the final section of the paper, I will try to illustrate some of the major shortcomings of Alexander’s sociology on the concrete example of advances in computer technology.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Pragmatička kritika poimanja svakodnevne prakse u kulturnoj sociologiji Džefrija Aleksandera, A Pragmatic Critique of the Conception of Everyday Praxis Within Jeffrey Alexander’s Cultural Sociology",
pages = "423-443",
doi = "10.2298/FID1301423P"
}
Jovanov, R.,& Prodanović, S.. (2013). Pragmatička kritika poimanja svakodnevne prakse u kulturnoj sociologiji Džefrija Aleksandera. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 423-443.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1301423P
Jovanov R, Prodanović S. Pragmatička kritika poimanja svakodnevne prakse u kulturnoj sociologiji Džefrija Aleksandera. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2013;:423-443.
doi:10.2298/FID1301423P .
Jovanov, Rastko, Prodanović, Srđan, "Pragmatička kritika poimanja svakodnevne prakse u kulturnoj sociologiji Džefrija Aleksandera" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2013):423-443,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1301423P . .

Corruption and social development

Birešev, Ana; Drezgić, Rada; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2013)

TY  - BOOK
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/871
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Corruption and social development
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_871
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Birešev, Ana, Drezgić, Rada, Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Corruption and social development",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_871"
}
Birešev, A., Drezgić, R.,& Prodanović, S.. (2013). Corruption and social development. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_871
Birešev A, Drezgić R, Prodanović S. Corruption and social development. 2013;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_871 .
Birešev, Ana, Drezgić, Rada, Prodanović, Srđan, "Corruption and social development" (2013),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_871 .

Smurfs, Cyborgs and Changelings: Prospects of Human Enhancement Retrospected

Prodanović, Srđan; Krstić, Predrag

(2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/646
AB  - This article stems from the impression of being condemned to late and moralizing reactions in regard to advances
in the life sciences.We suggest a return to a speculative
and theoretical approach in posing the question(s) of the limit of possible thinking of the enhanced human. This return allows for the possibility to show, not just inductively, but “clearly and distinctly,” the specific justifications and lines of reasoning of anthropocentric prejudice or species narcissism. It also enables us to move freely and precisely along the limits of thinking the
human/non-human. In this way, we hope to put forward a few
markers or guideposts that would further the debate about
notions of human enhancement.
T2  - European Journal of Future Research [Online]
T1  - Smurfs, Cyborgs and Changelings: Prospects of Human Enhancement Retrospected
VL  - 1
SP  - 21
DO  - 10.1007/s40309-013-0021-6
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan and Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2013",
abstract = "This article stems from the impression of being condemned to late and moralizing reactions in regard to advances
in the life sciences.We suggest a return to a speculative
and theoretical approach in posing the question(s) of the limit of possible thinking of the enhanced human. This return allows for the possibility to show, not just inductively, but “clearly and distinctly,” the specific justifications and lines of reasoning of anthropocentric prejudice or species narcissism. It also enables us to move freely and precisely along the limits of thinking the
human/non-human. In this way, we hope to put forward a few
markers or guideposts that would further the debate about
notions of human enhancement.",
journal = "European Journal of Future Research [Online]",
title = "Smurfs, Cyborgs and Changelings: Prospects of Human Enhancement Retrospected",
volume = "1",
pages = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s40309-013-0021-6"
}
Prodanović, S.,& Krstić, P.. (2013). Smurfs, Cyborgs and Changelings: Prospects of Human Enhancement Retrospected. in European Journal of Future Research [Online], 1, 21.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0021-6
Prodanović S, Krstić P. Smurfs, Cyborgs and Changelings: Prospects of Human Enhancement Retrospected. in European Journal of Future Research [Online]. 2013;1:21.
doi:10.1007/s40309-013-0021-6 .
Prodanović, Srđan, Krstić, Predrag, "Smurfs, Cyborgs and Changelings: Prospects of Human Enhancement Retrospected" in European Journal of Future Research [Online], 1 (2013):21,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0021-6 . .
4
1
1