TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Ilić, Vujo
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14683857.2023.2170720
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2788
AB  - In this article, taking Serbia as a case study, we address the issue of how social movements in illiberal democracies adapted to the effects of the pandemic and the governmental responses. We show that, contrary to expectations, these social movements have intensified their activities and visibility and adapted their agenda during the crisis. Our research studies two movements dealing with socio-economic issues – the right to housing and the right to food as particularly active during pandemics. While the pandemic further constrained the possibility for collective action, these social movements have quickly shifted their priorities towards solidarity with the most vulnerable groups, engaged directly with citizens, and pragmatically approached the polarized media environment, mobilizing broad public support. This finding indicates that social movements in illiberal democracies can exhibit resilience and adaptability to rapidly changing circumstances, even though questions about their sustainability and the attainability of their goals persist.
PB  - Routledge
T2  - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
T1  - The Pandemic in Illiberal Democracies: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Movements in Serbia
SP  - 1
EP  - 22
DO  - 10.1080/14683857.2023.2170720
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Ilić, Vujo",
year = "2023",
abstract = "In this article, taking Serbia as a case study, we address the issue of how social movements in illiberal democracies adapted to the effects of the pandemic and the governmental responses. We show that, contrary to expectations, these social movements have intensified their activities and visibility and adapted their agenda during the crisis. Our research studies two movements dealing with socio-economic issues – the right to housing and the right to food as particularly active during pandemics. While the pandemic further constrained the possibility for collective action, these social movements have quickly shifted their priorities towards solidarity with the most vulnerable groups, engaged directly with citizens, and pragmatically approached the polarized media environment, mobilizing broad public support. This finding indicates that social movements in illiberal democracies can exhibit resilience and adaptability to rapidly changing circumstances, even though questions about their sustainability and the attainability of their goals persist.",
publisher = "Routledge",
journal = "Southeast European and Black Sea Studies",
title = "The Pandemic in Illiberal Democracies: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Movements in Serbia",
pages = "1-22",
doi = "10.1080/14683857.2023.2170720"
}

Fiket, I., Pudar Draško, G.,& Ilić, V.. (2023). The Pandemic in Illiberal Democracies: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Movements in Serbia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Routledge., 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2170720

Fiket I, Pudar Draško G, Ilić V. The Pandemic in Illiberal Democracies: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Movements in Serbia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2023;:1-22.
doi:10.1080/14683857.2023.2170720 .

Fiket, Irena, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Ilić, Vujo, "The Pandemic in Illiberal Democracies: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Movements in Serbia" in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (2023):1-22,
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2170720 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vasiljevic, Jelena
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ifdt.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Democracy-KONF-program.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2804
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
C3  - International Conference Revitalizing democracy through participatory democratic innovations. ACT.WB Jean Monnet Network Final Conference, Belgrade, 16-18. May.
T1  - Social Movements and Internal Democracy
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2804
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Vasiljevic, Jelena and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Fiket, Irena",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "International Conference Revitalizing democracy through participatory democratic innovations. ACT.WB Jean Monnet Network Final Conference, Belgrade, 16-18. May.",
title = "Social Movements and Internal Democracy",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2804"
}

Vasiljevic, J., Pudar Draško, G.,& Fiket, I.. (2022). Social Movements and Internal Democracy. in International Conference Revitalizing democracy through participatory democratic innovations. ACT.WB Jean Monnet Network Final Conference, Belgrade, 16-18. May.
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2804

Vasiljevic J, Pudar Draško G, Fiket I. Social Movements and Internal Democracy. in International Conference Revitalizing democracy through participatory democratic innovations. ACT.WB Jean Monnet Network Final Conference, Belgrade, 16-18. May.. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2804 .

Vasiljevic, Jelena, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Fiket, Irena, "Social Movements and Internal Democracy" in International Conference Revitalizing democracy through participatory democratic innovations. ACT.WB Jean Monnet Network Final Conference, Belgrade, 16-18. May. (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2804 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ilić, Vujo
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1432
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2533
AB  - Participation in deliberation in stable democracies produces effects which are beneficial for democracy, while the results of deliberative innovations in non-democracies are more ambiguous. This article contributes to the debate about the effects of participatory democratic innovations on attitudes, related to democratic commitments, political capacities and political participation, in the increasingly ubiquitous hybrid regimes. We present the evidence collected from the participants before and after deliberative mini publics (DMPs), held in Serbia in 2020. Serbia is an exemplary case of a recent wave of autocratization, which had led to it becoming a hybrid regime, and it had no track record of deliberative innovations. When conducting the mini publics, we introduced an innovation in the standard design, by including active citizens – representatives of local initiatives or social movements particularly interested in the issue of DMPs. We could not find evidence that the democratic innovation affected attitudes of participants regarding democratic commitments, political capacities and political participation. However, we did find that participants of the DMPs became less satisfied with the functioning of the democracy on the local level. We argue that the anti-democratic wider context of hybrid regimes can produce adverse effects when introducing participatory democratic innovations, at least when it comes to this specific dimension of political participation. We conclude with the suggestions for further research, and a call for consideration of the wider political context when designing democratic interventions in hybrid regimes.
AB  - U stabilnim demokratijama učešće u deliberaciji proizvodi efekte koji pogoduju demokratiji, dok su rezultati deliberativnih inovacija u nedemokratijama neodređeniji. Ovaj članak predstavlja doprinos debati o efektima participatornih demokratskih inovacija na stavove o privrženosti demokratiji, političkom kapacitetu i političkoj participaciji u sve prisutnijim hibridnim režimima. U radu predstavljamo rezultate ispitivanja učesnika, pre i posle njihovog učešća u deliberativnim mini javnostima (DMJ), održanih u Srbiji 2020. godine. Srbija predstavlja uzorni slučaj poslednjeg talasa autokratizacije, putem kog je postala hibridni režim, i pored toga nema razvijenu praksu deliberativnih inovacija. Prilikom sprovođenja mini-javnosti, uveli smo inovaciju u uobičajeni dizajn, tako što su uključeni i aktivni građani - predstavnici lokalnih inicijativa ili društvenih pokreta koji su bili posebno zainteresovani za temu DMJ. Naši nalazi nisu pokazali da je demokratska inovacija uticala na promenu stavova učesnika o privrženosti demokratiji, političkom kapacitetu i političkoj participaciji. Međutim, utvrdili smo da su učesnici DMJ bili manje zadovoljni funkcionisanjem demokratije na lokalnom nivou. Ovo objašnjavamo širim, anti-demokratskim kontekstom hibridnih režima, koji proizvodi neželjene efekte prilikom uvođenja demokratskih inovacija, bar kada se radi o ovim specifičnim dimenzijama političke participacije. Zaključujemo članak sa predlozima za buduća istraživanja, i preporukom da se prilikom dizajniranja demokratskih intervencija u hibridnim režimima uvaže specifičnosti šireg političkog konteksta.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Failed Expectations: Can Deliberative Innovations Produce Democratic Effects in Hybrid Regimes?
T1  - Izneverena očekivanja: mogu li deliberativne inovacije u hibridnim režimima imati demokratske efekte?
IS  - 1
VL  - 33
SP  - 50
EP  - 71
DO  - 10.2298/FID2201050F
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ilić, Vujo and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Participation in deliberation in stable democracies produces effects which are beneficial for democracy, while the results of deliberative innovations in non-democracies are more ambiguous. This article contributes to the debate about the effects of participatory democratic innovations on attitudes, related to democratic commitments, political capacities and political participation, in the increasingly ubiquitous hybrid regimes. We present the evidence collected from the participants before and after deliberative mini publics (DMPs), held in Serbia in 2020. Serbia is an exemplary case of a recent wave of autocratization, which had led to it becoming a hybrid regime, and it had no track record of deliberative innovations. When conducting the mini publics, we introduced an innovation in the standard design, by including active citizens – representatives of local initiatives or social movements particularly interested in the issue of DMPs. We could not find evidence that the democratic innovation affected attitudes of participants regarding democratic commitments, political capacities and political participation. However, we did find that participants of the DMPs became less satisfied with the functioning of the democracy on the local level. We argue that the anti-democratic wider context of hybrid regimes can produce adverse effects when introducing participatory democratic innovations, at least when it comes to this specific dimension of political participation. We conclude with the suggestions for further research, and a call for consideration of the wider political context when designing democratic interventions in hybrid regimes., U stabilnim demokratijama učešće u deliberaciji proizvodi efekte koji pogoduju demokratiji, dok su rezultati deliberativnih inovacija u nedemokratijama neodređeniji. Ovaj članak predstavlja doprinos debati o efektima participatornih demokratskih inovacija na stavove o privrženosti demokratiji, političkom kapacitetu i političkoj participaciji u sve prisutnijim hibridnim režimima. U radu predstavljamo rezultate ispitivanja učesnika, pre i posle njihovog učešća u deliberativnim mini javnostima (DMJ), održanih u Srbiji 2020. godine. Srbija predstavlja uzorni slučaj poslednjeg talasa autokratizacije, putem kog je postala hibridni režim, i pored toga nema razvijenu praksu deliberativnih inovacija. Prilikom sprovođenja mini-javnosti, uveli smo inovaciju u uobičajeni dizajn, tako što su uključeni i aktivni građani - predstavnici lokalnih inicijativa ili društvenih pokreta koji su bili posebno zainteresovani za temu DMJ. Naši nalazi nisu pokazali da je demokratska inovacija uticala na promenu stavova učesnika o privrženosti demokratiji, političkom kapacitetu i političkoj participaciji. Međutim, utvrdili smo da su učesnici DMJ bili manje zadovoljni funkcionisanjem demokratije na lokalnom nivou. Ovo objašnjavamo širim, anti-demokratskim kontekstom hibridnih režima, koji proizvodi neželjene efekte prilikom uvođenja demokratskih inovacija, bar kada se radi o ovim specifičnim dimenzijama političke participacije. Zaključujemo članak sa predlozima za buduća istraživanja, i preporukom da se prilikom dizajniranja demokratskih intervencija u hibridnim režimima uvaže specifičnosti šireg političkog konteksta.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Failed Expectations: Can Deliberative Innovations Produce Democratic Effects in Hybrid Regimes?, Izneverena očekivanja: mogu li deliberativne inovacije u hibridnim režimima imati demokratske efekte?",
number = "1",
volume = "33",
pages = "50-71",
doi = "10.2298/FID2201050F"
}

Fiket, I., Ilić, V.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2022). Failed Expectations: Can Deliberative Innovations Produce Democratic Effects in Hybrid Regimes?. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 33(1), 50-71.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201050F

Fiket I, Ilić V, Pudar Draško G. Failed Expectations: Can Deliberative Innovations Produce Democratic Effects in Hybrid Regimes?. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2022;33(1):50-71.
doi:10.2298/FID2201050F .

Fiket, Irena, Ilić, Vujo, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Failed Expectations: Can Deliberative Innovations Produce Democratic Effects in Hybrid Regimes?" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 33, no. 1 (2022):50-71,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201050F . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Đorđević, Biljana
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1430
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2531
AB  - A worrying trend of autocratization that has been spreading globally in recent years, has thrust forward a new wave of appeals for deliberative and participatory democracy as a remedy for the crisis. With a few exceptions, the majority of participatory and deliberative institutions were implemented in stable democracies. The efforts to institutionalize participatory and deliberative models are almost completely absent in Serbia and other Western Balkan countries. Yet, there has been a trend of citizen mobilization in the form of social movements and local civic initiatives, which are both a symptom of unresponsive and quite openly authoritarian institutions, as well as a potential pathway to democratization. The pace and scope of these developments in the undemocratic societies of the Western Balkan region, in terms of both bottom up and top-down democratic experimentation, call for a better understanding of their internal dynamics, and their social and political impact. Responding to this need, the articles in the special issue focus on social movement mobilizations and deliberative experimentation. 

To begin with, our introductory article focuses particularly on understanding the possible role deliberative institutions could have in hybrid regimes. It looks at the first two cases of deliberative mini publics (DMPs) ever organized in Serbia, analyzing their rationale, specific design, implementation, as well as considering the possible role deliberative institutions could play in the hybrid regime of Serbia.
AB  - Zabrinjavajući trend autokratizacije koja se širi svetom poslednjih godina je pokrenuo novi talas poziva na deliberativnu i participativnu demokratiju kao lek za krizu. Uz nekoliko izuzetaka, većina participativnih i deliberativnih institucija je uspostavljana i sprovođena u stabilnim demokratijama. Napori da se participativni i deliberativni modeli institucionalizuju skoro u potpunosti izostaju u Srbiji i drugim zemljama Zapadnog Balkana. Ipak, ono što je prisutno je mobilizacija građana u okviru društvenih pokreta i lokalnih građanskih inicijativa, koja je istovremeno simptom neodgovornih i sve očiglednije autoritarnih institucija, kao i potencijalni put ka demokratizaciji. Tempo i obim ovakvog razvoja demokratskih eksperimenata, kako onih odozdo nagore tako i onih odozgo nadole, u nedemokratskim društvima regiona Zapadnog Balkana, zahtevaju bolje razumevanje njihove unutrašnje dinamike i njihovog društvenog i političkog uticaja. Kao odgovor na ovu potrebu, članci u ovom tematu stavljaju naglasak na mobilizaciju društvenih pokreta i deliberativno eksperimentisanje.
Na samom početku, naš uvodni članak se posebno fokusira na razumevanje moguće uloge koju bi deliberativne institucije mogle da imaju u hibridnim režimima. Razmatraju se prva dva slučaja deliberativnih mini javnosti (DMJ) ikada organizovanih u Srbiji, uz analizu obrazloženja, specifičnog dizajna, sprovođenja DMJ, kao i sagledavanje moguće uloge koju bi deliberativne institucije mogle da imaju u hibridnom režimu Srbije.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Promises and Challenges of Deliberative and Participatory Innovations in Hybrid Regimes: The Case of Two Citizens’ Assemblies in Serbia
T1  - Obećanja i izazovi deliberativnih i participativnih inovacija u hibridnim režimima: slučaj dve Građanske skupštine u Srbiji
IS  - 1
VL  - 33
SP  - 3
EP  - 25
DO  - 10.2298/FID2201003F
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Đorđević, Biljana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "A worrying trend of autocratization that has been spreading globally in recent years, has thrust forward a new wave of appeals for deliberative and participatory democracy as a remedy for the crisis. With a few exceptions, the majority of participatory and deliberative institutions were implemented in stable democracies. The efforts to institutionalize participatory and deliberative models are almost completely absent in Serbia and other Western Balkan countries. Yet, there has been a trend of citizen mobilization in the form of social movements and local civic initiatives, which are both a symptom of unresponsive and quite openly authoritarian institutions, as well as a potential pathway to democratization. The pace and scope of these developments in the undemocratic societies of the Western Balkan region, in terms of both bottom up and top-down democratic experimentation, call for a better understanding of their internal dynamics, and their social and political impact. Responding to this need, the articles in the special issue focus on social movement mobilizations and deliberative experimentation. 

To begin with, our introductory article focuses particularly on understanding the possible role deliberative institutions could have in hybrid regimes. It looks at the first two cases of deliberative mini publics (DMPs) ever organized in Serbia, analyzing their rationale, specific design, implementation, as well as considering the possible role deliberative institutions could play in the hybrid regime of Serbia., Zabrinjavajući trend autokratizacije koja se širi svetom poslednjih godina je pokrenuo novi talas poziva na deliberativnu i participativnu demokratiju kao lek za krizu. Uz nekoliko izuzetaka, većina participativnih i deliberativnih institucija je uspostavljana i sprovođena u stabilnim demokratijama. Napori da se participativni i deliberativni modeli institucionalizuju skoro u potpunosti izostaju u Srbiji i drugim zemljama Zapadnog Balkana. Ipak, ono što je prisutno je mobilizacija građana u okviru društvenih pokreta i lokalnih građanskih inicijativa, koja je istovremeno simptom neodgovornih i sve očiglednije autoritarnih institucija, kao i potencijalni put ka demokratizaciji. Tempo i obim ovakvog razvoja demokratskih eksperimenata, kako onih odozdo nagore tako i onih odozgo nadole, u nedemokratskim društvima regiona Zapadnog Balkana, zahtevaju bolje razumevanje njihove unutrašnje dinamike i njihovog društvenog i političkog uticaja. Kao odgovor na ovu potrebu, članci u ovom tematu stavljaju naglasak na mobilizaciju društvenih pokreta i deliberativno eksperimentisanje.
Na samom početku, naš uvodni članak se posebno fokusira na razumevanje moguće uloge koju bi deliberativne institucije mogle da imaju u hibridnim režimima. Razmatraju se prva dva slučaja deliberativnih mini javnosti (DMJ) ikada organizovanih u Srbiji, uz analizu obrazloženja, specifičnog dizajna, sprovođenja DMJ, kao i sagledavanje moguće uloge koju bi deliberativne institucije mogle da imaju u hibridnom režimu Srbije.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Promises and Challenges of Deliberative and Participatory Innovations in Hybrid Regimes: The Case of Two Citizens’ Assemblies in Serbia, Obećanja i izazovi deliberativnih i participativnih inovacija u hibridnim režimima: slučaj dve Građanske skupštine u Srbiji",
number = "1",
volume = "33",
pages = "3-25",
doi = "10.2298/FID2201003F"
}

Fiket, I.,& Đorđević, B.. (2022). Promises and Challenges of Deliberative and Participatory Innovations in Hybrid Regimes: The Case of Two Citizens’ Assemblies in Serbia. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 33(1), 3-25.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201003F

Fiket I, Đorđević B. Promises and Challenges of Deliberative and Participatory Innovations in Hybrid Regimes: The Case of Two Citizens’ Assemblies in Serbia. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2022;33(1):3-25.
doi:10.2298/FID2201003F .

Fiket, Irena, Đorđević, Biljana, "Promises and Challenges of Deliberative and Participatory Innovations in Hybrid Regimes: The Case of Two Citizens’ Assemblies in Serbia" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 33, no. 1 (2022):3-25,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201003F . .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Vasiljevic, Jelena
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2794
AB  - Leksikografska odrednica
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Pojmovnik angažmana
T1  - Aktivno građanstvo
SP  - 20
EP  - 21
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2794
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Vasiljevic, Jelena and Fiket, Irena",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Leksikografska odrednica",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Pojmovnik angažmana",
title = "Aktivno građanstvo",
pages = "20-21",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2794"
}

Vasiljevic, J.,& Fiket, I.. (2021). Aktivno građanstvo. in Pojmovnik angažmana
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 20-21.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2794

Vasiljevic J, Fiket I. Aktivno građanstvo. in Pojmovnik angažmana. 2021;:20-21.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2794 .

Vasiljevic, Jelena, Fiket, Irena, "Aktivno građanstvo" in Pojmovnik angažmana (2021):20-21,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2794 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2636
AB  - This article offers a collectively developed analysis of the Covid-19 crisis as it
relates to contemporary cultures of rejection, i.e. the socio-cultural conditions
in which authoritarian and right-wing populist politics thrive, in Europe. We
explore how the pandemic and its management reinforces, transforms and/or
overrides existing antagonisms and institutes new ones in Serbia, Croatia,
Austria, Germany and Sweden. We discuss how the Covid-19 crisis affects the
rise of new statisms; gendered patterns of social reproduction; mobility and
migration; digital infrastructures; and new political mobilizations
PB  - Routledge
T2  - Ethnic and Racial Studies
T1  - Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis
VL  - 44
DO  - 10.1080/01419870.2020.1859575
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This article offers a collectively developed analysis of the Covid-19 crisis as it
relates to contemporary cultures of rejection, i.e. the socio-cultural conditions
in which authoritarian and right-wing populist politics thrive, in Europe. We
explore how the pandemic and its management reinforces, transforms and/or
overrides existing antagonisms and institutes new ones in Serbia, Croatia,
Austria, Germany and Sweden. We discuss how the Covid-19 crisis affects the
rise of new statisms; gendered patterns of social reproduction; mobility and
migration; digital infrastructures; and new political mobilizations",
publisher = "Routledge",
journal = "Ethnic and Racial Studies",
title = "Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis",
volume = "44",
doi = "10.1080/01419870.2020.1859575"
}

Fiket, I.. (2021). Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis. in Ethnic and Racial Studies
Routledge., 44.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1859575

Fiket I. Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis. in Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2021;44.
doi:10.1080/01419870.2020.1859575 .

Fiket, Irena, "Cultures of rejection in the Covid-19 crisis" in Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44 (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1859575 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Pudar Drasko, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljevic, Jelena
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2638
AB  - This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’
characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies
and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we
discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in
question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide
a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the
two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some
differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining
principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success
of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of
2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements
in North Macedonia and Serbia.
PB  - Routledge
T2  - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
T1  - Small Steps and Big Dreams: Comparative Perspective on Social Movements’ Struggle for Democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia
VL  - 20
DO  - 10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Pudar Drasko, Gazela and Vasiljevic, Jelena",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’
characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies
and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we
discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in
question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide
a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the
two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some
differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining
principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success
of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of
2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements
in North Macedonia and Serbia.",
publisher = "Routledge",
journal = "Southeast European and Black Sea Studies",
title = "Small Steps and Big Dreams: Comparative Perspective on Social Movements’ Struggle for Democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia",
volume = "20",
doi = "10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317"
}

Fiket, I., Pudar Drasko, G.,& Vasiljevic, J.. (2020). Small Steps and Big Dreams: Comparative Perspective on Social Movements’ Struggle for Democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Routledge., 20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317

Fiket I, Pudar Drasko G, Vasiljevic J. Small Steps and Big Dreams: Comparative Perspective on Social Movements’ Struggle for Democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2020;20.
doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 .

Fiket, Irena, Pudar Drasko, Gazela, Vasiljevic, Jelena, "Small Steps and Big Dreams: Comparative Perspective on Social Movements’ Struggle for Democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia" in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ceriman, Jelena
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2637
AB  - According to the results of various studies, women remain responsible
for most household duties. Th is distribution is also refl ected in the position
of women in academia, since the family-dominant model tends to be reproduced within the academic community as well. Th is imbalance is refl ected
in the distribution of “lower rank” jobs in academia, and the shift ing of most
responsibilities for such jobs to women, leaving men with more time to pursue academic work. Th is situation, originating in the issue of family responsibilities, actually raises academic questions. Th e analysis in the paper is based
on empirical insights from a 2017 survey conducted among academic staff at
the University of Belgrade, and focuses on the following question: what factors lead to engagements within the family which seek to change patriarchal
patterns as expressed in the unequal distribution of domestic and family care
work, and which indirectly aff ect the distribution of responsibilities between
men and women in the academic sphere?
PB  - Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU
C3  - Naučnice u društvu. Radovi sa konferencije održane od 11. do 13. februara 2020. u Srpskoj akademiji nauka i umetnosti u Beogradu
T1  - Intra-family  Engagement? A Study of Female Academic Staff at the  University of Belgrade
SP  - 89
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2637
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ceriman, Jelena",
year = "2020",
abstract = "According to the results of various studies, women remain responsible
for most household duties. Th is distribution is also refl ected in the position
of women in academia, since the family-dominant model tends to be reproduced within the academic community as well. Th is imbalance is refl ected
in the distribution of “lower rank” jobs in academia, and the shift ing of most
responsibilities for such jobs to women, leaving men with more time to pursue academic work. Th is situation, originating in the issue of family responsibilities, actually raises academic questions. Th e analysis in the paper is based
on empirical insights from a 2017 survey conducted among academic staff at
the University of Belgrade, and focuses on the following question: what factors lead to engagements within the family which seek to change patriarchal
patterns as expressed in the unequal distribution of domestic and family care
work, and which indirectly aff ect the distribution of responsibilities between
men and women in the academic sphere?",
publisher = "Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU",
journal = "Naučnice u društvu. Radovi sa konferencije održane od 11. do 13. februara 2020. u Srpskoj akademiji nauka i umetnosti u Beogradu",
title = "Intra-family  Engagement? A Study of Female Academic Staff at the  University of Belgrade",
pages = "89",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2637"
}

Fiket, I.,& Ceriman, J.. (2020). Intra-family  Engagement? A Study of Female Academic Staff at the  University of Belgrade. in Naučnice u društvu. Radovi sa konferencije održane od 11. do 13. februara 2020. u Srpskoj akademiji nauka i umetnosti u Beogradu
Beograd: Etnografski institut SANU., 89.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2637

Fiket I, Ceriman J. Intra-family  Engagement? A Study of Female Academic Staff at the  University of Belgrade. in Naučnice u društvu. Radovi sa konferencije održane od 11. do 13. februara 2020. u Srpskoj akademiji nauka i umetnosti u Beogradu. 2020;:89.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2637 .

Fiket, Irena, Ceriman, Jelena, "Intra-family  Engagement? A Study of Female Academic Staff at the  University of Belgrade" in Naučnice u društvu. Radovi sa konferencije održane od 11. do 13. februara 2020. u Srpskoj akademiji nauka i umetnosti u Beogradu (2020):89,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2637 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
PB  - Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento
T2  - Partecipazione E Conflitto
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
SP  - 898
EP  - 918
DO  - 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.",
publisher = "Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento",
journal = "Partecipazione E Conflitto",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
pages = "898-918",
doi = "10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}

Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto
Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento., 12(3), 898-918.
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898

Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto. 2019;12(3):898-918.
doi:10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .

Fiket, Irena, Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" in Partecipazione E Conflitto, 12, no. 3 (2019):898-918,
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2639
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different
types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens’ protests,
social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of
instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of
the greater efficiency of socio-economic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse
of “neoliberal instrumentalism” and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms
of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative
named “anti-instrumentalist discourse”. Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let
Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for
the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Water-front project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3)
semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative
PB  - University of Salento, SIBA
T2  - Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
VL  - 12
DO  - 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different
types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens’ protests,
social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of
instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of
the greater efficiency of socio-economic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse
of “neoliberal instrumentalism” and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms
of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative
named “anti-instrumentalist discourse”. Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let
Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for
the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Water-front project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3)
semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative",
publisher = "University of Salento, SIBA",
journal = "Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
volume = "12",
doi = "10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}

Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies
University of Salento, SIBA., 12.
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898

Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies. 2019;12.
doi:10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .

Fiket, Irena, Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" in Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 12 (2019),
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317?journalCode=fbss20
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2021
AB  - This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.
PB  - Taylor & Francis Online
T2  - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
T1  - Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia
DO  - 10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Fiket, Irena and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
journal = "Southeast European and Black Sea Studies",
title = "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia",
doi = "10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317"
}

Pudar Draško, G., Fiket, I.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Taylor & Francis Online..
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317

Pudar Draško G, Fiket I, Vasiljević J. Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2019;.
doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 .

Pudar Draško, Gazela, Fiket, Irena, Vasiljević, Jelena, "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia" in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (2019),
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ćeriman, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2640
AB  - Since 2000, a number of legal and political measures and mechanisms
have been implemented to advance gender equality in research and higher education
institutions in Serbia, mainly as a part of the process of harmonisation of legislation
with the EU standards on gender equality. However, while on one side the relatively
high score on the Gender Equality Index is often evoked in political discourse to support
the claim that Serbia is doing well regarding gender equality in higher education, most
of the empirical research done in Serbia reveales persistent gender inequalities, gendered
career possibilities, and unequal working conditions in academia for women and men.
Originating from those contradictary assertations, our main research interest in this
chapter is concerned with the way in which the concept of gender equality is understood
in the normative frame of Serbia. Our hypothesis is that gender inequalities in the
academic sphere are acctually supported by the way in which the concept of gender
equality is framed in the Serbian normative order.
Our study will be based on the analyses of documents that form the normative
framework of gender equality in higher education in Serbia. In addition, we will analyse
the data gathered in interviews with the academics of the University of Belgrade. Hence,
an inappropriate normative framework will be detected, explored, and additionally
explained through its visible practical implications
PB  - Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga
T2  - Rodna ravnopravnost u visokom obrazovanju. Koncepti, prakse i izazovi
T1  - Razumevanje koncepta rodne ravnopravnosti u normativnom okviru visokog obrazovanja u Srbiji
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2640
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ćeriman, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Since 2000, a number of legal and political measures and mechanisms
have been implemented to advance gender equality in research and higher education
institutions in Serbia, mainly as a part of the process of harmonisation of legislation
with the EU standards on gender equality. However, while on one side the relatively
high score on the Gender Equality Index is often evoked in political discourse to support
the claim that Serbia is doing well regarding gender equality in higher education, most
of the empirical research done in Serbia reveales persistent gender inequalities, gendered
career possibilities, and unequal working conditions in academia for women and men.
Originating from those contradictary assertations, our main research interest in this
chapter is concerned with the way in which the concept of gender equality is understood
in the normative frame of Serbia. Our hypothesis is that gender inequalities in the
academic sphere are acctually supported by the way in which the concept of gender
equality is framed in the Serbian normative order.
Our study will be based on the analyses of documents that form the normative
framework of gender equality in higher education in Serbia. In addition, we will analyse
the data gathered in interviews with the academics of the University of Belgrade. Hence,
an inappropriate normative framework will be detected, explored, and additionally
explained through its visible practical implications",
publisher = "Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga",
journal = "Rodna ravnopravnost u visokom obrazovanju. Koncepti, prakse i izazovi",
booktitle = "Razumevanje koncepta rodne ravnopravnosti u normativnom okviru visokog obrazovanja u Srbiji",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2640"
}

Fiket, I.,& Ćeriman, J.. (2019). Razumevanje koncepta rodne ravnopravnosti u normativnom okviru visokog obrazovanja u Srbiji. in Rodna ravnopravnost u visokom obrazovanju. Koncepti, prakse i izazovi
Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2640

Fiket I, Ćeriman J. Razumevanje koncepta rodne ravnopravnosti u normativnom okviru visokog obrazovanja u Srbiji. in Rodna ravnopravnost u visokom obrazovanju. Koncepti, prakse i izazovi. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2640 .

Fiket, Irena, Ćeriman, Jelena, "Razumevanje koncepta rodne ravnopravnosti u normativnom okviru visokog obrazovanja u Srbiji" in Rodna ravnopravnost u visokom obrazovanju. Koncepti, prakse i izazovi (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2640 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Hrnjez, Saša
AU  - Scalmani, Davide
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2122
PB  - Milano: Mimesis Edizioni
T2  - Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa
T1  - Introduction
SP  - 11
EP  - 21
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2122
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Fiket, Irena and Hrnjez, Saša and Scalmani, Davide",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Milano: Mimesis Edizioni",
journal = "Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa",
booktitle = "Introduction",
pages = "11-21",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2122"
}

Bojanić, P., Fiket, I., Hrnjez, S.,& Scalmani, D.. (2018). Introduction. in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa
Milano: Mimesis Edizioni., 11-21.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2122

Bojanić P, Fiket I, Hrnjez S, Scalmani D. Introduction. in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa. 2018;:11-21.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2122 .

Bojanić, Petar, Fiket, Irena, Hrnjez, Saša, Scalmani, Davide, "Introduction" in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa (2018):11-21,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2122 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2651
AB  - U ovom tekstu biće predstavljena analiza normativnog okvira koja se tiče rodne
ravnopravnosti u oblasti akademskog rada. Sticanje uvida u položaj akademskih
radnica u Srbiji i identifikovanje mogućnosti za promenu zatečenog stanja, što
su osnovni ciljevi istraživanja na kojem je zasnovana celokupna publikacija, zahteva kao prvi korak upravo analizu normativnog okvira. Iako nam nije namera
da se ovde posebno bavimo analizom EU normativnog okvira, krenućemo od
njega, imajući u vidu neophodnost usklađivanja domaćeg normativa sa evropskim i specifične zahteve za harmonizacijom koji su Srbiji postavljeni od strane
EU institucija i njihovih pojedinačnih programa usmerenih na akademsku delatnost. Nakon ovog dela, u našem tekstu biće analiziran širi normativni okvir koji
se sastoji od strateških dokumenata i pratećih akcionih planova. U trećem delu
rada analizi će biti podvrgnuti zakoni koji se direktno odnose na akademske
radnike i radnice i naučnoistraživačku i inovacionu delatnost, zajedno sa setom
zakona, koji u oblasti rada, napredovanja i usavršavanja, regulišu zabranu rodne
diskriminacije ili predlažu afirmativne mere za njeno uklanjanje. Četvrti deo rada
biće posvećen analizi pravnih akata pet državnih univerziteta u Srbiji koji su se
našli u našem uzorku (Beograd, Novi Sad, Kragujevac, Niš i Novi Pazar).
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja
T1  - Rodna ravnopravnost u oblasti akademskog rada: normativni okvir
SP  - 24
EP  - 58
DO  - 978-86-80484-30-3
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U ovom tekstu biće predstavljena analiza normativnog okvira koja se tiče rodne
ravnopravnosti u oblasti akademskog rada. Sticanje uvida u položaj akademskih
radnica u Srbiji i identifikovanje mogućnosti za promenu zatečenog stanja, što
su osnovni ciljevi istraživanja na kojem je zasnovana celokupna publikacija, zahteva kao prvi korak upravo analizu normativnog okvira. Iako nam nije namera
da se ovde posebno bavimo analizom EU normativnog okvira, krenućemo od
njega, imajući u vidu neophodnost usklađivanja domaćeg normativa sa evropskim i specifične zahteve za harmonizacijom koji su Srbiji postavljeni od strane
EU institucija i njihovih pojedinačnih programa usmerenih na akademsku delatnost. Nakon ovog dela, u našem tekstu biće analiziran širi normativni okvir koji
se sastoji od strateških dokumenata i pratećih akcionih planova. U trećem delu
rada analizi će biti podvrgnuti zakoni koji se direktno odnose na akademske
radnike i radnice i naučnoistraživačku i inovacionu delatnost, zajedno sa setom
zakona, koji u oblasti rada, napredovanja i usavršavanja, regulišu zabranu rodne
diskriminacije ili predlažu afirmativne mere za njeno uklanjanje. Četvrti deo rada
biće posvećen analizi pravnih akata pet državnih univerziteta u Srbiji koji su se
našli u našem uzorku (Beograd, Novi Sad, Kragujevac, Niš i Novi Pazar).",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja",
booktitle = "Rodna ravnopravnost u oblasti akademskog rada: normativni okvir",
pages = "24-58",
doi = "978-86-80484-30-3"
}

Fiket, I.,& Delibašić, B.. (2018). Rodna ravnopravnost u oblasti akademskog rada: normativni okvir. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 24-58.
https://doi.org/978-86-80484-30-3

Fiket I, Delibašić B. Rodna ravnopravnost u oblasti akademskog rada: normativni okvir. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja. 2018;:24-58.
doi:978-86-80484-30-3 .

Fiket, Irena, Delibašić, Balša, "Rodna ravnopravnost u oblasti akademskog rada: normativni okvir" in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja (2018):24-58,
https://doi.org/978-86-80484-30-3 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Trajković, Đurđa
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2650
AB  - Pitanje koje ćemo u našoj studiji otvoriti, i na
koje ćemo, nadamo se, bar delimično odgovoriti, je: Da li postoje specifični uslovi
organizacije porodičnog života koji su pogodniji za razvoj akademske karijere
žena tj. koji omogućavaju postizanje rodne ravnopravnosti u profesionalnoj sferi?
Kako bismo pronašle odgovor na ovo pitanje, u drugom delu rada ćemo se posvetiti analizi raspodele poslova u domaćinstvu između muškaraca i žena, pokušavajući da, pre svega, predstavimo situaciju unutar domaćinstava akademskih
radnika i radnica, ali i da razumemo specifičnosti te situacije i razloge koji su
do nje doveli. U trećem delu rada, fokusiraćemo se na razumevanje načina na
koji akademske radnice i radnici na rukovodećim položajima organizuju i usklađuju profesionalne i privatne/porodične obaveze, i razlike koje eventualno postoje između muškaraca i žena u našem uzorku. Četvrti deo rada biće posvećen
zaključcima, koji će, uz kritički osvrt na empirijske nalaze, ukazati na njihovu teorijsku ali i političku relevantnost.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja, Beograd : Univerzitet, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Nema veze, mogu sve sama: usklađivanje poslovnih i porodičnih obaveza akademskih radnica i radnika i raspodela poslova u njihovim domaćinstvima
SP  - 59
EP  - 75
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2650
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Trajković, Đurđa",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Pitanje koje ćemo u našoj studiji otvoriti, i na
koje ćemo, nadamo se, bar delimično odgovoriti, je: Da li postoje specifični uslovi
organizacije porodičnog života koji su pogodniji za razvoj akademske karijere
žena tj. koji omogućavaju postizanje rodne ravnopravnosti u profesionalnoj sferi?
Kako bismo pronašle odgovor na ovo pitanje, u drugom delu rada ćemo se posvetiti analizi raspodele poslova u domaćinstvu između muškaraca i žena, pokušavajući da, pre svega, predstavimo situaciju unutar domaćinstava akademskih
radnika i radnica, ali i da razumemo specifičnosti te situacije i razloge koji su
do nje doveli. U trećem delu rada, fokusiraćemo se na razumevanje načina na
koji akademske radnice i radnici na rukovodećim položajima organizuju i usklađuju profesionalne i privatne/porodične obaveze, i razlike koje eventualno postoje između muškaraca i žena u našem uzorku. Četvrti deo rada biće posvećen
zaključcima, koji će, uz kritički osvrt na empirijske nalaze, ukazati na njihovu teorijsku ali i političku relevantnost.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja, Beograd : Univerzitet, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
booktitle = "Nema veze, mogu sve sama: usklađivanje poslovnih i porodičnih obaveza akademskih radnica i radnika i raspodela poslova u njihovim domaćinstvima",
pages = "59-75",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2650"
}

Fiket, I.,& Trajković, Đ.. (2018). Nema veze, mogu sve sama: usklađivanje poslovnih i porodičnih obaveza akademskih radnica i radnika i raspodela poslova u njihovim domaćinstvima. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja, Beograd : Univerzitet, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 59-75.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2650

Fiket I, Trajković Đ. Nema veze, mogu sve sama: usklađivanje poslovnih i porodičnih obaveza akademskih radnica i radnika i raspodela poslova u njihovim domaćinstvima. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja, Beograd : Univerzitet, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju. 2018;:59-75.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2650 .

Fiket, Irena, Trajković, Đurđa, "Nema veze, mogu sve sama: usklađivanje poslovnih i porodičnih obaveza akademskih radnica i radnika i raspodela poslova u njihovim domaćinstvima" in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja, Beograd : Univerzitet, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju (2018):59-75,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2650 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
AU  - Pudar Drasko, Gazela
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2649
AB  - U fokusu ove studije nalazi se moć delanja žena koje zauzimaju istaknute funkcije na državnim univerzitetima u Srbiji. Pošli smo od pretpostavke da su naše
akterke, najobrazovanije žene u ovom društvu, one čija moć delanja može da
doprinese unapređenju položaja drugih žena. Budući da žene čine najveći deo
zaposlenih u obrazovanju i nauci, njihovo prisustvo i osvajanje pozicija u sferama koje im po tradiciji ne pripadaju, od značaja su i za eliminisanje rodnih
nejednakosti i stereotipnih stavova i u široj društvenoj zajednici. Želeli smo da
ispitamo kako one same sagledavaju svoj životni i karijerni put, i da li smatraju
da je biti žena igralo neku ulogu na tom putu. Dekonstrukcijom uvreženih, ali
i onih manje primetnih stereotipa, težili smo da omeđimo granice rodne ravnopravnosti u najobrazovanijim krugovima našeg društva, u kom i dalje preovlađuje patrijarhalna matrica. Motner i Edvards (Mauthner & Edwards 2010)
razlikuju žene od feministkinja na položajima u akademiji, gde potonje karakteriše svest o rodnoj neravnopravnosti kao intersekcionalnom fenomenu koji prožima visoko obrazovanje i nauku, kao i posvećenost promenama u pravcu veće
društvene jednakosti. Polazeći od ove distinkcije, namera nam je bila da mapiramo da li među akterkama, ali i akterima studije, postoji feminističko liderstvo
i potencijal za promene zatečenog stanja.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja
T1  - Uvod
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Delibašić, Balša and Pudar Drasko, Gazela",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U fokusu ove studije nalazi se moć delanja žena koje zauzimaju istaknute funkcije na državnim univerzitetima u Srbiji. Pošli smo od pretpostavke da su naše
akterke, najobrazovanije žene u ovom društvu, one čija moć delanja može da
doprinese unapređenju položaja drugih žena. Budući da žene čine najveći deo
zaposlenih u obrazovanju i nauci, njihovo prisustvo i osvajanje pozicija u sferama koje im po tradiciji ne pripadaju, od značaja su i za eliminisanje rodnih
nejednakosti i stereotipnih stavova i u široj društvenoj zajednici. Želeli smo da
ispitamo kako one same sagledavaju svoj životni i karijerni put, i da li smatraju
da je biti žena igralo neku ulogu na tom putu. Dekonstrukcijom uvreženih, ali
i onih manje primetnih stereotipa, težili smo da omeđimo granice rodne ravnopravnosti u najobrazovanijim krugovima našeg društva, u kom i dalje preovlađuje patrijarhalna matrica. Motner i Edvards (Mauthner & Edwards 2010)
razlikuju žene od feministkinja na položajima u akademiji, gde potonje karakteriše svest o rodnoj neravnopravnosti kao intersekcionalnom fenomenu koji prožima visoko obrazovanje i nauku, kao i posvećenost promenama u pravcu veće
društvene jednakosti. Polazeći od ove distinkcije, namera nam je bila da mapiramo da li među akterkama, ali i akterima studije, postoji feminističko liderstvo
i potencijal za promene zatečenog stanja.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja",
booktitle = "Uvod",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649"
}

Fiket, I., Delibašić, B.,& Pudar Drasko, G.. (2018). Uvod. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649

Fiket I, Delibašić B, Pudar Drasko G. Uvod. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649 .

Fiket, Irena, Delibašić, Balša, Pudar Drasko, Gazela, "Uvod" in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Scalamani, Davide
AU  - Hrnjez, Sasa
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2648
AB  - The practice of translation and role of translators have become central
in the contemporary world. While the practices of translation in the past
were reserved for cultural and national elites who needed to bring classical
texts, such as the Bible or Greek classics, into their own culture, translation
today permeates everyday life and various aspects of society, becoming
one of the most important features of the multilingual world. This is especially relevant in a European context which is historically constituted as a
space of cultural and linguistic differences and where translators always
played an important role. But only in the last decades, with the institutional
organization of Europe, a need for translation has gained new political and
social dimensions. Current debates on the cultural and political identity of
Europe, on a common European language, on different linguistic heritages
in Europe etc., touch, in one way or another, the principle of translatability
and therefore the possibilities (and limits) of exchange between cultures on
the European continent. The linguistic and idiomatic plurality of Europe
shows that its cultures are already in process of translation, translated or
product of translation, inevitably entangled in other cultural horizons
PB  - Mimesis international
T2  - Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa
T1  - Introduction
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2648
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Bojanić, Petar and Scalamani, Davide and Hrnjez, Sasa",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The practice of translation and role of translators have become central
in the contemporary world. While the practices of translation in the past
were reserved for cultural and national elites who needed to bring classical
texts, such as the Bible or Greek classics, into their own culture, translation
today permeates everyday life and various aspects of society, becoming
one of the most important features of the multilingual world. This is especially relevant in a European context which is historically constituted as a
space of cultural and linguistic differences and where translators always
played an important role. But only in the last decades, with the institutional
organization of Europe, a need for translation has gained new political and
social dimensions. Current debates on the cultural and political identity of
Europe, on a common European language, on different linguistic heritages
in Europe etc., touch, in one way or another, the principle of translatability
and therefore the possibilities (and limits) of exchange between cultures on
the European continent. The linguistic and idiomatic plurality of Europe
shows that its cultures are already in process of translation, translated or
product of translation, inevitably entangled in other cultural horizons",
publisher = "Mimesis international",
journal = "Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa",
booktitle = "Introduction",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2648"
}

Fiket, I., Bojanić, P., Scalamani, D.,& Hrnjez, S.. (2018). Introduction. in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa
Mimesis international..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2648

Fiket I, Bojanić P, Scalamani D, Hrnjez S. Introduction. in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2648 .

Fiket, Irena, Bojanić, Petar, Scalamani, Davide, Hrnjez, Sasa, "Introduction" in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2648 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ćeriman, Jelena
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Rácz, Krisztina
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1719
AB  - U kakvom su odnosu dva domena – porodica i rad, koji u najvećem delu čine svakodnevicu žena i muškaraca? Da li su ovi domeni međusobno suprotstavljeni ili čine uigrani deo većeg sistema koji funkcioniše po jasno utvrđenim principima? Koje posledice dati međuodnos ima po muškarce, a koji po žene i da li možda otvara mogućnost drugačije perspektive koja ne mora nužno uključivati teškoće, probleme i opterećenja? Na koji način danas i ovde možemo razmatrati staro pitanje odnosa privatnog i javnog i potencijalno menjati njihova značenja u oblastima u kojima prepoznajemo ili blisko osećamo njihove napetosti i protivrečnosti? Studija Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica nastoji da ponudi odgovore na ova pitanja bazirajući se na podacima dobijenim u empirijskom istraživanju koje je sprovedeno 2017. godine u okviru Univerziteta u Beogradu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju (CELAP)
T1  - Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1719
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Ćeriman, Jelena and Fiket, Irena and Rácz, Krisztina",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U kakvom su odnosu dva domena – porodica i rad, koji u najvećem delu čine svakodnevicu žena i muškaraca? Da li su ovi domeni međusobno suprotstavljeni ili čine uigrani deo većeg sistema koji funkcioniše po jasno utvrđenim principima? Koje posledice dati međuodnos ima po muškarce, a koji po žene i da li možda otvara mogućnost drugačije perspektive koja ne mora nužno uključivati teškoće, probleme i opterećenja? Na koji način danas i ovde možemo razmatrati staro pitanje odnosa privatnog i javnog i potencijalno menjati njihova značenja u oblastima u kojima prepoznajemo ili blisko osećamo njihove napetosti i protivrečnosti? Studija Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica nastoji da ponudi odgovore na ova pitanja bazirajući se na podacima dobijenim u empirijskom istraživanju koje je sprovedeno 2017. godine u okviru Univerziteta u Beogradu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju (CELAP)",
title = "Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1719"
}

Ćeriman, J., Fiket, I.,& Rácz, K.. (2018). Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1719

Ćeriman J, Fiket I, Rácz K. Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1719 .

Ćeriman, Jelena, Fiket, Irena, Rácz, Krisztina, "Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica" (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1719 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://www.celap.edu.rs/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Zongliranje_pdf.compressed.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1714
AB  - Kada govorimo o izazovima sa kojima se akademske radnice
suočavaju na početku svojih karijera, o usklađenosti njihovog
privatnog i profesionalnog života i organizaciji slobodnog vremena,
neminovno razmatramo teme od velikog značaja. Međutim, iako
diskusija vezana za usklađenost privatnog i profesionalnog života ne
može proći bez osvrta na raspodelu poslova unutar domaćinstva,
ova problematika, potpuno neopravdano, gubi na atraktivnosti u
javnim diskusijama, često čak i onima koje karakterišu feministički
pristupi. Dve međusobno povezane problematike istražene su u
ovoj studiji. Prva problematika se odnosi na podelu poslova u
domaćinstvu (i na faktore koji na nju utiču), kao i na zadovoljstvo
akademskih radnica takvom situacijom. Druga se odnosi na
usklađivanje poslovnih i porodičnih obaveza s fokusom pre
svega na ispitivanje postojanja odnosa međuzavisnosti između
raspodele poslova unutar domaćinstva i fluidnije organizacije
posla, koja je karakteristična i za akademsku profesiju. Iako
prevashodno eksplorativnog karaktera, s obzirom na to da je
primarni cilj prikupljanja podataka korišćenih u mojoj studiji bio
uvid u situaciju u kojoj se nalaze akademske radnice na početku
karijere, koje su angažovane na Univerzitetu u Beogradu, u tekstu
ću pokušati da otvorim diskusiju vezanu za ova pitanja i ponudim neka objašnjenja.
Tekst moje studije podeljen je u četiri dela. Nakon uvoda sledi
deo teksta posvećen istraživačkim pitanjima i s njima povezanim
tezama koje proizilaze iz, u ovom delu izloženog, neminovno
selektivnog pregleda relevantne literature. U empirijskom delu
rada koji će nakon toga uslediti, podvrgnuću proveri istraživačka
pitanja i teze. Poslednji, zaključni, deo posvetiću diskusiji relevantnih
rezultata.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T2  - Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica
T1  - (I dalje) dupli teret na leđima (akademskih) radnica?
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1714
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Kada govorimo o izazovima sa kojima se akademske radnice
suočavaju na početku svojih karijera, o usklađenosti njihovog
privatnog i profesionalnog života i organizaciji slobodnog vremena,
neminovno razmatramo teme od velikog značaja. Međutim, iako
diskusija vezana za usklađenost privatnog i profesionalnog života ne
može proći bez osvrta na raspodelu poslova unutar domaćinstva,
ova problematika, potpuno neopravdano, gubi na atraktivnosti u
javnim diskusijama, često čak i onima koje karakterišu feministički
pristupi. Dve međusobno povezane problematike istražene su u
ovoj studiji. Prva problematika se odnosi na podelu poslova u
domaćinstvu (i na faktore koji na nju utiču), kao i na zadovoljstvo
akademskih radnica takvom situacijom. Druga se odnosi na
usklađivanje poslovnih i porodičnih obaveza s fokusom pre
svega na ispitivanje postojanja odnosa međuzavisnosti između
raspodele poslova unutar domaćinstva i fluidnije organizacije
posla, koja je karakteristična i za akademsku profesiju. Iako
prevashodno eksplorativnog karaktera, s obzirom na to da je
primarni cilj prikupljanja podataka korišćenih u mojoj studiji bio
uvid u situaciju u kojoj se nalaze akademske radnice na početku
karijere, koje su angažovane na Univerzitetu u Beogradu, u tekstu
ću pokušati da otvorim diskusiju vezanu za ova pitanja i ponudim neka objašnjenja.
Tekst moje studije podeljen je u četiri dela. Nakon uvoda sledi
deo teksta posvećen istraživačkim pitanjima i s njima povezanim
tezama koje proizilaze iz, u ovom delu izloženog, neminovno
selektivnog pregleda relevantne literature. U empirijskom delu
rada koji će nakon toga uslediti, podvrgnuću proveri istraživačka
pitanja i teze. Poslednji, zaključni, deo posvetiću diskusiji relevantnih
rezultata.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
journal = "Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica",
booktitle = "(I dalje) dupli teret na leđima (akademskih) radnica?",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1714"
}

Fiket, I.. (2018). (I dalje) dupli teret na leđima (akademskih) radnica?. in Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1714

Fiket I. (I dalje) dupli teret na leđima (akademskih) radnica?. in Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1714 .

Fiket, Irena, "(I dalje) dupli teret na leđima (akademskih) radnica?" in Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1714 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://www.celap.edu.rs/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Zongliranje_pdf.compressed.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1713
AB  - U kakvom su odnosu dva domena – porodica i rad, koji u najvećem
delu čine svakodnevicu žena i muškaraca? Da li su ovi domeni
međusobno suprotstavljeni ili čine uigrani deo većeg sistema
koji funkcioniše po jasno utvrđenim principima? Koje posledice
dati međuodnos ima po muškarce, a koji po žene i da li možda
otvara mogućnost drugačije perspektive koja ne mora nužno
uključivati teškoće, probleme i opterećenja? Na koji način danas i
ovde možemo razmatrati staro pitanje odnosa privatnog i javnog
i potencijalno menjati njihova značenja u oblastima u kojima
prepoznajemo ili blisko osećamo njihove napetosti i protivrečnosti?
Studija Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje
porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica nastoji
da ponudi odgovore na ova pitanja bazirajući se na podacima
dobijenim u empirijskom istraživanju koje je sprovedeno 2017.
godine u okviru Univerziteta u Beogradu. Pored lične motivacije
autorki da se ovom temom bave iz istraživačkog ugla,
podstaknute iskustvima rada u okviru Univerziteta u Beogradu,
ali i neophodnošću osmišljavanja strategija kojima će premostiti
zahteve akademskog rada u različitim fazama (re)konsolidacije
porodične grupe ili tranzicije u roditeljstvo u kojima se nalaze,
temu je odredila i aktuelnost pitanja reforme sistema visokog
obrazovanja u Srbiji.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T2  - Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica
T1  - Uvod
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1713
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U kakvom su odnosu dva domena – porodica i rad, koji u najvećem
delu čine svakodnevicu žena i muškaraca? Da li su ovi domeni
međusobno suprotstavljeni ili čine uigrani deo većeg sistema
koji funkcioniše po jasno utvrđenim principima? Koje posledice
dati međuodnos ima po muškarce, a koji po žene i da li možda
otvara mogućnost drugačije perspektive koja ne mora nužno
uključivati teškoće, probleme i opterećenja? Na koji način danas i
ovde možemo razmatrati staro pitanje odnosa privatnog i javnog
i potencijalno menjati njihova značenja u oblastima u kojima
prepoznajemo ili blisko osećamo njihove napetosti i protivrečnosti?
Studija Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: Usklađivanje
porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica nastoji
da ponudi odgovore na ova pitanja bazirajući se na podacima
dobijenim u empirijskom istraživanju koje je sprovedeno 2017.
godine u okviru Univerziteta u Beogradu. Pored lične motivacije
autorki da se ovom temom bave iz istraživačkog ugla,
podstaknute iskustvima rada u okviru Univerziteta u Beogradu,
ali i neophodnošću osmišljavanja strategija kojima će premostiti
zahteve akademskog rada u različitim fazama (re)konsolidacije
porodične grupe ili tranzicije u roditeljstvo u kojima se nalaze,
temu je odredila i aktuelnost pitanja reforme sistema visokog
obrazovanja u Srbiji.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
journal = "Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica",
booktitle = "Uvod",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1713"
}

Fiket, I.. (2018). Uvod. in Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1713

Fiket I. Uvod. in Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1713 .

Fiket, Irena, "Uvod" in Žongliranje između patrijarhata i prekarijata: usklađivanje porodičnih i profesionalnih obaveza akademskih radnica (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1713 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/belgrad/14002.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1718
AB  - Cilj ove studije bio je da zahvati sve važne elemente
socijalne strukture, kulturno-vrednosnih i političkih
orijentacija građana i građanki. Istraživanje smo
započeli sa idejom da prikažemo portrete tipičnih (i
manje tipičnih) građana Srbije kako bi se poboljšalo
razumevanje političkih dešavanja u Srbiji i mogućeg
uticaja građana. Cilj je bio analiza važnosti
najvažnijih aspekata socijalnog zaleđa koji bi mogli
da potencijalno razlikuju, pa i razjedinjuju građane i
građanke u političkom smislu. Analizirani su, dalje,
politički stavovi i vrednosti (u najopštijem smislu)
kako sadržinski (šta je vrednost i koje vrednosti su
raširene), tako i u kontekstu socijalnog zaleđa, a sve
u odnosu na političko rezonovanje građana. Težilo se
identifikaciji mehanizama i načina na koje se elementi
strukture i kulture izražavaju u političkom delovanju;
analizirane su percepcije toga na koji način se politika
obraća običnim ljudima, može li da odgovori na
njihove potrebe i u kojoj meri je društvenopolitički
kontekst okvir sputavanja autentičnih demokratskih
težnji, ili plodno tlo za njihovo negovanje i razvoj.
PB  - Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
T2  - Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
T1  - Političke orijentacije građana Srbije. Kartografija nemoći
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1718
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Fiket, Irena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Cilj ove studije bio je da zahvati sve važne elemente
socijalne strukture, kulturno-vrednosnih i političkih
orijentacija građana i građanki. Istraživanje smo
započeli sa idejom da prikažemo portrete tipičnih (i
manje tipičnih) građana Srbije kako bi se poboljšalo
razumevanje političkih dešavanja u Srbiji i mogućeg
uticaja građana. Cilj je bio analiza važnosti
najvažnijih aspekata socijalnog zaleđa koji bi mogli
da potencijalno razlikuju, pa i razjedinjuju građane i
građanke u političkom smislu. Analizirani su, dalje,
politički stavovi i vrednosti (u najopštijem smislu)
kako sadržinski (šta je vrednost i koje vrednosti su
raširene), tako i u kontekstu socijalnog zaleđa, a sve
u odnosu na političko rezonovanje građana. Težilo se
identifikaciji mehanizama i načina na koje se elementi
strukture i kulture izražavaju u političkom delovanju;
analizirane su percepcije toga na koji način se politika
obraća običnim ljudima, može li da odgovori na
njihove potrebe i u kojoj meri je društvenopolitički
kontekst okvir sputavanja autentičnih demokratskih
težnji, ili plodno tlo za njihovo negovanje i razvoj.",
publisher = "Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung",
journal = "Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung",
title = "Političke orijentacije građana Srbije. Kartografija nemoći",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1718"
}

Fiket, I.. (2017). Političke orijentacije građana Srbije. Kartografija nemoći. in Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1718

Fiket I. Političke orijentacije građana Srbije. Kartografija nemoći. in Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. 2017;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1718 .

Fiket, Irena, "Političke orijentacije građana Srbije. Kartografija nemoći" in Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (2017),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1718 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://akademskaknjiga.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=47&Itemid=69&lang=en
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1717
AB  - Iako su mišljenja podeljena o tome koliko danas možemo da pričamo o krizi demokratije ono oko čega postoji konsenzus jeste da sve manji broj građana aktivno učestvuje u javnom životu zajednice. Građani su sve manje informisani, sve manje zainteresovani za javna pitanja i demokratske institucije i – što ima značajne posledice za samu suštinu demokratije – sve manje se prepoznaju u političkim odlukama koje donose elite (Crouch 2004, Dalton 2004). Iz perspektive demokratske teorije jedini mogući odgovor na ovakvu situaciju demokratskog deficita bio bi osnaživanje građanske participacije. Ipak, iako se čini da je danas ideja o vrednosti i opravdanosti demokratske participacije postala neosporiva, ponovo se čuju zahtevi za ograničavanjem mogućnosti građana da učestvuju u donošenju političkih odluka, ali i u javnom životu uopšte .  
Polazeći iz perspektive deliberativnog modela demokratije, u ovom radu se tvrdi da je zahtev za redukovanjem prostora za građansku participaciju ne samo očigledno loš, zbog toga što dodatno urušava demokratiju ne dozvoljavajući da se napravi prostor za osnaživanje građanstva, već se zasniva i na teorijskim i empirijskim pretpostavkama koje nisu adekvatno postavljene. 
Pored toga, kroz problematizovanje koncepta idealnog građanina, ovaj rad pre svega ističe značaj aktivnosti i tolerantnosti kao karakteristika idealnog građanina koje su neophodne za ostvarenu demokratiju. Koristeći argumente deliberativnog pristupa demokratiji i uvide iz analiza deliberativnih arena, u radu se prvenstveno argumentuje kako je formiranje aktivnog i tolerantnog građanstva empirijski moguće, ali i kako ove dve karakteristike građanstva ne moraju biti u tenziji.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga
T2  - Angažman: uvod u studije angažovanosti
T1  - Formiranje aktivnog i tolerantnog građanstva. Potencijal i ograničenja deliberativnog modela demokratije
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1717
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Iako su mišljenja podeljena o tome koliko danas možemo da pričamo o krizi demokratije ono oko čega postoji konsenzus jeste da sve manji broj građana aktivno učestvuje u javnom životu zajednice. Građani su sve manje informisani, sve manje zainteresovani za javna pitanja i demokratske institucije i – što ima značajne posledice za samu suštinu demokratije – sve manje se prepoznaju u političkim odlukama koje donose elite (Crouch 2004, Dalton 2004). Iz perspektive demokratske teorije jedini mogući odgovor na ovakvu situaciju demokratskog deficita bio bi osnaživanje građanske participacije. Ipak, iako se čini da je danas ideja o vrednosti i opravdanosti demokratske participacije postala neosporiva, ponovo se čuju zahtevi za ograničavanjem mogućnosti građana da učestvuju u donošenju političkih odluka, ali i u javnom životu uopšte .  
Polazeći iz perspektive deliberativnog modela demokratije, u ovom radu se tvrdi da je zahtev za redukovanjem prostora za građansku participaciju ne samo očigledno loš, zbog toga što dodatno urušava demokratiju ne dozvoljavajući da se napravi prostor za osnaživanje građanstva, već se zasniva i na teorijskim i empirijskim pretpostavkama koje nisu adekvatno postavljene. 
Pored toga, kroz problematizovanje koncepta idealnog građanina, ovaj rad pre svega ističe značaj aktivnosti i tolerantnosti kao karakteristika idealnog građanina koje su neophodne za ostvarenu demokratiju. Koristeći argumente deliberativnog pristupa demokratiji i uvide iz analiza deliberativnih arena, u radu se prvenstveno argumentuje kako je formiranje aktivnog i tolerantnog građanstva empirijski moguće, ali i kako ove dve karakteristike građanstva ne moraju biti u tenziji.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga",
journal = "Angažman: uvod u studije angažovanosti",
booktitle = "Formiranje aktivnog i tolerantnog građanstva. Potencijal i ograničenja deliberativnog modela demokratije",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1717"
}

Fiket, I.. (2017). Formiranje aktivnog i tolerantnog građanstva. Potencijal i ograničenja deliberativnog modela demokratije. in Angažman: uvod u studije angažovanosti
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1717

Fiket I. Formiranje aktivnog i tolerantnog građanstva. Potencijal i ograničenja deliberativnog modela demokratije. in Angažman: uvod u studije angažovanosti. 2017;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1717 .

Fiket, Irena, "Formiranje aktivnog i tolerantnog građanstva. Potencijal i ograničenja deliberativnog modela demokratije" in Angažman: uvod u studije angažovanosti (2017),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1717 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/italian-political-science-review-rivista-italiana-di-scienza-politica/article/div-classtitledebating-europe-transforming-identities-assessing-the-impact-of-deliberative-poll-treatment-on-identitydiv/E343FAB45A5D5BF931D1ECC3EFF26176
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1715
AB  - Although there is a considerable amount of talk about transformative power of deliberation
on identity, the debate in literature remains highly theoretical in underlying the benefits of
deliberative model for EU Integration. So far, little empirical evidence is available on the
actual impact of deliberation. Can deliberation enhance European identity? We specifically
address this question by using deliberative polling quasi-experiment that involved random
sample of 348 European citizens in 2 days deliberation on issues of European concern. The
comparison of citizens’ sense of belonging to both EU and nation states before and after
deliberation, allowed us to explore the effects of deliberation on identity and further test it
against the control group. The analyses show that when European citizens are enabled to
deliberate on European issues beyond national borders their exclusive national identity
decreases and they become more community minded. The observed transformation of
identities is further analyzed in order to explore the relationship between European and
national identity. The analyses indicate that even after deliberative treatment in which
European identity has been activated the relationship between multiple identities remains
compatible.
PB  - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
T2  - Italian Political Science Review, Cambridge Journals
T1  - Debating Europe, Transforming Identities: Assessing the impact of Deliberative Poll treatment on identity
IS  - 3
VL  - 47
DO  - 10.1017/ipo.2016.26
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Although there is a considerable amount of talk about transformative power of deliberation
on identity, the debate in literature remains highly theoretical in underlying the benefits of
deliberative model for EU Integration. So far, little empirical evidence is available on the
actual impact of deliberation. Can deliberation enhance European identity? We specifically
address this question by using deliberative polling quasi-experiment that involved random
sample of 348 European citizens in 2 days deliberation on issues of European concern. The
comparison of citizens’ sense of belonging to both EU and nation states before and after
deliberation, allowed us to explore the effects of deliberation on identity and further test it
against the control group. The analyses show that when European citizens are enabled to
deliberate on European issues beyond national borders their exclusive national identity
decreases and they become more community minded. The observed transformation of
identities is further analyzed in order to explore the relationship between European and
national identity. The analyses indicate that even after deliberative treatment in which
European identity has been activated the relationship between multiple identities remains
compatible.",
publisher = "Cambridge : Cambridge University Press",
journal = "Italian Political Science Review, Cambridge Journals",
title = "Debating Europe, Transforming Identities: Assessing the impact of Deliberative Poll treatment on identity",
number = "3",
volume = "47",
doi = "10.1017/ipo.2016.26"
}

Fiket, I.. (2017). Debating Europe, Transforming Identities: Assessing the impact of Deliberative Poll treatment on identity. in Italian Political Science Review, Cambridge Journals
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press., 47(3).
https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2016.26

Fiket I. Debating Europe, Transforming Identities: Assessing the impact of Deliberative Poll treatment on identity. in Italian Political Science Review, Cambridge Journals. 2017;47(3).
doi:10.1017/ipo.2016.26 .

Fiket, Irena, "Debating Europe, Transforming Identities: Assessing the impact of Deliberative Poll treatment on identity" in Italian Political Science Review, Cambridge Journals, 47, no. 3 (2017),
https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2016.26 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Curkovic, Vesela
AU  - Mijacic, Dragisa
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1772
AB  - The integration of participatory models of democracy, within the process of formulation and implementation of public policy is strongly promoted by the EU institutions and by majority of developed democracies. The participatory models of democracy are based on the inclusion of many social actors, which can be considered not only as stakeholders but also as those who know well the social and economic context, in the formation of public policy. Participatory model, usually implemented at the local level, enable restoration of control over political decisions to the hands of the community and the formation of policies that will be able to protect and promote local economic and social interests and resources. At the same time, the literature points out that participation of the public in the formulation of public policy is one of the basic conditions of successfully planned and implemented policy. The use of participatory models of public lands management has proven to be very fruitful in many European countries which resulted in the implementation of different forms of participatory devices within the process of formation of the spatial and urban policy.The aim of this paper is to present both, the advantages and challenges of participatory models of democracy regarding the public land management. Theoretical model of participatory democracy applied to the public land management will be discussed in the first part of the paper. The second part of the paper will focus on the analysis of the legal and regulatory framework of Serbia and, related to this analysis, will discuss the capacity for the implementation of participatory model. The third part will present empirical examples of good practices and draw conclusions regarding the implementation of similar practices within the local self-government in Serbia.
PB  - Beograd : Asocijacija prostornih planera Srbije : Geografski fakultet
T2  - Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja
T1  - Primena participativnog modela demokratije na upravljanje javnim zemljištem: prednosti i izazovi
SP  - 475
EP  - 483
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1772
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Curkovic, Vesela and Mijacic, Dragisa",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The integration of participatory models of democracy, within the process of formulation and implementation of public policy is strongly promoted by the EU institutions and by majority of developed democracies. The participatory models of democracy are based on the inclusion of many social actors, which can be considered not only as stakeholders but also as those who know well the social and economic context, in the formation of public policy. Participatory model, usually implemented at the local level, enable restoration of control over political decisions to the hands of the community and the formation of policies that will be able to protect and promote local economic and social interests and resources. At the same time, the literature points out that participation of the public in the formulation of public policy is one of the basic conditions of successfully planned and implemented policy. The use of participatory models of public lands management has proven to be very fruitful in many European countries which resulted in the implementation of different forms of participatory devices within the process of formation of the spatial and urban policy.The aim of this paper is to present both, the advantages and challenges of participatory models of democracy regarding the public land management. Theoretical model of participatory democracy applied to the public land management will be discussed in the first part of the paper. The second part of the paper will focus on the analysis of the legal and regulatory framework of Serbia and, related to this analysis, will discuss the capacity for the implementation of participatory model. The third part will present empirical examples of good practices and draw conclusions regarding the implementation of similar practices within the local self-government in Serbia.",
publisher = "Beograd : Asocijacija prostornih planera Srbije : Geografski fakultet",
journal = "Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja",
booktitle = "Primena participativnog modela demokratije na upravljanje javnim zemljištem: prednosti i izazovi",
pages = "475-483",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1772"
}

Fiket, I., Curkovic, V.,& Mijacic, D.. (2014). Primena participativnog modela demokratije na upravljanje javnim zemljištem: prednosti i izazovi. in Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja
Beograd : Asocijacija prostornih planera Srbije : Geografski fakultet., 475-483.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1772

Fiket I, Curkovic V, Mijacic D. Primena participativnog modela demokratije na upravljanje javnim zemljištem: prednosti i izazovi. in Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja. 2014;:475-483.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1772 .

Fiket, Irena, Curkovic, Vesela, Mijacic, Dragisa, "Primena participativnog modela demokratije na upravljanje javnim zemljištem: prednosti i izazovi" in Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja (2014):475-483,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1772 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Di Mauro, Danilo
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://jmonnet.btk.pte.hu/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/jm_2014_vfinalfinal.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1729
AB  - This paper focuses on migration in Europe and European identity. Above all, it aims
to explore the capacity of European identity to offer an inclusive form of collective affiliation
both for intra- and extra-European migrants. We argue that the probability
for both, extra- and intra-EU migrants, to develop European identity is higher than
the probability to develop country-of-residence identity since the later one is based
on ascriptive criteria and therefore exclusive in its nature. Social scientists from different
traditions started only recently to deal with those questions focusing, above
all, on the effects of mobility within EU borders on identity and attitudes towards
Europe (Favel, 2009; Recchi and Favel, 2009). Our research aims to contribute to this
theoretical and empirical debate by analysing also extra-European migrants. The
high magnitude of extra-EU immigration (more than 30 million, out of the total 47
million of migrants that reside in EU countries were born outside the EU according to
Eurostat 2011) clearly shows the importance of the relationship between migrants
and European identity. In our empirical analyses we will rely on 2009 Eurobarometer
(EB) and 2009 European Election Survey (EES) data
PB  - Budapest : IDResearch Ltd./Publikon Publishers
T2  - European Integration: Perspectives and Challenges. How ‘Borderless’ is Europe?
T1  - Discovering Europe? Identity of the Migrants in the EU
SP  - 121
EP  - 133
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1729
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Di Mauro, Danilo",
year = "2014",
abstract = "This paper focuses on migration in Europe and European identity. Above all, it aims
to explore the capacity of European identity to offer an inclusive form of collective affiliation
both for intra- and extra-European migrants. We argue that the probability
for both, extra- and intra-EU migrants, to develop European identity is higher than
the probability to develop country-of-residence identity since the later one is based
on ascriptive criteria and therefore exclusive in its nature. Social scientists from different
traditions started only recently to deal with those questions focusing, above
all, on the effects of mobility within EU borders on identity and attitudes towards
Europe (Favel, 2009; Recchi and Favel, 2009). Our research aims to contribute to this
theoretical and empirical debate by analysing also extra-European migrants. The
high magnitude of extra-EU immigration (more than 30 million, out of the total 47
million of migrants that reside in EU countries were born outside the EU according to
Eurostat 2011) clearly shows the importance of the relationship between migrants
and European identity. In our empirical analyses we will rely on 2009 Eurobarometer
(EB) and 2009 European Election Survey (EES) data",
publisher = "Budapest : IDResearch Ltd./Publikon Publishers",
journal = "European Integration: Perspectives and Challenges. How ‘Borderless’ is Europe?",
booktitle = "Discovering Europe? Identity of the Migrants in the EU",
pages = "121-133",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1729"
}

Fiket, I.,& Di Mauro, D.. (2014). Discovering Europe? Identity of the Migrants in the EU. in European Integration: Perspectives and Challenges. How ‘Borderless’ is Europe?
Budapest : IDResearch Ltd./Publikon Publishers., 121-133.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1729

Fiket I, Di Mauro D. Discovering Europe? Identity of the Migrants in the EU. in European Integration: Perspectives and Challenges. How ‘Borderless’ is Europe?. 2014;:121-133.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1729 .

Fiket, Irena, Di Mauro, Danilo, "Discovering Europe? Identity of the Migrants in the EU" in European Integration: Perspectives and Challenges. How ‘Borderless’ is Europe? (2014):121-133,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1729 .